Hi,
On Fri, 31 Jan 2014, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> I've been arguing with myself a little, but on balance I'd prefer to
> stick with the template change for now.
Thanks, uploaded.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer
Discover the Debian Administrator's Handbook:
→ http://debian-handboo
On 2014-02-01 02:36, Daigo Moriwaki wrote:
> Hi team,
>
Hi,
> Looking at buildd status, my 'libunwind' package has been "Installed"
> successfully on all the architecture that the package is expected to be
> built on. However, it has never entered testing. "Check why" [1] says that
> libunwind7
Processing changes file: ruby-opengl_0.60.1+dfsg2-1~wheezy1_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1w9sfr-00050s...@franck.debian.or
Processing changes file: ruby-gsl_1.14.7+dfsg-1_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ruby-gsl_1.14.7+dfsg-1_mips.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ruby-gsl_1.14.7+dfsg-1_sparc.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ruby-opengl_0.60.1+dfsg2-1~wheezy1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Proc
Processing changes file: ruby-gsl_1.14.7+dfsg-1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ruby-gsl_1.14.7+dfsg-1_s390.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ruby-gsl_1.14.7+dfsg-1_s390x.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ruby-opengl_0.60.1+dfsg2-1~wheezy1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Proce
Processing changes file: ruby-gsl_1.14.7+dfsg-1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ruby-gsl_1.14.7+dfsg-1_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ruby-gsl_1.14.7+dfsg-1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ruby-gsl_1.14.7+dfsg-1_kfreebsd-i386.changes
ACCEPT
2014-01-31 Markus Wanner :
> On 01/31/2014 07:28 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> On the topic of 99->100, do you know if that will happen any time soon?
>> I am wondering whether we should go for finishing the 80->99 and do a
>> separate 99->100 or wait and jump directly from 80->100. If 100 is
>> co
Hi team,
Looking at buildd status, my 'libunwind' package has been "Installed"
successfully on all the architecture that the package is expected to be
built on. However, it has never entered testing. "Check why" [1] says that
libunwind7 and libunwind7-dev blocks. But they are deprecated since the
On 31/01/14 05:42, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Please go ahead, bearing in mind that the window for 7.4 closes this
> weekend.
This should now be in your queue. Many thanks.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
wit
The updated libcitygml package is not uploaded yet,
It was NMUd about a week ago, fixing the FTBFS bug, but I don't know if
all your planned changes were included. (By "OK" I meant "OK for
transition", ie built against latest openscenegraph and no RC bugs.)
Making unrelated changes to OK-for-
Processing changes file: curl_7.26.0-1+wheezy8_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: curl_7.26.0-1+wheezy8_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: curl_7.26.0-1+wheezy8_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: curl_7.26.0-1+wheezy8_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes f
On 01/31/2014 10:57 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On Friday, 31. January 2014 21:44:44 Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> The updated libcitygml package is not uploaded yet, but I intent to ask
>> for sponshorship at the end of the weekend if YunQiang Su hasn't replied
>
> My NMU got uploaded yesterd
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Thu, 2014-01-30 at 20:17 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-01-26 at 16:02 +0100, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> > I would like to propose an update of ruby-opengl for wheezy to remove
> > documentation without clear license.
>
> Please go ahead; thanks.
Flagg
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #736757 [release.debian.org] pu: package ruby-opengl/0.60.1+dfsg2-1~wheezy1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
736757: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736757
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #736676 [release.debian.org] pu: package ruby-gsl/1.14.7+dfsg-1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
736676: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736676
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Thu, 2014-01-30 at 20:23 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-01-26 at 01:10 +0100, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> > I am proposing an update of ruby-gsl for Wheezy in order to get rid of
> > non-free documentation present in the rdoc/ directory.
> > The modificat
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #737239 [release.debian.org] pu: package localepurge/0.6.3+deb7u1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
737239: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=737239
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRI
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Fri, 2014-01-31 at 19:36 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2014-01-31 19:28, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Fri, 2014-01-31 at 19:01 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> >> I would like to fix #736359 / CVE-2014-1638 in Wheezy and Squeeze[0].
> >> According to the security tra
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Thu, 2014-01-30 at 22:20 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sun, 2014-01-26 at 22:00 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > I would like to update the debian-handbook in Wheezy so that it actually
> > > documents Wheezy and
On Thu, 2014-01-30 at 22:01 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > It's a one-liner that fix issues with containers running with glibc >=
> > > 2.18. Would this be acceptable as well ?
