NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: redis_2.8.17-1+deb8u2_mipsel.changes ACCEPT

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: exfat-utils_1.1.0-2+deb8u1_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: redis_2.8.17-1+deb8u2_arm64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: redis_2.8.17-1+deb8u2_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: redis_2.8.17-1+deb8u2_armhf.changes ACCEPT Processing

Bug#803435: marked as done (nmu: akonadi_15.08.2-1)

Your message dated Sat, 31 Oct 2015 12:15:44 +0100 with message-id <5634a2e0.80...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#803435: nmu: akonadi_15.08.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #803435, regarding nmu: akonadi_15.08.2-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#798999: marked as done (transition: python3.5 supported)

Your message dated Sat, 31 Oct 2015 13:36:53 +0100 with message-id <5634b5e5.8020...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#798999: transition: python3.5 supported has caused the Debian Bug report #798999, regarding transition: python3.5 supported to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#803551: marked as done (nmu: fcitx-sunpinyin_0.4.1-2)

Your message dated Sat, 31 Oct 2015 13:35:41 +0100 with message-id <5634b59d.7070...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#803551: nmu: fcitx-sunpinyin_0.4.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #803551, regarding nmu: fcitx-sunpinyin_0.4.1-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#803551: nmu: fcitx-sunpinyin_0.4.1-2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu fcitx-sunpinyin_0.4.1-2 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuild against libsunpinyin3v5." let's finish the transition in experimental, too. Andreas

Bug#798999: transition: python3.5 supported

Followup-For: Bug #798999 A few binNMUs for experimental: nmu libselinux_2.4-2 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuild with python3.5 as a supported python3." nmu libguestfs_1:1.29.50-1 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuild with python3.5 as a supported python3." nmu python-apt_1.1.0~alpha3 . ANY .

Bug#803596: nmu: libdogleg_0.09-1 ceres-solver_1.10.0~dfsg0-3

On 31/10/15 18:01, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: binnmu > > nmu libdogleg_0.09-1 . amd64 . experimental . -m "Rebuild against suitesparse > 4.4.5" > nmu ceres-solver_1.10.0~dfsg0-3 . amd64 .

Bug#803596: marked as done (nmu: libdogleg_0.09-1 ceres-solver_1.10.0~dfsg0-3)

Your message dated Sat, 31 Oct 2015 19:26:52 +0100 with message-id <563507ec.9020...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#803596: nmu: libdogleg_0.09-1 ceres-solver_1.10.0~dfsg0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #803596, regarding nmu: libdogleg_0.09-1 ceres-solver_1.10.0~dfsg0-3 to be marked as

Bug#803605: transition: gpsd

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition hi release team, gpsd needs a transition again. I do not expect build failures or functional problems in the packages using libgps or libqgpsmm. Please let me know when I should upload

Processed: retitle 803590 to RM: core-network -- RoST; security issues, tagging 803590

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 803590 RM: core-network -- RoST; security issues Bug #803590 [release.debian.org] RM: core-network/4.7-2 Changed Bug title to 'RM: core-network -- RoST; security issues' from 'RM: core-network/4.7-2' > tags 803590 + jessie pending Bug

Processed: Re: Bug#798999: transition: python3.5 supported

Processing control commands: > reopen -1 Bug #798999 {Done: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort } [release.debian.org] transition: python3.5 supported Bug reopened Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #798999 to the same values previously set -- 798999:

Bug#798999: transition: python3.5 supported

Control: reopen -1 I thought the binNMU requests were in a separate bug, didn't realise I was closing the python transition one. Reopening.

