Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal
Please unblock package isc-dhcp
Andrew hasn't yet made it clear which version he's been planning to
support in wheezy [0], but he did upload this one well before the
freeze. Unfortunately
Hi, it's Nancee.
Here is the thing, I am looking for a man who is interesting to have fun with.
Really quickly about myself. I am fond of such things as listening to music,
partying, watching horror movies, I also really like snowboarding!
What would u think if I'd say that I love sex?) I really d
Processing changes file: clamav_0.97.5+dfsg-6~squeeze1_powerpc.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1t2w0e-5q...@franck.debian.org
On Sat, 18 Aug 2012 12:21:08 +0100, "Adam D. Barratt" writes:
>Okay. Assuming an upload could be made fairly quickly, I think I'd
>prefer a -3 which made the POD changes to the original binary and
>installed it under the new name. Thanks for working on this.
done; i've uploaded vmware-manager 0.
Dear release team and developer community,
due to changes in the mime-support package, upgrade of systems serving PHP
websites through CGI will not be automatic. There is
http://bugs.debian.org/674089 (critical) where the issue is discussed, and I
would like to reassign it to the release notes.
Your message dated Sat, 18 Aug 2012 23:57:39 +0100
with message-id <1345330659.31960.123.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#685259: unblock: request-tracker4/4.0.6-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #685259,
regarding unblock: request-tracker4/4.0.6-4
to be marked as don
On Aug 18, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > It was uploaded before the freeze cutoff, but it needs an ack by the d-i
> > team.
> What does this fix? The important changes seem to be in the previous
> version already, the remaining changes are essentially in the testsuite
> AFAICT?
There are no major c
Hi Matthijs,
The debdiff is huge, which is probably why your mail went missing (maybe
stuck in a queue for moderation?)
Although, much of it is just strings/translation changes, with
particularly long lines.
Of course I cannot speak for the release team, but looking back, IMHO it
would have been
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package request-tracker4
Changes fix one RC bug and one important bug.
Thanks!
unblock request-tracker4/4.0.6-4
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.5
APT prefers
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package lastfmsubmitd
It's just a po-debconf update (Danish translation added). It also
properly setup the Maintainer field since the package has been orphaned,
and fixes a P
Your message dated Sat, 18 Aug 2012 22:05:07 +0100
with message-id <1345323907.31960.120.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#685253: unblock: reportbug/6.4.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #685253,
regarding unblock: reportbug/6.4.3
to be marked as done.
This means tha
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package reportbug
It includes very small fixes for crashes or inconsistent behaviors.
unblock reportbug/6.4.3
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefer
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 09:10 +0200, Kilian Krause wrote:
> Please unblock package fex
>
> It addresses all currently known issues. It would be great if this could
> make it into wheezy still to spare us unneccessary work with supporting
> the 20120215-3 on our own.
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #684117 [release.debian.org] unblock: fex/20120718-4
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
684117: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684117
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
Your message dated Sat, 18 Aug 2012 20:45:57 +0100
with message-id <1345319157.31960.106.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#684316: unblock: openjdk-7/7~u3-2.1.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #684316,
regarding unblock: openjdk-7/7~u3-2.1.1-3
to be marked as done.
On Sun, 2012-07-15 at 18:31 +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> On So 15 Jul 2012 18:03:52 CEST Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Mike Gabriel (12/07/2012):
> >> Upstream slbackup-php 0.3 (as currently in wheezy: 0.3-3) is smarty2
> >> compliant and does not work with smarty3. slbackup-php as is not
> >> comple
Your message dated Sat, 18 Aug 2012 20:32:01 +0100
with message-id <1345318321.31960.103.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#681448: unblock: nsd3/3.2.11-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #681448,
regarding unblock: nsd3/3.2.12-1
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package boinc and boinc-app-seti
Right. Why do I want the two packages to be in unstable. Hm. Firstly,
I think the two belong together. The BOINC Debian packages allow everyo
On Sat, 2012-07-14 at 03:13 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Chris Lamb (13/07/2012):
> > Please unblock gunicorn/0.14.5. It fixes a grave security bug (#681471)
> > as well as a number of smaller issues.
> >
> > It's been in unstable for 10 or 11 days now and I've been using it
> > production for
On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 02:47 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Anton Gladky (16/07/2012):
> > Please unblock package paraview_3.14.1-7.
> >
> > The version fixes bug #680359 and has some minor fixes, including hardening
> > build-flags. Diff is attached.
