Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi, [ please Cc me on replies, I'm not subscribed to -release ]
I've got three minor bugfixes from not yet released libburn 1.2.4,
which I'd like to apply to libburn/1.2.2-1. I've not yet
Hi Guillem,
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012, Guillem Jover wrote:
I'll be doing a first push today. The remaning things I'll be finishing
up next are at least the strings cleanup left out from the 1.16.4
release, the cross-multiarch patches, part of the changelog binNMU
solution, and some other multiarch
Hi Raphael,
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
I know that in the long term you're in favor of moving the changelog in
the package metadata and I agree with this plan. But IMO we must find
an interim solution in the mean time.
Here's a suggestion. Please share your thoughts:
1/ we modify
2012-07-10 20:00 Neil McGovern ne...@debian.org:
| Hi,
|
| On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:58:53PM +0300, Jari Aalto wrote:
| | The Fix
| |Add required font package to debian/control
| |
|
| +Recommends: xfonts-100dpi
1.3-9 has been uploaded to unstable with this change.
Jari
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package tryton-proteus. The -3 upload fixes the #680817 FTBFS,
revealed by a Lucas-powered rebuild.
unblock tryton-proteus/2.2.2-3
debdiff attached
Your message dated Wed, 11 Jul 2012 12:25:09 +0200
with message-id 4ffd5485.5010...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: Bug#681150: unblock: libfam-ruby/0.2.0-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #681150,
regarding unblock: libfam-ruby/0.2.0-2.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Wed, 11 Jul 2012 12:26:37 +0200
with message-id 4ffd54dd.6050...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: Bug#681154: unblock: libimlib2-ruby/0.5.2-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #681154,
regarding unblock: libimlib2-ruby/0.5.2-2.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Wed, 11 Jul 2012 12:28:22 +0200
with message-id 4ffd5546.7060...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: Bug#681165: unblock: libnet-irc-ruby/0.14-5.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #681165,
regarding unblock: libnet-irc-ruby/0.14-5.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Wed, 11 Jul 2012 12:30:01 +0200
with message-id 4ffd55a9.5040...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: Bug#681171: unblock: geos/3.3.3-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #681171,
regarding unblock: geos/3.3.3-1.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
On 2012-07-11 05:45, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User:
release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package merb
Fixes RC bug #676078
unblock merb/1.0.12+dfsg-4.1
Hi,
This seems to be scheduled for removal from
Your message dated Wed, 11 Jul 2012 13:12:07 +0200
with message-id 4ffd5f87.3050...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#681145: unblock: libgc/7.1-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #681145,
regarding unblock: libgc/7.1-9
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Wed, 11 Jul 2012 13:33:34 +0200
with message-id 4ffd648e.1030...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#680983: RM: libjdic-java/0.9.5-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #680983,
regarding RM: libjdic-java/0.9.5-7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package salt
while discussing with upstream the Debian package with salt they highly
suggested adding an additional dependency to the Debian package
resulting in #680410.
I
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
1/ we modify dh_installchangelog to strip the binary-only changelog entry
for Multi-Arch: same packages
Wouldn't (1) be throwing away information, unless the stripped
information goes into another file?
Making the stripped info go into
Your message dated Wed, 11 Jul 2012 13:45:34 +0200
with message-id 4ffd675e.4040...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#681201: unblock: salt/0.10.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #681201,
regarding unblock: salt/0.10.1-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Dear release team,
I can only emphasize on the importance of having the latest version of
the openswan package in Debian as the fixes will be highly needed for
VPN servers dealing with mobile clients. All the patches will (according
to the lead developer of openswan upstream) also be included in
Hi,
We would like to 634538 fixed for Wheezy. Unfortunately, the changes
brought by tcpreplay/3.4.4-1 are quite large [1] and we are not able to
unblock the package for Wheezy. Would it be possible to prepare an
upload targeting testing-proposed-updates and versioned 3.4.3-2+wheezy1?
[1] after
On 06/07/12 14:19, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 04/07/12 17:53, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
Would it be OK to upload the newer version to Unstable in order for it
to get into Wheezy?
