On Tuesday 08 October 2013 01:51:41 Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Dienstag, 8. Oktober 2013, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > So while it is possible that the _maintainer_ is not needing a friendly
> > remainder, other interested third-party might.
>
> anyone interested in a package can opt-in via t
Hi KiBi,
Ansgar opened #714063 a while back for us and there was some discussion about
this bug on the debian-python list at the time.
The choices appear to be limited to:
(a) upload translate-toolkit with support for translating subtitle files
disabled
(b) upload an older version of python-a
Hi,
On Dienstag, 8. Oktober 2013, Bill Allombert wrote:
> So while it is possible that the _maintainer_ is not needing a friendly
> remainder, other interested third-party might.
anyone interested in a package can opt-in via the PTS...
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: wheezy
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
here's another tiny update I'd like to see in stable. Due to a simple
error in the state machine, asking the installer to perform a full
search (“2nd pass”) to find an ISO image
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 725748 wheezy
Bug #725748 [release.debian.org] pu: package netcfg/1.108
Added tag(s) wheezy.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
725748: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725748
Debi
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu wheezy
Hi,
(first off, sorry for being so late. I would understand punting that
until 7.3, etc.)
due to check's being broken (#712140) and netcfg's trying to use its
pkgconfig file in its maste
On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 09:52:17AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a friendly reminder. If you are listed below, then the listed
> packages of yours will be automatically removed from testing within 15
> days. The "first batch" of automatic removals will happen in about 8
> days.
>
Adam D. Barratt:
> On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 20:00 +, Robert Millan wrote:
>> Adam D. Barratt:
I guess this part will require manual handling by -release? (CCing)
Otherwise we'd have to make those packages kfreebsd-any...
>>>
>>> It'd need a force-hint, which says "ignore any install
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 release.debian.org
Bug #725633 [libgtg0] libgtg0: depends on obsolete libotf-trace1
Bug reassigned from package 'libgtg0' to 'release.debian.org'.
No longer marked as found in versions gtg-trace/0.2+dfsg-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug
Control: reassign -1 release.debian.org
Control: retitle -1 nmu: gtg-trace_0.2+dfsg-1
Control: user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Control: usertags binnmu
Control: subscribe -1 sthiba...@debain.org
Hello,
libotf-trace1 is now gone in the otf package, replaced by
libopen-trace-format1, gt
On Sun, 6 Oct 2013 23:59:44 +0200
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it doesn't appear you coordinated the libtorrent-rasterbar{6,7}
> transition with the release team, but I've set up a tracker anyway:
> http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libtorrent-rasterbar7.html
>
> Ideally you woul
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + squeeze pending
Bug #725731 [release.debian.org] RM: irssi-plugin-otr/0.3-2
Added tag(s) squeeze and pending.
> retitle -1 RM: irssi-plugin-otr -- RoM; security issues
Bug #725731 [release.debian.org] RM: irssi-plugin-otr/0.3-2
Changed Bug title to 'RM: irs
Control: tags -1 + squeeze pending
Control: retitle -1 RM: irssi-plugin-otr -- RoM; security issues
On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 21:14 +0200, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> The pre-1.0 versions of the OTR plugin are very broken for all
> software (xchat, irssi, etc) and are considered insecure as OTRv1 is
> su
On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 20:00 +, Robert Millan wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt:
> >> I guess this part will require manual handling by -release? (CCing)
> >>
> >> Otherwise we'd have to make those packages kfreebsd-any...
> >
> > It'd need a force-hint, which says "ignore any installability issues
> >
On 2013-10-07 15:55:26, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> (Probably OT as far as the release team is concerned: it might be
> worth filing CVE's against the clients that still support v1 and v2.
> Antoine, do you want to ask the OTR developers what's their take
> on it?)
I wouldn't bother, personnally. I
Adam D. Barratt:
>> I guess this part will require manual handling by -release? (CCing)
>>
>> Otherwise we'd have to make those packages kfreebsd-any...
>
> It'd need a force-hint, which says "ignore any installability issues
> created by migrating this source package" and only applies to the
> pa
Hi,
tl;dr: I support Antoine's proposal to drop from Squeeze and Wheezy
any OTR client or plugin that supports both OTRv1 and OTRv2.
I strongly doubt we're still shipping anything that supports v1 only,
but it would be wise to check.
> OTRv1 is susceptible to downgrade attacks (if my memory is c
Hi,
On Sonntag, 6. Oktober 2013, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> debian-edu itself is a little more complicated, as the new version adds
> a dependency on the new package from debian-edu-config, so we'd have to
> take the new versions together (or neither). I'd still like to have more
> team discussion a
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
The pre-1.0 versions of the OTR plugin are very broken for all
software (xchat, irssi, etc) and are considered insecure as OTRv1 is
susceptible to downgrade attacks (if my memory is correct).
I
Processing changes file: ttytter_2.1.0-1~deb7u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vtfph-0007oi...@franck.debian.org
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Sat, 2013-10-05 at 11:52 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-09-23 at 04:26 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Thijs Kinkhorst (2013-09-05):
> > > I'd like to see the possibilities of updating TTYtter in stable. The
> > > goal is to make TTYtter work with the
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #721921 [release.debian.org] pu: package ttytter/2.0.1-1+deb7u1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
721921: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=721921
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Processing changes file: base-files_7.1wheezy2_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vtfmf-0003n2...@franck.debian.org
Hi Cyril,
(adding ftpmaster in CC).
Le lundi, 7 octobre 2013 01.57:42 Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
> looking at the testing summary page for d-i, I noticed win32-loader is
> blocked from automatic migration. I'm not sure whether we want to
> keep it that way but at least the 0.7.4.9 release currently
Processing changes file: base-files_7.1wheezy2_armel.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vtdj3-0004ni...@franck.debian.org
On 2013-10-07 14:08, Robert Millan wrote:
Steven Chamberlain:
http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=kfreebsd-9
Updating kfreebsd-9 makes 5 non-depending packages uninstallable on
i386: cuse4bsd-dkms, fuse4bsd-dkms, kfreebsd-headers-486,
kfreebsd-headers-686, kfreebsd-headers-xe
Processing changes file: base-files_7.1wheezy2_mips.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vtdux-0002dh...@franck.debian.org
Processing changes file: base-files_7.1wheezy2_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: base-files_7.1wheezy2_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: base-files_7.1wheezy2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: base-files_7.1wheezy2_kfreebsd-i386.changes
ACCEPT
Proc
Steven Chamberlain:
> http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=kfreebsd-9
>> Updating kfreebsd-9 makes 5 non-depending packages uninstallable on
>> i386: cuse4bsd-dkms, fuse4bsd-dkms, kfreebsd-headers-486,
>> kfreebsd-headers-686, kfreebsd-headers-xen
>
> Note that britney tests i386
Processing changes file: base-files_7.1wheezy2_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vtadj-0005qt...@franck.debian.org
Hi!
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 01:13:27AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> you dropped the following binary package from the yaml-cpp source
> package:
> libyaml-cpp0.3
>
> It appears it is still depended on by the following packages:
> [...]
> | opencolorio: libopencolorio1 [amd64 armel armhf i38
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 04:07:25PM +0100, Wookey wrote:
> +++ Niels Thykier [2013-10-02 09:45 +0200]:
> > armel: Wookey (DD), Gatis Visnevskis (!DD), Nobuhiro Iwamatsu (DD), Steve
> > McIntyre (DD)
> > armhf: Jeremiah Foster (!DD, but NM?), Wookey (DD), Justus Winter (!DD),
> > Lennart Sorensen (
On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 09:33:51AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> If you are (or intend to become) an active porter for the lifetime of
> jessie, then please send a signed email explaining your involvement in
> the port to the Release Team before
> 1st of October 2013. Please explain the level of y
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 wheezy moreinfo
Bug #725661 [release.debian.org] pu: opencv/2.3.1+dfsg-1
Added tag(s) wheezy and moreinfo.
--
725661: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725661
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUB
Control: tag -1 wheezy moreinfo
Hi,
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu (2013-10-07):
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: pu
>
> I'd like to propose an upgrade of opencv.
>
> opencv distributed in wheezy includes source code of non-free (#7
Your message dated Mon, 7 Oct 2013 10:42:03 +0200
with message-id <20131007084203.gc29...@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#725671: different source packages, co-ordinated
release to jessie
has caused the Debian Bug report #725671,
regarding different source packages, co-ordinated release to jess
Package: release.debian.org
PostBooks has multiple source packages. Specifically, there is
src:postbooks (the client) and src:postbooks-schema-(empty|quickstart|demo)
The client can only be used with the matching postbooks-schema version
Is there an automated way to ensure these packages (and
37 matches
Mail list logo
