Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Don't close p-u bugs in your upload...
> reopen 723587
Bug #723587 {Done: Tomasz Rybak } [release.debian.org]
pu: Non-free file in PyOpenCL
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be clea
Processing changes file: ia32-libs_20130924_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vogj8-0005jr...@franck.debian.org
Processing changes file: ia32-libs-gtk_20130924_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vog4j-0003ag...@franck.debian.org
Your message dated Wed, 25 Sep 2013 03:19:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#724508: fixed in libfile-extattr-perl 1.09-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #724508,
regarding nmu: libfile-extattr-perl_1.09-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Hi,
I am an active porter for the following architectures and I intend
to continue this for the lifetime of the jessie release:
For sh4, I
- test packages on this architecture
- triage arch-specific bugs
- fix arch-related bugs
- maintain buildds
For armel and armhf, I
- test packages on this ar
Hi,
I have uploaded Nova 2013.1.3-2 with removed support for XAPI, as you
asked. I hope XCP support can come back quickly in Debian.
Thanks Stephane for keeping your calm, baring with me, and taking the
time to explain your point of view. I suppose you understood that I'm
disappointed to have to
On 09/12/2013 12:25 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> On 2013-09-11 21:53, Brian Gupta wrote:
>> I am considering putting forth a proposal to make MariaDB the default
>> mysql binary provider for Jesse. However there are a number of
>> unresolved issues, that might prevent consensus at
Processing changes file: pyopencl_2012.1.dfsg-1_multi.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: gajim_0.15.1-4.1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http:
Your message dated Tue, 24 Sep 2013 22:47:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#723587: fixed in pyopencl 2012.1.dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #723587,
regarding pu: Non-free file in PyOpenCL
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #723798 [release.debian.org] pu: package gajim/0.15.1-4
Added tag(s) pending.
--
723798: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=723798
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #723587 [release.debian.org] pu: Non-free file in PyOpenCL
Added tag(s) pending.
--
723587: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=723587
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Mon, 2013-09-23 at 21:08 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-09-20 at 08:45 +0200, Tanguy Ortolo wrote:
> > Julien Cristau, 2013-09-19 23:48+0200:
> > >The debdiff should be in this bug, please.
> >
> > Sorry, I thought I did it. Here it is.
>
> Thanks. In
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Mon, 2013-09-23 at 05:26 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Tomasz Rybak (2013-09-17):
> > After asking on debian-mentors I was advised that I should also
> > upload DFSG-free versions of packages to stable and oldstable:
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2013/
Processing changes file: pyopenssl_0.10-1+squeeze1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: pyopenssl_0.10-1+squeeze1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: pyopenssl_0.10-1+squeeze1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: pyopenssl_0.10-1+squeeze1_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Proce
Processing changes file: libquvi-scripts_0.4.18-1~deb7u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: pyopenssl_0.13-2+deb7u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: pyopenssl_0.13-2+deb7u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: pyopenssl_0.13-2+deb7u1_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Pro
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #724294 [release.debian.org] opu: package ia32-libs/20130923,
ia32-libs-gtk/20130923
Added tag(s) pending.
--
724294: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=724294
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with proble
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Mon, 2013-09-23 at 21:05 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-09-23 at 15:42 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > As usual I'd like to update ia32-libs and ia32-libs-gtk for the upcoming
> > squeeze point release. Attached are the debdiffs this will result in
> >
Processing changes file: exactimage_0.8.5-5+deb7u3_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: exactimage_0.8.5-5+deb7u3_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: exactimage_0.8.5-5+deb7u3_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: exactimage_0.8.5-5+deb7u3_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Proce
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Mon, 2013-09-23 at 09:37 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Cyril Brulebois writes:
> > Ansgar Burchardt (2013-09-16):
> >> libquvi-scripts/0.4.18-1 also made it to testing two days ago. There
> >> have been no new bug reports.
> >
> > (Hoping I'm not missing anything
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #721859 [release.debian.org] pu: package libquvi-scripts/0.4.18-1~deb7u1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
721859: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=721859
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UN
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 17:38:37 +0100, Graham Whaley wrote:
> I also have allocation for MIPS native build hardware. I need to discuss
> the present situation of the MIPS hardware within Debian, and how we can
> proceed to improve that situation. I've not identified who within Debian I
> need to
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:02:07 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 09/24/2013 09:48 PM, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> > Le 06/09/2013 10:14, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
> >> However, as I wrote it, it's going to happen, so please be patient about
> >> it. IMO, this shouldn't block any transition though. I
Le 24/09/2013 19:00, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
> Please don't think this way.
>
> I work daily on 79 packages to maintain OpenStack in Debian:
>
> http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=openstack-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
If you go that way, I could say that you're blocking my work on 214
p
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #724306 [release.debian.org] pu: package dpkg/1.16.11
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
724306: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=724306
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
For some reason, this didn't make it to debian-release; that's usually
related to attachment size, but they don't seem /that/ big...
On Mon, 2013-09-23 at 17:16 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> dpkg (1.16.11) stable; urgency=low
>
> [ Raphaël Hertzog ]
> * Fix usage
On 09/24/2013 10:04 PM, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Le 24/09/2013 15:48, Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
>> If I remove all binary packages of xen-api from testing, the following
>> new packages are broken: xcp-guest-templates, nova-xcp-plugins,
>> nova-compute-xen.
>>
>> xcp-guest-templates is built by gue
On 09/24/2013 09:48 PM, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Le 06/09/2013 10:14, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
>> However, as I wrote it, it's going to happen, so please be patient about
>> it. IMO, this shouldn't block any transition though. If the release team
>> is reading: just let everything transition to tes
Hi David.
Good timing. I needed to update everybody on the status.
I now have allocation for two full time permanent hires for Debian MIPS
work in my group, and will be placing those job adverts on the imgtec web
site as soon as I can (in the next few days), and posting those links to
the debian-
Hi,
I am not currently a porter but I would like to be one for the Hurd.
I do some test on QEMU and public Hurd host.
I am familiar with system programming and have some embedded and printer
driver development experience. I use Linux for 11 year, family with cross
compiling tool chain.
I never
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Seems like 1.09-3 is again built against Perl 5.14.
Please
nmu libfile-extattr-perl_1.09-3 . amd64 . -m "Rebuild against Perl 5.18."
(Alex
[added CC to debian-mips, please don't shoot me for cross-posting]
> "Graham" == Graham Whaley writes:
> I need to update you on the state of Debian support commitment within
> Imagination, particularly in light of the plight of MIPS support for
> jessie.
> Having become aware of this sit
Le 24/09/2013 15:48, Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
> If I remove all binary packages of xen-api from testing, the following
> new packages are broken: xcp-guest-templates, nova-xcp-plugins,
> nova-compute-xen.
>
> xcp-guest-templates is built by guest-templates which seems to be a leaf
> package and c
Le 06/09/2013 10:14, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
> However, as I wrote it, it's going to happen, so please be patient about
> it. IMO, this shouldn't block any transition though. If the release team
> is reading: just let everything transition to testing, and remove the
> old version of XCP 1.3.2 in t
Processing changes file: gxine_0.5.907-2+deb7u1_powerpc.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vopd1-0003ek...@franck.debian.org
On 09/11/2013 06:02 PM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 05:06:03PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
>
> Hi,
> two more testing removals related to the libav9 transition:
>
> - libavg 1.7.1-3 fails to build for unrelated boost reasons. Popcon is
> virtually non-existant.
Well the
35 matches
Mail list logo
