On 2012-11-28 00:12, Adrian Knoth wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
[...]
TIA
unblock jackd2/1.9.8~dfsg.4+20120529git007cdc37-5
[...]
Hi,
There is a build failure on kfreebsd-amd64 stalling the
On 2012-12-02 13:23, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 21:55:25 +0100, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
diff -Nru aephea-10.008/debian/control aephea-10.008/debian/control
--- aephea-10.008/debian/control2011-04-27 07:40:21.0 +0200
+++ aephea-10.008/debian/control
On 2012-12-08 17:10, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package python-mock
This upload resolved RC bug #694296, python-mock-doc: missing
Breaks+Replaces: python-mock
Your message dated Sun, 09 Dec 2012 11:15:25 +0100
with message-id 50c464bd.5030...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: Bug#695488: unblock: python-mock/0.8.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #695488,
regarding unblock: python-mock/0.8.0-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Dear release team,
I prepared a new revision on gnunet and uploaded it to mentors.
You'll find attached the full debdiff to the last unblocked revision
(0.9.3-3). Here is the detail of the changes, with the answers to Julien:
Le 25/11/2012 20:17, Julien Cristau a écrit :
+ * Revert the use
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 689154 unblock: gnunet/0.9.3-3wheezy1
Bug #689154 [release.debian.org] unblock: gnunet/0.9.3-4
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: gnunet/0.9.3-3wheezy1' from 'unblock:
gnunet/0.9.3-4'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 10:37:36PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
I am a bit concerned about the suid drop from an upgrade PoV. I would
expect a NEWS entry or so to inform people of the change just in case
they were relying on the suid.
Possibly.
Alternatively if the code-base is as dead as
Dear release team managers,
by now the minimal version of the package libpam-ssh has been uploaded since 21
days,
and an upstream version of the package meant for the experimental distribution
is currently
investigated by the sponsor.
As reported in #685614 and #664177, libpam-ssh is
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 15:46:00 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
mummy also produces the mummy binary, so would need a sourceful upload
to drop the -cil package. It has a libunwind dependency so would also
need a tpu due to the libunwind8 mess. :-( For added fun, the package is
in sync between
On Sun, 2012-12-09 at 12:24 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 15:46:00 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
mummy also produces the mummy binary, so would need a sourceful upload
to drop the -cil package. It has a libunwind dependency so would also
need a tpu due to the
Processing control commands:
tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #694452 [release.debian.org] unblock: gjs/1.32.0-3
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
694452: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694452
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 2012-11-26 15:31, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package gjs for an API extension that is necessary for a
RC bugfix in gnome-documents.
gjs
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 691988 unblock: libpam-ssh/1.92-15
Bug #691988 [release.debian.org] pre-approve unblock: libpam-ssh/1.92-15
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: libpam-ssh/1.92-15' from 'pre-approve unblock:
libpam-ssh/1.92-15'
thanks
Stopping processing
Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net (24/11/2012):
Ack from release, now just waiting for d-i approval.
d-i ack. Sorry for the lag…
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net (24/11/2012):
Ack from release, now just waiting for d-i approval.
Interesting output in 'd'…
Anyway, d-i ack, with apologies for the delay.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Your message dated Sun, 09 Dec 2012 13:24:29 +0100
with message-id 50c482fd.7070...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: Bug#694109: Make that kfreebsd-9_9.0-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #694109,
regarding unblock: kfreebsd-9/9.0-10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sun, 09 Dec 2012 13:24:44 +0100
with message-id 50c4830c.6010...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: Bug#694108: unblock: kfreebsd-8/8.3-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #694108,
regarding unblock: kfreebsd-8/8.3-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (29/11/2012):
Unblocked, but needs the predictable d-i ack; thanks.
d-i ack, sorry for the delay.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (01/12/2012):
Unblocked; thanks. Needs a d-i ack, so CCing KiBi.
