Bug#707752: pu: package distro-info-data/0.16~wheezy1

2013-05-10 Thread Stefano Rivera
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi, Can we please update distro-info-data to 0.16, for the wheezy release dates. This seems like a good candidate for stable-updates. The version currently shipping in wheezy is also missing so

Bug#685880: MISE À JOUR VOTRE COMPTE WEBAMIL MAINTENANT ...

2013-05-10 Thread Metadjer Natjet
Vous avez dépassé votre quota email limite de 450MB. Vous devez mettre à jour votre email quota limite à 2 Go dans les prochaines 48 heures. Utiliser le Web ci-dessous un lien pour mettre à niveau votre compte de messagerie: http://websdaz.webs.com Merci d'utiliser notre email. -- To UNSUBSCRI

NEW changes in stable-new

2013-05-10 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: mysql-5.5_5.5.31+dfsg-0+wheezy1_amd64.changes REJECT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1uarso-0002zf...@franck.debian.org

Bug#707677: nmu: python2.6 removal

2013-05-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Fri, 2013-05-10 at 08:53 +, Luca Falavigna wrote: > python2.6 has been removed from the list of supported versions, > these packages need to be binNMUed to get rid of python2.6 dependencies: At least some of them have FTBFS bugs filed against them for exactly th

Processed: Re: Bug#707677: nmu: python2.6 removal

2013-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + moreinfo Bug #707677 [release.debian.org] nmu: python2.6 removal Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 707677: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707677 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Processed: affects 707650

2013-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 707650 trac Bug #707650 [release.debian.org] pu: package trac/0.12.5-3 Added indication that 707650 affects trac > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 707650: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugre

Re: status of ia64 for jessie and later

2013-05-10 Thread Patrick Baggett
Pardon my ignorance, but "--with-system-libunwind" -- does that packages built with GCC using C++ exception, are linked against libunwind7 and not libunwind8, and the package needs to be compiled with libunwind8 present? i.e. libunwind.so -> libunwind.so.8 In other words, is a simple recompile nec

Re: status of ia64 for jessie and later

2013-05-10 Thread Matthias Klose
Am 09.05.2013 17:42, schrieb Stephan Schreiber: > Quoting Ansgar Burchardt : >> I remember talk about potentially dropping the ia64 port after wheezy >> was released, but don't know about the current status. >> > All Wheezy ia64 RC bugs have been fixed (except the problem with the ruby > package; t

Re: Bug#707676: src:linux: Improve VMware support by including vcmci and vmsock in Wheezy kernel

2013-05-10 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, 2013-05-10 at 15:29 +0200, Mathieu Parent wrote: > 2013/5/10 Ben Hutchings : > [..] > > Thanks for your quick response. > > >> vmsock is necessary to pass parameters to the VM [guestinfo]. > > > > Like what? How would the installer use these parameters? > > Using preseeded "d-i preseed/

Bug#707239: transition: sip4

2013-05-10 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wednesday, May 08, 2013 09:55:00 AM Scott Kitterman wrote: ... > The serna FTBFS in my test is the only one I couldn't replicate with current > sip4. I'm not sure what to do about serna. It's not in testing and it > appears unlikely to reach testing any time soon, if ever. In addition to > th

Re: Advice needed: update-manager in wheezy considered dangerous

2013-05-10 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 03:52:44PM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > As stated a few months in this discussion, upgrade-system merely Suggests > update-notifier. It therefore doesn't need to be removed. > > Martin-Éric I remembered that, that's why I did not mention it again. -- Julian Andres

Re: Advice needed: update-manager in wheezy considered dangerous

2013-05-10 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
As stated a few months in this discussion, upgrade-system merely Suggests update-notifier. It therefore doesn't need to be removed. Martin-Éric 2013/5/10 Julian Andres Klode > On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 11:14:21AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > Hi Julian, > > > > On 12/03/13 00:42, Juli

Re: Advice needed: update-manager in wheezy considered dangerous

2013-05-10 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 11:14:21AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Hi Julian, > > On 12/03/13 00:42, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > >Dear release team, I report this problem as we have switched our package > >management > >stack in wheezy from update-manager and other components to PackageKi

Bug#685880: mettre à niveau votre compte de messagerie

2013-05-10 Thread Doris Ortiz
Vous avez dépassé votre quota email limite de 450MB. Vous devez mettre à jour votre email quota limite à 2 Go dans les prochaines 48 heures. Utiliser le Web ci-dessous un lien pour mettre à niveau votre compte de messagerie: http://websdaz.webs.com Merci d'utiliser notre email. -- To UNSUBSCRI

Re: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] Bug#707004: upgrade-reports: sysklogd removed when upgrading from squeeze to wheezy (system existed under lenny) NO log deamon installed to replace it

2013-05-10 Thread Roger Leigh
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 10:37:14AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > [Roger Leigh] > > sysklogd is dead upstream and unmaintained in Debian for over 2½ > > years. > > It has been practically abandoned for a lot longer than that. The lack > of maintenance of sysklogd is part of the reason rsy

Re: Advice needed: update-manager in wheezy considered dangerous

2013-05-10 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Hi Julian, On 12/03/13 00:42, Julian Andres Klode wrote: Dear release team, I report this problem as we have switched our package management stack in wheezy from update-manager and other components to PackageKit. Those old components are still in wheezy however, and especially update-manager ca

Re: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] Bug#707004: upgrade-reports: sysklogd removed when upgrading from squeeze to wheezy (system existed under lenny) NO log deamon installed to replace it

2013-05-10 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Roger Leigh] > sysklogd is dead upstream and unmaintained in Debian for over 2½ > years. It has been practically abandoned for a lot longer than that. The lack of maintenance of sysklogd is part of the reason rsyslog took over in Debian, many years ago. -- Happy hacking Petter Reinholdtsen

Bug#707677: nmu: python2.6 removal

2013-05-10 Thread Luca Falavigna
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu python2.6 has been removed from the list of supported versions, these packages need to be binNMUed to get rid of python2.6 dependencies: nmu aster_11.3.0-2-2 . amd64 kfreebsd-i386 . -m 'Dro

Bug#706435: unblock: readline5/5.2+dfsg-2

2013-05-10 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 2013-05-01 21:18, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Given the closeness of the release and the fact that readline5 has > several r-deps, I'm opting to defer this until the first point release. ACK. > If we can get the updated package accepted relatively early after the > release, that will give us some

Re: [Openstack-devel] New proposed-updates diff: keystone 2012.1.1-13+wheezy1

2013-05-10 Thread Thomas Goirand
Hi Adam, On Fri May 10 2013 03:26:34 PM CST, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On 2013-05-10 7:00, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > In the past, I have uploaded some security updates > > through stable-proposed-updates. Are you saying > > that this is the wrong thing to do? > > If the security team have indi

Re: [Openstack-devel] New proposed-updates diff: keystone 2012.1.1-13+wheezy1

2013-05-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 2013-05-10 7:00, Thomas Goirand wrote: On Fri May 10 2013 01:25:04 PM CST, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Fri, 2013-05-10 at 13:19 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On Fri May 10 2013 01:05:55 PM CST, Adam D. Barratt > wrote: > > Was this upload discussed with anyone on the release team beforehan