Control: block -1 by 738752
Le mercredi 12 février 2014 à 22:58 +, Barak A. Pearlmutter a
écrit :
> Although I would not anticipate any difficulty, do let me know if any
> packages that build-depend on libqhull-dev require help getting them
> to build with the new version and I will do what I
Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 738752
Bug #738791 [release.debian.org] transition: qhull
738791 was not blocked by any bugs.
738791 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 738791: 738752
--
738791: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=738791
Debian Bug Trackin
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
The qhull library was upgraded from 2009.1 to 2012.1, fixing a number
of bugs. Upstream bumped the SO from 5 to 6, for good reason, so all
the packages that use it need to be rebuilt. (
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: wheezy
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
As reported in #738701, the firebug version currently in stable is not
compatible with iceweasel 24 from stable-security. I’d like you to
consider accepting the (rebuilt in Whee
On 2014-02-09 12:38, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
> We have fixed versions of flightgear and fgrun, and I expect (but can't
> promise, I'm not the maintainer) that they will be uploaded soon.
>
> If you want to remove libopenscenegraph80 and end this now, go ahead,
> it's uninstallable anyway (but not
On 2014-01-30 16:23, Robert Millan wrote:
> On 30/01/2014 00:03, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> @Robert: Re your "Could you elaborate?". I haven't forgotten it, but I
>> out of time - so I will get back to you on that.
>
> It's ok.
>
> I wanted more detail both on the problem and on the solution. You j
On 2014-02-07 21:28, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Feb 2014, Don Armstrong wrote:
>> Yeah. I think this is a bug I introduced when I switched to using
>> bugcfg instead of the hardcoded values which were being used before. I
>> just fixed this in @81492, but I haven't rolled it out to the BTS y
Your message dated Wed, 12 Feb 2014 12:21:55 +0100
with message-id <20140212112155.gx17...@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#719227: transition: poppler 0.22
has caused the Debian Bug report #719227,
regarding transition: poppler 0.22
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
control: block 731861 by 737366
Hi everyone,
As I see miniupnc transition is got stuck due to FTBFS of transmission on
kfreebsd-any, which is caused by its build-depends on libsystemd-daemon-dev
(see #737366).
Did I miss other blockers?
Best regards,
Boris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
Processing control commands:
> block 731861 by 737366
Bug #731861 [release.debian.org] transition: miniupnc
731861 was not blocked by any bugs.
731861 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 731861: 737366
--
731861: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=731861
Debian Bug
Processing control commands:
> block 731861 by 737366
Bug #731861 [release.debian.org] transition: miniupnc
731861 was blocked by: 737366
731861 was not blocking any bugs.
Ignoring request to alter blocking bugs of bug #731861 to the same blocks
previously set
--
731861: http://bugs.debian.org/
11 matches
Mail list logo
