On 09/11/15 22:25, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
> El Dilluns, 9 de novembre de 2015, a les 19:11:05, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort va
> escriure:
>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>>
>> On 06/11/15 23:53, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>> Severity: normal
>>> User: rele
El Dilluns, 9 de novembre de 2015, a les 19:11:05, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort va
escriure:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> On 06/11/15 23:53, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transitio
Hi,
On Mon, 2015-11-09 at 19:19 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 04/11/15 04:02, James Cowgill wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> > Severity: normal
> > Forwarded: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/a
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #804285 [release.debian.org] transition: ode
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
804285: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=804285
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 06/11/15 23:53, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Dear Release Team,
>
> I'm filing this bug for a new transition of ode (Open Dynamics Engine).
On 04/11/15 04:02, James Cowgill wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> Severity: normal
> Forwarded: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-polarssl.html
> X-Debbugs-CC: polar...@packages.debian.org
>
> Hi,
>
> polar
On 06/11/15 15:06, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> Forwarded: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gsl.html
>
> An uncoordinated transition to GSL 2.0 has started in unstable.
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/gsl.html
On 08/11/15 12:44, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 07-11-15 21:39, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>> On 7 November 2015 at 20:17, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> | Hi Dirk,
>> |
>> | On Fri, 06 Nov 2015 15:06:14 +0100 Bas Couwenber
On 2015-09-18 12:38, Thomas Goirand wrote:
- User creation was done in a non-OpenStack package standard way,
namely
missing the --disabled-login option.
I'm confused by this description. Your suggested change *removes*
--disabled-login, whereas the description implies that the problem was
th
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/gsl.html
Bug #804246 [release.debian.org] transition: gsl
Changed Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/gsl.html' from
'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gsl.
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #760849 [release.debian.org] transition: glew
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
760849: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=760849
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 09/11/15 10:17, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
> Dear Release Team,
>
> FYI, the 1.13.0 stable version has been released meanwhile by upstream
> on October 15, 2015.
>
> On October 25, 2015 a first testing-purpose package has been uploaded
> to experimental and with the h
On 09/11/15 11:30, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Nov 2015 12:30:11 +0100 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
> wrote:
>> All the rdeps have been binNMUed at this stage.
>
> What about experimental? Is there a "apt-cache rdepends libssl1.0.0"
> equivalent command that only reports packages from experim
On 2015-11-09 14:25, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 11/09/2015 09:34 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
#750010 has been waiting
for you to reply since September *last year*.
I opened this one on 31 May 2014, and only got a reply on 20 Sep 2014,
then I focused on the newer release of Debian rather than the
On 11/09/2015 09:34 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 2015-11-09 8:20, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> This patch has been prepared a long time ago. I've been waiting for the
>> release team's approval since the 18th of September. This is more than a
>> month and a half. I'm by the way disappointed to see n
Hi again!
I need to follow-up to my previous mail, adding the following info:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
> [...]
> * libreoffice_1:5.0.3~rc1-2 => CHECK <= this can be set to OK
> [...]
> * tulip_4.7.0dfsg-2 => FTBFS <= it's a FTBFS (no glew-related)
> [...]
Chee
On 9 November 2015 at 10:02, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
| On Sun, 8 Nov 2015 19:38:36 -0600 Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| > On 9 November 2015 at 01:12, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
| > | > edd@max:~$ bts block 802246 by 804495 804496 804497 804498 804499
804500 804501 804502
| > | > edd@max:~$
On Sat, 7 Nov 2015 12:30:11 +0100 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
wrote:
> All the rdeps have been binNMUed at this stage.
What about experimental? Is there a "apt-cache rdepends libssl1.0.0"
equivalent command that only reports packages from experimental?
Anyway, here we have a list:
atheme-services
On 09/11/15 09:59, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
> wrote:
>> On 08/11/15 11:57, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
>>> Only python-pgmagick needs a sourceful upload of its new release.
>>> I've contacted the maintainer but can do the update
On 08/11/15 23:44, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
> FTR, we're now down to just subversion, uwsgi and zeroc-ice.
>
> James and Antonio are making some progress with subversion in
> #803589, but it appears to be more tricky (and upstream has no fix
> yet).
>
> zeroc-ice has an upstream fix, but the
Dear Release Team,
FYI, the 1.13.0 stable version has been released meanwhile by upstream
on October 15, 2015.
On October 25, 2015 a first testing-purpose package has been uploaded
to experimental and with the huge help (as usual) from Luca Falavigna
(dktrkranz) and his Deb-O-Matic infrastructure
On Sun, 8 Nov 2015 19:38:36 -0600 Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 9 November 2015 at 01:12, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> | > edd@max:~$ bts block 802246 by 804495 804496 804497 804498 804499 804500
> 804501 804502
> | > edd@max:~$
> | >
> | > Thanks *so much* for your very timely and very l
On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
wrote:
> On 08/11/15 11:57, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
>> Only python-pgmagick needs a sourceful upload of its new release.
>> I've contacted the maintainer but can do the update myself if needed.
>
> Yes, that needs fixing, otherwise i
On 2015-11-09 8:20, Thomas Goirand wrote:
This patch has been prepared a long time ago. I've been waiting for the
release team's approval since the 18th of September. This is more than
a
month and a half. I'm by the way disappointed to see no reply at all
from the release team for so long
If
On 11/06/2015 03:17 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Hi,
> could you prepare a jessie update for CVE-2015-5223 ?
> http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/08/26/5
>
> Cheers,
> Moritz
Hi Moritz,
Thanks for taking care of it.
This patch has been prepared a long time ago. I've been
25 matches
Mail list logo