Le 01/11/2015 12:11, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
> On 11/10/15 14:14, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>> Le 30/09/2015 11:38, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
FYI, LLVM 3.7 has been released.
The safe way would be to do 3.5 => 3.6 now and 3.6 => 3.7 once 3.7.1 is
released (in one or two
Your message dated Sun, 1 Nov 2015 11:06:14 +0100
with message-id <5635e416.9060...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#803632: nmu: pstoedit_3.62-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #803632,
regarding nmu: pstoedit_3.62-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: britney
If run in a loop, live-2012-05-09 will eventually fail with:
AssertionError: NUNINST OUT OF SYNC
The problem is with hurd-i386 (fucked/break arch in this test) and I've
seen problems such
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu pstoedit_3.62-2 . mips64el . unstable . -m "Build against imagemagick
instead of graphicsmagick."
During the initial mips64el build only libgraphicsmagick++-11 was
available, but
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 21/10/15 00:53, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> Control: forwarded -1
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-x264.html
>
> Another x264
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #802549 [release.debian.org] transition: x264
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
802549: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=802549
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Your message dated Sun, 1 Nov 2015 11:20:18 +0100
with message-id <5635e762.3000...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#798256: transition: hdf5
has caused the Debian Bug report #798256,
regarding transition: hdf5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sun, 1 Nov 2015 11:19:16 +0100
with message-id <5635e724.9040...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#789133: transition: ocaml 4.02.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #789133,
regarding transition: ocaml 4.02.3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 803605 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gpsd.html
Bug #803605 [release.debian.org] transition: gpsd
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gpsd.html'.
> thanks
Stopping
On Sat, 31 Oct 2015 19:42:18 +0100 Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> gpsd needs a transition again. I do not expect build failures
> or functional problems in the packages using libgps or
> libqgpsmm.
direwolf & merkaartor fail to build due to missing compatibility with
libgps22.
I've reported the
Processing changes file: redis_2.8.17-1+deb8u2_mips.changes
ACCEPT
On 27/08/15 19:43, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> Hello Julien Cristau.
>
> Thanks for your quick reply.
>
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 06:17:22PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> I'd prefer to fix the root cause and start by making sure no accidental
>> ABI breakage like this happens again. Then we
Your message dated Sun, 1 Nov 2015 11:21:04 +0100
with message-id <5635e790.2050...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#791067: hdf5: library transition may be needed when
GCC 5 is the default
has caused the Debian Bug report #791067,
regarding hdf5: library transition may be needed when GCC 5
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 800509 by 803643 803644 803645 803646 803647 803650
Bug #800509 [release.debian.org] transition: llvm-toolchain-3.6
800509 was not blocked by any bugs.
800509 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 800509: 803645, 803643,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 800509 by 803652
Bug #800509 [release.debian.org] transition: llvm-toolchain-3.6
800509 was blocked by: 803643 803645 803650 803644 803646 803647
800509 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 800509: 803652
> thanks
Stopping
On 11/10/15 14:14, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Le 30/09/2015 11:38, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
>>
>>> FYI, LLVM 3.7 has been released.
>>> The safe way would be to do 3.5 => 3.6 now and 3.6 => 3.7 once 3.7.1 is
>>> released (in one or two months)
>>> or the fun way would be to skip 3.6 in the
On 11/01/2015 01:14 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Oct 2015 19:42:18 +0100 Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
>> gpsd needs a transition again. I do not expect build failures
>> or functional problems in the packages using libgps or
>> libqgpsmm.
>
> direwolf & merkaartor fail to build due to
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #797926 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl: remove SSLv3 methods
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
797926: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=797926
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 01/11/15 16:22, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 03:22:29PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 26/10/15 23:28, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> On 24/10/15 11:22, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 10:17:10PM +0100, Jonathan
On 2015-11-01 10:54:05, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> On 21/10/15 00:53, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> > Control: forwarded -1
> >
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
I just accidentally uploaded the new version of liblinear to unstable,
instead of my intended target experimental :-/ This bumps the SONAME in
unstable.
liblinear has two reverse
On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 06:52:08PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> >> Do the rdeps build against the new version? IOW, are there any users of the
> >> removed methods?
> >
> > There are users of the removed method. But all known ones should
> > have been changed to either not use it
On 26/10/15 23:28, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 24/10/15 11:22, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 10:17:10PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 12:25:16PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 10:36:33PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
On 01-11-15 17:10, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> On 11/01/2015 01:14 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On Sat, 31 Oct 2015 19:42:18 +0100 Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
>>> gpsd needs a transition again. I do not expect build failures
>>> or functional problems in the packages using libgps or
>>> libqgpsmm.
>>
On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 03:22:29PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 26/10/15 23:28, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > On 24/10/15 11:22, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> >> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 10:17:10PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 12:25:16PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Control: block -1 with 799805
Control: severity 799805 serious
On 01/11/15 19:05, Christian Kastner wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Hi,
>
> I just accidentally uploaded
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
This is a rebuild of the pre-built kernel modules for the 340.93
driver in jessie-pu.
Nonstandard PU version since we are doing some magic with it ...
(version ordering is correct,
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #803680 [release.debian.org] Transistion: liblinear
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> block -1 with 799805
Bug #803680 [release.debian.org] Transistion: liblinear
803680 was not blocked by any bugs.
803680 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking
28 matches
Mail list logo
