Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package proofgeneral
the new version fixes RC bug #694285 and corrects some wrong
information in README.Debian.
debdiff
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 695082 normal
Bug #695082 [release.debian.org] unblock: redmine/1.4.4+dfsg1-1.1
Severity set to 'normal' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
695082: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 07:10:11PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> [rt maintainers added to CC]
>
> On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 07:17 +0100, Tom Jampen wrote:
> > On 20.11.2012 19:56, Tom Jampen wrote:
> > >> On Thu, 2012-11-15 at 10:05 +0100, Tom Jampen wrote:
> > >>> An rt-authen-externalauth maintain
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
please unblock gimp 2.8.2-2. It fixes CVE-2012-5576
Cheers,
Moritz
unblock gimp/2.8.2-2
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package axis
Thanks to Alberto Fernández Martínez
CVE-2012-5784 (=bug #692650) was fixed and I just sponsered
his NMU. Debdiff is attached.
unblock axis/1.4-16.1
-- Syste
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package commons-httpclient
Thanks to Alberto Fernández Martínez
CVE-2012-5783 (= bug #692442) was closed and I just uploaded
his NMU. Debdiff is attached to the bug report.
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 10:55:56AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> As far as I can tell this escapeHTML function is not defined in the
> current version? Upstream git has it in core/js/js.js.
Attached is a new candidate debdiff.
Cheers,
Michael
diff -Nru owncloud-4.0.4debian2/debian/change
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 10:55:56AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 23:45:19 +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
>
> > +Index: owncloud-4.0.4debian2/apps/files/js/filelist.js
> > +===
> > +--- owncloud-4.0.4debian2.
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed
Bug #695109 [release.debian.org] unblock: xarchiver/1:0.5.2+20090319+dfsg-4.1
(pre-approval)
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
Bug #695109 [release.debian.org] unblock: xarchiver/1:0.5.2+20090319+dfsg-4.1
(pre-approval)
Added tag(s) confirmed.
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed
On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 17:11 +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> On Tue, 04. Dec 14:25 "Adam D. Barratt" wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 11:34 +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> > > Optional: I could also fix two minor/documentation bugs, #656301 and
> > > #692261.
[rt maintainers added to CC]
On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 07:17 +0100, Tom Jampen wrote:
> On 20.11.2012 19:56, Tom Jampen wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2012-11-15 at 10:05 +0100, Tom Jampen wrote:
> >>> An rt-authen-externalauth maintainer pointed out that apache2 needs to
> >>> be restarted after clearing the ca
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 17:05:26 +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
> On 12/05/2012 04:34 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 15:17:11 +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
> >> On 12/05/2012 03:11 PM, Roland Stigge wrote:
> >>> But don't worry - it's just a minor change and at least fixes the is
Your message dated Wed, 5 Dec 2012 19:38:36 +0100
with message-id <20121205183836.GB21676@nebkha>
and subject line Please Remove fs2ram from testing
has caused the Debian Bug report #691742,
regarding unblock: fs2ram/0.3.12
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
On 12/05/2012 04:34 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 15:17:11 +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
>> On 12/05/2012 03:11 PM, Roland Stigge wrote:
>>> But don't worry - it's just a minor change and at least fixes the issue
>>> for the protocol. ;-) So others won't be disturbed by it durin
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 15:17:11 +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
> On 12/05/2012 03:11 PM, Roland Stigge wrote:
> > But don't worry - it's just a minor change and at least fixes the issue
> > for the protocol. ;-) So others won't be disturbed by it during bug
> > squashing.
>
> So please consider sbu
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Christian Welzel wrote:
>> 2) What action is being taken to resolve the unbuildability of the
>> AS1 SWFs?
>
> Nothing. There is simply no open source AS1 compiler.
There is makeswf from libming-utils but it doesn't appear to be able
to compile debian/contrib/flvp
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Christian Welzel wrote:
>
>>> 2) What action is being taken to resolve the unbuildability of the
>>> AS1 SWFs?
>>
>> Nothing. There is simply no open source AS1 compiler.
