Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Bug #723822 [release.debian.org] RM: openstack-common/0.1+git20120203-1
Bug reassigned from package 'release.debian.org' to 'ftp.debian.org'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #723822 to the same values
previously set
Ignorin
Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Control: retitle -1 RM: openstack-common -- RoM; superseded
On 2013-09-20 7:44, Thomas Goirand wrote:
The upstream plan has changed, and this package isn't helpful
anymore.
It needs to be removed from Sid and testing asap, because of #722882,
which is blockin
Julien Cristau, 2013-09-19 23:48+0200:
The debdiff should be in this bug, please.
Sorry, I thought I did it. Here it is.
--
,--.
: /` ) Tanguy Ortolo
| `-'Debian Developer
\_
diff -u gajim-0.15.1/debian/changelog gajim-0.15.1/debian/changelog
--- gajim-0.15.1/debian/changelo
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hi,
The upstream plan has changed, and this package isn't helpful anymore.
It needs to be removed from Sid and testing asap, because of #722882,
which is blocking some migration to testing.
Che
Processing changes file: linux_3.2.51-1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vmtk7-000641...@franck.debian.org
Processing changes file: linux_3.2.51-1_powerpc.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux_3.2.51-1_s390x.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.
Processing changes file: linux_3.2.51-1_s390.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vms9u-0004ak...@franck.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 723798 + wheezy
Bug #723798 [release.debian.org] pu: package gajim/0.15.1-4
Added tag(s) wheezy.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
723798: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=723798
On Thu, 2013-09-19 at 23:48 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 23:32:03 +0200, Tanguy Ortolo wrote:
> > The version of gajim currently in stable, 0.15.1-4, has a security bug,
> > CVE-2012-5524 / Debian #693282. corsac has prepared an NMU for that, and I
> > was
> > suggested t
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 13:20:14 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Hi,
>
> First, I already uploaded opencv 2.4 to unstable by my mistake, sorry.
>
Hi,
Can you please get fi
Processing control commands:
> block 706798 by -1
Bug #706798 [release.debian.org] transition: Libav 9
706798 was blocked by: 713354 694143 720828 722610 694131 720801 694299 721544
720779 720727 721025 720785 723099 720820 692505 720796 693639 720668 693641
692809 721577 720790 720799 720826 69
Your message dated Thu, 19 Sep 2013 23:27:24 +0100
with message-id <1379629644.5669.31.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#717669: nmu: grive_0.2.0-1
tarantool_1.4.9+20130611.2012-1 tulip_3.7.0dfsg-4 ggcov_0.8.4-2 (rebuild
against new binutils)`
has caused the Debian Bu
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 23:32:03 +0200, Tanguy Ortolo wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: pu
>
> Hello,
>
> The version of gajim currently in stable, 0.15.1-4, has a security bug,
> CVE-2012-5524 / Debian #693282. cor
Processing changes file: moin_1.9.3-1+squeeze5_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vmlbd-00040f...@franck.debian.org
Processing changes file: linux_3.2.51-1_multi.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vmlb5-0003t4...@franck.debian.org
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello,
The version of gajim currently in stable, 0.15.1-4, has a security bug,
CVE-2012-5524 / Debian #693282. corsac has prepared an NMU for tha
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk).
> clone 723587 -1
Bug #723587 [release.debian.org] pu: Non-free file in PyOpenCL
Bug 723587 cloned as bug 723793
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I'm particularly keen to see communication packages working on as many
architectures as possible because otherwise two-way communications
opportunities are missed if some users are excluded.
In short, I'm not formally volunteering, but if people
On Thu, 2013-09-19 at 20:42 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> there was a bug in node-gyp 0.10.10-1 that prevented packages
> build-depending on it to build on kfreebsd.
> node-gyp 0.10.10-2 fixes the issue and the following packages
> need a binNMU :
No, they need giving back (which should thus go to $a
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 14:42:36 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2013-09-06 16:03:03, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > dependency level 2:
> >
> > with patch:
> > #693106 xine-lib
>
> xine-lib has been fixed and built everywhere. Please schedule binNMUs
> for mlt.
>
Scheduled.
Cheers,
Julie
On Tue, 2013-09-17 at 16:11 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 17.09.2013 16:04, schrieb Michael Biebl:
> > The ones which I could successfully binNMU were:
> > mail-notification
> > xiphos
> > ekiga
> > libreoffice
[...]
> I forgot:
> ktp-call-ui
> telepathy-qt
>
> they built successfully against t
On Thu, 2013-09-19 at 20:06 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-09-17 at 16:11 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > Am 17.09.2013 16:04, schrieb Michael Biebl:
> > > The ones which I could successfully binNMU were:
> > > libreoffice
[...]
> Scheduled.
For the record, that's currently stuck due
On Thu, 2013-09-19 at 20:26 +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> The binNMU of libreoffice and slow buildds
> might make it more then a few days.
Right now, the binNMU of libreoffice is unbuildable on all architectures
(libreoffice -> python3 -> dh-python -> python3:any, which edos-depcheck
and thus
Hello,
there was a bug in node-gyp 0.10.10-1 that prevented packages
build-depending on it to build on kfreebsd.
node-gyp 0.10.10-2 fixes the issue and the following packages
need a binNMU :
nmu node-zipfile_0.4.0+ds1 . kfreebsd-i386 kfreebsd-amd64 -m 'Rebuild against
node-gyp on kfreebsd'
node-
Hello!
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 07:08:34PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
> fwiw, at least this Release Team member would rather you had waited.
I'm sorry you feel that way.
>
> Lack of active objection is not the same as implicit acceptance,
> particularly in a less than 48-hour time frame
On Thu, 2013-09-19 at 11:20 +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:30:04PM +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> [...]
> > Following mbiebls excellent laid out plan. It's been smooth sailing so far
> > and I've built the above packages. I'm ready to sign and upload.
> >
> > Doe
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 723569 + pending
Bug #723569 [release.debian.org] transition: evolution-data-server 3.8 and
friends
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
723569: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bi
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 05:03:32PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Thanks for the pointer. AFAICT the particular mail was not sent to
> debian-release@lists.d.o, which is why I missed it. Anyhow, I will be
> sure to include you in the final tally.
I sent it to the 4 architectures I was interested
On 2013-09-19 16:56, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> [...]
>
> Message-ID: <20130904160124.gt12...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
> Sent September 4th.
>
Thanks for the pointer. AFAICT the particular mail was not sent to
debian-release@lists.d.o, which is why I missed it. Anyhow, I will be
sure to include you
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:38:29AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Here is a little status update on the mails we have received so far.
> First off, thanks to all the porters who have already replied!
>
> So far, the *no one* has stepped up to back the following architectures:
>
>hurd-i386
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
For hurd-i386, I
- - test the base system
- - fix arch-related bugs in general.
Unfortunately my time is limited but I do what I can.
I am a DD.
Thank you,
- --
Barry deFreese
Sometimes helper, sometimes hinderer to:
Debian Games, QA, GNU/Hurd
---
On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 09:33:51AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> roll-call
If ports not in unstable count, you can conditionally chalk me up for x32.
Conditionally, as I refuse to do so if I were the only official porter,
as I have little clue about the toolchain.
Thus, I'd be up for these:
> -
On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 09:33 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
Hi,
I am an active porter for the following architectures and I intend
to continue this for the lifetime of the jessie release:
For hurd-i386, I
- test most packages on this architecture
- fix toolchain issues
- triage arch-specific bugs
- f
On 2013-09-06 16:03:03, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> dependency level 2:
>
> with patch:
> #693106 xine-lib
xine-lib has been fixed and built everywhere. Please schedule binNMUs
for mlt.
Regards
--
Sebastian Ramacher
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was j...@debian.org).
> usertags + pu
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> severity 723587 normal
Bug #723587 [release.debian.org]
Samuel Thibault, le Thu 19 Sep 2013 12:55:20 +0200, a écrit :
> > On 2013-09-01 09:33, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > > If you are (or intend to become) an active porter for the lifetime of
> > > jessie, then please send a signed email explaining your involvement in
> > > the port to the Release Team be
Hi :),
I am an active developer for the following architectures and I intend
to continue this for the lifetime of the jessie release:
For hurd-i386, I
- test those packages on this architecture relevant to my development work
- fix arch-related bugs
- improve the Hurd in general, with focus on th
Hi,
I am an active porter for the following architectures and I intend
to continue this for the lifetime of the jessie release:
For hurd-i386, I
- test parts of the base system, the packages I use/deal with, and
occasionally the ones for which other people asked for Hurd fixes
- help maintainin
Niels Thykier, le Thu 19 Sep 2013 10:38:29 +0200, a écrit :
> So far, the *no one* has stepped up to back the following architectures:
>hurd-i386
It seems that for some unknown reason I never got to read your mail
actually. For debian-hurd@ people who would like to answer, here is the
mail:
Hi!
I'm not a DD or DM, but an upstream contributor and maintainer for the
toolchain, both for different things at work, and in my free time for the
Hurd. I have no plans to stop this, so this will cover the jessie
lifetime. As time permits, I also work on the Hurd itself, and advise
contributor
Your message dated Thu, 19 Sep 2013 12:09:46 +0200
with message-id <523acd6a.7070...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: nmu: paw_1:2.14.04.dfsg.2-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #720708,
regarding nmu: paw_1:2.14.04.dfsg.2-9
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:30:04PM +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
[...]
> Following mbiebls excellent laid out plan. It's been smooth sailing so far
> and I've built the above packages. I'm ready to sign and upload.
>
> Does anyone see any reason to not start this transition right away?
>
As n
On 2013-09-19 10:49, Rainer Herbst wrote:
> Dear Niels,
>
Hi,
> please transfer me from sparc to sparc64. Sorry, if I did not make
> that clear in my previous message.
>
Done. :)
> BTW, makes it sense to split SPARC64 from SPARC? I don't think
> there is a lot of SPARC32 out there now...
>
Dear Niels,
please transfer me from sparc to sparc64. Sorry, if I did not make
that clear in my previous message.
BTW, makes it sense to split SPARC64 from SPARC? I don't think there
is a lot of SPARC32 out there now...
Regards,
Rainer
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Rainer Herbst
Zentrale Ein
On 2013-09-01 09:33, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As we announced in [LAST-BITS], we would like to get a better idea of
> that status of the ports, to make an informed decision about which
> port can be released with jessie. One of the steps is to get an
> overview of which of the porters are (s
45 matches
Mail list logo
