Processing changes file: ejabberd_14.07-4+deb8u1_mips.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1ynbe2-hf...@franck.debian.org
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #782596 [release.debian.org] RFC: possible wheezy-pu: package debhelper to
address #708218 for wheezy?
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
782596: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=782596
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.de
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Wed, 2015-04-15 at 23:09 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2015-04-14 17:47, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
[...]
> > The fix for debhelper in #708218 didn't make it into wheezy so binNMUs
> > in wheezy for multiarch enabled packages will have the problem.
> >
> > Would
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 21:00 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 19:51:11 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 20:44 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > > I've prepared on update for libdatetime-timezone-perl for jessie,
> > > adding th
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 21:00 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 19:51:41 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 20:43 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > > I've prepared on update for libdatetime-timezone-perl for wheezy,
> > > adding th
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #783750 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package
libdatetime-timezone-perl/1:1.75-2+2015d
Added tag(s) pending.
--
783750: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=783750
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with pr
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #783749 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package
libdatetime-timezone-perl/1:1.58-1+2015d
Added tag(s) pending.
--
783749: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=783749
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with pr
Hi iustin!
On 19:21 Wed 29 Apr , Iustin Pop wrote:
> FYI, upstream seems to have fixed this on the 2.15 branch, and
> manually
> applying some of the changed done by Niklas (search on git.ganeti.org
> for "7.8", see especially commits
> b78a2c3013c16395c48e055de82c4f93d9b41c38,
> 083776b9dbd7
Processing changes file: libdatetime-timezone-perl_1.58-1+2015d_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1ynxx5-0006ns...@franck.debi
Processing changes file: libdatetime-timezone-perl_1.75-2+2015d_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1ynxwo-0006js...@franck.debi
On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 19:51:11 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 20:44 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > I've prepared on update for libdatetime-timezone-perl for jessie,
> > adding the data from the Olson db 2015d as a quilt patch.
> Please go ahead, thanks.
Thanks, uploaded.
On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 19:51:41 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 20:43 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > I've prepared on update for libdatetime-timezone-perl for wheezy,
> > adding the data from the Olson db 2015d as a quilt patch.
> Please go ahead, thanks.
Thanks, uploaded.
On 29.04.2015 20:47, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 08:33:07PM +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
>>> Having both for a year along each other will only waste people's time. Now
>>> at the beginning of the release cycle is the time to make a decision,
>>> not by dragging things into
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #783750 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package
libdatetime-timezone-perl/1:1.75-2+2015d
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
783750: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=783750
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org wit
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #783749 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package
libdatetime-timezone-perl/1:1.58-1+2015d
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
783749: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=783749
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org wit
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 20:44 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> I've prepared on update for libdatetime-timezone-perl for jessie,
> adding the data from the Olson db 2015d as a quilt patch.
Please go ahead, thanks.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-rel
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 20:43 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> I've prepared on update for libdatetime-timezone-perl for wheezy,
> adding the data from the Olson db 2015d as a quilt patch.
Please go ahead, thanks.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-rel
On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 17:33 +, transylvania wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt:
> > If someone provides a source debdiff for a proposed package, which has
> > been tested on Jessie, then we can certainly look at that.
>
> Hello Adam,
>
> Thanks for your reply. I can confirm that the 2015.02.28-1 packa
Hi Julien,
On 29.04.2015 20:40, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 20:33:07 +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
>
>> Having ffmpeg in testing during this time would be nice, e.g. so that people
>> using testing can easily compare them.
>>
> Not really. It's a library, users don't get to
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 08:42:05 -0700, Diane Trout wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 29, 2015 10:53:27 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > On 2015-04-29 07:09, Diane Trout wrote:
> > > I filed bug 783674 with a patch for kamoso, that builds and seems to
> > > work.
> > >
> > > Nothing else seems to need pa
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 08:33:07PM +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> > Having both for a year along each other will only waste people's time. Now
> > at the beginning of the release cycle is the time to make a decision,
> > not by dragging things into a year as of today. Picking one of the two
> >
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: wheezy
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I've prepared on update for libdatetime-timezone-perl for wheezy,
adding the data from the Olson db 2015d as a quilt patch.
Manually
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I've prepared on update for libdatetime-timezone-perl for jessie,
adding the data from the Olson db 2015d as a quilt patch.
Manually
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 09:03:33PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Sun, 2015-04-26 at 22:03 +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> > I'd like to fix #779357 in a point update. Debdiff attached
>
> Please go ahead, thanks.
Thanks, uploaded.
--
Niko Tyni nt...@debian.org
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 20:33:07 +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> Having ffmpeg in testing during this time would be nice, e.g. so that people
> using testing can easily compare them.
>
Not really. It's a library, users don't get to compare, they get to use
whichever one is chosen by the applic
Hi Moritz,
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 7:22 PM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> Having both for a year along each other will only waste people's time. Now
> at the beginning of the release cycle is the time to make a decision,
> not by dragging things into a year as of today. Picking one of the two
> won'
Hi Moritz,
On 29.04.2015 20:22, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
>
>> But having mysql-5.5 and mariadb-10.0 in jessie is apparently no
>> problem, despite previous claims. What's the difference?
>
> To properly migrate over a daemon they need to co-exist for a stable
> release
Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> But having mysql-5.5 and mariadb-10.0 in jessie is apparently no
> problem, despite previous claims. What's the difference?
To properly migrate over a daemon they need to co-exist for a stable
release, while a lib does not. Stretch will only have one of them.
> How do
Hi Jonathan,
thanks for answering my question.
On 29.04.2015 16:52, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> mysql-5.5 and mariadb-10.0 in Jessie is not exactly "no problem".
> There were extensive discussions before the freeze about which of
> the *four* forks of MySQL would ship in Jessie.
>
> Bear in mind
Hi Alessio,
On 29.04.2015 15:27, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun
> wrote:
>> Therefore I'm planning to discuss a possible transition from
>> Libav to FFmpeg with the maintainers of the reverse dependencies,
>> before asking the TC for a resolution.
>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
cdbs 0.4.128 fixed #770767, which made architecture:any Perl packages
that use cdbs and Module::Build get compiled with wrong C compiler flags.
This causes issues at least on i386. See #76926
Hi Alessandro,
On 29.04.2015 16:08, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> The decision has to be taken *now*, not in one year.
We should start discussing, sure, but I would be surprised if a decision
could be reached in a time frame short enough to qualify as 'now'.
> Last year, just before the freeze, we
Adam D. Barratt:
> If someone provides a source debdiff for a proposed package, which has
> been tested on Jessie, then we can certainly look at that.
Hello Adam,
Thanks for your reply. I can confirm that the 2015.02.28-1 package
installs and works on jessie.
It's a new upstream version and so
Processing changes file: ejabberd_14.07-4+deb8u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ejabberd_14.07-4+deb8u1_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ejabberd_14.07-4+deb8u1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ejabberd_14.07-4+deb8u1_mipsel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing
On 2015-04-29 18:45:56, Apollon Oikonomopoulos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 16:37 Wed 29 Apr , Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Unstable and stable currently have the same version of ganeti; as a
> > rule of
> > thumb, unless there's a really good reason then we always want fixes to have
> > been proven in
Hi Joerg,
2015-04-29 18:12 GMT+02:00 Joerg Jaspert :
> On 13926 March 1977, Bálint Réczey wrote:
>> 2015-04-29 15:38 GMT+02:00 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort :
>>> On 29/04/15 14:29, Bálint Réczey wrote:
The last word from the Security Team was Moritz's email which gave
ffmpeg green light after
On 13926 March 1977, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> 2015-04-29 15:38 GMT+02:00 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort :
>> On 29/04/15 14:29, Bálint Réczey wrote:
>>> The last word from the Security Team was Moritz's email which gave
>>> ffmpeg green light after Jessie's release.
>> No. He said that a decision between lib
On 2015-04-29 16:42, Diane Trout wrote:
On Wednesday, April 29, 2015 10:53:27 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
On 2015-04-29 07:09, Diane Trout wrote:
> I filed bug 783674 with a patch for kamoso, that builds and seems to
> work.
>
> Nothing else seems to need patches, so I hadn't filed bug reports.
>
Hi,
On 16:37 Wed 29 Apr , Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Unstable and stable currently have the same version of ganeti; as a
> rule of
> thumb, unless there's a really good reason then we always want fixes to have
> been proven in unstable before being backported to stable - that applies for
> smal
On Wednesday, April 29, 2015 10:53:27 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On 2015-04-29 07:09, Diane Trout wrote:
> > I filed bug 783674 with a patch for kamoso, that builds and seems to
> > work.
> >
> > Nothing else seems to need patches, so I hadn't filed bug reports.
> > Should I
> > have?
