Hi
Dne Tue, 24 Jul 2012 19:13:47 +0100
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk napsal(a):
On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 15:39 +0200, Michal Čihař wrote:
It seems that xcache 2.0.0 which is currently in testing/unstable is
quite buggy. On Debian side, we only have bug#682666,
The fix for that
Dear release managers ...
any comment (slightly edited the text, as I will remove the
big dep5 file before upload in case that makes it easier!)
??
Thanks
On Mi, 18 Jul 2012, Norbert Preining wrote:
Dear release managers,
before uploading to unstable I would concur with you about
possible
Op 20120724 om 21:35 schreef Alexander Golovko:
On Tue, 24 Jul 2012 20:14:10 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 21:10:49 +0400, Alexander Golovko wrote:
} Upstream position 5.2.x releases as bugfixes, 5.2.7 and 5.2.10 as
} significant bugfix releases.
There is a debdiff
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package vmware-manager
the version in unstable fixes rc bug #680481,
which is a file name conflict between the
packages vmm and vmware-manager: both
provide a program named
Hello release team,
tuareg-mode makes installation of emacs24 fail (#681823). This is tagged sid
as emacs24 is not in wheezy, but OTOH this bug will bite users who will
want to install emacs24 on top of wheezy. Would you unblock a package that
fixes this bug (patch as proposed in the BTS)?
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu python-gevent_0.13.6-1+b1 . ALL . -m Rebuild against libevent-2.0-5
2.0.19-stable; fixes #645833
A binNMU should fix bug #645833.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
thanks
Please unblock package deutex.
Version 4.4.902-13 resolves an RC
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 680056 by 682686
Bug #680056 [wireshark] wireshark: CVE-2012-4048: PPP dissector crash/segfault
680056 was not blocked by any bugs.
680056 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 680056: 682686
thanks
Stopping processing here.
On 25.07.2012 08:41, Geert Stappers wrote:
Op 20120724 om 21:35 schreef Alexander Golovko:
On Tue, 24 Jul 2012 20:14:10 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 21:10:49 +0400, Alexander Golovko wrote:
} Upstream position 5.2.x releases as bugfixes, 5.2.7 and 5.2.10 as
}
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 07:59:08PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 12:29 -0500, Rudy Godoy wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 06:18:21AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2012-07-22 at 23:58 -0500, Rudy Godoy wrote:
So, I ask for allowing torcs-data, torcs-data-tracks
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 12:03:02 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 25.07.2012 08:41, Geert Stappers wrote:
Op 20120724 om 21:35 schreef Alexander Golovko:
On Tue, 24 Jul 2012 20:14:10 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 21:10:49 +0400, Alexander Golovko wrote:
} Upstream position
Hi Adam
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 09:21:33PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 07:57 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 09:46:13PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 22:12 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package auctex
This NMU upload was meant to include two pending debconf translations
(Spanish and Slovak). I didn't get the maintainer's approval for it
(nor did I get any
I was wrong about that bit of my initial request. The package dependencies
are not correct in Unstable, but not Wheezy. All the more reason to let an
update it.
Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.6-6~), python ( 2.8), python (= 2.6.6-7~), python-
numpy (= 1:1.6.1), python-numpy-abi9, r-base-core (=
On 25.07.2012 08:47, Michal Čihař wrote:
Dne Tue, 24 Jul 2012 19:13:47 +0100
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk napsal(a):
From reading through the upstream tickets and ignoring the bits that
appear to be Windows specific, it looks like the segfault fixes are
On 25.07.2012 08:57, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Mi, 18 Jul 2012, Norbert Preining wrote:
The changes in the release I would like to upload are two-fold:
* documentation/format/lintian warning fixes
. some superficial white-space in control file removed
. better descriptions in the control
On Mi, 25 Jul 2012, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
above, please let us have a debdiff anyway, if only for documentation
Sure, give me 30min ... to build new packages ;-)
Best wishes
Norbert
Norbert Preining
On Do, 26 Jul 2012, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Mi, 25 Jul 2012, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
above, please let us have a debdiff anyway, if only for documentation
Sure, give me 30min ... to build new packages ;-)
Here we go, full debdiff for -2 release. I will not upload unless you
give me an
Hi,
On 2012-07-22 16:04, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Unblocked; thanks. [...]
Bindfs is not migrated yet, can you please recheck if unblock succeeded?
--
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++ GNU/Linux developer, Debian Developer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 23:14 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
A fixed pandoc has been uploaded (1.9.4.2-2)
http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/pandoc/news/20120723T204804Z.html
disabling the use of the threaded runtime:
$ debdiff pandoc_1.9.4.2-*.dsc
diff -Nru pandoc-1.9.4.2/debian/changelog
On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 21:36 +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
On 2012-07-22 16:04, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Unblocked; thanks. [...]
