On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 03:44:09AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> James McCoy (24/08/2012):
> > In case it's worth fixing that for Wheezy, I have a package I can
> > upload to testing. Attached is the debdiff.
> >
> > What do you think?
>
> I think I'd like to see this go through t-p-u indeed.
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 confirmed
Bug #685722 [release.debian.org] unblock (pre-approval): kamera/4:4.8.4-2
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
685722: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685722
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSU
Control: tag -1 confirmed
Hi,
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer (23/08/2012):
> There is a bug which causes that cameras that have a '/' in their names make
> the program crash (#685676). This upload just adds this patch to solve this
> problem.
>
> I'm attaching the debdiff, which is the pat
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 685456
Bug #685456 {Done: Cyril Brulebois } [release.debian.org]
Freeze exception for kde-gtk-config
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #685456 to the same values
previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
reopen 685456
thanks
Cyril Brulebois (26/08/2012):
> we would normally not accept new packages into testing, but that one
> seems a bit special. If I parse it properly, it was previously
> available in squeeze, from the src:gtk-qt-engine package, but it has
> now moved to a dedicated source packa
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2012 04:04:56 +0200
with message-id <20120826020456.gl19...@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#685456: Freeze exception for kde-gtk-config
has caused the Debian Bug report #685456,
regarding Freeze exception for kde-gtk-config
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2012 03:57:26 +0200
with message-id <20120826015726.gk19...@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#685411: unblock (pre-approval): k3b/2.0.2-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #685411,
regarding unblock (pre-approval): k3b/2.0.2-6
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2012 03:51:12 +0200
with message-id <20120826015112.gj19...@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#685860: unblock: geshi/1.0.8.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #685860,
regarding unblock: geshi/1.0.8.4-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Hi James,
James McCoy (24/08/2012):
> I recently uploaded a new upstream version of racket, completely
> forgetting that I meant to do a minor upload to fix #680685 (racket
> and planet-venus both ship a planet binary) first. The unstable
> upload does fix that bug, but the delta between the ver
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2012 03:28:22 +0200
with message-id <20120826012822.gh19...@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#685851: unblock: approx/5.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #685851,
regarding unblock: approx/5.3-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Hello,
Eugene V. Lyubimkin (25/08/2012):
> Hello Felix (and debian-release@, BCC'ed)
(cc'd this time, so that others see my reply.)
> On 2012-08-23 10:39, Felix Geyer wrote:
> > Source: htop
> > Version: 1.0.1-1
> > Severity: important
> >
> > htop doesn't export any build flags so it's built
Hi Tony,
tony mancill (24/08/2012):
> Please consider an unblock for package tomcat-native due to #685516.
> The current version in wheezy (1.1.23) is incompatible with the
> version of tomcat7-7.0.28 in wheezy.
that's the kind of things which would have been nice to have in the
changelog, we ha
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2012 02:56:07 +0200
with message-id <20120826005607.ge19...@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#685868: unblock: gccintro/1.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #685868,
regarding unblock: gccintro/1.0-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2012 02:53:47 +0200
with message-id <20120826005347.gd19...@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#685866: unblock: vzctl/3.0.30.2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #685866,
regarding unblock: vzctl/3.0.30.2-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2012 02:52:31 +0200
with message-id <20120826005231.gc19...@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#685862: unblock: pysurfer/0.3+git15-gae6cbb1-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #685862,
regarding unblock: pysurfer/0.3+git15-gae6cbb1-1.1
to be marked as done.
This mea
Marco d'Itri (25/08/2012):
> > 2. You want to compress only source with that, right?
> No... Unless somebody strongly feels that XZ binary packages are not
> yet acceptable for udev then I will fix this in the next upload.
As mentioned by Ansgar (who worked on xz compression in a lot of
packages)
Hi all,
Joey Hess (29/07/2012):
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> 3.12 contains no code changes, but several changes to task contents.
>
> Possibly the most important change is adding synaptic back to the gnom
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 12:05:45PM -0500, Rob Browning wrote:
> So now it looks like I need to upload two changes for emacs23 for
> wheezy: this change to remove the emacs binary package, and a CVE fix
> (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684695). So first
> question -- do you
On Aug 25, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> 1. This one appears twice:
> + * Moved 60-persistent-input.rules back from udev-gtk-udeb to udev-udeb.
