Hi,
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 03:14:15PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>
> Thanks - it would help to ping this bug when it uploaded too please.
Hereby pinging the bug, package uploaded, debdiff attached to this mail.
> I'm sure you realised but s/uploads/updates/ in your quoted mail
> above (o
On Wed 2013-03-27 15:46:59 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Fri 2013-03-15 01:08:00 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>
>> Ugh, this is a bad result, but i don't think the bug is in 0.8.1 -- the
>> crashing bug is in the earlier version (0.8-2), and one of the changes
>> in 0.8.1 is to impro
Hi,
On 05/04/13 14:37, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
>> CHECK_THIS_BEFORE_UPLOAD.txt
>
> looked suspicious.
>
> (I went looking to see what suite the changelog targetted as the original diff
> to -release was UNRELEASED. The package on mentors is unstable.)
Yeah, Elena's upload on mentors.d.o, match
Your message dated Fri, 5 Apr 2013 23:20:41 +0100
with message-id <20130405222041.gk11...@ernie.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#704772: tpu: libdr-tarantool-perl/0.15-1+deb70u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #704772,
regarding tpu: libdr-tarantool-perl/0.15-1+deb70u1
to be marked
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 08:53:26PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Control: tag -1 confirmed
>
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 06:29:29PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: tpu
> >
> > H
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 09:12:31PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > Well, my rationale is this: I assume that the input to those function calls
> > could be untrustworty, and there is no substitution going on anyway, so
> > changing them to fputs prevents naive future arguments being added
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 08:45:45PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 09:27:39PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Hi Jonathan,
> >
> > that's a 50:50 vote from release team. ;-)
> >
> > Just tell me your final decision and I'll follow.
>
> Well, my rationale is this: I ass
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 confirmed
Bug #704772 [release.debian.org] tpu: libdr-tarantool-perl/0.15-1+deb70u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
704772: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=704772
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSU
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 06:29:29PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: tpu
>
> Hi,
>
> I've prepared an NMU to tpu for #704267, an arch-specific FTBFS.
> Patch attac
Your message dated Fri, 5 Apr 2013 20:48:49 +0100
with message-id <20130405194849.gc19...@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#704730: unblock: evolution/3.4.4-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #704730,
regarding unblock: evolution/3.4.4-3
to be marked as done.
This means that y
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 09:27:39PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> that's a 50:50 vote from release team. ;-)
>
> Just tell me your final decision and I'll follow.
Well, my rationale is this: I assume that the input to those function calls
could be untrustworty, and there is no su
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 07:12:39PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> One remaining question: What about
>
>
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debian-science/packages/scotch.git;a=blob;f=debian/patches/format-security.patch
>
> Should I include this or not? Otherwise I can confirm that I sep
Hi Jonathan,
that's a 50:50 vote from release team. ;-)
Just tell me your final decision and I'll follow.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 09:13:17PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> Le 2013-04-05 19:12, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> >
> >http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debian
Le 2013-04-05 19:12, Andreas Tille a écrit :
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debian-science/packages/scotch.git;a=blob;f=debian/patches/format-security.patch
Should I include this or not?
not.
Otherwise I can confirm that I
separated
the bug-fix-only part
Hi Dominic,
just some suggestions:
Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> + * Work around test failure triggered by a bug in tarantool
> +(Closes: #704267)
[...]
> ++local $TODO = 'This triggers
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/tarantool/+bug/1018775 on i386';
Maybe refering to http:/
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 07:36:09PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > Additionally, it marks the package as MA: foreign. SVN also had two
> > old commits that add a missing pre-dependency on dpkg, and remove
> > redundant dirs from debian/alsa-base.dirs. If these two old commits
> > are unacceptable,
(disclaimer: I am not part of the release team).
On 05-04-13 06:50, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> Additionally, it marks the package as MA: foreign. SVN also had two
> old commits that add a missing pre-dependency on dpkg, and remove
> redundant dirs from debian/alsa-base.dirs. If these two old commits
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: tpu
Hi,
I've prepared an NMU to tpu for #704267, an arch-specific FTBFS.
Patch attached.
May I upload this?
Thanks,
Dominic.
--
Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/
PGP key 5178E
Package: libarchive
Version: 3.0.1b-1
Severity: serious
Note: this bug report is a continuation of discussions in the unblock
bug for libarchive (
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=704080 ).
my personal guess is that there's probably nothing s390x-specific to it,
it's probably br
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 04:53:54PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> patches/06_fix_mbox_to_maildir_conversion.patch | 1384
>
> patches/series |1
> 3 files changed, 1393 insertions(+)
>
> Eugh :-( though I did not look at it in de
Hi
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 03:14:15PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> >>No, we won't add hardening at this stage.
> >
> >OK, so if I do not hear anything from Christophe if he wants to
> >prepare
> >the tpu upload I will do so at latest next Monday (hopefully
> >earlier).
> >
> >Thanks for your
On 2013-04-05 at 14:35:29 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> What's "CHECK_THIS_BEFORE_UPLOAD.txt"?
It's the content of the Description field in PKG-INFO;
it was already this way in the original package and I didn't
change it because it wasn't related to the bug fix.
(and one of the reason why,
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 18:28:20 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> I am sorry for the inconveniences, I will fix the package immediately.
>
Don't, it's already taken care of.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 04/05/2013 06:28 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
I am sorry for the inconveniences, I will fix the package immediately.
Ah, you already did a binNMU to fix the issue. So, I'll just have to fix
my pbuilder.
Thanks!
Cheers,
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian
Hello Julien, hello Andreas!
On 04/05/2013 06:02 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 16:15:39 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu pidgin-latex_1.5.0-1 . amd64 . -m "Rebuild
Those are not dynamic libraries, but plugins with undefined symbols
which gets resolved at runtime. I guess upstream wants to be able to
resolve tcl symbols once the interpreter is loaded.
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 15:55:24 +0200, Mathieu Mala
Your message dated Fri, 5 Apr 2013 18:02:46 +0200
with message-id <20130405160246.gb5...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#704756: nmu: pidgin-latex_1.5.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #704756,
regarding nmu: pidgin-latex_1.5.0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 15:55:24 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> nmu volview_3.4-3 . ALL . -m "volview does not start because of a missing
> symbol"
>
> I'd appreciate if you c
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #704730 [release.debian.org] unblock: evolution/3.4.4-3
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
704730: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=704730
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 07:01:08AM +0200, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> A few days ago I uploaded a new evolution package including a backport of
> a fix for mail migration that would potentially hit many of our squeeze
> users.
changelog |
Hi Christo, hi Arnaud
Cc'in the Release Team list and Vincent.
haproxy appeared on the 'radar' for the wheezy release due to
CVE-2012-2942 (#674447) and CVE-2013-1912 (#704611) and it looks like
haproxy was behind by some minor releases on current 1.4.23 for the
stable series.
Upstream also comm
On 2013-04-04 20:40, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 07:43:11PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 08:33:00 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I have no idea how hard the handling of testing-proposed-uploads
might
> be for the release team. So I could imagine an
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu pidgin-latex_1.5.0-1 . amd64 . -m "Rebuild in a clean sid environment."
Once again a package built in experimental or Ubuntu was uploaded to
Debian:
pidgin-latex/amd64 unsatisfiable Dep
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 698698 by 704755
Bug #698698 [volview] volview does not start because of a missing symbol
698698 was not blocked by any bugs.
698698 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 698698: 704755
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Pleas
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu volview_3.4-3 . ALL . -m "volview does not start because of a missing
symbol"
I'd appreciate if you could binNMU volview on all arch. For some reason
something really wrong happen on v
On 2013-04-05 13:02, Elena ``of Valhalla'' wrote:
On 2013-04-05 at 11:55:17 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
I think this was the upload, still on mentors.d.o though:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/pyrrd
That's the upload, request for sponsorship is at #702864; I didn't
ping mentors@d.o aft
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 11:55:17AM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> I think this was the upload, still on mentors.d.o though:
> http://mentors.debian.net/package/pyrrd
I know this is not -mentors, but
> CHECK_THIS_BEFORE_UPLOAD.txt
looked suspicious.
(I went looking to see what suite the ch
Hi Elena,
On 05/04/13 13:02, Elena ``of Valhalla'' wrote:
> That's the upload, request for sponsorship is at #702864; I didn't
> ping mentors@d.o after a couple weeks because in the meanwhile the
> new freeze rules came into being.
I'm not familiar with the process for that, but is that filed p
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # maintainer advice
> close 702933
Bug #702933 {Done: Alexander Zangerl } [release.debian.org]
unblock: duplicity/0.6.20-3
Bug 702933 is already marked as done; not doing anything.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 08:57:51PM +0200, Antos Andras wrote:
> I hope the fixed 3.6.2 version gets in testing or stable soon.
testing? Yes, when I upload it (well, 4.x most probably) after wheezy
release.
stable? For sure with jessie in ~3 years...
(but I might *try* to get the fix[1] into a sta
On 2013-04-05 at 11:55:17 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> I think this was the upload, still on mentors.d.o though:
> http://mentors.debian.net/package/pyrrd
That's the upload, request for sponsorship is at #702864; I didn't
ping mentors@d.o after a couple weeks because in the meanwhile the
n
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 12:18:46PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 03:21:43AM +0100, peter green wrote:
> > Specifically it seems that s390x has not successfully built this
> > package for some time (since before s390x stopped being considered a
> > "broken and fucked"
Hi,
On 04/04/13 20:51, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 21:31 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 12:45:16PM +0100, Elena Grandi wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> It fixes important bug #691230 by backporting a small patch from the
>>> upstream repository; of course there
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 11:15:57AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 10:01:03 +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
>
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: binnmu
> >
> > Hi this is requested to s
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 03:21:43 +0100, peter green wrote:
> Thoughts? should I go file a rc bug about this issue?
>
Yes.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 03:21:43AM +0100, peter green wrote:
> Specifically it seems that s390x has not successfully built this
> package for some time (since before s390x stopped being considered a
> "broken and fucked" architecture). As a result the s390x package is
> out of date in both tes
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 10:01:03 +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> Hi this is requested to solve #704484 that prevents mod_tls working due to
> strict checking against open
Your message dated Fri, 5 Apr 2013 11:14:09 +0200
with message-id <20130405091409.gk5...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#704735: nmu: proftpd-dfsg_1.3.4a-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #704735,
regarding nmu: proftpd-dfsg_1.3.4a-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 10:01:03AM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> Hi this is requested to solve #704484 that prevents mod_tls working due to
> strict checking against ope
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hi this is requested to solve #704484 that prevents mod_tls working due to
strict checking against openssl version.
nmu proftpd-dfsg_1.3.4a-4 . ALL . -m "rebuild to force linking with the cu
50 matches
Mail list logo