FTR, the package has land in unstable and I've added an unblock hint.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
Hi,
We would like to fix #654506 and #674386 in Wheezy. Unfortunately, we
are not able to accept supercollider/1:3.5.2-1 from Unstable since the
changes are quite large. Usually, we ask the maintainer to prepare an
upload based on testing's source package and targeting
testing-proposed-updates.
Your message dated Wed, 11 Jul 2012 14:24:46 +0200
with message-id 4ffd708e.4030...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#680001: unblock: freeglut/2.6.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #680001,
regarding unblock: freeglut/2.6.0-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Wed, 11 Jul 2012 08:07:08 -0400
with message-id e61bfe55-72ee-41a4-b35b-d4d93da25...@email.android.com
and subject line Re: Bug#681168: unblock: merb/1.0.12+dfsg-4.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #681168,
regarding unblock: merb/1.0.12+dfsg-4.1
to be marked as done.
This
Am 11.07.2012 14:20, schrieb Mehdi Dogguy:
We would like to fix #654506 and #674386 in Wheezy. Unfortunately, we
are not able to accept supercollider/1:3.5.2-1 from Unstable since the
changes are quite large. Usually, we ask the maintainer to prepare an
upload based on testing's source package
Hi -
It's easy to fix #654506 because supercollider never used waf so the
file can simply be deleted in repacking a ~dfsg version, and build
will still work fine.
I don't want to work on #674386 because working on the scons build is
a waste of time when we've junked it long ago, and the bug is
2012/7/11 Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com:
Am 11.07.2012 14:20, schrieb Mehdi Dogguy:
We would like to fix #654506 and #674386 in Wheezy. Unfortunately, we
are not able to accept supercollider/1:3.5.2-1 from Unstable since the
changes are quite large. Usually, we ask the maintainer to
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org wrote:
Hi,
We would like to fix #654506 and #674386 in Wheezy. Unfortunately, we
are not able to accept supercollider/1:3.5.2-1 from Unstable since the
changes are quite large.
I think you mean 1:3.5.3~repack-1? That is what's
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package puppet
The 2.8.18 upstream release is a security release, fixing four security issues.
- http://puppetlabs.com/security/cve/cve-2012-3864/
-
On 11/07/12 16:01, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Mehdi Dogguyme...@dogguy.org
wrote:
Hi,
We would like to fix #654506 and #674386 in Wheezy. Unfortunately,
we are not able to accept supercollider/1:3.5.2-1 from Unstable
since the changes are quite large.
I think you
Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org writes:
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Wouldn't (1) be throwing away information, unless the stripped
information goes into another file?
Making the stripped info go into another file sounds fine to me.
Yes, that's another possibility but
On 08/07/12 21:10, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Maybe we could make something happen anyway, e.g. by letting it stay
for a longer period in unstable before considering an unblock. But
I'll let some other team members voice their opinion on this topic.
I second this. I think we could add an age-days
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org wrote:
On 11/07/12 16:01, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Mehdi Dogguyme...@dogguy.org
wrote:
Hi,
We would like to fix #654506 and #674386 in Wheezy. Unfortunately,
we are not able to accept
On 2012-07-08 19:57, Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
[]
-- Bhavani Shankar bh...@ubuntu.com Sun, 08 Jul 2012 22:08:46 +0530
I am hereby requesting for a freeze exception as it gets in new and
updated network support to the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package getmail4
getmail4 (4.32.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release.
- Prevent some nuisance stack traces if getmail cannot connect to the
POP/
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package refcard
Many I18N updates and better looking build pages.
refcard (5.0.8) unstable; urgency=low
* Team upload.
[ W. Martin Borgert ]
* Translation
On 10 July 2012 18:46, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
I suspect this may just swap you one bug report for another - libllvm3.0 is
multi-arch: same, which means that if it's binNMUed then e.g.
libllvm3.0:amd64 and libllvm3.0:i386 will no longer be co-installable.
