Jessie and te kFreeBSD port

Hi Steven and Christoph, It will be announced this morning that the kFreeBSD port is not being included in the official Jessie releases. We know this will be a disappointment to you, and it's not a decision we've taken lightly. We recognise that you work very hard on this port, and we want to off

Bug#768649: unblock: nvidia-graphics-modules/340.46+3.16.0+1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package nvidia-graphics-modules Rebuilt for the new kernel ABI, just passed NEW. The diff is a bit larger (changelog, doku) due to merging the previous two uploads to sid -

Bug#768648: unblock: context-modules/20140528-2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package context-modules Changes made in this release are two-fold: * install the metapost support files (Closes: #767273) in former releases the metapost support files were

Bug#768647: unblock: dansguardian/2.10.1.1-5.1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package dansguardian I just uploaded this NMU to DELAYED/10 * Stop shipping /var/lock/subsys (Policy 9.3.2). The initscript already cares for the creation of this direct

Bug#767663: openssl: completly drop SSLv3 support in jessie

Can you please clarify your position on the RC-ness of security issues related to the use of SSLv3? It's my understanding that you're happy to ignore them for jessie and that you don't want me to try and find them. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with

Bug#699806: unblock: dlocate/1.02+nmu3

On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 11:57:29PM +0100, intrigeri wrote: > I realize the subject is misleading (and the bug title was changed > since then), but #699806 is actually a wheezy pu bug you filed. And, > two months ago, you said you would upload the package shortly. > Hence this friendly ping :) Well

Bug#699806: unblock: dlocate/1.02+nmu3

Hi, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote (08 Nov 2014 22:23:11 GMT) : > You want an unblock for Wheezy? I realize the subject is misleading (and the bug title was changed since then), but #699806 is actually a wheezy pu bug you filed. And, two months ago, you said you would upload the package shortly.

Processed: Re: Bug#766283: please announce release name for jessie+1 in time for jessie to support it

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 766283 + pending Bug #766283 [release.debian.org] please announce release name for jessie+1 in time for jessie to support it Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 766283: http

Bug#768646: unblock: owfs/2.9p8-5

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package owfs Hi, owfs is missing a Breaks/Replaces that should have been added when two programs (and their manpage) move from one binary package to a new one. This fix

Bug#757342: marked as done (wheezy-pu: package php5/5.4.31-0+deb7u1)

Your message dated Sat, 8 Nov 2014 22:44:07 + with message-id <20141108224407.gi2...@betterave.cristau.org> and subject line Re: Bug#757342: PHP 5.4.34 released has caused the Debian Bug report #757342, regarding wheezy-pu: package php5/5.4.31-0+deb7u1 to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#768643: unblock: scanlogd/2.2.5-3.2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package scanlogd This NMU was just uploaded to DELAYED/10, it is not yet in sid. This is the second (and last) package in jessie shipping a directory in /var/run. Stop doing

Bug#717420: update reSIProcate in stable from 1.8.5 -> 1.8.12

Hi, intrigeri wrote (22 Jan 2014 10:35:56 GMT) : > Daniel Pocock wrote (21 Jan 2014 17:55:15 GMT) : >> On 21/01/14 18:43, intrigeri wrote: >>> Jonathan Wiltshire wrote (25 Sep 2013 21:59:15 GMT) : > I could provide a diff that eliminates changes in such files. >>> Yes, please. >>> >>> A

Bug#699806: unblock: dlocate/1.02+nmu3

On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 11:18:43PM +0100, intrigeri wrote: > John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote (08 Sep 2014 22:50:44 GMT) : > > Sure, will do once I am back from vacation. I am currently in Japan > > until next week. Will get back to this after my journey. > > Ping? You want an unblock for Wheezy?

