On 2012-11-16 04:10, Drew Parsons wrote:
> Hi Release Team,
>
Hi,
> zangband 1:2.7.5pre1-5 fixes RC bug #688259.
>
Unfortunately, it also bumps the debhelper compat from 5 -> 9, which is
not something we are willing to accept during the freeze.
> I believe I need to request manual interventio
Quoting Roger Leigh (rle...@debian.org):
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package sysvinit
>
> The attached debdiff includes a correction to the init script
> dependencies for the three bootclean
Hi,
hmm, the patches look ok, especially the DEP-3 headers are useful.
However, the debdiff seems to be for squeeze and not for wheezy? Are in
fact both squeeze and wheezy affected by the bugs? If yes, we need two
uploads.
-Timo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.
Hi Release Team,
zangband 1:2.7.5pre1-5 fixes RC bug #688259.
I believe I need to request manual intervention to unblock it so it can
reach testing and wheezy.
Thanks,
Drew
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On 16.11.2012 01:48, Michael Biebl wrote:
> On 15.11.2012 23:32, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: unblock
>>
>> Please unblock package sysvinit
>>
>> The attached debdiff includes a correction to the i
Debdiffs attached, release team cc'd.
Sorry for the delay. Had some urgent important interruptions to deal with.
As far as I know, I do not have any upload rights, so I believe this is
as far as I can go without assistance. My usual accomplice is busy until
next week some time, so if the patches
On 15.11.2012 23:32, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package sysvinit
>
> The attached debdiff includes a correction to the init script
> dependencies for the three bootclean
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package bind9
1) a rebase bind9 for wheezy to 9.8.4 will make security maintenance a
lot easier going forward. To properly fix bugs - some security and
basic functionaliy, u
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 12:17:58 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> [ Re-sent because the original mail seems to have hit the size limit. ]
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to upload the attached bind9 security fix provided by
> Moritz Mühlenhoff to t-p-u (CVE-2012-4244). Can I proceed?
>
> bind9 in sid is a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 690655 with 690656
Bug #690655 [release.debian.org] RM: openvas2 [wheezy] -- RoM;
abandoned-upstream
690655 was not blocked by any bugs.
690655 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 690655: 690656
> thanks
Stopping processing
Your message dated Thu, 15 Nov 2012 20:08:00 +
with message-id <1353010080.547.13.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#693166: unblock:
kpart-webkit/1.3~git20120518.9a111005-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #693166,
regarding unblock: webkitkde/1.3~git20120518.9a111
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 08:27:29PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
[...]
> My opinion is you can wait more than a couple days.
Anyway, I've learnt today that it has been discovered another security
issue which will lead to another CVE soon, hence I suggest to wait until
this one will be fixed in uns
Your message dated Thu, 15 Nov 2012 19:54:41 +
with message-id <1353009281.547.10.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#693349: unblock: flashplugin-nonfree/1:3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #693349,
regarding unblock: flashplugin-nonfree/1:3.1
to be marked as done
On Thu, 2012-11-15 at 12:21 +0100, Thomas Lange wrote:
> dracut 020-2 fixes the important bug #685004. Please unblock it.
>
> It also includes the security fix for CVE-2012-4453 (Closes:
> #688956). This was already fixed in 020-1.1, but his version did not
> went into testing because 020-2 was up
Your message dated Thu, 15 Nov 2012 20:34:43 +0100
with message-id <20121115193443.gy17...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#693272: unblock: pyatspi/2.5.3+dfsg-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #693272,
regarding unblock: pyatspi/2.5.3+dfsg-2.1
to be marked as done.
This means that y
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #693351 [release.debian.org] RM: kismet/2008-05-R1-4.3
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
693351: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=693351
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 19:39:35 +0200, Bob Bib wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: rm
>
> Hi release team,
> please remove kismet/2008-05-R1-4.3 package from testing, because it's too
> outda
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 693087 -1 -2 -3
Bug #693087 [libpam-rsa] segfault in xscreensaver, screen revealed
Bug 693087 cloned as bugs 693358-693360
> reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Bug #693358 [libpam-rsa] segfault in xscreensaver, screen revealed
Bug reassigned from pa
clone 693087 -1 -2 -3
reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
user ftp.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags -1 rm
retitle -1 RM: pam-rsa -- RoST; unmaintained, buggy and dangerous
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
reassign -2 release.debian.org
usertags -2 rm
retitle -2 RM: pam-rsa -- RoST; unmaint
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:17:08 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2012-11-15 09:20, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Andreas,
> >
> > could you please
> >
> > [ ] agree
> > [ ] disagree
> >
> > to the suggestion to lower the priority of this bug. I would like to
> > deal with this as quick as p
Your message dated Thu, 15 Nov 2012 20:30:00 +0100
with message-id <20121115193000.gx17...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#693271: unblock: lbzip2/2.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #693271,
regarding unblock: lbzip2/2.2-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 08:59:07 +0100, Emmanuel Bouthenot wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 02:01:13PM +0100, Emmanuel Bouthenot wrote:
> [...]
>
> > I'd like to get your approval about the upload of weechat 0.3.8-2wheezy1
> > to testing-proposed-updates in order to fix a security issue which cou
Your message dated Thu, 15 Nov 2012 20:24:56 +0100
with message-id <20121115192456.gv17...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#683323: unblock: python-apt/0.8.7
has caused the Debian Bug report #683323,
regarding unblock: python-apt/0.8.8
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Your message dated Thu, 15 Nov 2012 20:24:56 +0100
with message-id <20121115192456.gv17...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#683323: unblock: python-apt/0.8.7
has caused the Debian Bug report #683323,
regarding unblock: python-apt/0.8.8
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
On Thu, 2012-11-15 at 08:59 +0100, Emmanuel Bouthenot wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 02:01:13PM +0100, Emmanuel Bouthenot wrote:
> > I'd like to get your approval about the upload of weechat 0.3.8-2wheezy1
> > to testing-proposed-updates in order to fix a security issue which could
> > permit to
I think the best course of action is to contact debian-release team
and ask for an exception (e.g. in Cc:).
