Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 682603 unblock: linkchecker/7.9-2.2
Bug #682603 [release.debian.org] unblock: linkchecker/7.9-2.1
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: linkchecker/7.9-2.2' from 'unblock:
linkchecker/7.9-2.1'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact m
Updated patch attached.
Please unblock package linkchecker
Fixes RC bug #681069. Right now this isn't strictly essential since the
Python version (2.7.3) that induces this bug isn't in Wheezy, but the fix is
perfectly safe no matter what we do with python2.7, so I think it's better to
let it thr
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package linkchecker
Fixes RC bug #681069. Right now this isn't strictly essential since the
Python version (2.7.3) that induces this bug isn't in Wheezy, but the fix is
perf
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 11:04:13AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Steve M. Robbins (22/07/2012):
> > Given the long lifetime of stable Debian, I expect users would
> > appreciate having the latest Boost available. This is a leaf package
> > so should have no impact on stability of the a
On 21/07/12 15:49, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Aside from the question of whether the content can actually have
> authorship asserted over it in the first place, we've historically
> treated licensing issues in stable where the situation has subsequently
> been clarified in unstable as documentation u
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 10:40:34AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please could you unblock schroot? It contains the following
> changes:
>
> - PAM pam_env is used to set up additional environment from
> /etc/security/pam_env.conf and /etc/default/locale.
This single change was re
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Dear stable release team,
I would like to upload a new release of nss-pam-ldapd for squeeze that
fixes a few bugs. The fixes below (apart from the first one) should all
be very straightforward.
Your message dated Mon, 23 Jul 2012 22:40:44 +0100
with message-id <1343079644.32353.17.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#682579: unblock: mono-tools/2.10-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #682579,
regarding unblock: mono-tools/2.10-6
to be marked as done.
This means
Dear release team,
Am Montag, den 16.07.2012, 20:55 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
> Am Montag, den 09.07.2012, 15:32 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
> > So we need another pandoc upload removing the use of the threaded
> > runtime (Jonas?), then apply for a freeze exception and then get pandoc
>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi releasey folks,
I inserted a stray space after a line continuation "\" in an "if" block.
It created a warning that probably broke the entire block, meaning that
the workaround which was
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 681563 unblock: eglibc/2.13-35
Bug #681563 [release.debian.org] unblock: eglibc/2.13-34
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: eglibc/2.13-35' from 'unblock: eglibc/2.13-34 '
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assis
retitle 681563 unblock: eglibc/2.13-35
thanks
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 07:30:50AM -0600, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
> > Aurelien Jarno (14/07/2012):
> > > I guess it means the unblock is granted, just waited for d-i beta 1.
> > > Does it mean we can alre
On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 10:07 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> I was going through bugs in php5 and I have prepared fix for a bugs,
> none of them are truly critical, but the patches are small, pulled
> from upstream and they fix the problems our users are experiencing.
Apologies for the delay in getting
On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 21:07 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> > Any preference as to whether I upload to unstable or experimental (there
> > is no dependency on the newer pysvn)?
>
> First, please upload to experimental and ask users (probably include
> you :) to test with pysvn 1.7.5 in unstable. If
Your message dated Mon, 23 Jul 2012 20:33:14 +0100
with message-id <1343071994.32353.9.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#682564: unblock: moodle/2.2.3.dfsg-2.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #682564,
regarding unblock: moodle/2.2.3.dfsg-2.2
to be marked as done.
This
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package octave-java
unblock octave-java/1.2.8-6
Critical bug fixed: #681355
Additionally fixed: #664776 (this just runs some test code at build time)
Debdif
On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 19:59 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> From a quick look at the diff from the version in testing, lintian fixes
> generally don't qualify for unblocks, nor does a complete rewrite of the
> copyright file in to DEP-5 format.
>
> I guess one could claim that some of the changes
On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 12:29 -0500, Rudy Godoy wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 06:18:21AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sun, 2012-07-22 at 23:58 -0500, Rudy Godoy wrote:
> > > So, I ask for allowing torcs-data, torcs-data-tracks and
> > > torcs-data-cars to enter testing, thus being part of
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package moodle
This version fixes the security bug #682203 and the following CVEs:
CVE-2012-3388
CVE-2012-3389
CVE-2012-3393
CVE-2012-3394
CVE-2012-3395
CVE-2012-3396
CVE-20
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 06:18:21AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-07-22 at 23:58 -0500, Rudy Godoy wrote:
> > Hello, past May torcs-data (1.3.1) was removed from testing
> > automatically. This could probably happened due one RC bug
> > sitting on BTS.
>
> No, it was removed becaus
Hi!
