On Monday, August 03, 2015 02:20:40 PM Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 03-08-15 00:54, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> > On 01-08-15 16:40, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> >> The debdiff in case libkml needs to be NMUed is attached.
> >
> > The debdiff needs to be updated to incorporate the change
Hi Simon,
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 01:46:16PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> I notice that Ubuntu has gone ahead with a lot of library renames. Did
> the Ubuntu developers doing these uploads test the results, or did you
> just "upload and hope"? One reason I have held back from doing more NMUs
> i
> It looks like #748469 was fixed in upstream 3.16.5:
> http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/gtk+/3.16/gtk+-3.16.5.changes
> and #773135 was fixed in 3.15.4 :
> http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/gnome/sources/gtk+/3.15/gtk+-3.15.4.changes
Thanks Mert,
The versions you mention were never uploaded to De
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 23:35:29 +0200 Ruben Undheim
wrote:
> > The BTS metadata for #748469 and #773135 indicates that they are
not yet
> > fixed in unstable. If that's correct, then they need to be resolved
> > there before we can look at fixing them in stable; if not, then the
> > metadata needs
> The BTS metadata for #748469 and #773135 indicates that they are not yet
> fixed in unstable. If that's correct, then they need to be resolved
> there before we can look at fixing them in stable; if not, then the
> metadata needs to be updated to correctly reflect when (i.e. in which
> version(s)
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 23:06 +0200, Ruben Undheim wrote:
> gtk+3.0 in Jessie is affected by several quite serious bugs. 3 of them are so
> serious that they from time to time cause users losing their work. There has
> been a request to update gtk+3 to the latest 3.14.x b
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #795911 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package gtk+3.0/3.14.5-1+deb8u1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
795911: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=795911
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
gtk+3.0 in Jessie is affected by several quite serious bugs. 3 of them are so
serious that they from time to time cause users losing their work. There has
been a request to upda
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #795794 {Done: "Adam D. Barratt" }
[release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package nss/3.17.2-1.1+deb8u1
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #795794 to the same values
previously set
--
795794: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo
Control: reopen -1
Oops, didn't actually mean to close that...
On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 21:50 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 16:19 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> >
> > On Sun, 2015-08-16 at 22:51 +0200, Christoph Egger wrote:
> > > This is a
Your message dated Mon, 17 Aug 2015 21:50:07 +0100
with message-id <1439844607.1859.14.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#795794: jessie-pu: package nss/3.17.2-1.1+deb8u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #795794,
regarding jessie-pu: package nss/3.17.2-1.1+deb8u1
to be marked as do
On 17-08-15 21:50, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> I've completed the rebuilds of first dependency level, we need to
> untangle the spatialite->postgis->gdal->spatialite circular dependency
> to make the build dependencies for all these packages installable with
> the new libgeos-c1v5 package.
>
>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: wheezy
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Please review ssl-cert_1.0.32+deb7u1 for inclusion in oldstable. The
main change is switching from sha1 to sha256 for new certificates
because browsers start marking sha1 as insecure
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #795259 python-shapely: Drop hardcoded libgeos-c1 dependencies
> #Severity: serious
> #Tags: patch, sid, stretch
> #Found in version 1.4.3-2
> #795883 python-shapely: Don't (build) depend on libgeos-c1 for GCC 5
> #Severity: important
> #Tags: pat
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #795883: python-shapely: Don't (build) depend on libgeos-c1
> #791045: transition: geos (GCC 5)
> block 791045 by 795883
Bug #791045 [release.debian.org] transition: geos (GCC 5)
791045 was blocked by: 790756
791045 was not blocking any bugs.
Adde
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Sun, 2015-07-26 at 16:21 +1000, Carl Suster wrote:
> Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
>
> Hi,
>
> On 26/07/15 02:51, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Once 1.0.5-2 is in unstable, please prepare a package versioned as
> > 1.0.5-1+deb8u1, built and tested on stable, and send u
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #792468 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package plowshare4/1.0.5-2
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
792468: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=792468
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Wed, 2015-07-29 at 12:54 -0300, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
> It was reported a vulnerability on groovy that allow to execute
> arbitrary code remotely. For more information you can take a look at:
> https://bugs.debian.org/793397.
>
> I already uploaded a fix to unstab
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #793984 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package groovy/1.8.6-4
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
793984: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=793984
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Wed, 2015-07-29 at 12:56 -0300, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
> It was reported a vulnerability on groovy that allow to execute
> arbitrary code remotely. For more information you can take a look at:
> https://bugs.debian.org/793397.
>
> I don't think it warrant a DSA so
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #793986 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package groovy/1.8.6-1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
793986: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=793986
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #793688 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package groovy2/2.2.2+dfsg-3
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
793688: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=793688
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Sun, 2015-07-26 at 12:40 -0300, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
> It was reported a vulnerability on groovy2 that allow to execute
> arbitrary code remotely. For more information you can take a look at:
> https://bugs.debian.org/793398.
>
> I already uploaded a fix to unsta
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 09:06 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> Hi, I would like to upload the attached diff as a stable update for
> ruby2.1, fixing a minor security bug that didn't qualify for a DSA.
