Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Control: retitle -1 unblock: calibre/0.8.64+dfsg-1
On 2012-09-03 06:22, jimmy the saint wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package calibre
>
Hi,
> There is a bug
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #686547 [release.debian.org] unblock: calibre/0.8.51+dfsg-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> retitle -1 unblock: calibre/0.8.64+dfsg-1
Bug #686547 [release.debian.org] unblock: calibre/0.8.51+dfsg-1
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: calibre/0.8.64+dfsg-1' f
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package calibre
There is a bug in the currently used version, which was fixed in 0.8.52,
preventing the processing of .Lit files. Since .Lit is one of the most
commonly used
On 2012-09-02 15:27, Koichi Akabe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm sorry. The fixed patch is attached now.
> Please consider to accept it.
>
> Best regards,
> Koichi Akabe
>
> [...]
Hi,
The debdiff looks reasonable, feel free to go ahead. Please file an
unblock bug when it has been in unstable for a coup
i would like to comment on the issue
today i intent to play warzone2100 with a friend, he didn't had the
game so he downloaded the windows installer from the internet, he
downloaded 3.2-rc2 so i have to upgrade to experimental in order to
play with him.
what i'm trying to say is, upstream is offe
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
>> Adam D. Barratt schrieb:
>>> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>>>
>>> On Fri, 2012-07-13 at 13:03 +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
Please unblock libpng (wi
Hello, Debian Release Team!
Unfortunately maintainers for LXDE packages are too much busy this
summer (and still are busy) and I'm feel sad if old buggy software come
into Debian release as I still love debian. I hope you feel the same.
I'm talking about libfm and pcmanfm which entered
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #686533 [release.debian.org] RM: fparser/4.5-0.1 -- RoM; RC Buggy, no more
rdepends
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
686533: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686533
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with probl
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 18:13 -0400, Scott Howard wrote:
> Please remove fparser (source) from unstable. Binary packages are libfparser-
> dev, libfparser-4.3, libfparser-4.3-dbg.
Could you confirm where you're trying to get the package removed from?
You've filed the bug
Your message dated Sun, 02 Sep 2012 22:59:41 +0100
with message-id <1346623181.9978.4.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#686496: unblock: wesnoth-1.10/1:1.10.3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #686496,
regarding unblock: wesnoth-1.10/1:1.10.3-2
to be marked as done.
T
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Please remove fparser (source) from unstable. Binary packages are libfparser-
dev, libfparser-4.3, libfparser-4.3-dbg.
The Debian packages that depended on it now use the muparser library, and
f
On Sat, 2012-09-01 at 15:04 +0400, Alexander V. Kudrevatykh wrote:
> В Вск, 15/07/2012 в 22:34 -0400, Jon Bernard пишет:
> > * Alexander V. Kudrevatykh wrote:
> > > Any news? Bug is still present in testing/sid.
> >
> > I've not heard anything. I think the right thing to do is file a bug
> > ag
* Adam D. Barratt [2012-09-02 15:32:04 CEST]:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 13:11 +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > Please give your ACK for an upload that will cover only this change
> > (besides the changelog entry, obviously):
> >
> > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitwe
Your message dated Sun, 02 Sep 2012 21:29:09 +0100
with message-id <1346617749.9978.3.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#686501: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#686501: unblock:
xfwm4/4.8.3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #686501,
regarding unblock: xfwm4/4.8.3-2
to be marked a
Your message dated Sun, 02 Sep 2012 21:27:15 +0100
with message-id <1346617635.9978.2.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#686520: unblock: ruby-sinatra/1.3.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #686520,
regarding unblock: ruby-sinatra/1.3.2-2
to be marked as done.
This me
Your message dated Sun, 02 Sep 2012 21:23:01 +0100
with message-id <1346617381.9978.0.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#681396: unblock slbackup-php
has caused the Debian Bug report #681396,
regarding unblock slbackup-php
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> owner 686526 pkg-xfce-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Bug #686526 [release.debian.org] unblock: lightdm/1.2.2-4
Owner recorded as pkg-xfce-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
-
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi release team,
once again, this is a pre-upload approval request. The upload would fix
two dependency bugs (#679538 and #684714) which are not really grave (or
don't really affect Wheezy)
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 unblock: libquvi-scripts/0.4.8-2
Bug #686514 [release.debian.org] unblock: libquvi-scripts/0.4.8-1 (from
experimental)
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: libquvi-scripts/0.4.8-2' from 'unblock:
libquvi-scripts/0.4.8-1 (from experimental)'
--
686514: http:/
Control: retitle -1 unblock: libquvi-scripts/0.4.8-2
"Adam D. Barratt" writes:
> On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 16:43 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
>> I would like to include the version of libquvi-scripts currently in
>> experimental in wheezy. It includes various fixes to continue being
>> able to scra
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
Please unblock package ruby-sinatra
The upload fixes #683496 (missing dep on ruby-rack-protection), and the
fix is the addition of that package as a dependency.
unblock ruby-sinatra/1
Your message dated Sun, 02 Sep 2012 16:33:09 +0100
with message-id <1346599989.25118.34.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#685155: unblock: apt/0.9.7.4
has caused the Debian Bug report #685155,
regarding unblock: apt/0.9.7.4
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #686514 [release.debian.org] unblock: libquvi-scripts/0.4.8-1 (from
experimental)
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
686514: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686514
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with probl
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 16:43 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> I would like to include the version of libquvi-scripts currently in
> experimental in wheezy. It includes various fixes to continue being
> able to scrap information from video sites.
