Your message dated Tue, 02 Oct 2012 08:16:31 +0200
with message-id <506a86bf.1030...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#689386: unblock: moodle/2.2.3.dfsg-2.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #689386,
regarding unblock: moodle/2.2.3.dfsg-2.3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package moodle
This version fixes the security bug #687924 and the following CVEs:
CVE-2012-4400
CVE-2012-4401
CVE-2012-4402
CVE-2012-4407
CVE-2012-4408
This is the changel
Hello,
>> I should've done this earlier, but better late than never, right?
>
> Not really. There are time limits and they passed quite a long time ago
> now...after a considerable period of notice of the time limits
> themselves...
In the end, it was still good, because now I understand a bit mor
Hi,
I have uploaded the new version containing the fix for the new RC bug
previously mentioned to svn, and asked for upload to t-p-u to my
sponsor[1].
About the bug and the fix, the problem was that /etc/dotlrn/config.tcl
was being modified by debconf on the install and, as it's marked as a
conff
On Mon, 1 Oct 2012 17:39:08 -0400
Albert Huang wrote:
> I should've done this earlier, but better late than never, right?
Not really. There are time limits and they passed quite a long time ago
now...after a considerable period of notice of the time limits
themselves...
> (I was under the impre
On 2012-10-01 23:19, Arthur de Jong wrote:
> We recently discussed the status of Trac for wheezy [0] and would like
> to try to get Trac 0.12.4 into wheezy (it currently has 0.12.3-1).
I fully support this with testing, reviewing, uploading...
Whatever is necessary.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Your message dated Mon, 01 Oct 2012 22:56:11 +0100
with message-id <1349128571.4463.8.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#689358: unblock: libcanberra/0.28-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #689358,
regarding unblock: libcanberra/0.28-5
to be marked as done.
This means
Hello,
I should've done this earlier, but better late than never, right?
(I was under the impression that the packages must enter unstable
before considering any wheezy/testing exceptions.)
I would like to ask for a freeze exception for the following packages:
* libticonv
* libticables
* li
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hello,
Please unblock package qt-at-spi
unblock qt-at-spi/0.3.1-2
This adds the multi-arch declaration, so that users can install a 32bit
bridge for accessing 32bit applications on 64bit
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hello,
Please unblock package at-spi2-atk
unblock at-spi2-atk/2.5.3-2
Upstream has fixed a lot of reference leaks (which would translate into
memory leaks in applications, including long-
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hello,
Please unblock package at-spi2-core
unblock at-spi2-core/2.5.3-2
As Bug#663027 shows, the at-spi2-core package does not play well with
old versions of gdm: it freezes on keyboard t
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
Please unblock package libcanberra
* debian/watch: Switch to .xz tarballs
All the GNOME releated packages are generating .xz tarballs, update the
URL to watch them.
* Move canberra-g
Hi release team!
We recently discussed the status of Trac for wheezy [0] and would like
to try to get Trac 0.12.4 into wheezy (it currently has 0.12.3-1).
Trac 0.12.4 is a LTS release and should only get fixes for serious
issues and receives security support. It is probably easier to support
0.12
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu mksh_40.9.20120630-3 . armhf . -m "Rebuild against fixed klibc"
maximilian attems dixit:
>On Sun, 30 Sep 2012, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
[…]
>> and without busybox, and rebuilding mksh on
Processing changes file: tiff_3.9.4-5+squeeze5_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: tiff_3.9.4-5+squeeze5_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: tiff_3.9.4-5+squeeze5_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: tiff_3.9.4-5+squeeze5_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes fi
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package klibc
Has 3 fixes for armhf RC bug, plus security fix for dash
and a fix for x86 cross building.
See the diff:
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
inde
Control: tags 683323 - moreinfo
On Mon, 2012-10-01 at 12:23 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 06:36:03PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> >
> > > tags 683323 + moreinfo
> > Bug #683323 [release.debian.org] un
Your message dated Mon, 01 Oct 2012 19:34:35 +0100
with message-id <1349116475.4463.4.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#689316: unblock: prosody/0.8.2-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #689316,
regarding unblock: prosody/0.8.2-4
to be marked as done.
This means that y
Your message dated Mon, 01 Oct 2012 19:33:26 +0100
with message-id <1349116406.4463.3.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#689345: unblock: moodle/2.2.3.dfsg-2.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #689345,
regarding unblock: moodle/2.2.3.dfsg-2.3
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Mon, 01 Oct 2012 19:32:37 +0100
with message-id <1349116357.4463.2.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#689344: unblock: gnugk/2:3.0.2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #689344,
regarding unblock: gnugk/2:3.0.2-3
to be marked as done.
This means that y
Dmitry Smirnov schrieb:
> --nextPart3575724.xime2j9Qld
> Content-Type: Text/Plain;
> charset="windows-1251"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 06:07:18 Julien Cristau wrote:
>> At this point my preference would go towards removing zabbix from
>> wheezy. The ne
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package moodle
It fixes multiple security issues.
unblock moodle/2.2.3.dfsg-2.3
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500,
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package gnugk
It fixes CVE-2012-3534.
unblock gnugk/2:3.0.2-3
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Archi
On Mon, 01 Oct 2012 10:36:01 +0200 Niels Thykier wrote:
[...]
> Unblocked, thanks.
