Processing changes file: xemacs21_21.4.22-14~deb8u1_mipsel.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1zowjw-0001ud...@franck.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 791269 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-rtaudio.html
Bug #791269 [release.debian.org] rtaudio: library transition may be needed when
GCC 5 is the default
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://release.debian.org/trans
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 791270 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-rtmidi.html
Bug #791270 [release.debian.org] rtmidi: library transition may be needed when
GCC 5 is the default
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://release.debian.org/transit
Processing changes file: xemacs21_21.4.22-14~deb8u1_mips.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1zow51-0008hi...@franck.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 791268 with 791243
Bug #791268 [release.debian.org] rlog: library transition may be needed when
GCC 5 is the default
791268 was blocked by: 790756
791268 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 791268: 791243
> thanks
Stopping p
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 791268 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/rlog.html
Bug #791268 [release.debian.org] rlog: library transition may be needed when
GCC 5 is the default
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html
Processing changes file: xemacs21_21.4.22-14~deb8u1_arm64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: xemacs21_21.4.22-14~deb8u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: xemacs21_21.4.22-14~deb8u1_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
wit
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 791014 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/csound.html
Bug #791014 [release.debian.org] transition: csound (GCC 5)
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/csound.html'.
> thanks
Stopping proc
Processing changes file: xemacs21_21.4.22-14~deb8u1_powerpc.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1zovby-0004kp...@franck.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 794474 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-mimetic.html
Bug #794474 [release.debian.org] mimetic: library transition may be needed when
GCC 5 is the default
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://release.debian.org/trans
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 791141
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libmusicbrainz3.html
Bug #791141 [release.debian.org] transition: libmusicbrainz3 (GCC 5)
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libmu
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 791182
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libvsqlitepp.html
Bug #791182 [release.debian.org] libvsqlitepp: library transition may be needed
when GCC 5 is the default
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://release.deb
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was s...@debian.org).
> usertag 791129 + transition
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: transition.
> retitle 791129 transition: libindi1
Processing changes file: xemacs21_21.4.22-14~deb8u1_amd64.changes
REJECT
Processing changes file: xemacs21_21.4.22-14~deb8u1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: xemacs21_21.4.22-14~deb8u1_ppc64el.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: xemacs21_21.4.22-14~deb8u1_s390x.changes
ACCEP
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 791129 + transition
retitle 791129 transition: libindi1 (GCC 5)
tags 791129 = pending
block 791129 by 790756
reassign 791129 release.debian.org
severity 791129 normal
forwarded 791129 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libindi.html
t
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 07:08:11AM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 05:02:45PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > On 10/08/15 16:57, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > > On 2015-08-10 15:52, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > >> On 10/08/15 13:35, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > >>> Yes, provided
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 05:02:45PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On 10/08/15 16:57, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > On 2015-08-10 15:52, Simon McVittie wrote:
> >> On 10/08/15 13:35, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> >>> Yes, provided that an upload to unstable with a higher version number
> >>> happens b
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 790979 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-apt.html
Bug #790979 [release.debian.org] apt: library transition may be needed when GCC
5 is the default
Bug #794663 [release.debian.org] apt transition (libapt-pkg4.12 ->
libapt
> I don't think any of us can work out where you gained that understanding,
> sorry.
Fair enough, entirely possible that I missed something that is very
obvious to you but not to me.
Cheers
Rohan Garg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubs
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 08:34:49PM +0200, Rohan Garg wrote:
> > There are dozens of smaller transitions related to the libstdc++ transition,
> > covering thousands of packages, and they all require co-ordinating, ordering
> > and man time to process them. Chasing an individual transition after less
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 795125 - stretch sid
Bug #795125 [release.debian.org] transition: libassimp3 -> libassimp3v5
Bug #790980 [release.debian.org] assimp: library transition to libassimp3v5
Removed tag(s) stretch and sid.
Removed tag(s) stretch and sid.