Bug#757342: PHP 5.4.34 released

Hi, Ondřej Surý wrote (17 Oct 2014 14:28:17 GMT) : > Do you think, that in line what has been said in #757342, we could try > updating this as 5.4.34 instead of cherry-picking the changes? I see that 5.4.34-0+deb7u1 is in wheezy-security, and was also accepted in wheezy-p-u. Shall we then close t

Bug#699806: unblock: dlocate/1.02+nmu3

Hi, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote (08 Sep 2014 22:50:44 GMT) : > Sure, will do once I am back from vacation. I am currently in Japan > until next week. Will get back to this after my journey. Ping? Cheers, -- intrigeri -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with

Re: Jessie Freeze -> What is the next release name? (jessie+1)

On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 07:00:07PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 06:13:31PM +0100, Javier Barroso wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 11:56:49PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > > > The release team is pleased to announce that Debian 8.0 "Jessie" is > > > > frozen. > >

Bug#768603: marked as done (nmu: biosig4c++_1.4.1-1)

Your message dated Sat, 08 Nov 2014 21:40:26 + with message-id <545e8dca.9010...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#768603: nmu: biosig4c++_1.4.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #768603, regarding nmu: biosig4c++_1.4.1-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#768556: marked as done (nmu: libgpod_0.8.3-4)

Your message dated Sat, 08 Nov 2014 21:40:18 + with message-id <545e8dc2.4070...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#768556: nmu: libgpod_0.8.3-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #768556, regarding nmu: libgpod_0.8.3-4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#768588: marked as done (nmu: kbibtex_0.4.1-1)

Your message dated Sat, 08 Nov 2014 21:40:20 + with message-id <545e8dc4.4000...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#768588: nmu: kbibtex_0.4.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #768588, regarding nmu: kbibtex_0.4.1-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#767663: openssl: completly drop SSLv3 support in jessie

On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 09:19:18PM +, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 08/11/14 18:55, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > >On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 03:38:35PM +, Julien Cristau wrote: > >>On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 20:21:21 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > >> > >>>Package: release.debian.org > >>>Severity: norm

Bug#768560: marked as done (nmu: libvigraimpex_1.10.0+dfsg-7)

Your message dated Sat, 08 Nov 2014 21:40:30 + with message-id <545e8dce.1090...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#768560: nmu: libvigraimpex_1.10.0+dfsg-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #768560, regarding nmu: libvigraimpex_1.10.0+dfsg-7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim th

Bug#768608: marked as done (nmu: ruby-nmatrix_0.1.0~rc3-1)

Your message dated Sat, 08 Nov 2014 21:40:47 + with message-id <545e8ddf.5020...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#768608: nmu: ruby-nmatrix_0.1.0~rc3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #768608, regarding nmu: ruby-nmatrix_0.1.0~rc3-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#768610: marked as done (unblock: sblim-wbemcli/1.6.2-9)

Your message dated Sat, 08 Nov 2014 21:28:01 + with message-id <545e8ae1.9030...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#768610: unblock: sblim-wbemcli/1.6.2-9 has caused the Debian Bug report #768610, regarding unblock: sblim-wbemcli/1.6.2-9 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that t

Processed: tagging 768608

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 768608 + experimental Bug #768608 [release.debian.org] nmu: ruby-nmatrix_0.1.0~rc3-1 Added tag(s) experimental. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 768608: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport

Bug#768402: unblock: simplesamlphp/1.13.1-1

Hi, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote (07 Nov 2014 13:46:40 GMT) : > On Fri, November 7, 2014 12:52, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >> Are there corresponding Debian bugs so we can assess severity please? > These are the issues fixed in this release. > [...] > Does it add much value to re-file them in the Debian

Bug#768636: marked as done (unblock: gdm3/3.14.1-2)

Your message dated Sat, 08 Nov 2014 21:24:42 + with message-id <545e8a1a.2010...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#768636: unblock: gdm3/3.14.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #768636, regarding unblock: gdm3/3.14.1-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has b

Bug#767743: unblock: blitz++/0.10-3

Hi, Andreas Tille wrote (02 Nov 2014 10:59:20 GMT) : > The only reason to upload this package is a missing Breaks to fix > bug #767564. According to https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=767564#15, 0.10-3 still doesn't fix that RC bug. Cheers, -- intrigeri -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#767641: marked as done (unblock: espeakup/1:0.71-17)