I assume a
Your message dated Wed, 11 Jul 2012 18:40:25 +0200
with message-id 4ffdac79.2050...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: Bug#681239: unblock: getmail4/4.32.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #681239,
regarding unblock: getmail4/4.32.0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package octave
This version fixes an RC bug (#681064) which manifests during Squeeze-Wheezy
upgrades.
unblock octave/3.6.2-3
Thanks,
-- System Information:
Debian
Your message dated Wed, 11 Jul 2012 19:59:41 +0200
with message-id 4ffdbf0d.2020...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#681240: unblock: refcard/5.0.8
has caused the Debian Bug report #681240,
regarding unblock: refcard/5.0.8
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Wed, 11 Jul 2012 20:03:55 +0200
with message-id 4ffdc00b.2000...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#681245: unblock: octave/3.6.2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #681245,
regarding unblock: octave/3.6.2-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012, Russ Allbery wrote:
I don't think it's mandatory that we save the information, but it
certainly would be nice. I'd like apt-listchanges to show me the binary
NMU changelog. I've used that information before on the local system, and
that's a lot more convenient than going
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 09:23:05 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
I know that in the long term you're in favor of moving the changelog in
the package metadata and I agree with this plan. But IMO we must find
an interim solution in the mean time.
Whatever solution ends up being chosen in the end
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 23:54:26 +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
This has been done. I've now uploaded 5.2.9-1, which is just 5.2.8
plus the Debian patches incorporated upstream and some translation
updates and very minor bugfixes. If this could be allowed into
testing, that would be much
Dear Release Managers,
the status of the non-free fglrx driver does not look too good at the
moment: fglrx-driver is not in wheezy (it was removed in favor of Xorg
Xserver 1.12). Current Xorg is now supported, but the package is
RC-buggy on amd64, requiring a new upstream release to fix (which
* Betr.: Bug#681196: unblock: tryton-proteus/2.2.2-3 (Wed, 11 Jul 2012
12:11:14 +0200):
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package tryton-proteus. The -3 upload fixes the #680817 FTBFS,
revealed by
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 09:29:55 +0100, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
There was a mistake in the slibs for mysql 5.5.24+dfsg-1 and asteisk
built against it. Once 5.5.24+dfsg-2 has finished building asterisk
should be built again.
You need to give more details for such requests. What architectures
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 19:00:20 +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Hello.
Since the wheezy freeze is nearby, I wanted to notify the Release Team
about possible issue with qemu-kvm package.
Sorry we didn't get back to you earlier. Right now qemu-kvm 1.0 is in
testing, 1.1 is in sid, but is
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 14:18:54 +0200, Eva Ramon wrote:
Hello,
the package libtango has a bug which cannot be resolved #665017, because it
has a dependency on ldc, which cannot be satisfied (the package ldc isn't
in testing anymore). The libtango source package and its binary packages
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 11:20:24 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (07/07/2012):
As for the kernel, linux can't migrate on its own, packages would become
uninstallable. linux-latest is needed but is missing its s390 build
(hence the poke on IRC and the extra Cc
one for beta 1:
# 20120711
# RoKiBi: make grub-install work on RAID/LVM again
unblock grub-installer/1.75
unblock-udeb grub-installer/1.75
urgent grub-installer/1.75
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org (11/07/2012):
I think I fixed that by adding the linux-2.6 removal to the hint.
Sorry I didn't reply on that point. Yes, you did.
(I noticed it when mine failed due to yours being processed before, in
my test run.)
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description:
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 15:55:58 +0300, Boris Pek wrote:
The package was uploaded to unstable on June 18. But it have not migrated to
testing automatically [2] because of new bug report [3] with severity grave.
I should note, that this level of severity is questionable, because circular
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 16:32:45 +0300, Boris Pek wrote:
Hi,
I have done some QA work and have prepared few updates for packages which are
currently have no maintainers. Most of them were sponsored. But unfortunately
four packages were not uploaded before freeze:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 15:07:11 +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
The bug[1] fixed by the commit that caused the ABI break is pretty serious --
all faac-generated files are rejected by Banshee.
So you're saying that bug can't be fixed without breaking the ABI?
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
On 11/07/12 20:45, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 09:29:55 +0100, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
There was a mistake in the slibs for mysql 5.5.24+dfsg-1 and
asteisk built against it. Once 5.5.24+dfsg-2 has finished
building asterisk should be built again.