Unless we get upstream to change the license (which is unlikely), it's
too late in release cycle for any radical change (like stripping the
json out completely).
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 7:0
I've missed a DebDiff, sorry.
flashplugin-nonfree_3.1.diff.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hi release team,
please remove kismet/2008-05-R1-4.3 package from testing, because it's too
outdated (the latest upstream version is Kismet-2011-03-R2) and unmaintained
(the 2008-05-R1-4.3 versio
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package flashplugin-nonfree.
In general, an updated version of this helper package has better handling of
the upstream non-free Adobe Flash Player.
debdiff is attached.
u
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package lyskom-server
I've taken over this package and fixed the RC bug #689898 that caused it to be
removed
from testing, as well as cleaned up a few other relatively impor
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 18:00:36 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> Hi Mohammed, Thorsten, et al,
>>
>> I am looking to upload version 5.1.1alpha+20120614-2 of xz-utils
>> to unstable. The package can be found on alioth.debian.org:
>>
>> -
>> http://alioth.debian.org/~jrnie
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 11:30:04 -0800, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> Please unblock git/1:1.7.10.4-2 to get fixes to
>>
>> #678137 -- incompatibility with SVN 1.7
>>
>> and
>>
>> #587650 -- "Byte order is not compatible at ../../lib/Storable.pm"
>> errors when
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:04:08PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:36:28AM +, Michael Vogt wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 09:28:00PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2012-10-28 at 16:36 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > > A quick note first, as I
On 11/14/2012 06:12 PM, intrigeri wrote:
> Michael Shuler wrote (11 Nov 2012 20:59:10 GMT) :
>> In parsing certdata.txt for the ca-certificates package, neither of
>> these flags are used when the CA trust database is created, so both
>> CKT_NSS_MUST_VERIFY_TRUST and CKT_NSS_TRUST_UNKNOWN flags are
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:42:54AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
[...]
> Certainly, do you have a rough idea of how long you will need?
Before the end of the month, probably earlier but I will be glad to not
have to work under time pressure.
Regards,
M.
--
Emmanuel Bouthenot
mail: kolter@{ope
At Sun, 11 Nov 2012 18:36:14 +0100,
Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 09:28:28 +1100, Mark Purcell wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 7 Nov 2012 00:32:36 Paul Chitescu wrote:
> > > > unblock yate/4.1.0-1~dfsg-3
> > > >
> > > > [...]
> > >
> > > Does this require any more action?
> >
> > Hi Pa
On 15.11.2012 00:12, intrigeri wrote:
In any case, this is starting to look like a pre-approval request
more
than a unblock one, since the actual package to unblock has not been
uploaded yet. So, I guess it might be dealt with slightly faster if
the bug against release.d.o was formally put into
dracut 020-2 fixes the important bug #685004. Please unblock it.
It also includes the security fix for CVE-2012-4453 (Closes:
#688956). This was already fixed in 020-1.1, but his version did not
went into testing because 020-2 was upload before.
--
regards Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
Hi,
Michael Shuler wrote (11 Nov 2012 20:59:10 GMT) :
> In parsing certdata.txt for the ca-certificates package, neither of
> these flags are used when the CA trust database is created, so both
> CKT_NSS_MUST_VERIFY_TRUST and CKT_NSS_TRUST_UNKNOWN flags are
> ignored. This is why I indicated these
Hi,
Simon Kelley wrote (12 Nov 2012 21:05:35 GMT) :
> I'd strongly suggest moving to 2.63-4, rather than backporting.
> The changes for the security fix are not trivial, and probablity of
> introducing a bug backporting is much larger that the probablity
> that there's an un-found bug in 2.63 whic
Adam, I do not see any reason to unblock the freeze on minidjvu for
this issue.
But if you want to, and don't want the revamped autotools stuff, feel
free to just take 0.8.svn.2010.05.06+dfsg-0.1 and push it to
proposed-updates or whatever the procedure is.
Justification for
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:17:08AM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2012-11-15 09:20, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Andreas,
> >
> > could you please
> >
> > [ ] agree
> > [ ] disagree
> >
> > to the suggestion to lower the priority of this bug. I would like to
> > deal with this as quic
On 2012-11-15 00:15, Emmanuel Bouthenot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:02:10PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> [...]
>
>> Should you need a bit more time than given, please do not hesitate to
>> contact us. It is also easier for us if we can avoid having to
>> reintroduce a removed pa
On 2012-11-15 09:20, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Andreas,
>
> could you please
>
> [ ] agree
> [ ] disagree
>
> to the suggestion to lower the priority of this bug. I would like to
> deal with this as quick as possible but I would like to hear your opinion
> about the action that should be done.
Hi,
minidjvu (0.8.svn.2010.05.06+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* support multiarch
* ack silly NMU (silly because the waf file was unused, and because
there is a difference between "sourceless" and "source in odd
format")
* revamp autotools and engage automake for robustness
On Wed, 14 Nov 2012, Niels Thykier wrote:
> * The package had at least one RC bug without activity for the past
>14 days.
> Jonathan Wiltshire
>mediawiki-math (U)
>
> Mediawiki Maintenance Team
>mediawiki-math
Hey Jonathan,
will you take care of this? Otherwise I’ll have to
see
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Horizon had its /etc/openstack-dashboard/local_settings.py
world readable. This file contains passwords, so that isn't
good. My latest upload to SID fixes this.
Please unblock package horiz
47 matches
Mail list logo
