Right! I've rebuilt every package listed, here's the list of the verified ones.
nmu aster_11.3.0-2-2 . amd64 kfreebsd-i386 . -m 'Drop python2.6'
nmu cheetah_2.4.4-3 . armel armhf hurd-i386 i386 ia64 kfreebsd-amd64
kfreebsd-i386 mips mipsel powerpc sparc . -m 'Drop python2.6'
nmu
Your message dated Sat, 11 May 2013 11:51:47 +0100
with message-id 1368269507.7990.16.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#707677: nmu: python2.6 removal
has caused the Debian Bug report #707677,
regarding nmu: python2.6 removal
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Processing control commands:
block 667906 with -1
Bug #667906 [release.debian.org] transition: libffi6
667906 was blocked by: 701393 707399 701397 707509 707441
667906 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 667906: 707797
--
667906:
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 22:52 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
I like the idea. I am thinking we could (at excuse time) reject
packages with a breaks/conflicts on priority:optional or higher
(unless the package is priority:extra).
Is the optional / extra split actually well enough defined these days
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi
Please accept the updated nfs-utils package for the next point release. It
fixes some nasty bugs: one security issue (DNS reverse lookup), one segfault,
one hang and one major NFSv4
Luk Claes l...@debian.org (11/05/2013):
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
Please accept the updated nfs-utils package for the next point
release. It fixes some nasty bugs: one security issue (DNS reverse
lookup), one
On 2013-05-11 14:42, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 22:52 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
I like the idea. I am thinking we could (at excuse time) reject
packages with a breaks/conflicts on priority:optional or higher
(unless the package is priority:extra).
Is the optional /
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 08:27:23PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 06:31:08PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 09.05.2013 17:56, schrieb Roger Leigh:
The transitional package does need a version higher than the initscripts
Breaks: sysklogd ( 1.5-6.2)
so a 1.5-7 would
On Sun, 2013-05-05 at 22:13 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
On 2013-01-13 16:38, Niels Thykier wrote:
I have written a series of patches to reduce the size of britney.py.
In total, these patches removes 274 lines from britney.py[1]. There
are some refactoring patches interleaved with this that
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 706848 pu: package php5/5.4.4-14+deb7u1
Bug #706848 [release.debian.org] pu: package php5/5.4.4-16
Changed Bug title to 'pu: package php5/5.4.4-14+deb7u1' from 'pu: package
php5/5.4.4-16'
O.
Unknown command or malformed arguments to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk).
usertags 702278 = pu
Usertags were: unblock.
Usertags are now: pu.
tags 702278 + wheezy
Bug #702278
On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 02:33 +0100, intrigeri wrote:
Adam D. Barratt wrote (12 Jan 2012 21:38:38 GMT) :
On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 18:11 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
FWIW I also suspect that Jean-Michel's patch was correct and the patch
applied upstream contains a typo. disk.c in the upstream
On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 12:07 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 11:53 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
as already discussed, I’d like to propose a stable upload for gdm3 in
order to avoid a security risk when doing upgrades.
Theoretically, with the greeter session of gdm
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 12:47 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
The version of telepathy-idle in wheezy does not validate IRC servers'
SSL certificates when used with SSL (#706094, CVE ID requested).
The version in sid was already newer than wheezy, so I uploaded the
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #706142 [release.debian.org] tpu (or pu): telepathy-idle/0.1.11-2+deb7u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
706142: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706142
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #704478 [release.debian.org] pu: package request-tracker3.8/3.8.8-7+squeeze7
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
704478: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=704478
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 18:16 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
Currently this package keeps data non-cache data in /var/cache,
against Debian policy (see #704109).
The attached patch implements a fix for squeeze, and I would be grateful
if you could consider it at
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 11:38 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 14:53:27 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
inform is uninstallable in squeeze due to incorrect and superfluous call
to update-alternatives. Applied the same fix as in sid.
Is that
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #706763 [release.debian.org] pu: package inform/6.31.1+dfsg-1+squeeze1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
706763: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706763
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/11/2013 03:03 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Luk Claes l...@debian.org (11/05/2013):
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User:
release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu
Hi,
Please accept the updated nfs-utils package for
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #706756 [release.debian.org] pu: package xview/3.2p1.4-25+squeeze1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
706756: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706756
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Sat, 2013-05-04 at 13:14 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
I just discovered an installability problem in olvwm due to bad
alternatives handling. Since that package does not exist in
squeeze/amd64 this was not noticed earlier.
I backported the related
Processing control commands:
retitle -1 pu: gpsd/3.6-4+deb7u1
Bug #706727 [release.debian.org] unblock: gpsd/3.6-5
Changed Bug title to 'pu: gpsd/3.6-4+deb7u1' from 'unblock: gpsd/3.6-5'
tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #706727 [release.debian.org] pu: gpsd/3.6-4+deb7u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
Control: retitle -1 pu: gpsd/3.6-4+deb7u1
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Fri, 2013-05-03 at 21:55 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
Please unblock package gpsd as it fixes CVE-2013-2038
The bug is not *that* bad, so if you don't have the time to get it in
before wheezy is released, I'll prepare
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #706681 [release.debian.org] pu: package
nvidia-graphics-drivers/304.88-1+deb7u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
706681: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706681
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Fri, 2013-05-03 at 12:31 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
I just noticed an upgrade issue in libcuda1 which shows up on
upgrades from squeeze to wheezy with recommends installed.