Your message dated Sat, 08 Nov 2014 21:17:55 + with message-id <545e8883.4010...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#767641: unblock: espeakup/1:0.71-17 has caused the Debian Bug report #767641, regarding unblock: espeakup/1:0.71-17 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pro

Bug#767663: openssl: completly drop SSLv3 support in jessie

On 08/11/14 18:55, Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 03:38:35PM +, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 20:21:21 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Hi, SSLv3 has been disabled in jessie already, at least for normal usage. But there i

Bug#767476: transition: tilda

Hi, Sebastian Geiger wrote (31 Oct 2014 14:59:44 GMT) : > The complete changelog can be found directly in the package's > ChangeLog file [1] > [...] > [1] https://github.com/lanoxx/tilda/blob/master/ChangeLog version 1.2.2 (2014-10-28): * Fixed an error where Tilda failed to start when th

Bug#767750: unblock: libnet-dns-perl/0.81-1

Hi, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote (07 Nov 2014 15:38:12 GMT) : > Sorry but I'm not very fluent with perl, I am, so I had a look. Most changes are indeed very simple and minor style changes (mostly noop's in practice) that don't feel too risky to me. Not exactly the right time for such changes, but

Bug#768636: unblock: gdm3/3.14.1-2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please consider this: unblock gdm3/3.14.1-2 It partially reverts some upstream logging changes for the Xorg instance started by gdm3. I've tested this on a systemd laptop and in a sysvinit

Processed: tagging 767961

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 767961 - moreinfo Bug #767961 [release.debian.org] unblock: beignet/0.9.3~dfsg-1 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 767961: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?b

Processed: tagging 768324

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 768324 - moreinfo Bug #768324 [release.debian.org] unblock: appstream/0.7.4-1 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 768324: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=

Bug#767663: openssl: completly drop SSLv3 support in jessie

On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 03:38:35PM +, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 20:21:21 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > > > Hi, > > > > SSLv3 has been disabled in jessie already, at least for normal > > usage. But there is a way to

Re: Jessie Freeze -> What is the next release name? (jessie+1)

On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 06:13:31PM +0100, Javier Barroso wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 11:56:49PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > > The release team is pleased to announce that Debian 8.0 "Jessie" is > > > frozen. > > > I thought usually this type of announcement comes with next release >

Processed: block 767663 with 768611

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 767663 with 768611 Bug #767663 {Done: Julien Cristau } [release.debian.org] openssl: completly drop SSLv3 support in jessie 767663 was blocked by: 768562 767663 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 767663: 768611 > thanks Sto

Bug#768610: unblock: sblim-wbemcli/1.6.2-9

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package sblim-wbemcli This new revision fixes #768203 by declaring Breaks+Replaces python-pywbem (<< 0.8.0~dev650-1~) to seamlessly overwrite /usr/bin/wbemcli during upgrades

Bug#767641: unblock: espeakup/1:0.71-17

Emilio Pozuelo Monfort, le Sat 08 Nov 2014 15:42:36 +, a écrit : > On 06/11/14 19:06, Samuel Thibault wrote: > >Control: tags -1 - moreinfo > > > >Niels Thykier, le Thu 06 Nov 2014 17:14:18 +0100, a écrit : > >>Please remember to check the return value of asprintf, which can return > >>-1 on fa

Bug#768608: nmu: ruby-nmatrix_0.1.0~rc3-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu ruby-nmatrix_0.1.0~rc3-1 . ALL . experimental . -m "Rebuild against ruby 2.1" ruby-nmatrix (only in experimental) was built against ruby 1.9 which is gone for good :-) Andreas -- T

Processed: tagging 768603

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 768603 + experimental Bug #768603 [release.debian.org] nmu: biosig4c++_1.4.1-1 Added tag(s) experimental. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 768603: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?b

Bug#768603: nmu: biosig4c++_1.4.1-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu biosig4c++_1.4.1-1 . ALL . experimental . -m "Rebuild against octave 3.8" The packages in experimental still depend on the no longer available liboctave1. A test rebuild on amd64 was suc

Processed: tagging 768560

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 768560 + experimental Bug #768560 [release.debian.org] nmu: libvigraimpex_1.10.0+dfsg-7 Added tag(s) experimental. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 768560: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrep

Processed: tagging 768556

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 768556 + experimental Bug #768556 [release.debian.org] nmu: libgpod_0.8.3-4 Added tag(s) experimental. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 768556: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=

Re: pre-approved changes: ejabberd

On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 22:49:19 +0100, Philipp Huebner wrote: > Hi, > > I intend to upload a new revision of ejabberd-14.07 to unstable some > time next week fixing these bugs: > > #764974 serious - postinst uses /usr/share/doc content (Policy 12.3) > #767535 important - CVE-2014-8760 >

Bug#768602: unblock: wmbiff/0.4.27-2.3

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package wmbiff I am currently adopting the wmbiff package and would like to upload a new version to unstable. However, there is a recent NMU version currently in unstable wh

Bug#768579: marked as done (unblock: signing-party/1.1.10-3)

Your message dated Sat, 8 Nov 2014 16:10:27 + with message-id <20141108161026.gk19...@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net> and subject line Re: Bug#768579: unblock: signing-party/1.1.10-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #768579, regarding unblock: signing-party/1.1.10-3 to be marked as done. This me

Bug#768526: unblock: scim/1.4.15-3

On 08.11.2014 20:17, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Control: tag -1 - moreinfo + confirmed > > On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 07:10:09PM +0800, Rolf Leggewie wrote: >> Patch 3 is addressing what is discussed in #71621, that >> "update-alternative --remove" should not be called on upgrade or >> deconfigure.

Processed: tagging 768588

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 768588 + experimental Bug #768588 [release.debian.org] nmu: kbibtex_0.4.1-1 Added tag(s) experimental. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 768588: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=

Bug#768012: marked as done (unblock: quassel/0.10.0-2.1)

Your message dated Sat, 08 Nov 2014 15:58:38 + with message-id <545e3dae.3090...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#768012: unblock: quassel/0.10.0-2.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #768012, regarding unblock: quassel/0.10.0-2.1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pro

Bug#768596: unblock: lua-json/1.3.2-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package lua-json I've merge the next bugfix release of the 1.3 series to make lua-json work at all again. 1.3.2 fixes/changes: - compatibility with lpeg 0.12 - sets _ENV t

Processed: reopening 768579

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 768579 Bug #768579 {Done: Jonathan Wiltshire } [release.debian.org] unblock: signing-party/1.1.10-3 Bug reopened Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #768579 to the same values previously set > thanks Stopping processing here.

Processed: Re: Bug#768579: unblock: signing-party/1.1.10-3

Processing control commands: > tag -1 confirmed Bug #768579 {Done: Jonathan Wiltshire } [release.debian.org] unblock: signing-party/1.1.10-3 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 768579: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=768579 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with p

Bug#768579: unblock: signing-party/1.1.10-3

Control: tag -1 confirmed On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 03:10:21PM +0100, Guilhem Moulin wrote: > I would like to upload the attached changes: a regression bug has been > introduced in signing-party 1.1.10-1, making caff violate RFC 2822 when > sending messages with a non-English locale. This fixes bug

Bug#767641: unblock: espeakup/1:0.71-17

Control: tags -1 confirmed On 06/11/14 19:06, Samuel Thibault wrote: Control: tags -1 - moreinfo Niels Thykier, le Thu 06 Nov 2014 17:14:18 +0100, a écrit : Please remember to check the return value of asprintf, which can return -1 on failure. Right. Better try to do something sensible rath

Processed: Re: Bug#767641: unblock: espeakup/1:0.71-17

Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #767641 [release.debian.org] unblock: espeakup/1:0.71-17 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 767641: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=767641 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema

Processed: tagging 768012

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 768012 - moreinfo Bug #768012 [release.debian.org] unblock: quassel/0.10.0-2.1 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 768012: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug

Bug#767663: marked as done (openssl: completly drop SSLv3 support in jessie)

Your message dated Sat, 8 Nov 2014 15:38:35 + with message-id <20141108153835.gg2...@betterave.cristau.org> and subject line Re: Bug#767663: openssl: completly drop SSLv3 support in jessie has caused the Debian Bug report #767663, regarding openssl: completly drop SSLv3 support in jessie to be