d-i ack, and sorry for the delay.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Julien,
Am 26.11.2012 13:35, schrieb Julien Cristau:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:26:28 +0100, Micha Lenk wrote:
Hi Adam,
On 11/25/2012 09:41 PM CEST +02:00, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 21:52 +0100, Micha Lenk wrote:
This release fixes Debian bug #688831, symlinks in
Your message dated Sun, 9 Dec 2012 15:08:44 +0100
with message-id 20121209140844.gs5...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#694094: unblock: libaqbanking/5.0.24-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #694094,
regarding unblock: libaqbanking/5.0.24-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Hi,
I intend to fix #694052 [0], what do you think about it?
[0] http://bugs.debian.org/694052
This is the patch:
-Conflicts: magpierss (= 0.72-5)
-Replaces: magpierss (= 0.72-5)
+Conflicts: magpierss ( 0.72-6)
+Replaces: magpierss ( 0.72-6)
Cheers,
--
Marcelo Jorge Vieira
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 14:14:46 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
On Sat 08 Dec 2012 10:59:44 Julien Cristau escribió:
Why are libqt4-dbus and qdbus separate packages in the first place?
libqt4-dbus used to ship both the library and qdbus, an application. As part
of the
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
Control: retitle -1 unblock: nss-pam-ldapd/0.8.10-4
On Sat, 2012-12-08 at 15:17 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 23:05:06 +0200, Arthur de Jong wrote:
+@@ -97,39 +85,27 @@ static inline void tio_tv_prepare(struct
+ deadline-tv_usec=0;
+
Processing control commands:
tag -1 - moreinfo
Bug #691640 [release.debian.org] unblock: nss-pam-ldapd/0.8.10-3
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
retitle -1 unblock: nss-pam-ldapd/0.8.10-4
Bug #691640 [release.debian.org] unblock: nss-pam-ldapd/0.8.10-3
Changed Bug title to 'unblock:
Your message dated Sun, 9 Dec 2012 16:21:26 +0100
with message-id 20121209152126.gu5...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#691640: unblock: nss-pam-ldapd/0.8.10-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #691640,
regarding unblock: nss-pam-ldapd/0.8.10-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you
On Sun 09 Dec 2012 11:59:22 Julien Cristau escribió:
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 14:14:46 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
On Sat 08 Dec 2012 10:59:44 Julien Cristau escribió:
Why are libqt4-dbus and qdbus separate packages in the first place?
libqt4-dbus used to ship both
On Sun, December 9, 2012 16:10, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
On Sun, December 9, 2012 13:11, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Thank you Dominic for keeping updated. Security team, attached is the
proposed debdiff for the libcgi-pm-perl part.
Yes, please upload this to security master.
I did a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
for what it's worth, I'm currently acting as a sponsor for Jérôme. He
seems clearly interested in maintaining this package on the long run.
I am currently reviewing an upload targeted at experimental which is
of good quality.
Kind regards,
On Sun, 2012-12-09 at 17:03 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Sun, December 9, 2012 16:10, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
I did a grave mistake and the upload landed on ftp-master. Shortly
after I noticed my mistake I tried to cancel but it was to late, and
it's now on stable-new.
[...]
I'm
On 09/12/12 09:26, Niels Thykier wrote:
On 2012-11-28 00:12, Adrian Knoth wrote:
[...]
unblock jackd2/1.9.8~dfsg.4+20120529git007cdc37-5
[...]
There is a build failure on kfreebsd-amd64 stalling the migration to
testing. Could you please have a look at it and look at solving it
(even if
Your message dated Sun, 09 Dec 2012 16:20:07 +
with message-id 1355070007.19225.41.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#694826: unblock: s390-tools/1.16.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #694826,
regarding unblock: s390-tools/1.16.0-2
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Sun, 09 Dec 2012 16:22:34 +
with message-id 1355070154.19225.42.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#694745: unblock: xorg-server/2:1.12.4-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #694745,
regarding unblock: xorg-server/2:1.12.4-4
to be marked as done.
