Re: missing Build-Using field serious? wheezy-ignore as well?

2014-07-22 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wednesday, July 23, 2014 11:28:30 Paul Wise wrote: > On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 6:32 AM, Holger Levsen wrote: > > jcristau suggested to just downgrade them, but I seem to recall a > > consensus > > those shall be serious bugs indeed? (Doesnt the ftp team want those as > > serious?) > > gnu-efi app

Re: missing Build-Using field serious? wheezy-ignore as well?

2014-07-22 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 6:32 AM, Holger Levsen wrote: > jcristau suggested to just downgrade them, but I seem to recall a consensus > those shall be serious bugs indeed? (Doesnt the ftp team want those as > serious?) gnu-efi appears to be BSD licensed, so it isn't a license violation to have vers

Bug#753444: interruption code 0x4003B in libperl.so.5.18.2[3fffcfff000+1d0000]

2014-07-22 Thread Stephen Powell
Bug number 753592 was merged into bug number 753444. Bug number 753444 was then marked as fixed in perl-base version 5.18.2-6. At the time of this writing, this version is now in testing (jessie). So one would think it would be safe now to upgrade one's system, right? Well, yes and no. It can

Processed: transition: wxpython3.0

2014-07-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > block -1 by 734799 Bug #755757 [release.debian.org] transition: wxpython3.0 755757 was not blocked by any bugs. 755757 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 755757: 734799 -- 755757: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=755757 Debian Bug T

Bug#755757: transition: wxpython3.0

2014-07-22 Thread Olly Betts
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Control: block -1 by 734799 This is a follow-on from the wxwidgets3.0 transition. The wxwidgets2.8 source package actually contains the wxpython source, which has an embedded copy of wxw

missing Build-Using field serious? wheezy-ignore as well?

2014-07-22 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, shall I tag bugs like #755498 wheezy-ignore? #755498: elilo: Add a Built-Using field for gnu-efi - jcristau suggested to just downgrade them, but I seem to recall a consensus those shall be serious bugs indeed? (Doesnt the ftp team want those as serious?) cheers, Holger sign

Bug#755712: wheezy-pu: package exim4/4.80-7

2014-07-22 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Tue, 2014-07-22 at 18:12 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > exim 4.83 includes a fix for a minor security issue (local privilege > escalation to exim user) which I would like to fix for stable. I have > already doublechecked with debian security that fixing this via a

Processed: Re: Bug#755712: wheezy-pu: package exim4/4.80-7

2014-07-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #755712 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package exim4/4.80-7 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 755712: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=755712 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIB

Re: [PKG-Openstack-devel] Bug#755651: horizon: Please ensure it works with Django 1.7

2014-07-22 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Tue, 22 Jul 2014, Neil Williams wrote: > Raphael: please expand on why you want 1.7 in Jessie other than "it's > newest so must be best". I'm perfectly happy to have django1.7 and > later available from backports. Which specific *features* in django1.7 > are to be considered as justifying t

Re: [PKG-Openstack-devel] Bug#755651: horizon: Please ensure it works with Django 1.7

2014-07-22 Thread Neil Williams
On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 23:51:27 +0800 Thomas Goirand wrote: > > We intend to upload Django 1.7 to unstable as soon as it is > > available because we really want the latest version in jessie and > > the freeze is approaching fast. In preparation of that, I have > > uploaded a release candidate in exp

Bug#755712: wheezy-pu: package exim4/4.80-7

2014-07-22 Thread Andreas Metzler
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: wheezy User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hello, exim 4.83 includes a fix for a minor security issue (local privilege escalation to exim user) which I would like to fix for stable. I have already doublechecked with debian s

Re: [PKG-Openstack-devel] Bug#755651: horizon: Please ensure it works with Django 1.7

2014-07-22 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 07/22/2014 04:08 PM, hert...@debian.org wrote: > Source: horizon > Version: 2014.1.1-3 > Severity: important > User: python-dja...@packages.debian.org > Usertags: django17 > > Hello, > > your package horizon depends on python-django. As you might > know, Django 1.7 will be soon available and a

Bug#755212: transition: protobuf-c

2014-07-22 Thread Robert Edmonds
Gergely Nagy wrote: > I gave this some more thought, and there's a problem: while generating > riemann events and similar can be done with opaque types, if I do a > query, then I want to access the results, and to do that with opaque > types would mean I need a lot of getter functions (and an API +

Bug#755212: transition: protobuf-c

2014-07-22 Thread Gergely Nagy
Robert Edmonds writes: >> The various riemann-c-client headers in /usr/include/riemann include >> proto/riemann.pb-c.h, and there's syslog-ng-mod-riemann (from >> syslog-ng-incubator) that uses the library, thus, the generated header >> too, transitively. > > Ah, right. From a brief look at the

After Debian upgrade, X will hang machine showing only a black screen

2014-07-22 Thread Jose R R
Niltze! After a Debian distribution upgrade [apt-get dist-upgrade] my 3-month-old X build [X.Org X Server 1.15.99.902 (1.16.0 RC 2) Release Date: 2014-04-08] does not function properly anymore in a machine with Intel i915. I have since then built X from section: Build Process Based on build.sh Sc

Bug#754582: Bug#646130: Bug#754582: transition: parted

2014-07-22 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 22/07/14 09:16, Colin Watson wrote: > Please could you binNMU everything on > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-parted.html other than: > > * guymager (alternative dependency already in place so not needed) > * libvirt (needs another upload anyway for #710195) > * parted (obvi

Bug#754582: Bug#646130: Bug#754582: transition: parted

2014-07-22 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 12:11:19AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 20/07/14 01:29, Colin Watson wrote: > > May I go ahead and start the transition in unstable? I can wait for the > > partitionmanager NMU to land if you feel that's necessary, but I don't > > want to wait too long as I'm g

Processed: Re: Bug#755575: nmu: anjuta-extras_3.10.0-1

2014-07-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 anjuta-extras Bug #755575 [release.debian.org] nmu: anjuta-extras_3.10.0-1 Bug reassigned from package 'release.debian.org' to 'anjuta-extras'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #755575 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to

Bug#755575: nmu: anjuta-extras_3.10.0-1

2014-07-22 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: reassign -1 anjuta-extras Control: retitle -1 anjuta-extras: uninstallable with anjuta 3.12 Control: severity -1 serious On 22/07/14 08:57, Ralf Treinen wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: binnmu > > nmu anjut

Bug#755574: marked as done (nmu: ggcov_0.9-6+b1)

2014-07-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 22 Jul 2014 08:59:47 +0200 with message-id <53ce0be3.4020...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#755574: nmu: ggcov_0.9-6+b1 has caused the Debian Bug report #755574, regarding nmu: ggcov_0.9-6+b1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

Bug#755575: nmu: anjuta-extras_3.10.0-1

2014-07-22 Thread Ralf Treinen
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu anjuta-extras_3.10.0-1 . ALL . -m "rebuild against anjuta 2:3.12.0-1" anjuta-extras still depends on anjuta (< 2:3.11) -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers un