Re: Migration of emboss and embassy-* to testing?

Hi Adam. On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 07:33:13AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Thu, 2012-07-05 at 08:22 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > I have a question regarding the migration of emboss to testing. > > > >http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=emboss > > > > says: > > > >

Re: Migration of emboss and embassy-* to testing?

On Thu, 2012-07-05 at 08:22 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > I have a question regarding the migration of emboss to testing. > >http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=emboss > > says: > >Updating emboss makes 3 depending packages uninstallable on i386: > embassy-domainatrix

Migration of emboss and embassy-* to testing?

Hi release team, I have a question regarding the migration of emboss to testing. http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=emboss says: Updating emboss makes 3 depending packages uninstallable on i386: embassy-domainatrix, embassy-domalign, embassy-domsearch When looking at

Re: Requesting freeze exception for alpine

On Wed, 4 Jul 2012, Philipp Kern wrote: On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 08:49:42PM -0400, Asheesh Laroia wrote: I'd like to request an exception for alpine 2.02+dfsg-1 to enter testing. I'd actually prefer to create a 2.02+dfsg-2 that fixes a security bug, if that's okay: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin

Bug#680157: unblock: gcpegg/5.1-13

Julien Cristau writes: > shouldn't the opts->port argument have been dropped? same in > reg_pear.c, hw_pear.c. Good point. But, while it's no long used, it shouldn't hurt anything, and in testing it all works fine... so I'm inclined to leave it alone for now. > funky indent... (and in a bunch

Re: Freeze exception for luatex 0.70.1.20120524-3

On Mi, 04 Jul 2012, Philipp Kern wrote: > > I would like to ask for a freeze exception for > > luatex 0.70.1.20120524-3 > > Done, thanks. Thanks a lot. THis is very much appreciated! Best wishes Norbert Norbert Preinin

Re: unixcw: libcw3 --> libcw4 transition

On Wed, 2012-07-04 at 19:49 -0600, Philipp Kern wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 06:01:36PM -0700, Kamal Mostafa wrote: > > Luca Falavigna has advised that we need to get approval for a binary > > library package transition introduced by my recent upload to unstable of > > the 'unixcw' sou

Re: Requesting freeze exception for alpine

On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 08:49:42PM -0400, Asheesh Laroia wrote: > I'd like to request an exception for alpine 2.02+dfsg-1 to enter > testing. I'd actually prefer to create a 2.02+dfsg-2 that fixes a > security bug, if that's okay: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=653238 I've unbl

Re: Freeze exception for luatex 0.70.1.20120524-3

On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 09:48:19AM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: > I would like to ask for a freeze exception for > luatex 0.70.1.20120524-3 > Compared to the version currently in testing there are three changes: > * a fix for a typesetting issue (#680015) > filed as normal, but is actuall

Re: glibc: disabling armhf ldconfig support

Aurelien, thanks for informing us. On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 12:08:06AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > As a consequence the armhf value will have to be changed in the future, > which might have some side effects. What kind of side effects might happen? I.e. is it likely to break pure armhf systems

Bug#680314: marked as done (unblock: screenlets/0.1.2-8)

Your message dated Wed, 4 Jul 2012 19:46:36 -0600 with message-id <20120705014636.ga16...@spike.0x539.de> and subject line Re: Bug#680314: unblock: screenlets/0.1.2-8 has caused the Debian Bug report #680314, regarding unblock: screenlets/0.1.2-8 to be marked as done. This means that you claim tha

Re: unixcw: libcw3 --> libcw4 transition

Hi, On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 06:01:36PM -0700, Kamal Mostafa wrote: > Luca Falavigna has advised that we need to get approval for a binary > library package transition introduced by my recent upload to unstable of > the 'unixcw' source package: binary packages libcw3{,-dev} are to become > libcw4{,

unixcw: libcw3 --> libcw4 transition

Hi Release Team- Luca Falavigna has advised that we need to get approval for a binary library package transition introduced by my recent upload to unstable of the 'unixcw' source package: binary packages libcw3{,-dev} are to become libcw4{,-dev} I believe that the only other package which depends

Re: Preparation for d-i beta 1

Hi all, (Dropping -cd, -kernel and -live) As allocating time got easier with DebCamp, I have now successively tackled two issues regarding the debian-netboot packages which should probably land in for Wheezy (but could be delayed to a later beta): a) src:debian-installer-netboot-images [0,1] ha

Re: nbd freeze exception?

On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 05:23:02PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 17:08:16 -0600, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 12:59:39AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > so I've put it up at http://people.debian.org/~wouter/nbd-3.2.diff > > > Looks fine to me. Grea

Re: Freeze exception for binutils-mingw-w64 (helps fix RC #662746)

On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 12:24:59AM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote: > I'd like to request a freeze exception for binutils-mingw-w64; it > currently (needlessly) conflits with mingw32-binutils, which prevents > apt-get from handling mingw32-ocaml upgrades properly (#662746). Just to clarify, this is a pr

Bug#680314: unblock: screenlets/0.1.2-8

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package screenlets Fixes RC bug #618876. unblock screenlets/0.1.2-8 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe".

Bug#680312: unblock: webgen0.5/0.5.14+dfsg1-3

Cyril Brulebois (05/07/2012): > We can only unblock a package if it's in the archive already; otherwise > we can still approve a source debdiff before an upload, but then seeing > it (and not only the changelog entry) would be nice. ;-) > > The changelog looks sane though, which is nice already.

Bug#680312: unblock: webgen0.5/0.5.14+dfsg1-3

o< Duck. Marc Dequènes (Duck) (05/07/2012): > webgen0.5 (0.5.14+dfsg1-3) unstable; urgency=low > > * Update dependencies to follow the new ruby policy for: exif, haml, > and erubis. > * Fixed breakage with the new YAML parser in Ruby 1.9, which is now > the default version, thanks to

Freeze exception for binutils-mingw-w64 (helps fix RC #662746)

Dear release team, I'd like to request a freeze exception for binutils-mingw-w64; it currently (needlessly) conflits with mingw32-binutils, which prevents apt-get from handling mingw32-ocaml upgrades properly (#662746). The diff is as follows: diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog ind

Bug#680312: unblock: webgen0.5/0.5.14+dfsg1-3

Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Severity: normal Coin, Please unblock package webgen0.5 webgen0.5 (0.5.14+dfsg1-3) unstable; urgency=low * Update dependencies to follow the new ruby policy for: exif, haml, and erubis. * Fixed

glibc: disabling armhf ldconfig support

Hi, At the end of last year the patch unsubmitted-ldconfig-cache-abi.diff has been added, but has not been submitted upstream despite asking a few times. This patch provides correct ldconfig support for systems with both armel and armhf libraries. The situation is now that this patch breaks MIPS

Bug#664681: transition: KDE's 4.8 release of platform, applications and workspace

On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 10:35 +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > here it is a recap of the status of the various bits currently ongoing > so far. > 5) split of kdeutils > the monolithic kdeutils source has been replaced in KDE 4.8 > with the following sources: > ark filelight kcalc kcharselect kdf

Freeze exception request for zendframework 1.11.12-1

Dear release managers, I ask for a freeze exception request for zendframework version 1.11.12-1. This version fixes security bug #679215 and is the last minor bugfix version of zendframework 1.11. Thanks, signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#680280: pu: package plymouth/0.8.3-9.2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: squeeze confirmed User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu As agreed on irc, I'm about to upload plymouth to stable with the below changes. Cheers, Julien diff -u plymouth-0.8.3/debian/plymouth.init plymouth-0.8.3/debian/plymout

Bug#680274: marked as done (unblock: libapache-mod-auth-radius/1.5.8-1.1 and libapache2-mod-lisp/1.3.1-1.2)

Your message dated Wed, 04 Jul 2012 19:37:56 +0100 with message-id <1341427076.10885.5.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org> and subject line Re: Bug#680274: unblock: libapache-mod-auth-radius/1.5.8-1.1 and libapache2-mod-lisp/1.3.1-1.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #680274, regarding unblock:

Bug#629329: pu: package sphinx/0.6.6-3+squeeze1

* Adam D. Barratt , 2011-06-14, 21:06: I'm guessing there's no easy way to have the newer jQuery support both versions of the syntax? (Hey, it can't hurt to ask...) FYI, I filed #680276. -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "uns

Bug#680111: marked as done (unblock: wajig/2.7.1)

Your message dated Wed, 04 Jul 2012 19:28:39 +0100 with message-id <1341426519.10885.2.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org> and subject line Re: Bug#680111: unblock: wajig/2.7.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #680111, regarding unblock: wajig/2.7.1 to be marked as done. This means that you clai

Re: Proposed update to cron for Wheezy - freeze exception request

On Wed, 2012-07-04 at 01:45 +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 07:26:23PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > With those changes, please feel free to go ahead; thanks. > > Done, I just uploaded a package with those changes, thanks for the > fast response. Unblock

