Hi,
Thanks for your ping. And sorry, reply was late.
I am working about this.
Best regards,
Nobuhiro
2014-01-22 intrigeri :
> Hi,
>
> Cyril Brulebois wrote (07 Oct 2013 08:41:17 GMT) :
>> Nobuhiro Iwamatsu (2013-10-07):
>>> I'd like to propose an upgrade of opencv.
>>>
>>> opencv distributed
Is there a plan for doing so in unstable?
There is a plan for pushing a new upstream release in unstable. So, I do
not plan on pushing the timezone update in unstable.
Also, IANA has released a new updated timezone. So, I will have to
recreate this patch. Will get back on this.
- Rahul.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 735509 by 731168
Bug #735509 [release.debian.org] transition: leptonlib
735509 was not blocked by any bugs.
735509 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 735509: 731168
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
block 735509 by 731168
quit
Hi,
Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
> Leptonica upstream is releasing a new version that will
> have an increased soname (liblept3 -> liblept4). No exotic
> challenges expected.
This is a tiny transition: the only source package that will need
rebuilding is tesseract.
$ gr
Hi,
Am Montag, den 27.01.2014, 00:27 +0100 schrieb Julien Cristau:
> I can read britney output just fine, I just don't touch haskell stuff
> as far as binNMUs because everything seems to be uninstallable all the
> time and I don't know if you or anybody else is keeping track of your
> packages and
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:20:04AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Well, not directly with github-backup, but I've been waiting for
> haskell-text-icu to migrate for a while with no idea what's going on...
#734528
#734668
#735333
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.or
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 23:24:57 +, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Montag, den 27.01.2014, 00:20 +0100 schrieb Julien Cristau:
> > > But how does that relate to github-backup? It is a program, not a
> > > library, and thus has no difficult dependencies into the Haskell world.
> > > I be
Hi,
Am Montag, den 27.01.2014, 00:20 +0100 schrieb Julien Cristau:
> > But how does that relate to github-backup? It is a program, not a
> > library, and thus has no difficult dependencies into the Haskell world.
> > I believe you just have to issue the binNMUs and tomorrow the
> > github-backup l
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 23:01:48 +, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> moving this to the list, as I assume it was not meant personally.
>
> Am Sonntag, den 26.01.2014, 23:45 +0100 schrieb Julien Cristau:
> > On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 21:28:37 +, James Cowgill wrote:
> >
> > > Package: re
Hi,
moving this to the list, as I assume it was not meant personally.
Am Sonntag, den 26.01.2014, 23:45 +0100 schrieb Julien Cristau:
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 21:28:37 +, James Cowgill wrote:
>
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debia
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 21:28:37 +, James Cowgill wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> Hi,
>
> github-backup is still compiled against libicu48 on some architetures
>
> nmu github-backup_1.20131203 .
On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 19:24:21 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> Tony: Thanks for testing it.
> Are you uploading to s-p-u or do you want me to do it?
[After private coordination:]
Uploaded, tagged, and pushed.
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hi,
github-backup is still compiled against libicu48 on some architetures
nmu github-backup_1.20131203 . amd64 i386 powerpc sparc . -m "rebuild against
libicu52"
James
-- System Inform
On Sun, 26 Jan 2014, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Our general approach to such updates in the past has been that having
> the version of the package in stable document that release is
> preferable, particularly when the changes are principally documentation.
>
> A filtered debdiff showing the changes
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
I would like to update the debian-handbook in Wheezy so that it actually
documents Wheezy and not Squeeze. We finished the update in late december.
Attached is a filtered debdiff that drops chan
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 736762 ftp.debian.org
Bug #736762 [release.debian.org] RM: rubygems/1.8.24-1
Bug reassigned from package 'release.debian.org' to 'ftp.debian.org'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #736762 to the same values
previously set
On Fri, 2014-01-24 at 08:37 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> I was wondering, would you accept a new upstream version of
> debian-handbook into stable ?
>
> The current version documents squeeze and we finished the wheezy
> update late december. The debdiff would be huge but it's just
> a single ar
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 12:19:49 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 16:57:30 -0500, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> >
> > > I will upload protobuf 2.5.0-5 to unstable shortly. Is there anything I
> > > need to do to schedule binNMUs of the reverse deps or
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 728178 with 736172
Bug #728178 [release.debian.org] transition: gdcm 2.4.0
728178 was not blocked by any bugs.
