On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 08:01:25PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 19:31:40 +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote:
Can I do the upload to t-p-u (via a sponsor)?
Go ahead.
Uploaded.
Cheers,
Ivo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package im-config
Applications started by dbus do not get proper keyboard input for CJK
locales as reported in http://bugs.debian.org/694446. The proper
functioning input
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 09:31:26 +, Alan Woodland wrote:
On 7 November 2012 11:15, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
Hi Alan,
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 17:56:32 +0100, Alan Woodland wrote:
There's a bug outstanding for dropping the Recommends to Suggests on
the kernel
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 23:04:07 -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
+if [ $1 = triggered ]; then
+if [ -x /etc/init.d/dovecot ]; then
+if [ -x /usr/sbin/invoke-rc.d ]; then
+invoke-rc.d dovecot start
+else
+/etc/init.d/dovecot start
+fi
+
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 07:30:16 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
+cairo-dock (3.0.0-3) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Add dpkg-dev (= 1.16.1~) to Build-Depends.
+ * Enable hardening.
I'd prefer if the above items were left out.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: jmilli...@gmail.com
Please unblock package haskell-dbus
The version currently in testing, 0.10, has two bugs which can cause problems
for users who run processes with
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 21:29:30 +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
This is a relatively big debdiff, but most of the
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 11:46:33 +, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hello release team,
please unblock package ettercap.
A new upstream version 0.7.5 of ettercap (a network
Your message dated Sun, 2 Dec 2012 11:32:32 +0100
with message-id 20121202103232.gg5...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#694859: t-p-u pre-approval fossil/1.22.1+dfsg-0.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #694859,
regarding t-p-u pre-approval fossil/1.22.1+dfsg-0.1
to be marked as done.
On 01/12/12 11:40, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:02:00 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
unanimous feedback from users and the Games Team was that they
would prefer an are you sure? prompt when auto-downloading was
enabled.
Is the rest of the user interface generally
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 10:43:35 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
On 01/12/12 11:40, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:02:00 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
unanimous feedback from users and the Games Team was that they
would prefer an are you sure? prompt when auto-downloading was
Your message dated Sun, 2 Dec 2012 12:52:29 +0100
with message-id 20121202115229.gj5...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#691639: unblock: lxde-metapackages/4
has caused the Debian Bug report #691639,
regarding unblock: lxde-metapackages/4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sun, 2 Dec 2012 12:53:05 +0100
with message-id 20121202115305.gk5...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#694327: unblock: javamorph/0.0.20100201-1.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #694327,
regarding unblock: javamorph/0.0.20100201-1.2
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Sun, 2 Dec 2012 12:54:46 +0100
with message-id 20121202115446.gl5...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#694656: unblock: update-notifier/0.99.3debian11
has caused the Debian Bug report #694656,
regarding unblock: update-notifier/0.99.3debian11
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Sun, 2 Dec 2012 13:10:40 +0100
with message-id 20121202121040.gm5...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#690458: RM: blcr/0.8.2-15 testing
has caused the Debian Bug report #690458,
regarding RM: blcr/0.8.2-15 testing
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 21:55:25 +0100, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
diff -Nru aephea-10.008/debian/control aephea-10.008/debian/control
--- aephea-10.008/debian/control2011-04-27 07:40:21.0 +0200
+++ aephea-10.008/debian/control2012-11-26 10:12:59.0 +0100
@@
Dear release-team,
please, consider a granting a wheezy-ignore tag for bugs
#617613 (freecad) and #618968 (netgen).
Both bugs are license issues, which are, seems to be fixed,
but not in Wheezy. It is impossible to make a new uploads now
to correctly close those bugs.
Thanks,
Anton
--
To
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Hi,
please unblock openbox. The version in unstable contains a minor change fixing
an RC bug which causes installations/upgrades to fail (#694396).
unblock: openbox/3.5.0-6
Kind
Your message dated Sun, 2 Dec 2012 15:11:10 +0100
with message-id 20121202141110.go5...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#694935: unblock: openbox/3.5.0-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #694935,
regarding unblock: openbox/3.5.0-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sun, 2 Dec 2012 15:25:58 +0100
with message-id 20121202142558.gf5...@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org
and subject line Re: Bug#680076: unblock: fonts-sil-padauk/2.80-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #680076,
regarding unblock: fonts-sil-padauk/2.80-1
to be marked as done.
This
Package: bcrypt
Version: 1.1-8
Previously a request was submitted to have bcrypt removed from testing
(#694093). Work has since been completed by DD Michael Stapelberg to
address the two RC bugs that were the motivation behind removal. I would
therefore request that the bcrypt package be included
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello Julien,
Thank you for your answer. Does it mean I should prepare a new version
with the following changes :
Le 25/11/2012 20:17, Julien Cristau a écrit :
+ * Revert the use dh_installdocs --link-doc (Closes: #687875,
#687881, +
Please feel free to ignore this, but there were a few bugfixes in
lockfile-progs 0.1.17 (just uploaded to sid) that I thought might make
it appropriate for consideration for wheezy:
1) No longer (unintentionally) includes .git* in the source package.
2) Fixes cross-build problem. (Closes:
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Anton Gladky wrote:
Dear release-team,
please, consider a granting a wheezy-ignore tag for bugs
#617613 (freecad) and #618968 (netgen).
Both bugs are license issues, which are, seems to be fixed,
but not in Wheezy. It is impossible to make a new uploads now
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Tobias Hansen wrote:
Can this bug be tagged wheezy-ignore? From the bug report:
Please submit a release.debian.org bug report to better track this request.
Thanks,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
The package in wheezy contains incorrect (outdated) information w.r.t.
to support for legacy hardware (as it was written before AMD released
the beta driver) and is therefore misleading the users on upgrades.
There are also some (partial) upgrade issues with the 32-bit stuff on amd64
Could
On Sat, 1 Dec 2012 12:13:06 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 21:50:17 +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
Control: retitle -1 unblock: nut/2.6.4-2.1
Upon request of Arnaud Quette, I have uploaded a NMU of nut
versioned 2.6.4-2.1, which fixes RC bug #677054. The change
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear release-team,
please, consider a granting a wheezy-ignore tag for bugs
#617613 (freecad) and #618968 (netgen).
Both bugs are license issues, which are, seems to be fixed,
but not in Wheezy. It is
On 2012-12-02 21:37, Michael Gilbert wrote:
The package in wheezy contains incorrect (outdated) information w.r.t.
to support for legacy hardware (as it was written before AMD released
the beta driver) and is therefore misleading the users on upgrades.
There are also some (partial) upgrade
Ok, thanks, Michael, for the hint! #694975
Cheers,
Anton
2012/12/2 Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org:
Please submit a release.debian.org bug report to better track your request.
Best wishes,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Your message dated Sun, 02 Dec 2012 22:13:25 +
with message-id 1354486405.15448.2.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#694559: unblock (RFS): apt-build/0.12.44
has caused the Debian Bug report #694559,
regarding unblock (RFS): apt-build/0.12.44
to be marked as done.
31 matches
Mail list logo