>
> I adde
(re-sending for the benefit of -release)
On 2015-04-29 12:47, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
On 29.04.2015 12:28, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 29/04/15 10:41, Bálint Réczey wrote:
2015-04-29 9:44 GMT+02:00 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort :
On 27/04/15 00:30, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
On 27.04.2015 00:01
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On 2015-04-29 16:16, Apollon Oikonomopoulos wrote:
On 16:43 Wed 29 Apr , Apollon Oikonomopoulos wrote:
Fixes in 2.12.2:
There is also a fix for #776770 in 2.12.2 [1], which I missed and will
also document when/if the package is uploaded.
fwiw, the origina
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #783722 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package ganeti/2.12.3-0+deb8u1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
783722: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=783722
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UN
On 16:43 Wed 29 Apr , Apollon Oikonomopoulos wrote:
> Fixes in 2.12.2:
There is also a fix for #776770 in 2.12.2 [1], which I missed and will
also document when/if the package is uploaded.
Regards,
Apollon
[1] http://git.ganeti.org/?p=ganeti.git;a=commitdiff;h=51e9eef694
--
To UNSUBS
2015-04-29 16:17 GMT+02:00 Bálint Réczey :
> 2015-04-29 16:08 GMT+02:00 Alessandro Ghedini :
>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 03:28:40PM +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
>>> Hi Alessandro,
>>>
>>> On 29.04.2015 14:58, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
>>> > On mer, apr 29, 2015 at 02:29:43 +0200, Bálint Réczey wr
2015-04-29 16:08 GMT+02:00 Alessandro Ghedini :
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 03:28:40PM +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
>> Hi Alessandro,
>>
>> On 29.04.2015 14:58, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
>> > On mer, apr 29, 2015 at 02:29:43 +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote:
>> >>> Since there are concerns on shipping b
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 03:28:40PM +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> Hi Alessandro,
>
> On 29.04.2015 14:58, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> > On mer, apr 29, 2015 at 02:29:43 +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> >>> Since there are concerns on shipping both libav and ffmpeg, we won't allow
> >>> ffmpeg unle
Dear Moritz,
Could you please clarify Security Team's position? Do the Security
Team still want to keep ffmpeg out of testing?
Cheers,
Balint
2015-04-29 15:55 GMT+02:00 Alessio Treglia :
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Bálint Réczey wrote:
>> He gave a green light to migration, it is very cl
2015-04-29 15:27 GMT+02:00 Alessio Treglia :
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun
> wrote:
>> Therefore I'm planning to discuss a possible transition from
>> Libav to FFmpeg with the maintainers of the reverse dependencies,
>> before asking the TC for a resolution.
>
> What if one
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> He gave a green light to migration, it is very clear.
If you're thinking of this [1] then yes, it's very clear that is *NOT*
a green light at all.
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=763148#134
--
Alessio Treglia
2015-04-29 15:38 GMT+02:00 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort :
> On 29/04/15 14:29, Bálint Réczey wrote:
>> The last word from the Security Team was Moritz's email which gave
>> ffmpeg green light after Jessie's release.
>
> No. He said that a decision between libav and ffmpeg would still have to be
> made. I
On 29/04/15 14:29, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> The last word from the Security Team was Moritz's email which gave
> ffmpeg green light after Jessie's release.
No. He said that a decision between libav and ffmpeg would still have to be
made. IOW, we won't ship Stretch with both libav and ffmpeg.
Allowi
Hi Alessandro,
2015-04-29 14:58 GMT+02:00 Alessandro Ghedini :
> On mer, apr 29, 2015 at 02:29:43 +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote:
>> > Since there are concerns on shipping both libav and ffmpeg, we won't allow
>> > ffmpeg unless it is chosen to be the default and there is a clear
>> > transition
>> >
Hi Alessandro,
On 29.04.2015 14:58, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> On mer, apr 29, 2015 at 02:29:43 +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote:
>>> Since there are concerns on shipping both libav and ffmpeg, we won't allow
>>> ffmpeg unless it is chosen to be the default and there is a clear transition
>>> plan, so
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun
wrote:
> Therefore I'm planning to discuss a possible transition from
> Libav to FFmpeg with the maintainers of the reverse dependencies,
> before asking the TC for a resolution.