Bug#680274: unblock: libapache-mod-auth-radius/1.5.8-1.1 and libapache2-mod-lisp/1.3.1-1.2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package libapache-mod-auth-radius and libapache2-mod-lisp. Both NMUs fix the same problem which was caused by the apache2 source package changes. The debdiffs can be found in

Bug#680111: unblock: wajig/2.7.1

On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Tue, 2012-07-03 at 19:23 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: >> Please unblock package wajig. The change improves multi-arch >> handling slightly and fixes a related exception. > > The source package appears to have grown a bunch of cruft:

Bug#680256: unblock: liquidsoap/1.0.1-1

2012/7/4 Adam D. Barratt : > On 04.07.2012 17:54, Romain Beauxis wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> 2012/7/4 Adam D. Barratt : >>> >>> On 04.07.2012 17:34, Romain Beauxis wrote: Our bugfix release of liquidsoap has been caught in the middle of the freeze.. We had already uploaded ocaml-dtoo

Bug#680259: unblock: gmic/1.5.1.6+dfsg-4

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi, today the gmic author pointed me to a mistake in the manpage of zart, which mentioned the wrong author for the program. Also I found some missing copyright information in debian/copyrig

Bug#680256: unblock: liquidsoap/1.0.1-1

On 04.07.2012 17:54, Romain Beauxis wrote: Hi, 2012/7/4 Adam D. Barratt : On 04.07.2012 17:34, Romain Beauxis wrote: Our bugfix release of liquidsoap has been caught in the middle of the freeze.. We had already uploaded ocaml-dtools 0.3.0 and ocaml-flac 0.1.1 when the freeze happened. Howeve

Bug#680256: unblock: liquidsoap/1.0.1-1

Hi, 2012/7/4 Adam D. Barratt : > On 04.07.2012 17:34, Romain Beauxis wrote: >> >> Our bugfix release of liquidsoap has been caught in the middle of >> the freeze.. We had already uploaded ocaml-dtools 0.3.0 and ocaml-flac >> 0.1.1 when the freeze happened. However, liquidsoap 1.0.0 does not build

Bug#680256: unblock: liquidsoap/1.0.1-1

On 04.07.2012 17:34, Romain Beauxis wrote: Our bugfix release of liquidsoap has been caught in the middle of the freeze.. We had already uploaded ocaml-dtools 0.3.0 and ocaml-flac 0.1.1 when the freeze happened. However, liquidsoap 1.0.0 does not build against ocaml-dtools 0.3.0 Liquidsoap 1.

Bug#680179: marked as done (unblock: packaging-tutorial/0.7)

Your message dated Wed, 4 Jul 2012 18:45:19 +0200 with message-id <20120704164519.ge6...@radis.cristau.org> and subject line Re: Bug#680179: unblock: packaging-tutorial/0.7 has caused the Debian Bug report #680179, regarding unblock: packaging-tutorial/0.7 to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#680157: unblock: gcpegg/5.1-13

On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 23:48:52 -0600, Bdale Garbee wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > Please unblock package gcpegg. This version fixes RC bug #680014 which > affects all 64-bit architectures. It also

Bug#680256: unblock: liquidsoap/1.0.1-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Please unblock package liquidsoap Hi Release team! Our bugfix release of liquidsoap has been caught in the middle of the freeze.. We had already uploaded ocaml-dtools 0.3.0 and oc

Re: Bug#679388: asterisk-prompt-it-menadri-gsm: should be names Menardi instead of Menadri

Hi, Package asterisk-prompt-it is in unstable and may migrate to Wheezy but has one major issue (): The binary packages were named "menadri" instead of "menardi". While no technical issue with that, Mr. Menardi who contributed those sound files might be upset. A n

Bug#679979: Report wasn't quite complete

On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 15:41:21 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > +opendkim (2.6.2-1) unstable; urgency=low > + > + * New upstream release (addresses three bugs that affect the Debian > package) > +- Fix bug #SF3539449: Clarify legal "Socket" values. Requested by Scott > + Kitterman. >

Re: Getting dependency based boot fixed for wheezy

On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 10:41:28 +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > file-rc now has a patch to enable insserv support (#539591). I'd > like for this to be fixed in wheezy. It requires the following > changes: > > 1) Enabling of the insserv -s option (#573004). This is a one- >line change to debia

Re: nbd freeze exception?

On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 17:08:16 -0600, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 12:59:39AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Wouter Verhelst (02/07/2012): > > > No, this isn't a request for a freeze exception, yet. I'd just like to > > > test the waters before I start wor

Re: libggi removal

On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 10:55:18AM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote: > On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 11:09:04PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > I suggest we remove libggi from Wheezy. It's totally obsolete these days, > > dead upstream and RC-buggy since 1.5 years (608981). > > > > Removing it would invol

Bug#680205: marked as done (RM: canorus/0.7+dfsg+svn1256-2 -- RoM, has RC bug #679297)

Your message dated Wed, 04 Jul 2012 15:11:23 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#680205: RM: canorus/0.7+dfsg+svn1256-2 -- RoM, has RC bug #679297 has caused the Debian Bug report #680205, regarding RM: canorus/0.7+dfsg+svn1256-2 -- RoM, has RC bug #679297 to be marked as done. This m

Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#680205: RM: canorus/0.7+dfsg+svn1256-2 -- RoM, has RC bug #679297

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 680205 release.debian.org Bug #680205 [ftp.debian.org] RM: canorus/0.7+dfsg+svn1256-2 -- RoM, has RC bug #679297 Bug reassigned from package 'ftp.debian.org' to 'release.debian.org'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #68020

Re: How to get new licq binary package with hardening enabled uploaded

On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > If there aren't any real changes to the source packages other than for the > purposes of forcing a rebuild then no - the "proper way" is to get a binNMU > scheduled for amd64, so that it gets rebuilt on the buildds; I've just done > that.

Re: songwrite: fixing RC bug would require new source package

On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 08:34:24AM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote: > songwrite is currently orphaned and has an RC bug #672210. The problem is > that the version of songwrite is much too old, in fact upstream has since > october 2007 (!) moved from songwrite to songwrite2. IMHO, fixing #672210 > would r

Re: Freeze exception request for adasockets 1.8.10-2

On 04.07.2012 10:45, Phil Brooke wrote: I ask for a freeze exception request for adasockets version 1.8.10-2. This is a similar problem as for adacgi (an earlier email). Bug 680045 is fixed in this version. The bug meant that gprbuild would not work for this package because I had omitted two l

Re: Freeze exception request for adacgi 1.6-17

On 04.07.2012 10:36, Phil Brooke wrote: I ask for a freeze exception request for adacgi version 1.6-17. Bug 679638 is fixed in this version. The bug meant that gprbuild would not work for this package because I had omitted a line from this package's gpr file that is mandated by Debian's Ada pol

Bug#680179: unblock: packaging-tutorial/0.7

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Please unblock package packaging-tutorial The upload fixes RC bug #676748. I also used the opportunity to make small updates to the content, and update translations. The package is

Re: libggi removal

On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 11:09:04PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > I suggest we remove libggi from Wheezy. It's totally obsolete these days, > dead upstream and RC-buggy since 1.5 years (608981). > > Removing it would involve the following packages: > > GGI-related and to be removed along, no r

Freeze exception request for adacgi 1.6-17

Dear release managers, I ask for a freeze exception request for adacgi version 1.6-17. Bug 679638 is fixed in this version. The bug meant that gprbuild would not work for this package because I had omitted a line from this package's gpr file that is mandated by Debian's Ada policy. I have made

Freeze exception request for adasockets 1.8.10-2

Dear release managers, I ask for a freeze exception request for adasockets version 1.8.10-2. This is a similar problem as for adacgi (an earlier email). Bug 680045 is fixed in this version. The bug meant that gprbuild would not work for this package because I had omitted two lines from this

Re: How to get new licq binary package with hardening enabled uploaded

On 04.07.2012 09:04, Erik Johansson wrote: Licq 1.6.1-2 was uploaded before the freeze with the intention to enable hardening build flags. Unfortunately the uploaded binary version was built with a buggy cdbs version which meant that the hardening flags are not enabled in the amd64 build. I woul

How to get new licq binary package with hardening enabled uploaded

Hi, Licq 1.6.1-2 was uploaded before the freeze with the intention to enable hardening build flags. Unfortunately the uploaded binary version was built with a buggy cdbs version which meant that the hardening flags are not enabled in the amd64 build. I would like to see wheezy have a version with

Re: Freeze exception for colorhug-client 0.1.11

Hi Dne Tue, 03 Jul 2012 21:58:38 +0100 "Adam D. Barratt" napsal(a): > On Tue, 2012-07-03 at 09:46 +0200, Michal Čihař wrote: > > I'd like to upload colorhug-client 0.1.11-1 to unstable and get freeze > > exception for it. It's new upstream release which fixes few annoying > > bugs (most notably