Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 802550
Bug #802549 [release.debian.org] transition: x264
802549 was not blocked by any bugs.
802549 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 802549: 802550
--
802549: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=802549
Debian Bug Tracking
Control: block -1 by 802550
On 2015-10-21 00:53:24, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> Control: forwarded -1
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-x264.html
>
> Another x2
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-x264.html
Another x264 SONAME bump. New version is in unstable and all reverse
dependencies build fine against the n
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-x264.html
Bug #802549 [release.debian.org] transition: x264
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-x264.html'.
--
802549: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrep
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu cdo_1.6.9+dfsg.1-3 . amd64 . unstable . -m "Rebuild with libnetcdf7"
The build by the maintainer doesn't use the new netcdf packages.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu grads_2:2.0.2-8 . amd64 . unstable . -m "Rebuild with libnetcdf7"
The build by the maintainer doesn't use the new netcdf packages.
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 08:38:32PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>Hi again,
>
>Steve McIntyre (2015-10-08):
>> On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 05:14:17AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> > I've just pushed a patch in D-I bumping the linux kernel ABI for the
>> > latest linux migration to testing, and ther
On Tue, 2015-10-20 at 22:33 +0200, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-10-20 at 20:18 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
> >
> > On Thu, 2015-10-15 at 15:18 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> > > This update to multipath-tools fixes a couple of problems. Details
> > >
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 789133 with 801862
Bug #789133 [release.debian.org] transition: ocaml 4.02.3
789133 was blocked by: 801458 789614 789619 801459 789402 789354 789403 790062
789133 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 789133: 801862
> thanks
St
On 20/10/15 21:08, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Sat, 2015-07-04 at 17:53 +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> In any case, I've now gone and made a branch for jessie and built a
>> package, there is a debdiff attached
>
> Please go ahead; sorry for the delay.
>
Than
On Tue, 2015-10-20 at 20:18 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> On Thu, 2015-10-15 at 15:18 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> > This update to multipath-tools fixes a couple of problems. Details
> > are
> > referenced in the changelog, and further details are present in
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #801851 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package
multipath-tools/0.5.0-6+deb8u1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
801851: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=801851
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Thu, 2015-10-15 at 15:18 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> This update to multipath-tools fixes a couple of problems. Details are
> referenced in the changelog, and further details are present in
> referenced bugs.
>
> All these changes are already available in Unst
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Sun, 2015-10-11 at 20:59 -0300, Joao Eriberto Mota Filho wrote:
> I would like to ask for acceptance of the jessie-pu based in attached debdiff.
> This upload will close a 'serious' bug present in Jessie.
>
> The changelog is:
>
> --
> stress (1.0.1-1+deb8u1) j
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #801551 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package stress/1.0.1-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
801551: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=801551
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Sat, 2015-07-04 at 17:53 +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> In any case, I've now gone and made a branch for jessie and built a
> package, there is a debdiff attached
Please go ahead; sorry for the delay.
Regards,
Adam
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #791403 [release.debian.org] pu: ganglia-modules-linux/1.3.6-2
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
791403: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=791403
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 01:12:42PM -0500, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Oct 2015, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > On Sat, 17 Oct 2015, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > I've been waiting for the release team for a while to make a decision
> > > on #765639 for a year now. Could you help in getting a decision?
>
Hi again,
Steve McIntyre (2015-10-08):
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 05:14:17AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > I've just pushed a patch in D-I bumping the linux kernel ABI for the
> > latest linux migration to testing, and therefore pondering when to
> > schedule a release. I'm thinking somewhen b
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 09:57:04AM -0500, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Oct 2015, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > I've been waiting for the release team for a while to make a decision
> > on #765639 for a year now. Could you help in getting a decision?
> >
> > I've actually been waiting for longer than
On Tue, 20 Oct 2015, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Oct 2015, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > I've been waiting for the release team for a while to make a decision
> > on #765639 for a year now. Could you help in getting a decision?
> >
> > I've actually been waiting for longer than that, I can't direct
Your message dated Tue, 20 Oct 2015 19:59:00 +0200
with message-id <562680e4.5080...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#802514: Acknowledgement (nmu: ibus-libpinyin_1.7.2-1)
has caused the Debian Bug report #802514,
regarding nmu: ibus-libpinyin_1.7.2-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu ibus-libpinyin_1.7.2-1 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuild against
libpinyin6."
ibus-libpinyin/experimental was built against libpinyin5/experimental
which is has been superseded by libp
On Sat, 17 Oct 2015, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> I've been waiting for the release team for a while to make a decision
> on #765639 for a year now. Could you help in getting a decision?
>
> I've actually been waiting for longer than that, I can't directly find
> all links, but previous discussions about
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Bug #802474 [release.debian.org] Error in dist squeeze armel content list
Bug reassigned from package 'release.debian.org' to 'ftp.debian.org'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #802474 to the same values
previously set
Ignor
Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Control: forcemerge 801200 -1
On 2015-10-20 13:25, Andreas Hänel wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: grave
The Release Team don't run the archive. Reassigning to ftp.debian.org.
When trying to install python on following release:
uname -a
Linux G
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: grave
When trying to install python on following release:
uname -a
Linux GeSyNAS 2.6.31.8.nv+v2 #1 Thu Apr 18 17:40:54 HKT 2013 armv5tel
GNU/Linux
/etc/debian_version = 6.0.3
/etc/apt/sources.list =
deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ squeeze main
deb-s
27 matches
Mail list logo