What if one or more maintainers do not agree with you to make his
On mer, apr 29, 2015 at 02:29:43 +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> > Since there are concerns on shipping both libav and ffmpeg, we won't allow
> > ffmpeg unless it is chosen to be the default and there is a clear transition
> > plan, so that we can switch from one to the other. Only then will the bloc
Processing changes file: ejabberd_14.07-4+deb8u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: win32-loader_0.7.8+deb8u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Arch
Processing changes file: httpcomponents-client_4.1.1-2+deb7u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1ynrok-0005is...@franck.debian
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #783488 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package win32-loader/0.7.8+deb8u1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
783488: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=783488
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To U
Control: tags -1 + pending
On 2015-04-29 7:58, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
Le mardi, 28 avril 2015, 20.10:47 Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 14:36 +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> I'd like to get two late-notified issues in the win32-loader pack
Control: tags -1 + pending
On 2015-04-28 20:09, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 14:43 +0200, Philipp Huebner wrote:
I would like to upload ejabberd 14.07-5 to stable-proposed-updates.
It removes a useless and confusing manpage for a binary that no long
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #782848 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package
httpcomponents-client/4.1.1-2
Added tag(s) pending.
--
782848: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=782848
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #783489 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package ejabberd/14.07-5
Added tag(s) pending.
--
783489: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=783489
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
Control: tags -1 + pending
On 2015-04-26 12:34, Markus Koschany wrote:
On 26.04.2015 13:30, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2015-04-25 at 17:23 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Sat, 2015-04-18 at 20:56 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
similar to commons-httpclient [1
Dear Emilio,
2015-04-29 12:28 GMT+02:00 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort :
> On 29/04/15 10:41, Bálint Réczey wrote:
>> 2015-04-29 9:44 GMT+02:00 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort :
>>> On 27/04/15 00:30, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
On 27.04.2015 00:01, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 26/04/15 19:06, Andreas
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 + moreinfo
Bug #783708 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package youtube-dl/2015.02.28-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
783708: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=783708
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UN
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
On 2015-04-28 16:43, transylvania wrote:
youtube-dl is one of those packages that needs to be
frequently kept up to date with upstream in order to be
consistently useful. The version currently in jessie
(2014.08.05-1+deb8u1) is failing for many Youtube downloads
(see
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Tags: jessie
Severity: normal
Dear Release Team,
youtube-dl is one of those packages that needs to be
frequently kept up to date with upstream in order to be
consistently useful. The version currently in jessie
On 29.04.2015 12:28, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 29/04/15 10:41, Bálint Réczey wrote:
>> 2015-04-29 9:44 GMT+02:00 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort :
>>> On 27/04/15 00:30, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
On 27.04.2015 00:01, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 26/04/15 19:06, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote
On 29/04/15 10:41, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> 2015-04-29 9:44 GMT+02:00 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort :
>> On 27/04/15 00:30, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
>>> On 27.04.2015 00:01, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 26/04/15 19:06, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> Dear release team,
>
> as you undoubtedly
On 2015-04-29 07:09, Diane Trout wrote:
I filed bug 783674 with a patch for kamoso, that builds and seems to
work.
Nothing else seems to need patches, so I hadn't filed bug reports.
Should I
have?
I added some metadata to that bug and took the liberty of making it
severity:normal; if it ca
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 760003 with 783674
Bug #760003 [release.debian.org] transition: qt-gstreamer
760003 was not blocked by any bugs.
760003 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 760003: 783674
> tags 783674 + stretch sid
Bug #783674 [kamoso] kamos
Hi Niels,
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:09:02PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2015-04-14 17:47, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Hi Stable release managers,
> >
> > This is not a wheezy-pu request per se. The recent libxrender update
> > th
2015-04-29 9:44 GMT+02:00 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort :
> On 27/04/15 00:30, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
>> On 27.04.2015 00:01, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> On 26/04/15 19:06, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
Dear release team,
as you undoubtedly know: jessie has been released! \o/
T
On 27/04/15 00:30, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> On 27.04.2015 00:01, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 26/04/15 19:06, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
>>> Dear release team,
>>>
>>> as you undoubtedly know: jessie has been released! \o/
>>>
>>> Thus this bug is now obsolete and I'm closing it.
>>>
>>> Ple
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 29/04/15 08:09, Diane Trout wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 28, 2015 19:07:27 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 28/04/15 08:10, Diane Trout wrote:
>>> On Friday, September 05, 2014 17:53:19 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 31/08/14 01:08, Diane Trout wrote:
> Pa
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #760003 [release.debian.org] transition: qt-gstreamer
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
760003: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=760003
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Le mardi, 28 avril 2015, 20.10:47 Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 14:36 +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> > I'd like to get two late-notified issues in the win32-loader package
> > as released in jessie:
> >
> > * The screenshot describing the
78 matches
Mail list logo