728178 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 728178: 736172
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 17:40:02 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Please see #736365 [0] for the debdiff and information about
> > testing on wheezy.
> With the obvious change to the distribution in the changelog header,
> please go ahead; thanks.
Thanks Adam.
Tony: Thanks for testing it.
Are you
Your message dated Sun, 26 Jan 2014 18:44:23 +0100
with message-id <20140126174423.ga9...@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#725968: pu: package libvirt/0.9.12.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #725968,
regarding pu: package libvirt/0.9.12.2-1
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
Control: tags -1 + wheezy confirmed
On Sun, 2014-01-26 at 09:08 -0800, tony mancill wrote:
> The version of tuxguitar in wheezy still depends on xulrunner-10.0,
> whereas wheezy now has iceweasel 17 and will shortly (at least via
> -security) have 24.
Heh, that sounds familiar. :-)
> The propose
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + wheezy confirmed
Bug #736769 [release.debian.org] pu: package tuxguitar/1.2-13
Added tag(s) wheezy and confirmed.
--
736769: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736769
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
-
On Sun, 2014-01-26 at 09:13 -0800, tony mancill wrote:
> On 01/22/2014 12:03 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > The version of tuxguitar in wheezy still depends on xulrunner-10.0,
> > whereas wheezy now has iceweasel 17 and will shortly (at least via
> > -security) have 24.
> >
> > Would it be possibl
On 01/22/2014 12:03 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Package: tuxguitar
> Version: 1.2-13
> Severity: important
> X-Debbugs-CC: debian-release@lists.debian.org
>
> Hi,
>
> The version of tuxguitar in wheezy still depends on xulrunner-10.0,
> whereas wheezy now has iceweasel 17 and will shortly (at le
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Dear Release Team:
The version of tuxguitar in wheezy still depends on xulrunner-10.0,
whereas wheezy now has iceweasel 17 and will shortly (at least via
-security) have 24.
The proposed update
Cédric Boutillier (2014-01-26):
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: rm
>
> Hi!
>
> As a member of the Ruby team, I am asking for the removal of rubygems
> from the archive.
You want to read this, then reassign the bug repor
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hi!
As a member of the Ruby team, I am asking for the removal of rubygems
from the archive. This package is for ruby1.8 only, which is now
deprecated (newer Ruby interpreter have their own versi
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi!
I would like to propose an update of ruby-opengl for wheezy to remove
documentation without clear license.
Please find below the changelog entry and in attachment the full
debdiff.
-8<
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu bluez_5.5-1~exp1 . ALL . experimental . -m "Rebuild against libudev1"
libudev0 is no longer available.
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
wit
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu oxygen-transparent_0~20130220-1 . ALL . experimental . -m "Rebuild against
libkdecorations4abi2"
Still depends on the no more available libkdecorations4abi1 (#734980).
Andreas
--
T
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 07:08:29PM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Cyril Brulebois wrote (29 Sep 2013 23:07:34 GMT) :
> >> + my $modconf;
> >> + if (`uname -r` =~ /(\d+)\.(\d+)\.(\d+)/) {
> >> +-if ($2 > 4) {
> >> ++if (($2 > 4) || ($1 > 2)) {
>
> > The regex isn't anchored (^) and want
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu libaio-ocaml_1.0.1-1 . ALL . experimental . -m "Rebuild against ocaml 4.01"
That still depends on 3.x ...
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu libquvi_0.9.3-1 . ALL . experimental . -m "Rebuild against libproxy1"
uninstallable in experimental due to the no longer available libproxy0,
#729898
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 12:19:49 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 16:57:30 -0500, Robert Edmonds wrote:
>
> > I will upload protobuf 2.5.0-5 to unstable shortly. Is there anything I
> > need to do to schedule binNMUs of the reverse deps or is that handled by
> > the release
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 16:57:30 -0500, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> I will upload protobuf 2.5.0-5 to unstable shortly. Is there anything I
> need to do to schedule binNMUs of the reverse deps or is that handled by
> the release team?
>
Scheduled now.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Dig
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 726165 + pending
Bug #726165 [release.debian.org] transition: protobuf
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
726165: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=726165
Deb
37 matches
Mail list logo