Bindfs is not migrated yet, can you please recheck if unblock succeeded?
Not sure what happened there; there's a bunch of other hints from the
same day. Really
On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 07:25 -0500, Rudy Godoy wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 07:59:08PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 12:29 -0500, Rudy Godoy wrote:
So, in that case I'd like you to let pass rev. 6 (1.3.3-6)
packages from sid.
You're supposed to provide a
Your message dated Wed, 25 Jul 2012 21:47:08 +0200
with message-id 50104d3c.2040...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: Bug#682746: unblock: deutex/4.4.902-13
has caused the Debian Bug report #682746,
regarding unblock: deutex/4.4.902-13
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Wed, 25 Jul 2012 21:58:07 +0200
with message-id 50104fcf.30...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: Bug#682514: unblock: phpldapadmin/1.2.2-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #682514,
regarding unblock: phpldapadmin/1.2.2-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi release team,
The spip package currently in stable is vulnerable to some security
issues (#677290, #672961, #680118), the last one being
On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 02:52 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Do, 26 Jul 2012, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Mi, 25 Jul 2012, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
above, please let us have a debdiff anyway, if only for documentation
Sure, give me 30min ... to build new packages ;-)
Here we go, full
Your message dated Wed, 25 Jul 2012 23:05:15 +0200
with message-id 50105f8b.90...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: Bug#682039: unblock: clamav/0.97.5+dfsg-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #682039,
regarding unblock: clamav/0.97.5+dfsg-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
On 2012-07-19 22:44, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote:
I've just uploaded gscan2pdf 1.0.4-4 to sid. -2 is currently in wheezy.
Please find attached a debdiff between -2 and -4 which fixes two serious bugs:
#678911(Device-dependent options disappear after selecting Lineart mode)
#682100
Your message dated Wed, 25 Jul 2012 22:31:01 +0100
with message-id 1343251861.495.33.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#682777: unblock: auctex/11.86-10.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #682777,
regarding unblock: auctex/11.86-10.1
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Wed, 25 Jul 2012 22:34:46 +0100
with message-id 1343252086.495.35.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#680901: Would have to be done in Testing now
has caused the Debian Bug report #680901,
regarding nmu: rpy_1.0.3-21
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Wed, 25 Jul 2012 23:51:53 +0200
with message-id 50106a79.6030...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: Bug#682391: unblock: wvstreams/4.6.1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #682391,
regarding unblock: wvstreams/4.6.1-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package blockdiag
Fixes RC bug #681328
unblock blockdiag/1.1.6-1.1
diff -Nru blockdiag-1.1.6/debian/changelog blockdiag-1.1.6/debian/changelog
---
Your message dated Wed, 25 Jul 2012 23:36:27 +0100
with message-id 1343255787.495.40.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#682821: unblock: blockdiag/1.1.6-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #682821,
regarding unblock: blockdiag/1.1.6-1.1
to be marked as done.
This means
Cédric Boutillier dijo:
Hi!
I've imported an upstream fix to the division by zero errors with
Ruby1.9 in ruby-gruff, causing RC bug #676206.
(...)
Hi,
I have just reviewed and uploaded Cédric's changes, fixing the RC bug
he mentions. I am attaching the full diff between the package
Le Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 03:51:55PM +, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) a écrit :
It is now visible:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/mime-support.git;a=summary
Dear all,
I have uploaded to mime-support version 3.53_experimental1 to experimental.
As discussed earlier, me and
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu libgeier0_0.13-1 . ALL . -m rebuild to work around xmlsec issue (bug
#675513)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Hi Adam,
On Mi, 25 Jul 2012, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Maybe Japanese? In any case, please go ahead.
Fixed two instances of japanese to Japanese, and uploaded to unstable,
has already been accepted.
Thanks a lot
Norbert
On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 13:19 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Mi, 25 Jul 2012, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Maybe Japanese? In any case, please go ahead.
Fixed two instances of japanese to Japanese, and uploaded to unstable,
has already been accepted.
Unblocked.
Regards,
Adam
--
To
On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 18:20 -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Cédric Boutillier dijo:
I've imported an upstream fix to the division by zero errors with
Ruby1.9 in ruby-gruff, causing RC bug #676206.
[...]
I have just reviewed and uploaded Cédric's changes, fixing the RC bug
he mentions. I am
On Do, 26 Jul 2012, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Fixed two instances of japanese to Japanese, and uploaded to unstable,
has already been accepted.
Unblocked.
Thanks.
Best wishes
Norbert
Norbert Preining
40 matches
Mail list logo