Bug#768579: marked as done (unblock: signing-party/1.1.10-3)

Your message dated Sat, 8 Nov 2014 15:36:43 + with message-id <20141108153643.gi19...@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net> and subject line Re: Bug#768579: unblock: signing-party/1.1.10-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #768579, regarding unblock: signing-party/1.1.10-3 to be marked as done. This me

Bug#768012: unblock: quassel/0.10.0-2.1

Hi Emilio, Thomas, Jonathan, On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 04:31:34PM +, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 06/11/14 07:54, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > >Hi Release Team, hi Thomas > > > >This unblock request cannot be done this way anymore as there was a > >new upstream version upload to unstable,

Bug#767661: marked as done (openssl: new upstream release 1.0.2 for jessie)

Your message dated Sat, 8 Nov 2014 15:38:03 + with message-id <20141108153803.gf2...@betterave.cristau.org> and subject line Re: Bug#767661: openssl: new upstream release 1.0.2 for jessie has caused the Debian Bug report #767661, regarding openssl: new upstream release 1.0.2 for jessie to be ma

Re: binNMUs for dpkg-buildflags / -fstack-protector-strong

On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 10:29:17 +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 11:53:44PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 06:19:51PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 22:36:43 +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > > > > > Sorry I did

Bug#768588: nmu: kbibtex_0.4.1-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu kbibtex_0.4.1-1 . ALL . experimental . -m "Rebuild against poppler 0.22" kbibtex in experimental is currently uninstallable due to ancient dependencies. Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, em

Bug#768582: marked as done (unblock: man-db/2.7.0.2-3)

Your message dated Sat, 08 Nov 2014 14:36:58 + with message-id <8f206ef25fe809b57e98645113144...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org> and subject line Re: Bug#768582: unblock: man-db/2.7.0.2-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #768582, regarding unblock: man-db/2.7.0.2-3 to be marked as done. This means

Bug#768582: unblock: man-db/2.7.0.2-3

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package man-db. I notice that openssh 1:6.7p1-3 was already unblocked, and man-db is for the same reason: it drops obsolete assumptions about dpkg-statoverride's path. Even

Bug#768579: unblock: signing-party/1.1.10-3

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package signing-party Hi there, I would like to upload the attached changes: a regression bug has been introduced in signing-party 1.1.10-1, making caff violate RFC 2822 whe

Bug#768563: marked as done (unblock: flightgear-data/3.0.0-2)

Your message dated Sat, 08 Nov 2014 15:01:58 +0100 with message-id <545e2256.9020...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: Bug#768563: unblock: flightgear-data/3.0.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #768563, regarding unblock: flightgear-data/3.0.0-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim t

Bug#768571: marked as done (unblock: flashproxy/1.7-1)

Your message dated Sat, 08 Nov 2014 13:54:56 + with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#768571: unblock: flashproxy/1.7-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #768571, regarding unblock: flashproxy/1.7-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#768564: marked as done (unblock: flightgear/3.0.0-4)

Your message dated Sat, 08 Nov 2014 14:52:54 +0100 with message-id <545e2036.4080...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: Bug#768564: unblock: flightgear/3.0.0-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #768564, regarding unblock: flightgear/3.0.0-4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pr

Bug#768571: unblock: flashproxy/1.7-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package flashproxy flashproxy 1.7-1 in testing is affected by RC bug #765156 which makes it FTBFS on slow machines due to a too-low wait in some of the tests. This is fixed

Processed: block 767663 with 768562

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 767663 with 768562 Bug #767663 [release.debian.org] openssl: completly drop SSLv3 support in jessie 767663 was not blocked by any bugs. 767663 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 767663: 768562 > thanks Stopping processing he

Bug#768564: unblock: flightgear/3.0.0-4

On 11/08/2014 01:32 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: > Btw, please improve the changelog message to say what is being fixed > (like "Added patch to fix a deadlock in the garbage collector" etc.). Sorry, I already uploaded this one prior to sending the unblock request. The acceptance message just arrived,

Bug#768557: marked as done (unblock: ibus-table-extraphrase/1.2.0.20100305-2)

Your message dated Sat, 8 Nov 2014 12:36:08 + with message-id <20141108123608.gh19...@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net> and subject line Re: Bug#768557: unblock: ibus-table-extraphrase/1.2.0.20100305-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #768557, regarding unblock: ibus-table-extraphrase/1.2.0.201003

Bug#768564: unblock: flightgear/3.0.0-4

On 2014-11-08 13:27, Niels Thykier wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > On 2014-11-08 13:22, Markus Wanner wrote: >> Package: release.debian.org >> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org >> Usertags: unblock >> Severity: normal >> X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-fgfs-c...@lists.alioth.debian.org >> >>

Bug#768564: unblock: flightgear/3.0.0-4

Control: tags -1 confirmed On 2014-11-08 13:22, Markus Wanner wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-fgfs-c...@lists.alioth.debian.org > > Please unblock package flightgear > > The recent uplo

Processed: Re: Bug#768564: unblock: flightgear/3.0.0-4

Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #768564 [release.debian.org] unblock: flightgear/3.0.0-4 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 768564: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=768564 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema

Bug#768563: unblock: flightgear-data/3.0.0-2

Control: tags -1 confirmed On 2014-11-08 13:16, Markus Wanner wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-fgfs-c...@lists.alioth.debian.org > > Please confirm an upload as proposed is fine and then

Processed: Re: Bug#768563: unblock: flightgear-data/3.0.0-2

Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #768563 [release.debian.org] unblock: flightgear-data/3.0.0-2 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 768563: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=768563 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Bug#768564: unblock: flightgear/3.0.0-4

Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-fgfs-c...@lists.alioth.debian.org Please unblock package flightgear The recent upload to unstable fixes bug #750939 (severity: important - Occasional deadlock when process

Bug#768526: unblock: scim/1.4.15-3

Control: tag -1 - moreinfo + confirmed On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 07:10:09PM +0800, Rolf Leggewie wrote: > On 08.11.2014 17:35, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > Control: tag -1 moreinfo > > > > On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 12:21:14PM +0800, Rolf Leggewie wrote: > >> I would like to apply the following patch

Processed: Re: Bug#768526: unblock: scim/1.4.15-3

Processing control commands: > tag -1 - moreinfo + confirmed Bug #768526 [release.debian.org] unblock: scim/1.4.15-3 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. Bug #768526 [release.debian.org] unblock: scim/1.4.15-3 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 768526: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=768526 Debian

Bug#768563: unblock: flightgear-data/3.0.0-2

Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-fgfs-c...@lists.alioth.debian.org Please confirm an upload as proposed is fine and then unblock package flightgear-data. The proposed upload includes a fix for bug #766251

Bug#768560: nmu: libvigraimpex_1.10.0+dfsg-7

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu gb libvigraimpex_1.10.0+dfsg-7 . amd64 . experimental . nmu libvigraimpex_1.10.0+dfsg-7 . armel armhf hurd-i386 i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 mipsel powerpc sparc . experimental . -m "Re

Bug#767700: marked as done (unblock: pdns/3.4.1-1)

Your message dated Sat, 8 Nov 2014 11:51:17 + with message-id <20141108115117.gb2...@betterave.cristau.org> and subject line Re: Bug#767700: unblock: pdns/3.4.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #767700, regarding unblock: pdns/3.4.1-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#768557: unblock: ibus-table-extraphrase/1.2.0.20100305-2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package ibus-table-extraphrase This fixes the grave bug #768149 and makes several targeted fixes. ibus-table 1.9.1-3 is in testing (jessie) and requires this ibus-table-extr

Bug#768556: nmu: libgpod_0.8.3-4

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu libgpod_0.8.3-4 . ALL . experimental . -m "Rebuild against libplist2." libgpod in experimental still depends on the no longer available libplist1. Maybe not on all architectures, but I d

Bug#768526: unblock: scim/1.4.15-3

On 08.11.2014 17:35, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Control: tag -1 moreinfo > > On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 12:21:14PM +0800, Rolf Leggewie wrote: >> I would like to apply the following patches to scim in unstable and have >> them migrate to testing/jessie. Please let me know if you will allow a >> free