> >
> > It appears this issue isn't fixed in unstable yet; is that cor
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #736797 [release.debian.org] pu: package debian-handbook/7.20140126~deb7u1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
736797: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736797
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To
On 2014-01-31 22:21, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Fri, 2014-01-31 at 20:45 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> I would like to fix #736359 / CVE-2014-1638 in Squeeze. According to
>> the security tracker, the security team has classified the bug as
>> "minor" and declar
[trimmed Cc:]
On Friday, 31. January 2014 21:44:44 Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> The updated libcitygml package is not uploaded yet, but I intent to ask
> for sponshorship at the end of the weekend if YunQiang Su hasn't replied
My NMU got uploaded yesterday and is built successfully.
@release t
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #737251 [release.debian.org] pu: package localepurge/0.6.2+nmu1+squeeze1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
737251: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=737251
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
T
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Fri, 2014-01-31 at 20:45 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> I would like to fix #736359 / CVE-2014-1638 in Squeeze. According to
> the security tracker, the security team has classified the bug as
> "minor" and declared it does not need a DSA[1].
>
> The problem is tha
On 01/31/2014 09:23 PM, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
> Updated status:
> osgearth, libcitygml, qgis: OK (qgis FTBFS on arm*, but that's non-RC as
> there's no old arm* version in sid)
The updated libcitygml package is not uploaded yet, but I intent to ask
for sponshorship at the end of the weekend if
Not being sure whether to go to 3.2.0rc, 3.2.0 final or wait for the
(indefinitely delayed) 3.2.1 is what has already made this drag on for
months.
> [3.2.1] should be binary compatible. (And their current 3.2
> branch still has a SOVERSION of 100.)
3.2.1 bumps the OpenThreads soversion to 20,
Robert Edmonds wrote:
> Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 12:00:35 -0500, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> >
> > > Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 12:19:49 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 16:57:30 -0500, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> >
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: squeeze
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
(TL;DR: This is #737239 once more for opu)
Long story:
Hi,
I would like to fix #736359 / CVE-2014-1638 in Squeeze. According to
the security tracker, the security team has class
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 12:00:35 -0500, Robert Edmonds wrote:
>
> > Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 12:19:49 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 16:57:30 -0500, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I will upload protob
On 01/31/2014 07:28 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On the topic of 99->100, do you know if that will happen any time soon?
> I am wondering whether we should go for finishing the 80->99 and do a
> separate 99->100 or wait and jump directly from 80->100. If 100 is
> coming soon, it is probably easiest
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Affected packages:
(unstable)roberto@miami:~$ apt-cache rdepends libsasl2-2
libsasl2-2
Reverse Depends:
znc
ziproxy
subversion
li
On 2014-01-05 13:48, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>[...]
> Hello,
>
Hi,
Sorry, I seem to have lost track of this.
> I would rather not introduce new binary packages now (going through
> NEW) but can keep it in mind for the next soname bump, not that I
> expect one soonish.
>
Okay.
> [...]
>>> If y
On 2014-01-31 19:28, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Fri, 2014-01-31 at 19:01 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> I would like to fix #736359 / CVE-2014-1638 in Wheezy and Squeeze[0].
>> According to the security tracker, the security team has classified
>> the bug as "mino
Processing changes file: linux_3.2.54-1_mips.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1w9ieo-0002gq...@franck.debian.org
On 2014-01-30 01:42, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
> Control: reopen -1
> (This may or may not be called a transition, but certainly isn't fixed.)
>
Hi,
Thanks for reopening the bug. :)
> Current status (note that the tracker isn't currently being updated):
> osgearth: OK
> simgear/flightgear/fgrun:
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Fri, 2014-01-31 at 19:01 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> I would like to fix #736359 / CVE-2014-1638 in Wheezy and Squeeze[0].
> According to the security tracker, the security team has classified
> the bug as "minor" and declared it does not need a DSA[1].
>
> The p
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #737239 [release.debian.org] pu: package localepurge/0.6.3+deb7u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
737239: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=737239
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUB
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: wheezy
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
I would like to fix #736359 / CVE-2014-1638 in Wheezy and Squeeze[0].
According to the security tracker, the security team has classified
the bug as "minor" and declared it does
Processing changes file: linux_3.2.54-1_sparc.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1w9cyu-0001rr...@franck.debian.org
ebian/changelog ia32-libs-20140131/debian/changelog
--- ia32-libs-20131011/debian/changelog 2013-10-11 09:50:18.0 +0200
+++ ia32-libs-20140131/debian/changelog 2014-01-31 10:54:27.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,46 @@
+ia32-libs (20140131) squeeze-proposed-updates; urgency=low
+
+ * Packages up
41 matches
Mail list logo