>
> | paraview (3.14.1-7) unstable; urgency=
Your message dated Sat, 18 Aug 2012 19:46:28 +0100
with message-id <1345315588.31960.94.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#685247: unblock: sitesummary/0.1.5
has caused the Debian Bug report #685247,
regarding unblock: sitesummary/0.1.5
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Sat, 18 Aug 2012 19:44:53 +0100
with message-id <1345315493.31960.93.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#685246: unblock: sbnc/1.2-26
has caused the Debian Bug report #685246,
regarding unblock: sbnc/1.2-26
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package sitesummary
It's just a po-debconf update (Danish translation added). All the PO
files changed in the debdiff are just the result of running
debconf-updatepo (so merr
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package sbnc
It's just a po-debconf update (Danish translation added).
Thanks in advance.
Regards
David
unblock sbnc/1.2-26
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # It's done, not dine, wally
> close 684930
Bug #684930 [release.debian.org] unblock (pre-approval): octave/3.6.2-5
Marked Bug as done
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
684930: http://bugs.debian.org
On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 19:23 +0200, Steffen Möller wrote:
> On 08/18/2012 04:00 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 15:32 +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote:
> >> Please unblock package ztex-bmp
> >>
> >> The upload closes a FTBFS issues that appeared along the update of the
> >> free pas
"Adam D. Barratt" writes:
> Okay; thanks. Please go ahead with the upload and let us know once it's
> been accepted.
octave 3.6.2-5 has been accepted into unstable.
Thanks,
--
.''`.Sébastien Villemot
: :' :Debian Maintainer
`. `' http://www.dynare.org/sebastien
`- GPG Key
On 08/18/2012 04:00 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 15:32 +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote:
>> Please unblock package ztex-bmp
>>
>> The upload closes a FTBFS issues that appeared along the update of the
>> free pascal compiler. It was directly provid
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear Release team,
I'm writing this report for your consideration. makehuman was removed on
2012-06-19 (revision 1.0.0~alpha6-3). Then, I uploaded two new revisions being
the last one on 20
Your message dated Sat, 18 Aug 2012 17:01:25 +0100
with message-id <1345305685.31960.87.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#684991: Please allow uploading ejabberd 2.1.10-3 to
Wheezy
has caused the Debian Bug report #684991,
regarding Please allow uploading ejabberd 2.1.
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 21:59:34 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Please go ahead, and let us know once the package has been accepted.
>
FWIW https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-changes/2012/08/msg00775.html
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing changes file: xen_4.0.1-5.3_i386.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1t2lev-0006dx...@franck.debian.org
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed
On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 14:17 +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> Rafael Laboissiere writes:
> > * Adam D. Barratt [2012-08-16 22:13]:
> >> +--- a/src/mkoctfile.in
> >> b/src/mkoctfile.in
> >> +@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@
> >> [...]
> >> +-: ${XTRA_CXXFLAGS=%OCTAVE_
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed
Bug #684930 [release.debian.org] unblock (pre-approval): octave/3.6.2-5
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
Bug #684930 [release.debian.org] unblock (pre-approval): octave/3.6.2-5
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
684930: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/b
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 16:24:52 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As it seems, Daniel has uploaded a version of open-vm-tools that reverts
> the contentious changes. This version has been in unstable for 11 days now
> and no bugs have been reported since.
>
> Can you please review and unb
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 10:16:36 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 12:28:35PM +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> > Package: ia32-libs-i386
> > Version: 20120701
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Currently, ia32-libs-i386 depends on
> > libldap-2.4-2 (>= 2.4.23-7.2)
> > libnss
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 15:35:41 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> It was uploaded before the freeze cutoff, but it needs an ack by the d-i
> team.
>
What does this fix? The important changes seem to be in the previous
version already, the remaining changes are essentially in the testsuite
AFAICT?
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 07:25:49AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 22:56:15 -0430
> Muammar El Khatib wrote:
>
> > Dear Release team,
> >
> > I'd like to know if you could unlock makehuman. The last changes introduced
> > in revisions -4, and -5 where minimal. You can take a look
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 01:48:24 +0200, ancow wrote:
> Multiarch being a release goal, I'd consider this issue release critical, but
> maybe that's just me...
>
"Release goal" very much implies "not release critical".
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 18:25:28 -0500, Rob Browning wrote:
> I suppose we could do what gcc-defaults does, i.e. 4:4.7.1-1, or in this
> case 23:*. That might be reasonable.