Processed: Re: Bug#768010: future mongodb unblock

Processing control commands: > tag -1 moreinfo Bug #768010 [release.debian.org] future mongodb unblock Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 768010: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=768010 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de

Bug#768010: future mongodb unblock

Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 07:30:09AM +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote: > Upstream released MongoDB 2.6.0 too late for Jessie and started to > work for 2.8.0. Then I was blind to see they backport important fixes > for the 2.4.x tree. The 2.4.11 [1] and 2.4.12 [2] change

Bug#768469: closed by Jonathan Wiltshire (Re: Bug#768469: unblock: gcl/2.6.12-1)

On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 11:32:26AM -0500, Camm Maguire wrote: > Greetings! I humbly ask you to reconsider, especially in light of the > fact that the package tracking webpages and quality assurance webpages > did not post this migration time change, and still reported the 5 days > (and in fact sti

Bug#768395: marked as done (unblock: iceweasel/31.2.0esr-3.1)

Your message dated Sat, 8 Nov 2014 10:59:00 + with message-id <20141108105900.ge19...@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net> and subject line Re: Bug#768395: unblock: iceweasel/31.2.0esr-3.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #768395, regarding unblock: iceweasel/31.2.0esr-3.1 to be marked as done. This

Bug#768550: marked as done (unblock: pkg-php-tools/1.26)

Your message dated Sat, 08 Nov 2014 11:39:32 +0100 with message-id <545df2e4.9020...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: Bug#768550: unblock: pkg-php-tools/1.26 has caused the Debian Bug report #768550, regarding unblock: pkg-php-tools/1.26 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pr

Bug#768399: marked as done (unblock: sisu/5.7.1-2)

Your message dated Sat, 8 Nov 2014 10:35:09 + with message-id <20141108103509.gc19...@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net> and subject line Re: Bug#768399: unblock: sisu/5.7.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #768399, regarding unblock: sisu/5.7.1-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim t

Bug#768550: unblock: pkg-php-tools/1.26

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package pkg-php-tools The changelog is as follow: pkg-php-tools (1.26) unstable; urgency=medium * PEAR/Buildsystem: Remove unused function _phppkginfo() * dh_phppear, dh

Bug#768521: marked as done (unblock: openjade1.3/1.3.2-13)

Your message dated Sat, 8 Nov 2014 10:15:04 + with message-id <20141108101504.gb19...@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net> and subject line Re: Bug#768521: unblock: openjade1.3/1.3.2-13 has caused the Debian Bug report #768521, regarding unblock: openjade1.3/1.3.2-13 to be marked as done. This means

Bug#768544: marked as done (unblock: apparmor/2.9.0-2)

Your message dated Sat, 08 Nov 2014 11:11:58 +0100 with message-id <545dec6e.2010...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: Bug#768544: unblock: apparmor/2.9.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #768544, regarding unblock: apparmor/2.9.0-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the proble

Bug#768544: unblock: apparmor/2.9.0-2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package apparmor 2.9.0-2, that fixes one RC bug (#768211), an important one (#768357), and avoids the latter from occurring in another area. Note that the added and affected c

Processed: Re: Bug#768506: unblock globus packages with fix for symlink-to-dir conversions

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + moreinfo Bug #768506 [release.debian.org] unblock globus packages with fix for symlink-to-dir conversions Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 768506: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=768506 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org w

Bug#768506: unblock globus packages with fix for symlink-to-dir conversions

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On 2014-11-07 22:05, Mattias Ellert wrote: I got bug reports for 6 of the globus packages saying they did not handle symlink to dir conversion properly. However, the same problem exists in all globus packages providing a doc binary package (except for one that just r

Bug#768526: unblock: scim/1.4.15-3

Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 12:21:14PM +0800, Rolf Leggewie wrote: > I would like to apply the following patches to scim in unstable and have > them migrate to testing/jessie. Please let me know if you will allow a > freeze exception for all or at least some of them. The scim

  1   2   >