Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: wheezy
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
This package has two bugs that can cause significant issues. Both result
in a failure of a DNS lookup; one with a timeout that should not occur and the
other with a traceback.
The
* Julien Cristau [140511 01:35]:
> Please file a serious bug against ruby2.0 titled something like "do not
> ship with jessie", and tag it jessie and sid.
Filed as #747679.
-ch
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 12:51:25 +0200, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Dear Release Team,
>
> now that ruby1.9.1 is gone, we, the Ruby maintainers, need to make
> sure that r
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 12:51:25PM +0200, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
> During the ruby1.9.1-rm transition we discovered very late in the
> process that we were missing some packages, esp. xapian-bindings.
> As I know very little about ben, please crosscheck the ben file.
>
> Thanks,
> Christian
Hi,
On 2014-05-09 22:11, Stanley Reznicek wrote:
I installed Debian 7.4 which worked good for about three days. On boot
up it showed a waring : not starting port mapper not running. My
keyboard and mouse was dead. What is the fix for this problem ?
For support please contact debian-u...@lists.
On 2014-05-09 Ricardo Mones wrote:
[...]
> This is a new mini-shrinking-transition for libetpan new upstream
> release 1.4.1. Source packages affected are now:
> - claws-mail (claws-mail itself and all claws-mail-* plugins)
> - cairo-dock-plug-ins (cairo-dock-mail-plug-in)
[..]
> Anyway, I've u
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Dear Release Team,
now that ruby1.9.1 is gone, we, the Ruby maintainers, need to make
sure that ruby2.0 is also not included in jessie.
Similar to the ruby1.9.1-rm transition, we expect
Dear release managers, dear libpng maintainers, all DD
I would like to find a resolution of the currently very
unfortunate state of libpng in Debian.
We have
* libpng 1.2 in stable, testing, unstable
* libpng 1.6 in experimental, but not providing libpng-dev
If we continue like this, the next
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 742630 + pending
Bug #742630 [release.debian.org] transition: tracker 1.0
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
742630: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=742630
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 742853 + pending
Bug #742853 [release.debian.org] transition: mpich2
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
742853: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=742853
Debia
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 744377 + pending
Bug #744377 [release.debian.org] transition: sip-api-11.0
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
744377: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=744377
11 matches
Mail list logo