The postinst uses a script from nvidia support (and gracefully ignores
the fact if
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 15:46 +0400, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote:
Please unblock package ejabberd 2.1.10-5.
It fixes one important bug [1] which prevents certain (correct) XMPP
client implementations (namely, the XMPP library used by git-annex) to
authenticate
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #706209 [release.debian.org] pu: ejabberd/2.1.10-4+deb7u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
706209: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706209
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
[Dropped the CC to -security]
On Fri, 2013-05-10 at 16:20 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Thanks for the long explanation. Next time the
security team asks to upload to s-p-u, I will
ask the release team as you told me. Sorry if I did
wrong then. Hopefully there is only little harm in
this
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + pending
Bug #706806 [release.debian.org] pu: package xorg/1:7.7+3
Added tag(s) pending.
--
706806: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706806
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 15:34 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 2013-05-05 8:19, Julien Cristau wrote:
the vmware folks requested the addition of xserver-xorg-input-vmmouse
to xserver-xorg-input-all's dependencies, which rather makes sense.
I've done that in
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 15:47 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
What's the plan for fixing this in unstable / jessie? (Partly because
the preferred workflow is fix sid, propose fix, upload, and partly
because dak requires that unstable = stable.)
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + pending
Bug #707137 [release.debian.org] pu: package tasksel/3.14.1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
707137: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707137
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Processing changes file: tasksel_3.14.1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: xorg_7.7+3~deb7u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 15:25 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 2013-05-06 12:05, Luca BRUNO wrote:
I'd like to upload a stable +deb7u2 for gcc-msp430.
This is the fix for #706482 which was not closed with +deb7u1 due to
short timing before the release. This
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + pending
Bug #706937 [release.debian.org] pu: package
gcc-msp430/4.6.3~mspgcc-20120406-3+deb7u2
Added tag(s) pending.
--
706937: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706937
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing changes file: gcc-msp430_4.6.3~mspgcc-20120406-3+deb7u2_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 02:26:22PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 16:45:09 -0500, Lukasz Szybalski wrote:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
odbcinst1debian2 : Breaks: tdsodbc ( 0.82-8) but 0.82-7 is to be
installed
E: Error,
[recipients trimmed]
I recommend applying the patch from bug #639300 in a stable update, instead
of leaving akonadi/virtuoso un-coinstallable with all ODBC drivers in
wheezy. Attached is an updated patch for this issue.
My recommendation is to have unixodbc drop the useless and broken Breaks.
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + pending
Bug #706763 [release.debian.org] pu: package inform/6.31.1+dfsg-1+squeeze1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
706763: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706763
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Sat, 2013-05-11 at 18:05 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 11:38 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 14:53:27 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
inform is uninstallable in squeeze due to incorrect and superfluous call
to
Processing changes file:
gcc-msp430_4.6.3~mspgcc-20120406-3+deb7u2_kfreebsd-i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
gcc-msp430_4.6.3~mspgcc-20120406-3+deb7u2_powerpc.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: xorg_7.7+3~deb7u1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
Processing changes file: inform_6.31.1+dfsg-1+squeeze1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: inform_6.31.1+dfsg-1+squeeze1_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: inform_6.31.1+dfsg-1+squeeze1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
On 2013-05-11 22:03, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2013-05-11 at 18:05 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 11:38 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
Is that package autobuilt in squeeze?
There don't appear to be any entries in the w-b database, but it is on
the whitelist, so should
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear release team!
As we installed Wheezy on our cluster, I found that profisis is broken because
of a bug in profnet-isis (#707874).
Processing changes file: gcc-msp430_4.6.3~mspgcc-20120406-3+deb7u2_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
gcc-msp430_4.6.3~mspgcc-20120406-3+deb7u2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Processing changes file: inform_6.31.1+dfsg-1+squeeze1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: inform_6.31.1+dfsg-1+squeeze1_sparc.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 09:18:03PM +0200, Sune Vuorela wrote:
[recipients trimmed]
I recommend applying the patch from bug #639300 in a stable update, instead
of leaving akonadi/virtuoso un-coinstallable with all ODBC drivers in
wheezy. Attached is an updated patch for this issue.
My
Processing changes file: gcc-msp430_4.6.3~mspgcc-20120406-3+deb7u2_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: gcc-msp430_4.6.3~mspgcc-20120406-3+deb7u2_s390.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: xorg_7.7+3~deb7u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
Processing changes file: inform_6.31.1+dfsg-1+squeeze1_mips.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ubizx-0004ki...@franck.debian.org
Processing changes file: gcc-msp430_4.6.3~mspgcc-20120406-3+deb7u2_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: gcc-msp430_4.6.3~mspgcc-20120406-3+deb7u2_sparc.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: xorg_7.7+3~deb7u1_mips.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Processing changes file: gcc-msp430_4.6.3~mspgcc-20120406-3+deb7u2_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: gcc-msp430_4.6.3~mspgcc-20120406-3+deb7u2_mips.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Processing changes file:
gcc-msp430_4.6.3~mspgcc-20120406-3+deb7u2_mipsel.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On 05/12/2013 01:32 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
What's the plan for getting a new keystone version in to sid? Currently
sid, testing and wheezy all have the same version.
Regards,
Adam
Cc:-ing the Alioth list.
I am planning on uploading all of OpenStack Grizzly 2013.1.1 (the bug
release
Processing changes file: gcc-msp430_4.6.3~mspgcc-20120406-3+deb7u2_s390x.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
55 matches
Mail list logo