On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 17:51:56 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 06:38:21PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 15:14:15 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> >
> > > That is of course, your perogative. However, if you could kindly prepare
> > > a patchset bet
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 06:38:21PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 15:14:15 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
>
> > That is of course, your perogative. However, if you could kindly prepare
> > a patchset between 1.16.5 and whatever you want to migrate, with all the
> > translation
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package dkms
My NMU dkms 2.2.0.3-1.1 fixes two bugs:
#666023 (serious): /usr/lib/dkms/common.postinst fails if /lib/modules
does not exist
#657145 (i
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 15:14:15 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> That is of course, your perogative. However, if you could kindly prepare
> a patchset between 1.16.5 and whatever you want to migrate, with all the
> translation and documentation changes stripped out, lets see how big
> that is.
>
IT
Hi!
(Debian KDE Extras Team mail address corrected)
El Jueves, 12 de julio de 2012, Cyril Brulebois escribió:
> Hello,
>
> and thanks for checking with us.
>
> Raúl Sánchez Siles (06/07/2012):
> > Since I don't have upload rights I requested regular uploaders
> > first, then kde- extras t
Hi release team,
[ CC me please. ]
stumpwm, which is maintained by me, was been removed from testing due
to #649707. Actually, this bug should be merged with #647544 and
closed when cl-asdf/2:2.019-1 was uploaded. But the submitter and I
had never done it.
Now I've closed it. Please add stump
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 09:56:24PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 09:42:18 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > Advancing that as much as you can would certainly be useful to catch any
> > errors, and to ensure translators get a chance to contribute.
>
> So, the upload happene
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package phpldapadmin
This upload add two debconf templates translation (and, well, a
Standards version bump that would have better been left aside but I
think it's f
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
> Aurelien Jarno (14/07/2012):
> > I guess it means the unblock is granted, just waited for d-i beta 1.
> > Does it mean we can already upload eglibc/2.13-35, and that only the
> > changes between 2.13-34 and 2.13-35 would be considered for the freeze
>
Greatings dear Release Managers,
I would like to submit a new debian release 5.2.0-2 of my package of
the mmass software. As you'll see in the debdiff attached, the
modification is in the debian/start-script file that I use to start
the mmass.py program. I forgot to transmit the parameters to the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear release team,
Please unblock version 1.1-2 of mathjax. This upload fixes a potential
build failure, and fixes search in the docs (by adding missing source
files).
I've changed the mai
Hi Arthur,
On Sat, 21 Jul 2012 11:27:06 +0200
Arthur de Jong wrote:
> Thanks. I've had a look at rabbitvcs and while it works with python-svn
> 1.7.6-0.1 there is a problem with the fact that subversion 1.7 no longer
> ships a .svn directory in every subdirectory of a working copy.
True.
> Thi
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package linux
This version fixes many bugs, and has already been approved in principle.
Ben.
unblock linux/3.2.23-1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT
This version of lua5.2 fixes a nasty multiarch related issue
and the mess my previous attempt made.
Debdiff attached (w.r.t the version in weezy).
diff -Nru lua5.2-5.2.1/debian/changelog lua5.2-5.2.1/debian/changelog
--- lua5.2-5.2.1/debian/changelog 2012-06-15 10:08:18.0 +0200
+++
This version of lua5.1 fixes a nasty multiarch related issue (bug #676695)
and the mess my previous attempt made (#682234, #682183, #682299).
Debdiff attached (w.r.t the version in weezy).
diff -Nru lua5.1-5.1.5/debian/changelog lua5.1-5.1.5/debian/changelog
--- lua5.1-5.1.5/debian/changelog
Hi,
Steve M. Robbins (22/07/2012):
> Given the long lifetime of stable Debian, I expect users would
> appreciate having the latest Boost available. This is a leaf package
> so should have no impact on stability of the archive.
>
> [Testing currently has Boost 1.49 as default and I propose to ke
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
GLPI 0.83.31 (micro-fix based on 0.83.3) is an important security
release, fixing two CVEs:
CVE-2012-4002:
Bug #3704: CSRF prevention step 1
Bug #3707: CSRF prevention step 2
CVE-
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package josm 0.0.svn5267+dfsg1-2.
It fixes #682315 which, even if not RC, would make the package almost unusable
in wheezy.
OpenStreetMap has undergone a license change in i
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 682268 - moreinfo
Bug #682268 [release.debian.org] unblock: foremost/1.5.7-4
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
682268: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=6
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 681448 unblock: nsd3/3.2.12-1
Bug #681448 [release.debian.org] unblock: nsd3/3.2.11-1
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: nsd3/3.2.12-1' from 'unblock: nsd3/3.2.11-1'
> thank you
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistan
Hi,
>>> i could do that. But i would prefer to accapt the hole package.
>>> The version 1.11.12 is the last minor bugfix release in the line of
>>> version 1.11. So it makes sense to have this version in wheezy.
> [...]
>> And unfortunately those have also happened too late for us to review
>> man
41 matches
Mail list logo
