On Sunday, September 01, 2013 00:07:12 Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> Scott Kitterman (2013-08-31):
> > See #697348. This fixes a bug that is causing problems with other
> > software
> > on squeeze systems. It's a low risk fix. It's self-contained and a
> > direct
> > backport of the u
Le 31/08/2013 21:15, Vincent Blut a écrit :
> Le 31/08/2013 20:21, Ben Hutchings a écrit :
>> On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 17:49 +0200, Vincent Blut wrote:
>>> [Cc'ing debian-{kernel, release} mailing lists]
>>>
>>> Le 26/08/2013 00:31, Ben Hutchings a écrit :
In preparation for the next stable updat
Hi Scott,
Scott Kitterman (2013-08-31):
> See #697348. This fixes a bug that is causing problems with other software
> on squeeze systems. It's a low risk fix. It's self-contained and a direct
> backport of the upstream change for this issue that's already in wheezy.
the patch doesn't seem cr
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: opu
See #697348. This fixes a bug that is causing problems with other software
on squeeze systems. It's a low risk fix. It's self-contained and a direct
backport of the upstream change for this i
Le 31/08/2013 20:21, Ben Hutchings a écrit :
> On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 17:49 +0200, Vincent Blut wrote:
>> [Cc'ing debian-{kernel, release} mailing lists]
>>
>> Le 26/08/2013 00:31, Ben Hutchings a écrit :
>>> In preparation for the next stable update, I want to upload a
>>> new kernel with bug fixe
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 05:30:37PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 22:57:53 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
>
> > perl 5.18.1-2 has now been accepted in unstable.
> >
> For the record all binNMUs have been scheduled yesterday. Some archs
> are still catching up.
Hi Julie
On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 17:49 +0200, Vincent Blut wrote:
> [Cc'ing debian-{kernel, release} mailing lists]
>
> Le 26/08/2013 00:31, Ben Hutchings a écrit :
> > In preparation for the next stable update, I want to upload a new
> > kernel with bug fixes from the 3.2.y stable branch (and a few
> > othe
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 720303 + wheezy
Bug #720303 [release.debian.org] pu: package libvirt/0.9.12-11+deb7u2
Added tag(s) wheezy.
> tags 720426 + wheezy
Bug #720426 [release.debian.org] pu: package openssl/1.0.1e-2
Added tag(s) wheezy.
> tags 721018 + wheezy
Bug #7
Hi Jay
Your plan looks good except that I think it would be better to have
libtiff5-dev provide libtiff-dev and not introduce a proper libtiff-dev.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists
Hi Joost
There are quite some syntax errors in the ben files you provided, like
missing 'is_' and missing ';'. Apparently you did not wait for an answer
and already uploaded all packages, that's not how it it supposed to
work... But anyway the big thing that still needs to happen AFAICS is
fixing
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 18:43:57 +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to schedule the libtelepathy-logger2 to
> libtelepathy-logger3 transition.
>
> The fo
On 08/31/2013 02:54 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:48:56AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> A number of packages are involved in both libav and libx264 transitions.
>> Do you want to do both of them at the same time, or serialized?
>
> I've successfully rebuild vxl again
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:48:56AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> A number of packages are involved in both libav and libx264 transitions.
> Do you want to do both of them at the same time, or serialized?
I've successfully rebuild vxl against current sid/libav9. Can you schedule
a binNMU for vxl 1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 712615 with 721423
Bug #712615 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.18
712615 was blocked by: 719855 701402 721318 707406 708004 713332 709668 693892
719495 708018 721320 713580 719734 719593 708596 708841 708025 707502 721418
720140 70
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 712615 with 721421 721422
Bug #712615 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.18
712615 was blocked by: 701402 719855 707406 721318 708004 713332 693892 709668
719495 708018 721320 713580 719734 719593 708596 708841 708025 721418 707502
72
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 712615 with 721418
Bug #712615 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.18
712615 was blocked by: 719855 701402 721318 707406 708004 713332 709668 693892
719495 708018 721320 713580 719734 719593 708596 708841 708025 707502 720140
708839 71
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 712615 with 721405
Bug #712615 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.18
712615 was blocked by: 701402 719855 707406 721318 708004 713332 693892 709668
719495 708018 721320 713580 719734 719593 708596 708841 708025 707502 720140
708839 71
shirish शिरीष (2013-08-31):
> Any update on getting the three packages from experimental to unstable.
You're mailing 709039@ which is assigned to the release team; you want
to contact the relevant maintainers instead.
Mraw,
KiBi.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian
18 matches
Mail list logo