Processing changes file: libcgi-pm-perl_3.49-1squeeze2_amd64.changes
REJECT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1thjyu-00061o...@franck.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 695174 - moreinfo
Bug #695174 [release.debian.org] t-p-u pre-approval owncloud/4.0.4debian2-3.1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
695174:
On Sat, 2012-10-27 at 16:57 +0200, Hector Romojaro wrote:
I have fixed the postinst permission issue, the postrm aolserver call
and now the local config modifications are authoritative and debconf
values are overwritten with them at the beginning of the config script.
debdiff between testing
Processing changes file: iceweasel_3.5.16-20_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: iceweasel_3.5.16-20_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: iceweasel_3.5.16-20_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: iceweasel_3.5.16-20_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package guile-g-wrap
I just applied the patch of #694272 which seemed straightforward and
uploaded to DELAYED/3. The maintainer did not insisted and thus I
assume the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package gri
I just applied the patch of #694275 which seemed straightforward and
uploaded to DELAYED/3. The maintainer did not insisted and thus I
assume the package is
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 681016 + confirmed
Bug #681016 [release.debian.org] unblock: dotlrn/2.5.0+dfsg-6+wheezy2
Added tag(s) confirmed.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
681016:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 681016 tpu: dotlrn/2.5.0+dfsg-6+wheezy3
Bug #681016 [release.debian.org] unblock: dotlrn/2.5.0+dfsg-6+wheezy2
Changed Bug title to 'tpu: dotlrn/2.5.0+dfsg-6+wheezy3' from 'unblock:
dotlrn/2.5.0+dfsg-6+wheezy2'
End of message, stopping
Hi Scott,
First, a disclaimer: I'm not a python expert or a member of the
release team, so please take anything I say with a grain of salt.
This review is mostly meant to help get this unstuck.
Scott Kitterman wrote:
- Match the version number for python and python2.7.3. Although this is
Your message dated Sun, 09 Dec 2012 20:59:26 +
with message-id 1355086766.19225.46.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#695521: unblock: gri/2.12.23-2.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #695521,
regarding unblock: gri/2.12.23-2.2
to be marked as done.
This means that
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org writes:
On 09/12/12 09:26, Niels Thykier wrote:
On 2012-11-28 00:12, Adrian Knoth wrote:
[...]
unblock jackd2/1.9.8~dfsg.4+20120529git007cdc37-5
[...]
There is a build failure on kfreebsd-amd64 stalling the migration to
testing. Could you please have a
[Jonathan Nieder, 2012-12-09]
[...]
--- python-defaults-2.7.3~rc2/debian/pyversions.py 2012-06-05
22:58:56.0 -0400
+++ python-defaults-2.7.3/debian/pyversions.py 2012-07-26
18:26:10.0 -0400
@@ -110,7 +110,8 @@
else:
return _unsupported_versions
(Release team: please see the end of this message in particular...)
intrigeri intrig...@debian.org writes:
I removed a bit of the dust accumulated on my elisp skills and
reviewed the proposed changes. They look sane.
(Disclaimer: I'm not a release team member.)
I've tested the proposed
On Sun, 2012-12-09 at 12:51 -0200, Marcelo Jorge Vieira wrote:
I intend to fix #694052 [0], what do you think about it?
[...]
-Conflicts: magpierss (= 0.72-5)
-Replaces: magpierss (= 0.72-5)
+Conflicts: magpierss ( 0.72-6)
+Replaces: magpierss ( 0.72-6)
That sounds okay, but please file a pu
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 10:23:10AM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 08:24:51PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 12:53:08PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 12:39:28AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
Please unblock package schroot
I
Your message dated Mon, 10 Dec 2012 08:13:49 +0100
with message-id 50c58bad.6070...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: Bug#695520: unblock: guile-g-wrap/1.9.14-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #695520,
regarding unblock: guile-g-wrap/1.9.14-1.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
49 matches
Mail list logo