>
Really shouldn't use the emacs version as epoch. That's also not what
gcc does.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Descrip
2012/8/18 Adam D. Barratt :
> Given my RM hat, I realise that. ;p In any case, whatever the fate of
> the packages currently in unstable, the libcitadel in NEW is an
> improvement over what's currently in unstable so there's no objections
> to accepting it from NEW from the release team side.
I'v
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 15:49:05 -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> As the dependency was not dropped, and as #679300 ended up in the
> removal of ruby-commandline (and the transitional libcommandline-ruby)
> from the archive, dhelp is currently not installable in testing.
>
ruby-commandline is still in
On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 12:56 +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 09:06:07PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Does 8.14-1 contain any changes beyond the SONAME change and
> > corresponding library package rename?
>
> Unfortunately yes. There is some cosmetic (autoconf caches got
Your message dated Sat, 18 Aug 2012 15:31:53 +0100
with message-id <1345300313.31960.79.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#685229: unblock: nvidia-graphics-modules/302.17+2
has caused the Debian Bug report #685229,
regarding unblock: nvidia-graphics-modules/302.17+2
to b
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
during last month there were one seriuos and one grave bugs against
hylafax. Both of them have been fixed almost three weeks ago while
upting the package with some changes due to better
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 01:04:42PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Adam Borowski (18/08/2012):
> > I just got bit by the lack of multiarch here (wine is broken on amd64
> > if nvidia is involved), and wrote a multiarchification patch before
> > realizing there's already one here. It's redundant,
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package nvidia-graphics-modules
Now that linux 3.2.23-1 migrated to testing, please let
nvidia-graphics-modules follow. It's a rebuild against the newer headers
needed to fix
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #685227 [release.debian.org] unblock: ztex-bmp/20120314-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
685227: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685227
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 15:32 +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote:
> Please unblock package ztex-bmp
>
> The upload closes a FTBFS issues that appeared along the update of the
> free pascal compiler. It was directly provided by upstream. The package
> is not in the archive for
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 12:10:18PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 11:36 +0200, Sebastian Harl wrote:
> > sorry, I must have missing this E-mail somehow :-/
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 04:48:02PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > This change appears not to be docum
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package ztex-bmp
The upload closes a FTBFS issues that appeared along the update of the
free pascal compiler. It was directly provided by upstream. The package
is not in the
Hi everyone,
First of all, thank you for your comments! I'll try to clarify some
things, but I am not sure yet if I understood everything correctly.
First, about the change of the maintainer email. I was absolutely
convinced that I'd put that in the changelog, but as I just noticed, I've
forgotte
Rafael Laboissiere writes:
> [Cc:ing to the DOG mailing list.]
>
> * Adam D. Barratt [2012-08-16 22:13]:
>
>> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>> +--- a/src/mkoctfile.in
>> b/src/mkoctfile.in
>> +@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@
>> [...]
>> +-: ${XTRA_CXXFLAGS=%OCTAVE_CONF_XTRA_CXXFLAGS%}
>> +
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock xen/4.1.3-1. It updates the package to the release. By
doing this it fixes two security bugs, error handling in exceptional
conditions, missing access control and adds hardwar
Just to help those scanning the RC bug lists, the binNMU request for
bobcat is #683244. The binNMU for c++-annotations would need to be
requested later.
I've done a simple test in a pbuilder chroot and the principle of the
request does fix these two RC bugs.
--
Neil Williams
=
http
Dear Adam,
On 08/18/2012 01:34 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 13:17 +0200, Steffen Möller wrote:
>> On 08/18/2012 12:48 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 12:05 +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote:
The uploader is upstream who kindly added a patch to fix a FTBFS
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock xserver-xorg-video-nouveau, it fixes bug #675161 which
has made the version in testing unusable for the past three months. The
version in unstable had been blocked from migra
On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 13:17 +0200, Steffen Möller wrote:
> On 08/18/2012 12:48 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 12:05 +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote:
> >> The uploader is upstream who kindly added a patch to fix a FTBFS.
[...]
> > While I'm happy to believe that a number of the pa
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 15:38 +1000, Alexander Zangerl wrote:
> sorry for the late response: after digging through this a few more times
> i've got an explanation for the debdiff output.
[...]
> the problem is that the debian diff doesn't represent file deletions,
> and that i rather should have left
Hello,
On 08/18/2012 12:48 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 12:05 +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote:
>> The uploader is upstream who kindly added a patch to fix a FTBFS.
