On 29/07/14 20:37, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 15:24:58 +0200, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
My question, should I add HB_VERSION_CHECK as it was before 0.9.30 ?
Or should I add it as an alias for HB_VERSION_ATLEAST ?
Bring it back with the old implementation, I would say.
Le 27/07/2014 13:20, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
On 26/07/14 22:31, Eric Maeker wrote:
Le 26/07/2014 15:36, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
On 26/07/14 11:54, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
So I suggest you do the following:
1: Rename libquazip1-dev to libquazip-dev.
This has been
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Dear Release Team,
we are packaging the 3.2.1 stable release of openscenegraph, which is
API-compatible with the current version in Debian, so only binNMUs
should be needed.
Reverse
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 09:09:31AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
You can upload it directly to unstable (e.g. 0.9.32-1 with
HB_VERSION_CHECK/hb_version_check added back) with the old package name
(libharfbuzz0b). Then the packages in experimental with the renamed package
will
be
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jul 2014 12:10:39 +0200
with message-id 53d8c49f.3050...@debian.org
and subject line Re: Bug#755094: transition: harfbuzz
has caused the Debian Bug report #755094,
regarding transition: harfbuzz
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu twig_1.15.1-1 . ALL . -m Rebuild for phpapi-20131226
The twig package was prepared in April, and just passed NEW; in the
meantime, PHP was upgraded in Debian, with a different API.
Am Mittwoch, den 30.07.2014, 14:57 +0200 schrieb Roland Mas:
nmu twig_1.15.1-1 . ALL . -m Rebuild for phpapi-20131226
The twig package was prepared in April, and just passed NEW; in the
meantime, PHP was upgraded in Debian, with a different API. Hence,
one of the binary packages can't
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 14:57:02 +0200, Roland Mas wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu twig_1.15.1-1 . ALL . -m Rebuild for phpapi-20131226
The twig package was prepared in April, and just passed NEW; in
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jul 2014 16:05:26 +0200
with message-id 20140730140526.gd3...@betterave.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#756508: nmu: twig_1.15.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #756508,
regarding nmu: twig_1.15.1-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Daniel Beyer, 2014-07-30 15:23:00 +0200 :
Am Mittwoch, den 30.07.2014, 14:57 +0200 schrieb Roland Mas:
nmu twig_1.15.1-1 . ALL . -m Rebuild for phpapi-20131226
The twig package was prepared in April, and just passed NEW; in the
meantime, PHP was upgraded in Debian, with a different API.
Am Mittwoch, den 30.07.2014, 16:10 +0200 schrieb Roland Mas:
Daniel Beyer, 2014-07-30 15:23:00 +0200 :
(...)
in the meantime upstream released Twig 1.16.0 and I'm currently updating
the twig packaging. Instead of doing a nmu, may I asked you to upload
the new upstream release for me,
Hi,
Please find an updated status below.
I've filed a few more bugs for fixes to build systems which don't need
any hint about the new hdf5 paths.
I've uploaded a fix for #756108 to DELAYED/2.
I've added a usertag HDF5-transition [1] to the bugs related to this
transition, but not for bugs
On 30/07/14 20:09, Gilles Filippini wrote:
Hi,
Please find an updated status below.
I've filed a few more bugs for fixes to build systems which don't need
any hint about the new hdf5 paths.
I've uploaded a fix for #756108 to DELAYED/2.
I've added a usertag HDF5-transition [1] to the
13 matches
Mail list logo
