Bug#698381: marked as done (unblock: ifupdown/0.7.8)

2013-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 Apr 2013 07:50:32 +0100 with message-id <1366008632.5232.9.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org> and subject line Re: Bug#698381: unblock: ifupdown/0.7.8 has caused the Debian Bug report #698381, regarding unblock: ifupdown/0.7.8 to be marked as done. This means that you

Processed: Bug#698381: unblock: ifupdown/0.7.8

2013-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reopen -1 Bug #698381 {Done: Julien Cristau } [release.debian.org] unblock: ifupdown/0.7.7 Bug reopened Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #698381 to the same values previously set > retitle -1 unblock: ifupdown/0.7.8 Bug #698381 [release.debian.org] u

Bug#698381: unblock: ifupdown/0.7.8

2013-04-14 Thread Andrew Shadura
Control: reopen -1 Control: retitle -1 unblock: ifupdown/0.7.8 Hello, Please unblock ifupdown 0.7.8. This fixes an annoying segfault with vlans on ifdown. -- WBR, Andrew ifupdown_0.7.7..0.7.8.dsc.diff Description: Binary data

Re: Bug#704748: Not a practical issue (could even be considered a feature...:-))

2013-04-14 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Steven Chamberlain (ste...@pyro.eu.org): > On 14/04/13 11:03, Christian PERRIER wrote: > > As a consequence, having the desktop-gnome task broken on kFreeBSD > > because of the dependency on n-m-gnome can be considered as non > > release critical... > > Just for the record, I'm not happy a

Re: Bug#704748: Not a practical issue (could even be considered a feature...:-))

2013-04-14 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 14.04.2013 20:56, schrieb Steven Chamberlain: > On 14/04/13 11:03, Christian PERRIER wrote: >> As a consequence, having the desktop-gnome task broken on kFreeBSD >> because of the dependency on n-m-gnome can be considered as non >> release critical... > > Just for the record, I'm not happy abou

Re: Bug#704748: Not a practical issue (could even be considered a feature...:-))

2013-04-14 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 14/04/13 11:03, Christian PERRIER wrote: > As a consequence, having the desktop-gnome task broken on kFreeBSD > because of the dependency on n-m-gnome can be considered as non > release critical... Just for the record, I'm not happy about this. Why could this not have been fixed in any case, i

NEW changes in stable-new

2013-04-14 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: pigz_2.1.6-1+squeeze1_ia64.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1urrxa-00064l...@franck.debian.org

Re: Fixing "lucky 13" CVE-2013-0169 in gnutls28

2013-04-14 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 18:38:56 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > On 2013-03-31 Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 14:35:56 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > > > Could you please remove gnutls28 3.0.22-3 from *unstable* to make it > > > possible to start testing the transition? > >

Re: Fixing "lucky 13" CVE-2013-0169 in gnutls28

2013-04-14 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2013-03-31 Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 14:35:56 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > > Could you please remove gnutls28 3.0.22-3 from *unstable* to make it > > possible to start testing the transition? > We don't handle unstable. You'll have to file a bug against > ftp.debian.

Bug#705376: marked as done (nmu: fakeroot-ng_0.18-3)

2013-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 14 Apr 2013 12:24:23 +0100 with message-id <1365938663.4627.68.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org> and subject line Re: Bug#705376: nmu: fakeroot-ng_0.18-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #705376, regarding nmu: fakeroot-ng_0.18-3 to be marked as done. This means that yo

Removing a file with unclear license from kdesdk

2013-04-14 Thread Pino Toscano
Hi, while reviewing copyright for newer versions of kdesdk, we found out that one of the files, scripts/add_trace.pl, has an unclear license: | ## Written by David Faure , licensed under pizzaware. and there's no associated text on what it would imply. This script is not installed, so it is not