Re: why is nvidia-cuda-toolkit not migrating to testing?

2013-07-14 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2013-07-13 at 23:14 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: Adam D. Barratt, le Sat 13 Jul 2013 21:02:47 +0100, a écrit : On Sat, 2013-07-13 at 00:01 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: Adam D. Barratt, le Fri 12 Jul 2013 19:20:41 +0100, a écrit : Looking at the results from this morning's

Bug#710720: transition: libechonest

2013-07-14 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 18:00:57 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi! A new upstream release of libechonest is sitting in experimental and I would like to push

Bug#707546: transition: libdvbpsi

2013-07-14 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 01:23:49 +0100, Alessio Treglia wrote: On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 11:28 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: Does vlc need source changes? Either way please go ahead and let us know when the new libdvbpsi is in sid. Uploaded to sid just few moments ago and

Processed: tagging 716886

2013-07-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 716886 + wheezy Bug #716886 [release.debian.org] pu: package foxyproxy/3.4-1.1~deb7u1 Added tag(s) wheezy. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 716886:

Processed: Re: Bug#707650: pu: package trac/0.12.5-3

2013-07-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: tags -1 + confirmed Bug #707650 [release.debian.org] pu: package trac/0.12.5-3 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 707650: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707650 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Bug#707650: pu: package trac/0.12.5-3

2013-07-14 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 22:25 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 11:58 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: On 06/29/2013 06:51 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sun, 2013-06-23 at 19:45 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: [...] I hope that my filtered

Re: Stable update for sysvinit

2013-07-14 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2013-06-10 at 13:37 +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 07:53:45PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: [...] What's the plan for getting this fixed in sid? The change looks okay (although -3.3+ would presumably have sufficed) but we're getting very close to the cut-off for

Bug#710720: transition: libechonest

2013-07-14 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
By the way, due to insane upstream handling of sonames, I uploaded 2.1 instead of 2.0 as originally requested [0]. My bad for not saying it before, but the new upstream release didn't requiere any changes wrt the transition. So it would be good to have Good: .depends ~ libechonest2.1 instead of

Re: Stable update for sysvinit

2013-07-14 Thread Roger Leigh
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 03:43:18PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Mon, 2013-06-10 at 13:37 +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 07:53:45PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: [...] What's the plan for getting this fixed in sid? The change looks okay (although -3.3+ would

Processed: retitle 704032 to transition: boost-defaults 1.54

2013-07-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 704032 transition: boost-defaults 1.54 Bug #704032 [release.debian.org] transition: boost-defaults 1.53 Changed Bug title to 'transition: boost-defaults 1.54' from 'transition: boost-defaults 1.53' thanks Stopping processing here.

Bug#704032: Transition to boost 1.54

2013-07-14 Thread Steve M. Robbins
retitle 704032 transition: boost-defaults 1.54 thanks Boost 1.54 is now in sid on all architectures, so we should transition to that. -Steve signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Processed: [st...@sumost.ca: Bug#704032: Transition to boost 1.54]

2013-07-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 715474 important Bug #715474 [libclucene-dev] Contains boost headers that cause problems with libboost1.54-dev Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' block 704032 by 715474 Bug #704032 [release.debian.org] transition: boost-defaults

Bug#714532: pu: package cookie-monster/1.1.0-5~deb7u1

2013-07-14 Thread David Prévot
Control: retitle: pu: package cookie-monster/1.1.0-5~deb7u1 On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 07:00:52PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sun, 2013-06-30 at 16:15 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: The diff looks fine to me; thanks. Thanks, uploaded as 1.1.0-5~deb7u1, since it’s just a rebuild in Wheezy

Processed: retitle 714532 to pu: package cookie-monster/1.1.0-5~deb7u1

2013-07-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 714532 pu: package cookie-monster/1.1.0-5~deb7u1 Bug #714532 [release.debian.org] pu: package cookie-monster/1.1.0-4+deb7u1 Changed Bug title to 'pu: package cookie-monster/1.1.0-5~deb7u1' from 'pu: package cookie-monster/1.1.0-4+deb7u1'

Bug#707650: pu: package trac/0.12.5-3

2013-07-14 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On 07/14/2013 10:32 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Please use wheezy as the distribution, version the upload as 0.12.5-3~deb7u1 and go ahead; thanks. Thanks! I've gone ahead with the upload. Please let me know if anything seems amiss. --dkg signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

Bug#708536: python3.3 transition

2013-07-14 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Monday, July 08, 2013 10:24:02 AM Julien Cristau wrote: On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 22:27:47 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: With the exceptions of #710545 and #711761, all the issues related to switching the default python3 to python3.3 appear to have been resolved. The consensus on

Bug#712623: opu: package wv2/0.4.2.dfsg.1-1

2013-07-14 Thread Olly Betts
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 07:29:45PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Control: tags -1 + moreinfo squeeze Control: severity -1 normal On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 11:32 +1200, Olly Betts wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: serious As with #712622, no, it's not. README.Debian says that