Bug#755212: closed by Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (Re: Bug#755212: transition: protobuf-c)

2014-08-11 Thread Robert Edmonds
Hi, I think the transition is not quite over; there is still #756422, which blocks #755212. We need a sourceful upload of collectd in order to rebuild (or possibly remove) the .pb-c.[ch] files in the collectd-dev package, which is an "Architecture: all" package. I would be happy to NMU collectd,

Processed: reopening 755212

2014-08-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 755212 Bug #755212 {Done: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort } [release.debian.org] transition: protobuf-c Bug reopened Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #755212 to the same values previously set > thanks Stopping processing here. Plea

Final steps for Jessie Beta 1

2014-08-11 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi people, two parts in this mail: information for everyone, and action for debian-cd@ at the end. Bits of infomation: --- Thanks to Colin's last parted upload, partitioning is in a much better shape now. I've successfully tested the following things using an i386 netinstall ima

Processed: fontypython: Please update to use wxpython3.0

2014-08-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > block 755757 by -1 Bug #755757 [release.debian.org] transition: wxpython3.0 755757 was blocked by: 757308 757755 757306 757431 757434 734799 757429 757304 757289 757313 757299 755757 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 755757: 757886 -- 755757: htt

Re: libquazip transition

2014-08-11 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 10/08/14 10:13, Eric Maeker wrote: > Le 1 août 2014 à 10:44, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit : > >>> I'll ping you >>> back for a review of the code. >> >> Great, let me know when that's ready. The sooner, the better. > > Thanks to Andreas, the new package is uploaded with all corrections done

Bug#757854: RM: ufraw/0.19.2-2

2014-08-11 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Hi, please remove ufraw from testing as part of the lcms1 deprecation. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscrib

Bug#757853: RM: haskell-hsmagick/0.5-4

2014-08-11 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Please remove haskell-hsmagick from testing as part of the lcms1 deprecation. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "uns

Re: osmgpsmap not migrating to testing

2014-08-11 Thread Ross Gammon
On 08/10/2014 10:58 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: > On 2014-08-10 20:38, Ross Gammon wrote: >> Hi, >> > [...] > > The process from here > = > > *In the particular case*, here is how I suggest we handle this: > > * You bump #748386 to serious (or have it fixed). I will get on

Processed: tagging 757734

2014-08-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 757734 + wheezy Bug #757734 [release.debian.org] pu: package witty/3.1.2-2 Added tag(s) wheezy. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 757734: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=757734

Bug#757539: nmu: apertium language packages due to pcre3 update

2014-08-11 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 09:57:30 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > In any case, apertium is broken right now so those binNMUs are needed. > Sounds to me like what's needed is source changes to apertium, not binNMUs. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#757799: wheezy-pu: package xdg-utils/1.1.0~rc1+git20111210-6.1

2014-08-11 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: wheezy User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi Release Team The NMU of xdg-utils now for some weeks already in unstable fixes an annoying bug in xdg-email while opening a composer window in Thunderbird. The underlying issue i

Bug#756078: transition: gnat

2014-08-11 Thread Reto Buerki
Hi Emilio On 08/10/2014 04:54 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > The last blockers are #756081 and #755076. Can someone from debian-ada take a > look at those? Thanks for the ping. I will transition all my packages to gnat-4.9 this week (hopefully). - reto -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-