You need to give more
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (11/07/2012):
And possibly the final one for beta 1:
# 20120711
# RoKiBi: make grub-install work on RAID/LVM again
unblock grub-installer/1.75
unblock-udeb grub-installer/1.75
urgent grub-installer/1.75
Sorry for having processed that myself, but clock's
Hello,
taking off any hat I could have and talking as a random user.
René Mayrhofer rm...@debian.org (08/07/2012):
Unfortunately, we (Harald Jenny, the real maintainer of openswan for
the past 6 months or so, and me, the one who is only doing uploads)
missed the freeze deadline due to various
Jonathan McCrohan jmccro...@gmail.com (11/07/2012):
On 10 July 2012 18:46, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
I suspect this may just swap you one bug report for another - libllvm3.0 is
multi-arch: same, which means that if it's binNMUed then e.g.
libllvm3.0:amd64 and
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 681196 unblock: tryton-proteus/2.2.2-4
Bug #681196 [release.debian.org] unblock: tryton-proteus/2.2.2-3
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: tryton-proteus/2.2.2-4' from 'unblock:
tryton-proteus/2.2.2-3'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Hello,
and thanks for checking with us.
John Stamp jst...@users.sourceforge.net (05/07/2012):
Because the last upload was so long ago, I modified the packaging to
take advantage of multiarch and hardened build flags. A debdiff is
attached.
Last upload long ago doesn't mean you get to
On 11/07/12 21:31, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
On 11/07/12 20:45, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 09:29:55 +0100, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
There was a mistake in the slibs for mysql 5.5.24+dfsg-1 and
asteisk built against it. Once 5.5.24+dfsg-2 has finished
building asterisk should be
Hello,
and thanks for checking with us.
Raúl Sánchez Siles rasas...@gmail.com (06/07/2012):
Since I don't have upload rights I requested regular uploaders
first, then kde- extras team for sponsoring. The situation was such
that I failed to manage time left to freeze properly and upload
Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org writes:
The right *temporary* solution then. Remember that this was meant as an
intermediary solution until the full changelog (with the bin-nmu entry)
is just integrated in the package medata (control.tar).
Oh, yes, absolutely agreed. Sorry for not making
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org writes:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 09:23:05 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
I know that in the long term you're in favor of moving the changelog in
the package metadata and I agree with this plan. But IMO we must find
an interim solution in the mean time.
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:42:22AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Last upload long ago doesn't mean you get to rewrite the packaging
during freeze, that's really not appreciated.
Reminder:
http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html
OK. Thank you. I've attached a debdiff that fixes
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 17:01:24 -0700
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote:
Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org writes:
The right *temporary* solution then. Remember that this was meant as an
intermediary solution until the full changelog (with the bin-nmu entry)
is just integrated in the
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 08:27:23AM +0200, George Danchev wrote:
I've got three minor bugfixes from not yet released libburn 1.2.4,
which I'd like to apply to libburn/1.2.2-1. I've not yet uploaded
libburn 1.2.2-2, so this is a request for upload to sid and unblock.
Both, Thomas Schmitt and I
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 12:19:04PM +0300, Jari Aalto wrote:
2012-07-10 20:00 Neil McGovern ne...@debian.org:
| Hi,
|
| On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:58:53PM +0300, Jari Aalto wrote:
| | The Fix
| |Add required font package to debian/control
| |
|
| +Recommends:
Sigh, again...
On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 09:23:05 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012, Guillem Jover wrote:
I'll be doing a first push today. The remaning things I'll be finishing
up next are at least the strings cleanup left out from the 1.16.4
release, the cross-multiarch
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package imageshack-uploader
Fixes RC bug #672084,
unblock imageshack-uploader/2.2+hg20100408.d802dea89428-5.1
diff -Nru
On 12/07/2012 04:26, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 15:07:11 +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
The bug[1] fixed by the commit that caused the ABI break is pretty serious --
all faac-generated files are rejected by Banshee.
So you're saying that bug can't be fixed without breaking
69 matches
Mail list logo