> +(Closes: #666223)
>
> I suspect a copy/paste failure, since 50-udev-default.rules was moved
> to, but not mentioned in the changelog?
It appears twi
Niels Thykier (24/08/2012):
> On 2012-08-23 09:42, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > Still TBD:
> >
> >> > # not strictly needed, but should be harmless, and helps reduce the
> >> > # diff against testing:
> >> > unblock libbsd/0.4.2-1
> >> > unblock-udeb libbsd/0.4.2-1
> >> >
> >> > # KiBi-upload; big re
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package zoneminder
Zoneminder was removed from testing due to mootools briefly being removed from
testing (Bug #682265).
Zoneminder 1.25.0-1.1 was unblocked, but didn't ent
Hi all,
(for your information, no action required.)
thanks to Christian's efforts to upload (& communicate on) the last bits
staged in d-i's git repositories, here's another round of unblocks I've
added to my hints file. No self-upload here.
# 20120825
# upcoming d-i bet
Hi Marco,
reviewing udev's diff between testing and sid, I found those tiny things:
1. This one appears twice:
+ * Moved 60-persistent-input.rules back from udev-gtk-udeb to udev-udeb.
+(Closes: #666223)
I suspect a copy/paste failure, since 50-udev-default.rules was moved
to, but not ment
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear release managers,
We know we are in late, however... please consider the following
demand, which highly increases the quality of debian with respect to
these three packages packages.
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 tpu: cdbs/0.4.115+deb7u1
Bug #685287 [release.debian.org] unblock or tpu: cdbs/0.4.117
Changed Bug title to 'tpu: cdbs/0.4.115+deb7u1' from 'unblock or tpu:
cdbs/0.4.117'
--
685287: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685287
Debian Bug Trac
Control: retitle -1 tpu: cdbs/0.4.115+deb7u1
Cyril Brulebois writes:
> Julien Cristau (22/08/2012):
>> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 12:55:36 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
>> > I have attached both the current diff from unstable to testing and a
>> > diff of only the changes in 0.4.117. If you prefe
Ulli Horlacher writes:
> On Sat 2012-08-25 (16:34), Philipp Kern wrote:
>
>> Upstream could be petitioned to remove that clause... (I sort of understand
>> it,
>> too, but it's clearly against Debian's standards.)
>
> "Upstream" is me, the original author of F*EX.
> No, I will not remove the anti
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 3:56 AM, Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 22:52 +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
>> Please unblock ns3 as it was uploaded before freeze but blocked by an
>> already-fixed RC bug. Out-dated binaries were removed by ftp team, and
>> the false RC-bug has been marked as
Marco d'Itri (12/08/2012):
> sure, but can you clarify which event I need to wait for, so that I
> will not create any other unnecessary noise?
Need someone from -boot, and someone from -release, to ACK those
changes. Now that Julien has committed the needed bits in d-i's git
repository, and now
Julien Cristau writes:
> Really shouldn't use the emacs version as epoch. That's also not what
> gcc does.
Right -- not going to do that. I'm just going to use a sufficiently
large native version, i.e. 45.0.
So now it looks like I need to upload two changes for emacs23 for
wheezy: this change
On Sat 2012-08-25 (16:34), Philipp Kern wrote:
> Upstream could be petitioned to remove that clause... (I sort of understand
> it,
> too, but it's clearly against Debian's standards.)
"Upstream" is me, the original author of F*EX.
No, I will not remove the anti-military clause in the license.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package gccintro
Just typo-fixes and clarification of difference from upstream.
unblock gccintro/1.0-2
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unsta
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package im-config
This will fix
* http://bugs.debian.org/683950
* http://bugs.debian.org/300486
* Fundamental X initialization sequence/timing problem for the input
me
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package vzctl
The reason for the update is better information on how to download the
openvz kernel package.
unblock vzctl/3.0.30.2-3
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package pysurfer
It just adds a missing dependency, closing the #684754 RC-bug.
Regards
David
unblock pysurfer/0.3+git15-gae6cbb1-1.1
-- System Information:
Debian Releas
Joey Hess (25/08/2012):
> Please don't forget tasksel 3.12.