> block 7
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 795125 790980
Bug #795125 [release.debian.org] transition: libassimp3 -> libassimp3v5
Bug #795125 [release.debian.org] transition: libassimp3 -> libassimp3v5
Added tag(s) stretch and sid.
Bug #790980 {Done: IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GN
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was s...@debian.org).
> usertag 790980 + transition
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: transition.
> block 790980 by 790756
Bug #790980
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 790980 + transition
block 790980 by 790756
reassign 790980 release.debian.org
retitle 790980 assimp: library transition to libassimp3v5
thanks
Reopening the bug as a transition tracker and reassigning, as requested
in the original bug report.
Re
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Due to the gcc-5 transition, the "libassimp3" package from "assimp" has changed
exported symbols and has been renamed to "libassimp3v5".
The SONAME has *not* changed.
I have uploaded "as
Processing changes file: activemq_5.6.0+dfsg-1+deb7u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux_3.2.68-1+deb7u3_multi.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux_3.2.68-1+deb7u3_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux_3.2.68-1+deb7u3_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing c
Processing changes file: activemq_5.6.0+dfsg1-4+deb8u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux_3.16.7-ckt11-1+deb8u3_multi.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux_3.16.7-ckt11-1+deb8u3_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux_3.16.7-ckt11-1+deb8u3_arm64.changes
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Sat, 2015-06-20 at 19:23 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + cpnfirmed
>
> On Sat, 2015-06-06 at 09:27 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> > There is an upgrade issue from ancient xemacs21 versions (from squeeze,
> > there was no xemacs21 in wheezy) where
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #787904 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package xemacs21/21.4.22-14~deb7u1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
787904: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=787904
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To
> There are dozens of smaller transitions related to the libstdc++ transition,
> covering thousands of packages, and they all require co-ordinating, ordering
> and man time to process them. Chasing an individual transition after less
> than a week isn't particularly helpful.
As I understand it, th
Your message dated Mon, 10 Aug 2015 17:37:35 +0200
with message-id <20150810153735.gg3...@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#794989: nmu: xsdcxx_4.0.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #794989,
regarding nmu: xsdcxx_4.0.0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
On 10/08/15 16:57, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On 2015-08-10 15:52, Simon McVittie wrote:
>> On 10/08/15 13:35, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>>> Yes, provided that an upload to unstable with a higher version number
>>> happens before or ASAP afterwards please.
>>
>> iceweasel/38.1.1esr-1 is already in
On 2015-08-10 15:52, Simon McVittie wrote:
On 10/08/15 13:35, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Yes, provided that an upload to unstable with a higher version number
happens before or ASAP afterwards please.
iceweasel/38.1.1esr-1 is already in unstable, which is why I suggested
iceweasel/38.1.1esr-1~d
On 2015-08-10 15:21, Rohan Garg wrote:
Hi
I was wondering what the hold up on this bug was?
There are dozens of smaller transitions related to the libstdc++
transition, covering thousands of packages, and they all require
co-ordinating, ordering and man time to process them. Chasing an
indiv
On 10/08/15 13:35, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Yes, provided that an upload to unstable with a higher version number
> happens before or ASAP afterwards please.
iceweasel/38.1.1esr-1 is already in unstable, which is why I suggested
iceweasel/38.1.1esr-1~deb9u1 for t-p-u.
S
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
Hi
I was wondering what the hold up on this bug was?
Cheers
Rohan Garg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/CAEb1ZdjdV-6cd2=c+uftwb0sx4hsugv+x60u5oanb-
Sehr geehrter Holger,
Holger Levsen (2015-08-10):
> Dear debian-boot people,
>
> this is a ping about applying the trivial patch to fix this hillarious bug.
> I'm hoping the fix will be uploaded to sid soon to make it possible to push
> it
> into the 8.2 point update, thus cc:ing the stable r
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was m...@debian.org).
> usertags 791082 + transition
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: transition.
