Hi Julien
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 18:51:52 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>
>> Anyway I'll wait until mono properly enter testing and then -as Niels
>> explained- will fix both testing+unstable
>>
> Nope, having a fixed gdcm is a blocker f
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock 1:2.1.7-7 when it becomes eligible for testing. It fixes
the following RC bugs:
#696817 - I have removed the code that modified peoples configuration
files altogether.
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 10:50:40PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > 0.3.1-2.3
> > > seems to add /usr/share/dpkg/buildflags.mk to debian/rules, with no
> > > build-dependency, which is not the same thing as "compile with -O2 on
> > > mipsel". Why?
> >
> > That was an overlook on my side, I shou
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 18:51:52 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Anyway I'll wait until mono properly enter testing and then -as Niels
> explained- will fix both testing+unstable
>
Nope, having a fixed gdcm is a blocker for mono's migration to testing,
please fix this ASAP in sid and testing (o
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 21:47:29 +, Javi Merino wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 11:21:54AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > Are the debdiffs for the various NMUs in the BTS somewhere?
>
> I've attached them to this email.
>
Thanks.
> > 0.3.1-2.3
> > seems to add /usr/share/dpkg/buildflags.
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 11:21:54AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 16:30:04 +, Javi Merino wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 01:45:44PM +, Javi Merino wrote:
> > > Hi Laszlo,
> > >
> > > On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 22:50:40 +, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> > > > On Wed
I hereby add my voice to the number of people concerned at the state of
Ekiga in Debian. If 4.0 doesn't get unblocked to be shipped in wheezy,
we are going to be releasing a *very* buggy version to the world.
Whereas Ekiga hasn't always shined by its stability, within a few
minutes of using it, I
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 03:31:33PM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Dominic Hargreaves wrote (02 Feb 2013 13:19:21 GMT) :
> > As the release team aren't too happy about the size of the 0.9 debdiff,
> > what do you think about my suggestion - are these the right commits
> > to fix the RC bugs in q
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 15:53:28 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Jan Wagner writes:
>
> > okay ... the question is now: How should we fix the issue in wheezy?
>
> > Should we update nagios-snmp-plugins with the proposed changes or will
> > this going to be fixed anyhow?
>
> The change to nagios-s
See below for a problem that has come up on the freedombox list.
It seems that this bug should have been marked at least serious and
probably RC all along. This is quite an important package to have
working as it enables a lot of other stuff. And there is already a fix
available. However that fix
Hi,
Philipp Kern writes:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 03:40:51PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>> [s390 removed]
>
> re-added.
>
>> It built on parry. The .upload file says:
>>
>> wouter@parry:/home/buildd/upload$ cat iceape_2.7.12-1_powerpc.upload
>> u iceape-dbg_2.7.12-1_powerpc.deb ftp-master.d
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 03:40:51PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> [s390 removed]
re-added.
> It built on parry. The .upload file says:
>
> wouter@parry:/home/buildd/upload$ cat iceape_2.7.12-1_powerpc.upload
> u iceape-dbg_2.7.12-1_powerpc.deb ftp-master.debian.org Sat Jan 19 13:58:00
>
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 10:06:15PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-02-03 at 22:48 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > Please unblock package iceape. It fixes the last Mozilla security
> > round.
>
> Julien unblocked this a while ago, but it's not migrated due to missing
> builds on a
Hi,
Josselin Mouette wrote (02 Jan 2013 20:28:32 GMT) :
> Please unblock gnome-menus to work around a bug in menu-xdg that still
> fills the GNOME menus with Debian entries.
I don't feel competent to review the diff, so a way I found to help
was to run the proposed version for a week. I did not
Hi Daniel,
On Sonntag, 3. Februar 2013, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> > I'm going to re-upload testing's version with an epoch to unbreak
> > everything.
> if you disagree with the maintainer, please follow the proper way
> (CTTE), thanks.
I believe the CTTE also wants to get wheezy released, and I don
Am 03.02.2013 22:55, schrieb Moritz Mühlenhoff:
Patrick, what's the status?
Cheers,
Moritz
I already pinged upstream about the open questions.
--
/*
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
Patrick Matthäi
GNU/Linux Debian Developer
Blog: http://www.linux-dev.org/
E-Mail: pm
I will. Thanks.
// Ola
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 10:56:05PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 10:31:06PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: "Adam D. Barratt"
> > > To: Ola Lundqvist , 699...@bugs.debian.org
> > > Sent: ons, 30 jan
On 02/04/2013 08:40 AM, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> On 02/03/2013 10:53 PM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
>> On 02/03/2013 10:44 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>>> Now please explain how exactly syslinux-themes-debian is involved
>>> here.
>>
>> it's a bug in your config, you need more files present on the m
18 matches
Mail list logo