>
> "A patch" is somewhat of a misnomer, given:
>
> patches/0001-Adjust-compile
Your message dated Sat, 18 Aug 2012 12:10:18 +0100
with message-id <1345288218.31960.55.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#683720: unblock: rrdtool/1.4.7-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #683720,
regarding unblock: rrdtool/1.4.7-2
to be marked as done.
This means that
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package tcltrf
It fixes a DFSG violation (distributing non-distributable MS DLL, see bug
#685207 [1] for detail). The diff between current 2.1.4-dfsg-3 and
2.1.4-dfsg1-1 is
Hi Adam,
Adam Borowski (18/08/2012):
> I just got bit by the lack of multiarch here (wine is broken on amd64
> if nvidia is involved), and wrote a multiarchification patch before
> realizing there's already one here. It's redundant, except for one
> bit: since an upload is needed anyway
given t
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 684735 - security
Bug #684735 [release.debian.org] unblock: ganglia (security)
Removed tag(s) security.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
684735: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #685209 [release.debian.org] unblock: ball/1.4.1+20111206-4
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
685209: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685209
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 12:05 +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote:
> The uploader is upstream who kindly added a patch to fix a FTBFS.
"A patch" is somewhat of a misnomer, given:
patches/0001-Adjust-compiler-settings.patch | 22
patches/0001-mis
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hello release team,
yesterday, PostgreSQL announced new security/bug fix microreleases:
http://www.postgresql.org/about/news/1407/
I uploaded 9.1.5 into unstable with priority "medium":
Hi all,
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 04:24:52PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> As it seems, Daniel has uploaded a version of open-vm-tools that reverts
> the contentious changes. This version has been in unstable for 11 days now
> and no bugs have been reported since.
>
> Can you please review and un
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # debdiff and reference to fixed bugs in bug log
> tags 683299 - moreinfo
Bug #683299 [release.debian.org] unblock:
open-vm-tools/2:8.8.0+2012.05.21-724730-4
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you ne
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package ball
The uploader is upstream who kindly added a patch to fix a FTBFS.
The buildd are happy now, the package as a good rate of acceptance
on popcon http://qa.debian.o
On 18 August 2012 17:27, Philipp Kern wrote:
> FWIW I tested 0.6.9.1-1 on wheezy and it still responds to "conflicts" with
> the
> removal of all i386 binaries on an amd64 system.
The fix is only recent and was not present in that version. There is
positive feedback for multiarch-conflicts.patch
Hi,
sorry, I must have missing this E-mail somehow :-/
On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 04:48:02PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 10:28 +0200, Sebastian Harl wrote:
> > Please unblock package rrdtool
> >
> > The current version in unstable (1.4.7-2) fixes an RC bug (#664724)
> > ca
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 12:03:36PM +0800, Daniel Hartwig wrote:
> Another version, 0.6.9.1-1, is in experimental which has further
> improvements to multi-arch support and general usability, including
> some notable bug fixes. Those are entangled with significant changes
> to the command line inte
On 18 August 2012 16:48, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 12:03 +0800, Daniel Hartwig wrote:
>> Please unblock package aptitude
>>
>> Includes non-intrusive changes for multi-arch support. Without the
>> first of these aptitude is effectively broken o
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 12:03 +0800, Daniel Hartwig wrote:
> Please unblock package aptitude
>
> Includes non-intrusive changes for multi-arch support. Without the
> first of these aptitude is effectively broken on multi-arch systems
> due to #672340. Changelog entry:
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #685195 [release.debian.org] unblock: aptitude/0.6.8-2
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
685195: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685195
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Control: merge 683753 -1
On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 15:13 +0800, YunQiang Su wrote:
> Please consider unblock ns3 to testing.
There's already a request for that - #683753; please check before filing
new ones.
> The current version of ns3 in unstable is uploaded before freeze,
> while blocked by FTBFS
Processing control commands:
> merge 683753 -1
Bug #683753 [release.debian.org] unblock: ns3/3.14.1+dfsg-1
Bug #685199 [release.debian.org] Freeze exception for ns3
Merged 683753 685199
--
683753: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683753
685199: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugr
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Please consider unblock ns3 to testing.
The current version of ns3 in unstable is uploaded before freeze,
while blocked by FTBFS on mipsel and mips due to lack of memory
on these two architectures.
I have asked ftp-master to deleted it from testing [bu
79 matches
Mail list logo
