On 2014-10-03 Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 07, 2014 at 02:16:03PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> Package: libgnutls26
>> Version: 2.12.23-17
>> GnuTLS 2.12 should not be shipped in jessie, let's make sure it does
>> not accidentally re-enter testing after its removal (which is not yet
>> s
Your message dated Sat, 04 Oct 2014 02:02:08 +0200
with message-id <542f3900.8030...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#763920: nmu: apq_3.2.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #763920,
regarding nmu: apq_3.2.0-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 12:37:09PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> >>seemed like the sensible thing to do, and I didn't see any problem
> >>with the proposed plan. After all, libjpeg62 had been long
> >>deprecated in favor of libjpeg8. Neither of us thought you would
> >>care about libjpeg62
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hello.
A bug in the gnat-4.9 compiler broke some packages Build-Depending on
it. It is now closed by 4.9.1-2, and they should build fine.
nmu apq_3.2.0-2 libaunit_3.7.1-1 music123_16.3-6+
Processing changes file: at_3.1.13-2+deb7u1_mips.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1xa6i5-0001o0...@franck.debian.org
Hi Michael,
On 03.10.2014 02:10, Michael Gilbert wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
So I hope the maintainer of chromium is now happy to be able to use more
system libraries.
chromium moves way too fast to take advantage of any stable ffmpeg
api.
How did you com
Processing changes file: at_3.1.13-2+deb7u1_mipsel.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1xa5xv-0006g1...@franck.debian.org
Processing changes file: at_3.1.13-2+deb7u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: at_3.1.13-2+deb7u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: at_3.1.13-2+deb7u1_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: at_3.1.13-2+deb7u1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: at_3.1.
"Adam D. Barratt" writes:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Thu, 2014-10-02 at 22:50 +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
>> dwm (6.0-4+deb7u1) stable; urgency=low
>>
>> * Fix broken patch headers.
>> Closes: bug#722994, Thanks to Guillem Jover.
>>
>> -- Vasudev Kamath Thu, 14 Aug 2014 12:
Adam D. Barratt schrieb:
> On 2014-10-01 13:25, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
>> Adam D. Barratt schrieb:
The alternative is to drop chromium security support for wheezy way
too soon.
>>>
>>> They're not the only alternatives. Granted, they may be the only ones
>>> which you're willing to
Processing changes file: at_3.1.13-2+deb7u1_source.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: axis_1.4-16.2+deb7u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: hawtjni_1.0~+git0c502e20c4-3+deb7u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libdatetime-timezone-perl_1.58-1+2014h_amd64.changes
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #755018 [release.debian.org] pu: package hawtjni/1.0~+git0c502e20c4-3
Added tag(s) pending.
--
755018: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=755018
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUB
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #763662 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package
libdatetime-timezone-perl/1:1.58-1+2014h
Added tag(s) pending.
--
763662: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=763662
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with pr
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #763815 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package axis/1.4-16.2+deb7u1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
763815: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=763815
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBS
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #763552 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package at/3.1.13-2+deb7u1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
763552: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=763552
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCR
Control: tags -1 + pending
On 2014-10-02 10:32, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:42:12 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
On 10/02/2014 01:29, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 00:06:30 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
>
>> I would like to update at in Debian Wheezy: ba
Control: tags -1 + pending
On 2014-08-24 20:06, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On 2014-07-16 21:47, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
Markus has prepared a new version of hawtjni to fix CVE-2013-2035
(#708293) by backporting the corresponding upstream commits.
Please find attached th
Control: tags -1 + pending
On 2014-10-01 19:46, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Wed, 01 Oct 2014 19:14:38 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> I'd like to upload libdatetime-timezone-perl/1:1.58-1+2014h to s-p-u
> for inclusion into the upcoming wheezy point release.
[...]
With the distribution fixed up,
Your message dated Fri, 03 Oct 2014 13:54:37 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#723641: pu: package xen/4.1.4-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #723641,
regarding pu: package xen/4.1.4-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Control: tags -1 + pending
On 2014-10-02 22:39, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Thu, 2014-10-02 at 23:32 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
On 02.10.2014 23:18, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-10-02 at 22:42 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
>
>> I have prepared a new point
Hi,
looking a bit from the outside it looks to me as different questions
discussed in parallel.
The one question is how we came here.
* Bill Allombert (ballo...@debian.org) [141003 12:15]:
> On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 01:41:02AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > On 30/09/14 11:32, Bill Al
On 03/10/14 12:14, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 01:41:02AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 30/09/14 11:32, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 08:55:16PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
Bill,
I am very sorry that I have not Cced everything related to the
libjpeg-t
Your message dated Fri, 03 Oct 2014 12:10:42 +0200
with message-id <542e7622.1040...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#740495: Moreinformation about imagemagick transition
has caused the Debian Bug report #740495,
regarding transition: imagemagick
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 01:41:02AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 30/09/14 11:32, Bill Allombert wrote:
> >On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 08:55:16PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> >>Bill,
> >>
> >>I am very sorry that I have not Cced everything related to the
> >>libjpeg-transition
> >>to you. I h
24 matches
Mail list logo