>
> There are however a
On dim., 2012-09-02 at 15:03 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> A version with just the patch would be cleaner, but it looks like the
> package is already using dh9 so the build-dep change is arguably a
> no-op; please go ahead and let us know once the package has been
> accepted.
Done, with only th
On Sat, 2012-09-01 at 23:54 +0200, Yann Leboulanger wrote:
> A new Gajim release fixes some bugs in the current 0.15 release.
>
> A list of fixed bugs is here: [0]
>
> 4 debian bugs are also closed, including an important one:
> [1], [2], [3], [4].
>
> I prepared a package for this bug-fix only
Dear release team,
I wondered if it's possible to escalate this bug somehow, on the basis
that the wheezy kfreebsd installer is broken until this package update
is unblocked. See for example:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677704#59
I think getting the kfreebsd installer w
Processing control commands:
> block 686500 by -1
Bug #686500 [release.debian.org] RM: jscoverage/0.3.1-1
686500 was not blocked by any bugs.
686500 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 686500: 686507
--
686500: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686500
686507: http:
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #686501 [release.debian.org] unblock: xfwm4/4.8.3-2
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
686501: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686501
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 15:13 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> this is a pre-upload unblock request for xfwm4. It seems that Gtk3
> applications might trigger a bad behavior in xfwm, where the window
> might “jump” widely on the screen in some cases.
>
> There's an ups
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 13:11 +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> Please give your ACK for an upload that will cover only this change
> (besides the changelog entry, obviously):
>
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-games/wesnoth.git;a=commitdiff;h=9f59ef
That change
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #686496 [release.debian.org] unblock: wesnoth-1.10/1:1.10.3-2
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
686496: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686496
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRI
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package ruby-compass
The version just uploaded to unstable fixes RC bug #680846.
A git diff between the version in testing and this version is attached.
unblock ruby-compas
Hi,
I'm sorry. The fixed patch is attached now.
Please consider to accept it.
Best regards,
Koichi Akabe
2012/8/31 Koichi Akabe
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 14:48:16 +0200
> Niels Thykier wrote:
>
> >
> > I am afraid I will have to ask you to at least drop the debhelper compat
> > change.
>
I'm not aware of any alternative for javascript coverage packaged in
debian. So if possible I would like to keep it in unstable.
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #686500 [release.debian.org] RM: jscoverage/0.3.1-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
686500: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686500
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 08:29 -0400, David Prévot wrote:
> As recently (re)discussed with the maintainer, please, remove jscoverage
> from testing (and stable), that will fix two RC-bugs (#579227 and
> #684850). Quote from #579227:
jscoverage has a reverse-build-dependen
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> owner 686501 pkg-xfce-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Bug #686501 [release.debian.org] unblock: xfwm4/4.8.3-2
Owner recorded as pkg-xfce-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
this is a pre-upload unblock request for xfwm4. It seems that Gtk3
applications might trigger a bad behavior in xfwm, where the window
might “jump” widely on the screen in some cases.
On 22.08.2012 21:01, Michael Biebl wrote:
> I'd like to upload a fix for #655972 [1] to stable, which fixes
> CVE-2012-2736.
friendly ping
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digita
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 686497 by 683376
Bug #686497 [openttd] New Upstream Version 1.2.2
686497 was not blocked by any bugs.
686497 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 686497: 683376
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: Johan Euphrosine
As recently (re)discussed with the maintainer, please, remove jscoverage
from testing (and stable), that will fix two RC-bugs (#579227 and
#684850). Quote from #57
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package wesnoth-1.10
Please give your ACK for an upload that will cover only this change
(besides the changelog entry, obviously):
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-g
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package libreoffice
Removes non-free RFCs from unused zlib copy and fixes up a build-dep
(the real fix back then would have been to use python3.pc imho but it's
probably not
Your message dated Sun, 02 Sep 2012 11:12:53 +0100
with message-id <1346580773.25118.16.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#686488: unblock: daptup/0.12.5.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #686488,
regarding unblock: daptup/0.12.5.1
to be marked as done.
This means that
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hello,
Please unblock the package daptup which fixes a serious issue (details
in debian/changelog).
Full debdiff attached.
unblock daptup/0.12.5.1
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
On 2012-09-02 10:00, Tom Bombadil wrote:
> To whom it may concern,
>
Hi,
I have CC'ed to maintainers of calibre.
> The current version of Calibre - 0.8.51 - has a significant regression
> which prevents it from processing .Lit files, which is one of the most
> common ebook format. Since Calibr
Your message dated Sun, 02 Sep 2012 10:10:41 +0200
with message-id <50431481.8060...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#686477: unblock: glm/0.9.3.3+dfsg-0.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #686477,
regarding unblock: glm/0.9.3.3+dfsg-0.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
48 matches
Mail list logo
