Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Release Team,
A belated transition self contained request for ptlib & opal:
t38modem - FTBFS #707430
openam - binNMU OK
ekiga - binNMU OK
libpt2.10.4
Reverse Depends:
t38modem
opena
On Monday 8th April 2013 22:04 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> On Monday 08 April 2013 02:43 PM, Guy Roussin wrote:
> >> Just to re-confirm, is the actual bug, that was initially reported by
> >> Guy, is that also resolved?
> > Yes the bug is resolved. No more errors when "update-initramfs -u"
> >
>
Your message dated Sat, 25 May 2013 00:21:41 +0200
with message-id <20130524222141.gc12...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#709618: camlp5 et al need hinting
has caused the Debian Bug report #709618,
regarding camlp5 et al need hinting
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
as part of the big GNOME 3.8 transition I'd like start with a small one:
gjs.
Even though the soname has not changed, there were some incompatible
changes, so we renamed the library
> please kill rails 2.3 from testing. It has been replaced by rails 3.2
>
> (And hopefully by rails 4.0 before jessie is out, so we don't end up
> with having two version of RubyGemHell(TM) next time).
>
> I will ask for RM, but it will need some checking with our r-deps:
>
> Checking reverse d
Dear FTP Masters,
This stable-security update for src:kfreebsd-9 does not seem to have
copied fully to the stable-updates queue:
On 22/05/13 20:54, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> mmc-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di_9.0-10+deb70.1_kfreebsd-amd64.udeb has incorrect
> size; deleting it
> sound-modules-9.0-2-am
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #709634 [release.debian.org] RM: ruby-activesupport-2.3/2.3.14-7,
ruby-actionmailer-2.3/2.3.14-3, ruby-actionpack-2.3/2.3.14-5,
ruby-activerecord-2.3/2.3.14-6, ruby-activeresource-2.3/2.3.14-3,
ruby-rails-2.3/2.3.14-4
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
Your message dated Fri, 24 May 2013 19:22:19 +0100
with message-id <1369419739.18864.6.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#709629: nmu: libavg/1.7.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #709629,
regarding nmu: libavg/1.7.1-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 17:38 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> please kill rails 2.3 from testing. It has been replaced by rails 3.2
We can't right now:
$ dak rm -Rn -s testing ruby-active{support,record,resource}-2.3
ruby-rails-2.3 ruby-action{pack,mailer}-2.3
[...]
# Brok
Processing changes file: php5_5.4.4-14+deb7u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ufvnx-00045q...@franck.debian.org
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hi,
please kill rails 2.3 from testing. It has been replaced by rails 3.2
(And hopefully by rails 4.0 before jessie is out, so we don't end up
with having two version of RubyGemHell(TM) next t
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Please schedule binNMUs for libavg to drop python2.6 dependencies.
#701304 shouldn't be a problem anymore, I was able to reproduce the
build failure some days ago, but it seems the cause of
[Recipients fixed up to use the bug, rather than the list]
On 2013-05-24 14:44, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
Le 24/05/2013 15:15, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
Looking at the dependencies, I guess why needs rebuilding against
the
new coq, or removing?
Removing, because of #707585, as said in [1]. With
Le 24/05/2013 15:15, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
> Looking at the dependencies, I guess why needs rebuilding against the
> new coq, or removing?
Removing, because of #707585, as said in [1]. With Mehdi's approval (he
is why's maintainer).
[1] https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/OCamlTaskForce/OCamlTransi
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: tools
In addition to displaying the result of attempting to migrate a
particular package on its own, it would be helpful if migration.pl could
display the results of any hints (manual or automa
On 2013-05-24 14:03, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: important
Really?
Dear Release Managers,
Now that glib has migrated, I think that camlp5 [1] and related
packages need manual hinting. All the packages listed in the "Coq"
section of [2] need to enter together.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 704032 with 701336 708802
Bug #704032 [release.debian.org] transition: boost-defaults 1.53
704032 was blocked by: 704045 709248 709576 709254 701243 709575 709574 709577
709570 704044 709578 706648 709579 709251 701288
704032 was blocking:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: important
Dear Release Managers,
Now that glib has migrated, I think that camlp5 [1] and related
packages need manual hinting. All the packages listed in the "Coq"
section of [2] need to enter together.
[1] http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?pack
Processing changes file: php5_5.4.4-14+deb7u1_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ufpln-0002te...@franck.debian.org
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 13:46:50 +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Le 23/05/2013 13:13, Arno Töll a écrit :
> > we are ready to upload Apache2 2.4 to Debian Sid now. This means the
> > transition is effectively starting now, and going to break your modules.
>
> There are currently ~20 source entang
Processing changes file: php5_5.4.4-14+deb7u1_sparc.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ufoaz-0003bj...@franck.debian.org
Processing changes file: php5_5.4.4-14+deb7u1_mips.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ufom4-0006q7...@franck.debian.org
Le samedi 11 mai 2013 à 18:00 +0100, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
> On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 12:07 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 11:53 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > as already discussed, I’d like to propose a stable upload for gdm3 in
> > > order to avoid a security ris
Processing changes file: php5_5.4.4-14+deb7u1_mipsel.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ufmo2-0004rt...@franck.debian.org
Processing changes file: php5_5.4.4-14+deb7u1_kfreebsd-i386.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ufmfo-0003dz...@franck.debian.org
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 08:36:38 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> [Summary of previous mails: we are discussing how/when to move openmotif
> to motif].
>
> On 23-05-13 08:43, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> > 2013/5/22 Paul Gevers :
> >> Ok. Then we just have to wait until the RT grants us a transition slot.
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 24.05.2013, 01:18 +0200 schrieb Julien Cristau:
> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 23:18:41 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Am Mittwoch, den 08.05.2013, 16:51 +0200 schrieb Julien Cristau:
> > > I'd like to have the switch to libffi6 (#667906) sorted before that, if
>
27 matches
Mail list logo