I know.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear release team,
please unblock package geshi
The upload fixes RC bug #685324, in addition to this change I added myself
to the Uploaders field because I intend to maintain this package
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 03:50:00PM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote:
> As I'm not seeing any chance of meeting DFSG criteria 5 and 6 with the above
> intention (which clearly is discriminating certain groups - even though
> personally I can perfectly well understand upstream's will on why this is)
> I'm
Hi Release Team,
I plan to take over of python-eventlet . It has a FTBFS bug[1] in Wheezy
due to the bug in python-greenlet [2]. It is fixed, but not migrated to
testing due to an other RC bug[3]. Tried to reach its maintainer, Örjan,
but no success yet. As he is MIA for two hundred days, I plan t
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> please find below a number of unblock/unblock-udeb requests I'm mostly
> OK with as far as d-i is concerned. I added some comments so that one
> can grasp what impact this or that change has; some of them are marked
> “KiBi-upload”s, basically due to some needed, tiny fix-u
Hi Philipp,
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 02:24:41AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 09:13:42PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > + YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO USE THIS SOFTWARE FOR MILITARY PURPOSES OR WITHIN
> > + MILITARY ORGANIZATIONS! THIS INCLUDES ALSO MILITARY RESEARCH AND
> > + E
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
thanks
Hi Release Team,
Previously cvs2svn tests were failing due to a subversion behavior
change. The fix is from upstream[1] SVN r5381 . The debdiff is attached.
Regards,
Laszlo
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 684355 unblock: autofs/5.0.6-3
Bug #684355 [release.debian.org] unblock: autofs/5.0.6-3 (pre-upload)
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: autofs/5.0.6-3' from 'unblock: autofs/5.0.6-3
(pre-upload)'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please con
retitle 684355 unblock: autofs/5.0.6-3
thanks
On 09.08.2012 09:39, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package autofs
>
> There are a few relatively small changes fixing some
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package approx.
Version 5.3-1 fixes important bug #685724, and requires only a
one-line fix (debdiff attached). Thanks for considering this.
unblock approx/5.3-1
-- System
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
I have uploaded psutils_1.17.dfsg-1, which removes some files with
unclear or inappropriate copyright. This closes RC bug #682908. No
changes were made that were not directly related to this fix.
I updated README.source and copyright to describe the
Please unblock package scim-anthy version 1.2.7-5
It has been reported to us that the configuration setup
for scim-anthy crashes for some users (bug 682601 and
680988). This is due to the recent transition in the
package from gtk2 to gtk3.
We've also included build-flag hardening in this upload
Hello Felix (and debian-release@, BCC'ed)
On 2012-08-23 10:39, Felix Geyer wrote:
> Source: htop
> Version: 1.0.1-1
> Severity: important
>
> htop doesn't export any build flags so it's built without
> optimizations, debugging symbols and hardening options.
Thank you for the report. The package
On 25.08.2012 12:52, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 00:26:01 +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: unblock
>>
>> Please unblock package qemu-kvm
>>
> Feel free to upload, and
Julien Cristau (22/08/2012):
> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 12:55:36 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> > I have attached both the current diff from unstable to testing and a
> > diff of only the changes in 0.4.117. If you prefer an upload to tpu
> > instead of unblocking the version currently in unstab
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 00:26:01 +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package qemu-kvm
>
Feel free to upload, and ping back once it has spent a few days in sid.
Thanks
Your message dated Sat, 25 Aug 2012 08:06:21 +0100
with message-id <1345878381.22919.39.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#685833: unblock: smokeping/2.6.8-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #685833,
regarding unblock: smokeping/2.6.8-1.1
to be marked as done.
This me
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed
Bug #685195 [release.debian.org] unblock: aptitude/0.6.8-2
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
Bug #685195 [release.debian.org] unblock: aptitude/0.6.8-2
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
685195: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685195
De
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed
On Sat, 2012-08-25 at 09:48 +0800, Daniel Hartwig wrote:
> On 18 August 2012 17:10, Daniel Hartwig wrote:
> > On 18 August 2012 16:48, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >> -2 doesn't appear to be in the archive yet?
> >
> > Wanted to get approval first, in case of ch
54 matches
Mail list logo