Bug#797031: marked as done (nmu: apertium_3.4.0~r61013-3)

Your message dated Sat, 31 Oct 2015 15:03:22 +0100 with message-id <5634ca2a.9000...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#797031: nmu: apertium_3.4.0~r61013-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #797031, regarding nmu: apertium_3.4.0~r61013-3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#795543: marked as done (nmu: google-glog and autofdo)

Your message dated Sat, 31 Oct 2015 15:18:31 +0100 with message-id <5634cdb7.2000...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#795543: nmu: google-glog and autofdo has caused the Debian Bug report #795543, regarding nmu: google-glog and autofdo to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#765639: wheezy-pu: openssl new upstream version

On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 02:20:22PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sun, 2015-06-14 at 11:52 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 12:22:52PM +1000, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > Is the policy for what gets included in the stable branches described > > > somewhere? > > > > It's

Processed: block 789077 with 803587

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 789077 with 803587 Bug #789077 [release.debian.org] transition: ruby2.2 789077 was blocked by: 791848 791846 803589 791847 803489 789077 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 789077: 803587 > thanks Stopping processing here.

Bug#803590: RM: core-network/4.7-2

I agree. Thanks! Eriberto 2015-10-31 13:47 GMT-02:00 Salvatore Bonaccorso : > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: rm > > Hi Stable Release managers, > > Joao Eriberto Mota Filho (maintainer of core-network)

Bug#803596: nmu: libdogleg_0.09-1 ceres-solver_1.10.0~dfsg0-3

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu libdogleg_0.09-1 . amd64 . experimental . -m "Rebuild against suitesparse 4.4.5" nmu ceres-solver_1.10.0~dfsg0-3 . amd64 . experimental . -m "Rebuild against suitesparse 4.4.5" The

Bug#803605: transition: gpsd

Control: tags -1 confirmed On 31/10/15 19:42, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > hi release team, > > gpsd needs a transition again. I do not expect build failures > or functional

Processed: Re: Bug#803605: transition: gpsd

Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #803605 [release.debian.org] transition: gpsd Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 803605: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=803605 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#803605: transition: gpsd

> You can go ahead. uploaded, thanks. -- Bernd ZeimetzDebian GNU/Linux Developer http://bzed.dehttp://www.debian.org GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F

Processed: Re: Bug#803467: jessie-pu: package redis/2:2.8.17-1+deb8u1

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #803467 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package redis/2:2.8.17-1+deb8u1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 803467: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=803467 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#803467: jessie-pu: package redis/2:2.8.17-1+deb8u1

Control: tags -1 + pending On Fri, 2015-10-30 at 14:11 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Fri, 2015-10-30 at 11:49 +, Chris Lamb wrote: > > I'd like update redis in stable to fix an issue when running under > > systemd (#803233). Most documentation on the

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: mariadb-10.0_10.0.20-0+deb8u1_allonly.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: mariadb-10.0_10.0.20-0+deb8u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: mariadb-10.0_10.0.20-0+deb8u1_arm64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file:

Bug#803610: marked as done (nmu: coinor-csdp_6.1.1-1 dsdp_5.8-9.1)

Your message dated Sat, 31 Oct 2015 21:49:06 +0100 with message-id <56352942@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#803610: nmu: coinor-csdp_6.1.1-1 dsdp_5.8-9.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #803610, regarding nmu: coinor-csdp_6.1.1-1 dsdp_5.8-9.1 to be marked as done. This means that you

NEW changes in oldstable-new

Processing changes file: unzip_6.0-8+deb7u4_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: unzip_6.0-8+deb7u4_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: unzip_6.0-8+deb7u4_armhf.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: unzip_6.0-8+deb7u4_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file:

Processed: Re: Bug#803362: jessie-pu: package exfat-utils/1.1.0-2+deb8u1

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #803362 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package exfat-utils/1.1.0-2+deb8u1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 803362: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=803362 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#803362: jessie-pu: package exfat-utils/1.1.0-2+deb8u1

Control: tags -1 + pending On Fri, 2015-10-30 at 16:37 +0100, Sven Hoexter wrote: > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 02:22:45PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Please go ahead; thanks. > > Uploaded for jessie. Flagged for acceptance. > This ack was only for jessie and we handle the wheezy > upload in

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: exfat-utils_1.1.0-2+deb8u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT

Bug#803610: nmu: coinor-csdp_6.1.1-1 dsdp_5.8-9.1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Dear Release Team, During the Wheezy release cycle, the libblas3gf package was renamed libblas3 (and similarly liblapack3gf->liblapack3, libatlas3gf-base->libatlas3-base). Since there was

Bug#803569: jessie-pu: package exim4/4.84-8+deb8u1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hello, I would like to fix 803562 in jessie. Exim's MIME checking ACL (available in exim4-daemon-heavy) was found to not correctly handle some broken MIME containers. Jessie

Bug#765639: Bug#802159: New OpenSSL upstream version

On Sat, 2015-10-31 at 00:02 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 02:38:13PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Oct 2015, Don Armstrong wrote: > > > If there's something specific that you'd like the CTTE to try to do > > > beyond what I've just reported now, let me know. > >

Bug#765639: Bug#802159: New OpenSSL upstream version

On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 02:22:04PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sat, 2015-10-31 at 00:02 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 02:38:13PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > > > On Tue, 20 Oct 2015, Don Armstrong wrote: > > > > If there's something specific that you'd like the CTTE

Bug#803580: marked as done (nmu: mahimahi_0.91-1)

Your message dated Sat, 31 Oct 2015 15:49:15 +0100 with message-id <5634d4eb.3080...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#803580: nmu: mahimahi_0.91-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #803580, regarding nmu: mahimahi_0.91-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#803590: RM: core-network/4.7-2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Hi Stable Release managers, Joao Eriberto Mota Filho (maintainer of core-network) is X-Debbug-CC'ed. If the core-network daemon is started, then #799756 explains core-network allows privilege

Processed: FTBFS with ruby2.2 (only)

Processing control commands: > block 789077 by -1 Bug #789077 [release.debian.org] transition: ruby2.2 789077 was blocked by: 803489 791847 791846 791848 789077 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 789077: 803589 -- 789077: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=789077

Processed: block 792779 with 790978

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 792779 with 790978 Bug #792779 [release.debian.org] nmu: android-platform-frameworks-base_21-2 792779 was not blocked by any bugs. 792779 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 792779: 790978 > thanks Stopping processing here.

Bug#803580: nmu: mahimahi_0.91-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu mahimahi_0.91-1 . amd64 . unstable . -m "Rebuild with libprotobuf9v5." Maintainer uploaded binaries were built against libprotobuf9. Andreas

Bug#799564: marked as done (nmu: visp_2.10.0+dfsg-1)

Your message dated Sat, 31 Oct 2015 15:05:26 +0100 with message-id <5634caa6.2080...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#799564: nmu: visp_2.10.0+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #799564, regarding nmu: visp_2.10.0+dfsg-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#798198: marked as done (nmu: psi4_4.0~beta5+dfsg-2)

Your message dated Sat, 31 Oct 2015 15:07:58 +0100 with message-id <5634cb3e.9060...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#798198: nmu: psi4_4.0~beta5+dfsg-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #798198, regarding nmu: psi4_4.0~beta5+dfsg-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#765639: wheezy-pu: openssl new upstream version

On Sun, 2015-06-14 at 11:52 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 12:22:52PM +1000, Julien Cristau wrote: > > Is the policy for what gets included in the stable branches described > > somewhere? > > It's documented at: > https://www.openssl.org/about/releasestrat.html > > > What

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: exfat-utils_1.1.0-2+deb8u1_s390x.changes ACCEPT

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: exfat-utils_1.1.0-2+deb8u1_arm64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: exfat-utils_1.1.0-2+deb8u1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: exfat-utils_1.1.0-2+deb8u1_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: exfat-utils_1.1.0-2+deb8u1_ppc64el.changes

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: exfat-utils_1.1.0-2+deb8u1_mipsel.changes ACCEPT

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: exfat-utils_1.1.0-2+deb8u1_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: exfat-utils_1.1.0-2+deb8u1_armhf.changes ACCEPT