> block 791082 with 790756
Bug #7910
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 confirmed moreinfo
Bug #795079 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package
iceweasel/38.1.1esr-1~deb9u1
Added tag(s) moreinfo and confirmed.
--
795079: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=795079
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian
Control: tag -1 confirmed moreinfo
On 2015-08-10 12:45, Simon McVittie wrote:
(X-Debbugs-Cc icewea...@packages.debian.org because this is really a
request
for a maintainer upload.)
iceweasel in unstable fixes a security vulnerability in pdf.js that is
being actively exploited. The fix seems un
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: stretch
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
(X-Debbugs-Cc icewea...@packages.debian.org because this is really a request
for a maintainer upload.)
iceweasel in unstable fixes a security vulnerability in pdf.js that is
being
On Mon, 2015-08-10 at 08:03 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
>
> > block 791170 with 747868
> Bug #791170 [release.debian.org] libsigc++-2.0: library transition is
> needed when GCC 5 is
> 791170 was blocked by: 777977 778160 790643 79075
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 791086 by 790756
Bug #791086 [src:leveldb] leveldb: libstdc++ transition
791086 was not blocked by any bugs.
791086 was blocking: 777814
Added blocking bug(s) of 791086: 790756
> reassign 791086 release.debian.org
Bug #791086 [src:leveldb] l
block 791086 by 790756
reassign 791086 release.debian.org
tags 791086 = pending
severity 791086 normal
retitle 791086 transition: libleveldb1v5
forwarded 791086 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-leveldb.html
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 791086 + transition
lev
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 791050 + pending
Bug #791050 [release.debian.org] glibmm2.4: library transition may be needed
when GCC 5 is the default
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
791050: http://bu
On 08/10/2015 10:52 AM, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
>
>
> On 10/08/2015 09:48, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> On 08/10/2015 10:42 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> On 10-08-15 08:45, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
>
>>> I'm not sure if it's wise to start the netcdf transition already, even
>>> though I wo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 10/08/2015 09:48, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 08/10/2015 10:42 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 10-08-15 08:45, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure if it's wise to start the netcdf transition already, even
>> though I would prefer t
On 08/10/2015 10:42 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 10-08-15 08:45, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> I'm not sure if it's wise to start the netcdf transition already, even
> though I would prefer to transition to the new netcdf packages instead
> of doing a v5 rename. A number of reverse dependen
On 01-07-15 16:39, Matthias Klose wrote:
> The gfortran module version 14 is triggered by making gfortran-5 the default
> gfortran (which should happen at the same time as the C/C++ default switch).
>
> It affects all packages depending on gfortran modules, the previous transition
> tracker bug ht
On 10-08-15 08:45, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> The big hurdle is the netcdf/gfortran transition: a number of
> packages depend on netcdf.mod. As Matthias points out below, this
> would involve a package rename anyway: do we wish to combine the
> two, given that the netcdf transition has been tested
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 791170 with 747868
Bug #791170 [release.debian.org] libsigc++-2.0: library transition is needed
when GCC 5 is
791170 was blocked by: 777977 778160 790643 790756 777842
791170 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 791170: 74786
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 791170 with 692811
Bug #791170 [release.debian.org] libsigc++-2.0: library transition is needed
when GCC 5 is
791170 was blocked by: 747868 790643 777977 778160 777842 790756
791170 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 791170
Processing control commands:
> severity 790643 serious
Bug #790643 [museek+] FTBFS: Could NOT find Event (missing: Event_LIBRARIES)
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> block 791170 by 790643
Bug #791170 [release.debian.org] libsigc++-2.0: library transition is needed
when GCC 5 is
791170 wa
Dear debian-boot people,
this is a ping about applying the trivial patch to fix this hillarious bug.
I'm hoping the fix will be uploaded to sid soon to make it possible to push it
into the 8.2 point update, thus cc:ing the stable release managers, to make
them aware of the issue too.
You also
54 matches
Mail list logo