>
> mtasc has been in Debian for years:
>
>
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Christian Welzel wrote:
>> 2) What action is being taken to resolve the unbuildability of the
>> AS1 SWFs?
>
> Nothing. There is simply no open source AS1 compiler.
mtasc has been in Debian for years:
http://packages.debian.org/sid/mtasc
--
bye,
pabs
http://wi
Am 05.12.2012 13:07, schrieb Neil McGovern:
> Can someone explain: 1) Why there were no updates to the bug
> between December 2010 and June 2012?
The bug could not be resolved, so i didnt see any reason to update it.
Work was going on in the background to fix this (libjs-swfobject,
libjs-swfuploa
On 12/05/2012 03:25 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 03:17:11PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
>> On 12/05/2012 03:11 PM, Roland Stigge wrote:
>>> But don't worry - it's just a minor change and at least fixes the issue
>>> for the protocol. ;-) So others won't be disturbed by it during
On 12/05/2012 03:11 PM, Roland Stigge wrote:
> But don't worry - it's just a minor change and at least fixes the issue
> for the protocol. ;-) So others won't be disturbed by it during bug
> squashing.
So please consider sbuild 0.63.2-1.1 for wheezy (freeze exemption).
(Maybe Roger will override t
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 03:17:11PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
> On 12/05/2012 03:11 PM, Roland Stigge wrote:
> > But don't worry - it's just a minor change and at least fixes the issue
> > for the protocol. ;-) So others won't be disturbed by it during bug
> > squashing.
>
> So please consider sb
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> What's causing the ABI change? Is it due to using a different fso-specs
> version than the one which was used to generate current libfso-glib?
Correct.
> That would mean that we're not only not building from source, but we're
> also not ac
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 20:19:42 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
>
> Please add a wheezy-ignore tag for #693577, rationale:
>
> Fixing this will change the ABI, resulting in a transition.
>
> It will require upstream work to fix properly.
>
> The packag
Your message dated Wed, 5 Dec 2012 13:45:51 +0100
with message-id <20121205124551.GC26998@mobee>
and subject line Re: Bug#695198: pu: package bogofilter/1.2.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #695198,
regarding pu: package bogofilter/1.2.2-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #695198 [release.debian.org] pu: package bogofilter/1.2.2-2
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
695198: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695198
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On 05.12.2012 11:27, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
Please pre-approve an upload to stable-security to update bogofilter
for
http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2012-5468
If you really mean stable-security then you need to be talking to the
security team...
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Please add a wheezy-ignore tag for #693577, rationale:
Fixing this will change the ABI, resulting in a transition.
It will require upstream work to fix properly.
The package still builds fine.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signatu
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 08:01:58PM +0100, Tobias Hansen wrote:
> the discussion in RC bug #591969 ended with a call for a wheezy-ignore
> tag. The bug was also tagged squeeze-ignore. What does the release team say?
>
In general, I'm fairly loathed to add a *second* release ignore tag.
Can someon
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: serious
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu security
Hi,
Please pre-approve an upload to stable-security to update bogofilter for
http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2012-5468
Here's the diff against the package in squeeze (w
Your message dated Wed, 5 Dec 2012 11:26:15 +0100
with message-id <20121205102615.gn5...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#694304: unblock: exim4/4.80-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #694304,
regarding unblock: exim4/4.80-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Your message dated Wed, 5 Dec 2012 11:22:34 +0100
with message-id <20121205102234.gm5...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#694830: unblock: kde-workspace/4:4.8.4-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #694830,
regarding unblock (pre-approval): kde-workspace/4:4.8.4-5
to be marked as done.
Th
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 695174 + moreinfo
Bug #695174 [release.debian.org] t-p-u pre-approval owncloud/4.0.4debian2-3.1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
695174: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 23:45:19 +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> +Index: owncloud-4.0.4debian2/apps/files/js/filelist.js
> +===
> +--- owncloud-4.0.4debian2.orig/apps/files/js/filelist.js 2012-12-04
> 22:47:26.810080751 +0100
> +++
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 20:09:38 +0100, Pino Toscano wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to upload akonadi 1.7.2-2.
> The only change is a fix in the provided README.Debian, to actuall
35 matches
Mail list logo
