Re: cgmanager and #757348

On 2015-03-15 19:09, Niels Thykier wrote: > [...] > > Excellent - looks good. Please go ahead and (have a sponsor?) upload it > to testing-proposed-updates. Once it is accepted, please notify us and > we will unblock it. > > ~Niels > I see it was uploaded and I have approved it. Thanks :) ~

Bug#772183: unblock: libjpeg6b/1:6b2-2

Hi Bill, Just to make it clear: * You seem to be making the case that we have lost the ability to produce (truly) LSB compliant binaries and the tech-ctte were not fully informed about the true scope of the consequences of their resolution. - If you feel they were uninformed, then p

Bug#780576: marked as done (unblock: suricata/2.0.7-2)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Mar 2015 22:28:03 +0100 with message-id <55074ae3.80...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: Bug#780576: unblock: suricata/2.0.7-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #780576, regarding unblock: suricata/2.0.7-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#780574: marked as done (unblock: tcpdump/4.6.2-4)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Mar 2015 19:08:20 + with message-id <1426532900.1658.11.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk> and subject line Re: Bug#780574: unblock: tcpdump/4.6.2-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #780574, regarding unblock: tcpdump/4.6.2-4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim t

Bug#780594: marked as done (unblock: cdbs/0.4.129)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Mar 2015 19:05:45 + with message-id <1426532745.1658.10.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk> and subject line Re: Bug#780594: unblock: cdbs/0.4.129 has caused the Debian Bug report #780594, regarding unblock: cdbs/0.4.129 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that th

Bug#780598: marked as done (RM: 0xffff/0.6-1)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Mar 2015 19:04:20 + with message-id <1426532660.1658.9.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk> and subject line Re: Bug#780598: RM: 0x/0.6-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #780598, regarding RM: 0x/0.6-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem h

Bug#780605: marked as done (unblock: abcde/2.6-2)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Mar 2015 18:51:34 + with message-id <1426531894.1658.8.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk> and subject line Re: Bug#780605: unblock: abcde/2.6-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #780605, regarding unblock: abcde/2.6-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the p

Bug#780615: marked as done (RM: diakonos/0.9.0-2)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Mar 2015 18:45:53 + with message-id <1426531553.1658.6.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk> and subject line Re: Bug#780615: RM: diakonos/0.9.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #780615, regarding RM: diakonos/0.9.0-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the p

Bug#780611: marked as done (unblock: fake-hwclock/0.9)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Mar 2015 18:49:16 + with message-id <1426531756.1658.7.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk> and subject line Re: Bug#780611: unblock: fake-hwclock/0.9 has caused the Debian Bug report #780611, regarding unblock: fake-hwclock/0.9 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#780615: RM: diakonos/0.9.0-2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Please remove diakonos from jessie. It depends on a library that used to be in the Ruby standard library but is not provided by the current Ruby version anymore. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin

Bug#780611: unblock: fake-hwclock/0.9

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package fake-hwclock Bug #779040 was filed - the systemd support that I added with help from Alexandre Detiste was not quite complete: fake-hwclock is not being run properly

Bug#780605: unblock: abcde/2.6-2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock [ Back from VAC! ] Please unblock package abcde We're stuck with version mismatches with eyeD3 - the current upstream only supports a newer version than the one in Jessie. The NMUd fix for

Bug#780598: RM: 0xffff/0.6-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Hi, Please remove 0x from Debian testing. The upstream version from testing has different issues, which may eventually result in flashing problems. There is a minor upstream release 0.6.1,

Bug#780594: unblock: cdbs/0.4.129

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Please unblock package cdbs Recent fix for bug#770767 contained a typo: Ending quote was applied too early in perl-makemaker-vars.mk, leading

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 780094 -moreinfo Bug #780094 [release.debian.org] pre-unblock: virtualbox/4.3.18-dfsg-3, virtualbox-guest-additions-iso 4.3.18-2 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 7800

Processed: tagging 779462

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # sorry, false bug number > tags 779462 - pending Bug #779462 {Done: Mehdi Dogguy } [release.debian.org] unblock: shorewall/4.6.4.3-2 . shorewall-core/4.6.4.3-2 Removed tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Processed: tag bug 779462 as pending

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 779462 + pending Bug #779462 {Done: Mehdi Dogguy } [release.debian.org] unblock: shorewall/4.6.4.3-2 . shorewall-core/4.6.4.3-2 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 779462: h

Bug#780576: unblock: suricata/2.0.7-2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package suricata The 2.0.7-2 release fixes: * A couple of security issues. * A Debian RC bug. * Several upstream bugs. Here is the debdiff, generated with: % debdiff sur

Bug#780574: unblock: tcpdump/4.6.2-4

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Dear Release Team, Please unblock tcpdump 4.6.2-4, it includes four security fixes that are not tracked in the BTS, but have CVE identifiers. Full debdiff attached. Thanks! unblock tcpdump

Processed: affects 779134

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 779134 testdisc Bug #779134 [release.debian.org] nmu: testdisk_6.14-3, partclone_0.2.73-2 Added indication that 779134 affects testdisc > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 779134: http://bugs.d

Processed: affects 779134

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 779134 testdisc-dbg Bug #779134 [release.debian.org] nmu: testdisk_6.14-3, partclone_0.2.73-2 Added indication that 779134 affects testdisc-dbg > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 779134: http:

Processed: affects 779134

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 779134 partclone Bug #779134 [release.debian.org] nmu: testdisk_6.14-3, partclone_0.2.73-2 Added indication that 779134 affects partclone > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 779134: http://bugs

Re: requests and #780506 (security bug)

On 2015-03-16 04:20, Daniele Tricoli wrote: > Dear Release Managers, > > I need guidance on how to proper handle this: requests version > in testing is 2.4.3-4 but 2.4.3-5 was uploaded into unstable > to fix #770173. > > I already fixed on SVN #780506 but I did not uploaded > requests 2.4.3-6 be

Re: Fwd: Cap'n Proto security advisory / Debian

On 2015-03-16 06:17, Tom Lee wrote: > Hi release team, > > A number of security bugs in the capnproto 0.4.1-2 package in Jessie have > been reported to me by upstream (please see the attached email to the > Debian security team for details). Hi Tom, Thanks for the heads up. > I've raised corres