On Thu, 2015-08-06 at 09:10 -0300, Gilvan Simões Barros wrote:
Recentemente instalei o Debian GNU/Linux 8 \n \l amd64, com 2 Hd,
Please contact one of the Debian user support channels for help:
https://www.debian.org/support
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/
http://forums.debian.net/
Hi,
On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 13:12:16 + Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote:
Package: src:libsigc++-2.0
libsigc++-2.0 has been uploaded in the mean time and built successfully
everywhere. The auto tracker at [1] looks ok to me.
Please schedule the binNMUs (excluding glibmm2.4, which will get
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
please do not removal (bug #7942980) , as stated in the bug
a workaround exist to use the package, besides the package
is broken for a change on the public server,
private servers continue to
Control: tag -1 wontfix
Control: close -1
On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 04:28:49PM +0800, gustavo panizzo (gfa) wrote:
please do not removal (bug #7942980) , as stated in the bug
a workaround exist to use the package, besides the package
is broken for a change on the public server,
private servers
Processing control commands:
tag -1 wontfix
Bug #794925 [release.debian.org] RM: asciinema/0.9.8-1
Added tag(s) wontfix.
close -1
Bug #794925 [release.debian.org] RM: asciinema/0.9.8-1
Marked Bug as done
--
794925: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=794925
Debian Bug Tracking
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was m...@debian.org).
usertags 791746 + transition
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: transition.
block 791746 with 790756
Bug #791746
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 20:32:21 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
Dear RT: I prepared:
https://titanpad.com/diCx29YOqT
(conveniently ending with qt) as a possible message to the Qt/KDE team to
try to help with the ongoing transition. It would be just cool if some of you
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 791170 + pending
Bug #791170 [release.debian.org] libsigc++-2.0: library transition is needed
when GCC 5 is
Added tag(s) pending.
block 791170 with 777842 777977 778160
Bug #791170 [release.debian.org] libsigc++-2.0: library transition is
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 791746 normal
Bug #791746 [release.debian.org] FTBFS with GCC 5: changes to symbols file
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
retitle 791746 transition: libindi
Bug #791746 [release.debian.org] FTBFS with GCC 5: changes to symbols
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
sparse FTBFS in jessie and sid since the llvm default version was updated
to 3.5. Unfortunately nobody rebuilt contrib and non-free before the
release so this was not noticed in
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: wheezy
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
The security update to the linux kernel (3.2.65-1+deb7u2) changed the
KPI by moving d_alias into the d_u union, which causes subsequent
(re)build attempts of the openafs kernel
Hi Debian Release Team,
TLTR:
Virtualbox suffers of many security issues in Debian,
specially because Upstream (Oracle) refuses to give
patches for CVEs, and (you can see in the Debian bug
794466 an analysis of the Oracle policy and discussion)
this makes difficult to handle security uploads
On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 09:23:31PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
Virtualbox suffers of many security issues in Debian,
specially because Upstream (Oracle) refuses to give
patches for CVEs, and (you can see in the Debian bug
794466 an analysis of the Oracle policy and discussion)
this
Hi Frank and Release Team,
Oracle at this moment maintains a 4.0.x 4.1.x 4.2.x 4.3.x 5.0.x
branches where security fixes seems to be addressed all.
(virtualbox-ose from o-o-s still needs some pinpoint fixes)
virtualbox-ose is at version 3.2.10, and the last release from [1]
is 3.2.28, and
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu xsdcxx_4.0.0-1 . ALL . unstable . -m Rebuild for new libstdc++6
This is happening because of the libstdc++6 transition.
Technically this is only happening because libstdc++6 declared a
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
The python-sqlalchemy transition was all set to finish today when the
maintainer (zigo) uploaded neutron-vpnaas and so set the whole thing back
by five days (at least, who knows what else he
16 matches
Mail list logo