Thanks to you for processing my request so promptly!
Rest assured that this is very appreciated.
Bye.
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt
New GnuPG key, see the transition document!
Your message dated Mon, 01 Oct 2012 18:39:29 +0200
with message-id <5069c741.7020...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#689251: unblock: alpine/2.02+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #689251,
regarding unblock: alpine/2.02+dfsg-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Your message dated Mon, 01 Oct 2012 18:42:29 +0200
with message-id <5069c7f5.7040...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#688576: unblock: software-center/5.1.2debian2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #688576,
regarding unblock: software-center/5.1.2debian2.1
to be marked as done.
This means tha
On 10/01/2012 05:19 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
I don't quite understand why syslinux-themes-debian should have heavy
changes because of live-build.
first, because live-build expects the theme packages to be structured in
a certain way. syslinux-themes-debian has not been updated yet to
reflect t
Hi,
On 01/10/2012 16:00, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
it's rather pointless to unblock syslinux-themes-debian at the
moment, it needs heavy changes to be updated for live-build until
the end of the week anyway.
I don't quite understand why syslinux-themes-debian should have heavy
changes
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package prosody
This version fixes #681667 : Broken initscript (won't stop prosody)
The debdiff is pretty trivial: the init script starts prosody using
the Lua interpreter c
Your message dated Mon, 01 Oct 2012 15:57:24 +0200
with message-id <5069a144.2010...@progress-technologies.net>
and subject line Re: unblock: syslinux-themes-debian/12-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #688485,
regarding unblock: syslinux-themes-debian/12-1.1
to be marked as done.
This means th
Hi David,
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 09:08:30 -0400, David Prévot wrote:
> Please unblock package mathematica-fonts, it fixes an important issue
> via unstable (#686260: allow for translation of all user-visible
> messages), with a review of all descriptions, update most existing
> translations (includi
Hi,
On Samstag, 29. September 2012, Bertrand Marc wrote:
> Would you consider to give gnunet 0.9.3-4 a freeze exception ?
>
> This version is not yet uploaded to unstable, my sponsor is waiting for
> your approval.
fwiw, the diff looks good to me, but as there as some not 100%
straightforwards
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 06:36:03PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
>
> > tags 683323 + moreinfo
> Bug #683323 [release.debian.org] unblock: python-apt/0.8.7
> Bug #684450 [release.debian.org] unblock: python-apt/0.8.7
> Added tag(s) morei
Hi!
> this is a quick update on what's going on with your package in NEW.
>
> We're holding it due to a library transition which would affect some
> reverse
> dependencies. As Wheezy is frozen, Release Team asked us to refrain from
> processing packages which introduce unplanned transitions, as th
Hi!
>> Please review midgard2-core for inclusion in squeeze.
>
> I'm assuming you mean wheezy?
Of course wheezy :)
>> Package contains only one RC bug:
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677795
>
> and hopefully "fixes one RC bug" :-)
It's worth mentioning that lintian (-i -I -
On 01/10/2012 10:11, Gergely Nagy wrote:
Olivier Bonvalet writes:
Also, since ads are often the main funding source of a website, I
think blocking ads is a «politic» choice which can't be the default
behavior.
You are right, this is a political choice. I don’t think Debian should
endorse the
Hi David,
thanks a lot for the NMU and the associated unblock request, while I
was away :)
Cheers,
--Seb
On Sep/29, David Prévot wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package minbif
>
> It
Your message dated Mon, 01 Oct 2012 10:36:01 +0200
with message-id <506955f1.3070...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#689204: unblock: apt-listbugs/0.1.8
has caused the Debian Bug report #689204,
regarding unblock: apt-listbugs/0.1.8
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Your message dated Mon, 01 Oct 2012 10:26:09 +0200
with message-id <506953a1.9050...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#689292: unblock: tinyproxy/1.8.3-3 (security issue)
has caused the Debian Bug report #689292,
regarding unblock: tinyproxy/1.8.3-3 (security issue)
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Mon, 01 Oct 2012 10:28:23 +0200
with message-id <50695427.7040...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#689218: unblock: mathematica-fonts/16
has caused the Debian Bug report #689218,
regarding unblock: mathematica-fonts/16
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Olivier Bonvalet writes:
>>> Also, since ads are often the main funding source of a website, I
>>> think blocking ads is a «politic» choice which can't be the default
>>> behavior.
>>
>> You are right, this is a political choice. I don’t think Debian should
>> endorse the web being run by advert
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 09:39:50 +0200, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
> Hi Julien,
> could you please explain why you would remove hylafax from wheezy (I am
> probably missing something here)? Isn't the package currently in testing
> good enough? All RC bugs have been already solved. If you think it is
>
Hi Julien,
could you please explain why you would remove hylafax from wheezy (I am
probably missing something here)? Isn't the package currently in testing
good enough? All RC bugs have been already solved. If you think it is
compulsory to fix these bugs on the wheezy version, than I may prepare
an
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
Please unblock package tinyproxy. It fixes a denial of service.
unblock tinyproxy/1.8.3-3
Thanks,
Thijs
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear Release Team,
I have applied upstream patches for CVE-2012-445{6,7} (yes, yet another
CVE in keystone...), and fixed bad handling of /etc/keystone/keystone.conf.
The later modification
45 matches
Mail list logo
