Processing changes file: sendmail_8.14.4-4+deb7u1_mips.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: sparse_0.4.5~rc1-2~deb8u1_mips.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: sparse_0.4.5~rc1-2~deb8u1_arm64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: sparse_0.4.5~rc1-2~deb8u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: sparse_0.4.5~rc1-2~deb8u1_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: sparse_0.4.5~rc1-2~deb8u1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Proc
Processing changes file: sendmail_8.14.4-4+deb7u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: sendmail_8.14.4-4+deb7u1_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: sendmail_8.14.4-4+deb7u1_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: sendmail_8.14.4-4+deb7u1_mipsel.changes
ACCEPT
Process
Processing changes file: sendmail_8.14.4-4+deb7u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: sendmail_8.14.4-4+deb7u1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: sendmail_8.14.4-4+deb7u1_kfreebsd-i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: sendmail_8.14.4-4+deb7u1_powerpc.chang
Processing changes file: sparse_0.4.5~rc1-2~deb8u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: sparse_0.4.5~rc1-2~deb8u1_powerpc.changes
ACCEPT
On September 2, 2015 02:48:01 PM you wrote:
> > I haven't checked, but I will be conservative and assume it needs
> > transition. I have already staged v4.8 in experimental for that purpose;
> > see also #793250 and #796561.
>
> Thanks, I've noted those on the Titanpad. I will not open a separate
Processing changes file: libvdpau_0.4.1-7+deb7u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libvdpau_0.4.1-7+deb7u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libvdpau_0.4.1-7+deb7u1_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libvdpau_0.4.1-7+deb7u1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing c
Processing changes file: libvdpau_0.8-3+deb8u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libvdpau_0.8-3+deb8u1_arm64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libvdpau_0.8-3+deb8u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libvdpau_0.8-3+deb8u1_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #794940 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package sparse/0.4.5~rc1-2~deb8u1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
794940: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=794940
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 16:31 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Sat, 2015-08-08 at 13:46 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> > sparse FTBFS in jessie and sid since the llvm default version was updated
> > to 3.5. Unfortunately nobody rebuilt
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #798334 [release.debian.org] opu: package maven2/2.2.1-12+deb7u1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
798334: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=798334
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Sat, 2015-08-29 at 16:09 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> Apologies for the delay in getting back to you on this.
>
> On Mon, 2014-11-03 at 21:12 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> > there is one security bug open against sendmail that
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #787900 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package live-tools/3.0.20-1+deb7u1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
787900: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=787900
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Tue, 2015-09-08 at 23:03 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Tue, 2015-09-08 at 10:11 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> > Please accept maven2/2.2.1-12+deb7u1 in wheezy-proposed-updates, this update
> > combined with the maven2-core updat
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #767975 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package sendmail/8.14.4-4+deb7u1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
767975: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=767975
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Sat, 2015-08-29 at 16:12 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Sat, 2015-06-06 at 08:49 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> > live-tools diverts update-initramfs and installs its own implementation
> > (that calls the original update-initra
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 798744 transition: xmms2
Bug #798744 [release.debian.org] nmu: promoe esperanza
Changed Bug title to 'transition: xmms2' from 'nmu: promoe esperanza'
> tags 798744 + confirmed
Bug #798744 [release.debian.org] transition: xmms2
Added tag(s)
Your message dated Sat, 12 Sep 2015 21:29:18 +0200
with message-id <20150912192918.gq3...@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#796323: stretch-pu: package icedove/38.2.0-1~stretch
has caused the Debian Bug report #796323,
regarding stretch-pu: package icedove/38.2.0-1~stretch
to be marke
retitle -1 transition: xmms2
tag -1 confirmed
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag -1 = transition
thanks
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 10:27:22AM +0200, Rémi Vanicat wrote:
> xmms2 has been rebuild for the g++-v5 transition. Two package build
> depend on libxmmsclient++-dev and need to b
Your message dated Sat, 12 Sep 2015 20:04:40 +0100
with message-id <20150912190440.gl3...@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#798692: nmu: libstdc++v5 related binNMUs in
experimental
has caused the Debian Bug report #798692,
regarding nmu: libstdc++v5 related binNMUs in experime
On 2015-07-19 23:27, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> It does indeed look like amd64 (a maintainer upload) was different to i386
> as built by wanna-build, and a rebuild is an appropriate fix. Scheduled in
> sid with +b2, I'll leave the Jessie rebuild until it's migrated.
The first binNMU attempt got s
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 04:56:19PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Please don't use -quiet@ when replying to release.debian.org bugs.
> There's no good reason for the reply not to be sent to debian-release;
> in fact, not doing so is actively harmful.
Sorry. Ok.
> I read that, and I know what "a
Please don't use -quiet@ when replying to release.debian.org bugs.
There's no good reason for the reply not to be sent to debian-release;
in fact, not doing so is actively harmful.
On Sat, 2015-09-12 at 18:48 +0300, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 02:14:04PM +0100, Adam D. Barr
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: britney
Dear release developpers,
Playonlinux is a arch:all package (it is written in python and bash)
which depends on the 32 bits version of wine. Therefore I
added a dependency on wine32|wine32-
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #798749 [release.debian.org] pu: package monit/1:5.9-1+jessie1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
798749: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=798749
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Sat, 2015-09-12 at 12:32 +0300, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
> I would like to make an upload to stable in order to fix bug
> #796989 (umask bug) in the monit package.
+monit (1:5.9-1+jessie1) unstable; urgency=medium
That should be 1:5.9-1+deb8u1, with an upload targ
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was a...@debian.org).
> usertags 794935 transition
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: transition.
> usertags 798749 pu
There were no use
Your message dated Sat, 12 Sep 2015 12:46:46 +0200
with message-id <55f40296.1080...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#786830: wheezy-pu: package debian-security-support
has caused the Debian Bug report #772803,
regarding add the debian-security-support package to wheezy
to be marked as done.
T
On Sat, 2015-09-12 at 11:48 +0300, Sergey Kirpichev wrote:
> I would like to make an upload to stable in order to fix bug
> #796989 (umask bug) in the monit package.
>
> The full patch between this new package version and the version
> 1:5.9-1 currently in Jessie is attached (mostly it's come from
Dear Release Team,
I would like to make an upload to stable in order to fix bug
#796989 (umask bug) in the monit package.
The full patch between this new package version and the version
1:5.9-1 currently in Jessie is attached (mostly it's come from
upstream, tokens.h and y.tab.c are automatically
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
xmms2 has been rebuild for the g++-v5 transition. Two package build
depend on libxmmsclient++-dev and need to be rebuild.
see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=797646
nmu
32 matches
Mail list logo