>
> Te following patches were cherry-picked from upstream:
>
> http:
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #794090 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package ruby2.1/2.1.5-2+deb8u2
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
794090: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=794090
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Sat, 2015-08-08 at 13:46 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> sparse FTBFS in jessie and sid since the llvm default version was updated
> to 3.5. Unfortunately nobody rebuilt contrib and non-free before the
> release so this was not noticed in time :-(
+ * Temporarily
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #794940 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package sparse/0.4.5~rc1-2~deb8u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
794940: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=794940
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Sun, 2015-08-16 at 22:51 +0200, Christoph Egger wrote:
> This is a small patch from mozilla hg. It fixes #774195 and is
> confirmed to work. Would be cool if if can be included in the next
> stable release.
Please go ahead.
Regards,
Adam
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #795794 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package nss/3.17.2-1.1+deb8u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
795794: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=795794
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: reopen 791305
Jonas Smedegaard wrote in debian/changelog:
>* Re-release to unstable.
> Still closes: bug#791305. Thanks (also) to Simon McVittie.
No, this doesn't complete the transition. Assuming it builds successfully
everywhere, this is the last thing that needs to be done in
Processing control commands:
> reopen 791305
Bug #791305 {Done: Jonas Smedegaard } [release.debian.org]
transition: ucommon (libucommon7v5)
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 13:46:16 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> I notice that Ubuntu has gone ahead with a lot of library renames. Did
> the Ubuntu developers doing these uploads test the results, or did you
> just "upload and hope"? One reason I have held back from doing more NMUs
> is that for t
Your message dated Mon, 17 Aug 2015 13:00:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#790987: fixed in botan1.10 1.10.10-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #790987,
regarding botan1.10: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
On 17/08/15 11:07, Matthias Klose wrote:
> There seems to be a tendency to avoid transitions, where Debian doesn't have
> any
> reverse dependencies, or where developers analyze the library API's and come
> to
> the conclusion that no transition is necessary. I'm not yet sure if this is
> the
>
2015-08-17 12:47 GMT+02:00 Bastien ROUCARIES :
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Unstable now has GCC 5 as the default for more than two weeks. The
> follow-up
> > transitions are in progress, however the list of transitions at [1] is
> not
> > exhaustive, because this
Your message dated Mon, 17 Aug 2015 11:36:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#791305: fixed in ucommon 6.4.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #791305,
regarding transition: ucommon (libucommon7v5)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Unstable now has GCC 5 as the default for more than two weeks. The follow-up
> transitions are in progress, however the list of transitions at [1] is not
> exhaustive, because this only covered libraries without dependencies on
> libraries
Unstable now has GCC 5 as the default for more than two weeks. The follow-up
transitions are in progress, however the list of transitions at [1] is not
exhaustive, because this only covered libraries without dependencies on
libraries which need a transition. There is now another test rebuild [2] d
retitle 791313 transition: xmlrpc-c (g++-5)
reassign 791313 release.debian.org
severity 791313 normal
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags 791313 + transition
forwarded 791313 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-xmlrpc-c.html
thanks
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 at 22:40:48 +010
Quoting Simon McVittie (2015-08-17 10:44:47)
> reopen 791305
> retitle 791305 transition: ucommon (libucommon7v5)
> reassign 791305 release.debian.org
> severity 791305 normal
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
> usertags 791305 + transition
> forwarded 791305 https://release.debian.org/
On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 11:16 +0200, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've noticed a new libcrypto++ has entered sid, but the transition
> tracker[1] doesn't seem to agree on the library names, or something
> (it still shows libcrypto++ as "bad").
>
> What's going on there?
>
> [1] https://
Hi,
I've noticed a new libcrypto++ has entered sid, but the transition
tracker[1] doesn't seem to agree on the library names, or something
(it still shows libcrypto++ as "bad").
What's going on there?
[1] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libcrypto++.html
Thanks,
--
,''`. Chri
Hi,
could we please have a transition tracker for botan1.10, as
apparently there's a conflict with libcrypto++, namely the
pdns package which uses both libs. (And libcrypto++ has
already "started"...)
Thanks,
--
,''`. Christian Hofstaedtler
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' 7D1A CFFA D9E0 806C
Control: forwarded 790990
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-cairomm.html
On 14/08/15 10:05, Simon McVittie wrote:
> I have NMU'd a renamed library to DELAYED/2
Now in unstable and built everywhere.
S
Processing control commands:
> forwarded 790990 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-cairomm.html
Bug #790990 [release.debian.org] transition: cairomm (libcairomm-1.0-1v5)
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-cairomm.html'.
--
790990: htt
reopen 791305
retitle 791305 transition: ucommon (libucommon7v5)
reassign 791305 release.debian.org
severity 791305 normal
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags 791305 + transition
forwarded 791305 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-ucommon.html
thanks
On Fri, 03 Jul 2
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 791305
Bug #791305 {Done: Jonas Smedegaard } [src:ucommon] ucommon:
library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and
On 12/08/15 09:57, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Now that openexr has built everywhere, I've NMU'd imagemagick to DELAYED/2
Sorry, I didn't spot that my local sbuild instance was still seeing
libopenexr6 instead of libopenexr6v5 at the time. I normally do
source+all uploads, but the ftpmasters prefer to
retitle 791073 transition: id3lib3.8.3 (libid3-3.8.3v5)
forwarded 791073
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-id3lib3.8.3.html
thanks
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 at 15:35:13 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> ok, uploading to experimental now
This change has reached unstable and built everywhere
49 matches
Mail list logo
