Processing changes file: linux_3.2.46-1_mips.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1uluwj-0008ve...@franck.debian.org
Processing control commands:
block 706828 with -1
Bug #706828 [release.debian.org] transition: libgd2
706828 was blocked by: 709050 709040 711789 709048 711787 710768 709047
706828 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 706828: 711822
--
706828:
Processing changes file: linux_3.2.46-1_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ulved-00042j...@franck.debian.org
Processing control commands:
block 706828 with -1
Bug #706828 [release.debian.org] transition: libgd2
706828 was blocked by: 709040 711822 709047 709050 711789 709048 711787 710768
706828 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 706828: 711836
--
706828:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 709312 transition: libgsoap3
Bug #709312 [release.debian.org] nmu: Packages depending on gsoap
Changed Bug title to 'transition: libgsoap3' from 'nmu: Packages depending on
gsoap'
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user
Hi Adam, Petter,
On So 09 Jun 2013 23:10:53 CEST Adam D. Barratt wrote:
However, can the update of slbackup-php be uploaded to s-p-u? What is
the preferred version? 0.4.3-3 or 0.4.3-2+deb7u1?
In general, the latter is preferable as it clearly indicates that the
upload was made to a suite
On 2013-06-07 18:53, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, 2013-06-07 at 18:48 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
The packages haven't transitioned yet because the last binNMU for
h323plus only finished building a few hours ago and the old
libraries
haven't been decrufted yet. It's in hand... :)
And
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 711817 + wheezy
Bug #711817 [release.debian.org] pu: package dkimpy/0.5.3-1+deb7u1
Added tag(s) wheezy.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
711817:
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 07:53:45PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2013-05-18 at 21:33 +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
+sysvinit (2.88dsf-41+wheezy1) stable-proposed-updates; urgency=low
+
+ [ Roger Leigh ]
+ * Correct the Breaks on bootchart to ensure that all broken
+versions
On Sunday 09 June 2013 11:28 PM, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
I can't see anything on
http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/multipath-tools.html so I'm assuming
this isn't going to make the first point release next weekend?
Attached are the 2 patches that need to be added.
I'm slightly
On 2013-06-10 15:21, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
On Sunday 09 June 2013 11:28 PM, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
I can't see anything on
http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/multipath-tools.html so I'm
assuming
this isn't going to make the first point release next
weekend?
[...]
Ritesh, if these
On Monday 10 June 2013 08:12 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
For the record, the window for getting fixes in to the upcoming point
release closed yesterday.
Getting the fixes in to sid would be appreciated in any case, so that
we can look at a p-u update for 7.2.
I will get it done for sid
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 709687 with 698627
Bug #709687 [release.debian.org] transition: ptlib, opal
709687 was not blocked by any bugs.
709687 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 709687: 698627
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Processing control commands:
severity -1 important
Bug #709949 [src:libarchive] libarchive: FTBFS on mips and powerpc:
test_read_disk_directory_traversals atime mismatches
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
unblock 706866 with -1
Bug #706866 [release.debian.org] transition:
Processing changes file: cyrus-sasl2_2.1.25.dfsg1-6+deb7u1_sparc.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1um77s-0002mx...@franck.debian.org
Package: ben
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
If a source package builds Multi-Arch: same binaries, it should get
binNMUs on all archs at the same time to remain co-installable. It
would be nice if ben's overview pages gave some indication for such
packages.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description:
On 09-06-13 11:05, Paul Gevers wrote:
On 04-06-13 08:31, Julien Cristau wrote:
Do we know how many of the lesstif2 reverse dependencies are libraries
whose ABI would change if rebuilt with motif instead?
No, but I can try to find out. The original idea of lesstif was to be a
binary
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 22:32:08 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
glw: fails with GLwDrawA.h:147:0: Undefined identifier WidgetClass
defined in X11/Intrinsic.h as typedef struct _WidgetClassRec
*WidgetClass;
sciplot: fails to check right now on
/usr/include/X11/Core.h:51:0: Undefined identifier
18 matches
Mail list logo
