Bug#799369: swift update for jessie

On 11/09/2015 09:34 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On 2015-11-09 8:20, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> This patch has been prepared a long time ago. I've been waiting for the >> release team's approval since the 18th of September. This is more than a >> month and a half. I'm by the way disappointed to see

Bug#804246: transition: gsl

On 9 November 2015 at 10:02, Andreas Beckmann wrote: | On Sun, 8 Nov 2015 19:38:36 -0600 Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | > On 9 November 2015 at 01:12, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: | > | > edd@max:~$ bts block 802246 by 804495 804496 804497 804498 804499 804500 804501 804502 |

Bug#760849: transition: glew

Hi again! I need to follow-up to my previous mail, adding the following info: On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: > [...] > * libreoffice_1:5.0.3~rc1-2 => CHECK <= this can be set to OK > [...] > * tulip_4.7.0dfsg-2 => FTBFS <= it's a FTBFS (no

Bug#804285: transition: ode

El Dilluns, 9 de novembre de 2015, a les 19:11:05, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort va escriure: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > On 06/11/15 23:53, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertags:

Bug#799369: jessie-pu: package swift/2.2.0-1

On 2015-09-18 12:38, Thomas Goirand wrote: - User creation was done in a non-OpenStack package standard way, namely missing the --disabled-login option. I'm confused by this description. Your suggested change *removes* --disabled-login, whereas the description implies that the problem was

Bug#804246: transition: gsl

Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/gsl.html On 08/11/15 12:44, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 07-11-15 21:39, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: >> On 7 November 2015 at 20:17, Andreas Beckmann wrote: >> | Hi Dirk, >> | >> | On Fri, 06 Nov 2015 15:06:14 +0100 Bas

Processed: Re: Bug#804246: transition: gsl

Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/gsl.html Bug #804246 [release.debian.org] transition: gsl Changed Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/gsl.html' from

Bug#804246: transition: gsl

On 06/11/15 15:06, Bas Couwenberg wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > Forwarded: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gsl.html > > An uncoordinated transition to GSL 2.0 has started in

Bug#804285: transition: ode

Control: tags -1 confirmed On 06/11/15 23:53, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Dear Release Team, > > I'm filing this bug for a new transition of ode (Open Dynamics

Bug#803997: transition: polarssl

On 04/11/15 04:02, James Cowgill wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > Severity: normal > Forwarded: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-polarssl.html > X-Debbugs-CC: polar...@packages.debian.org > > Hi, > >

Processed: Re: Bug#804285: transition: ode

Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #804285 [release.debian.org] transition: ode Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 804285: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=804285 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#799369: swift update for jessie

On 2015-11-09 14:25, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 11/09/2015 09:34 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: #750010 has been waiting for you to reply since September *last year*. I opened this one on 31 May 2014, and only got a reply on 20 Sep 2014, then I focused on the newer release of Debian rather than the

Processed: Re: Bug#760849: transition: glew

Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #760849 [release.debian.org] transition: glew Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 760849: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=760849 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#760849: transition: glew

Control: tags -1 confirmed On 09/11/15 10:17, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: > Dear Release Team, > > FYI, the 1.13.0 stable version has been released meanwhile by upstream > on October 15, 2015. > > On October 25, 2015 a first testing-purpose package has been uploaded > to experimental and with the

Bug#797926: transition: openssl: remove SSLv3 methods

On 09/11/15 11:30, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > On Sat, 7 Nov 2015 12:30:11 +0100 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort > wrote: >> All the rdeps have been binNMUed at this stage. > > What about experimental? Is there a "apt-cache rdepends libssl1.0.0" > equivalent command that only reports

Bug#803997: transition: polarssl

Hi, On Mon, 2015-11-09 at 19:19 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 04/11/15 04:02, James Cowgill wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition > > Severity: normal > > Forwarded:

Bug#799369: swift update for jessie

On 2015-11-09 8:20, Thomas Goirand wrote: This patch has been prepared a long time ago. I've been waiting for the release team's approval since the 18th of September. This is more than a month and a half. I'm by the way disappointed to see no reply at all from the release team for so long If

Bug#804246: transition: gsl

On Sun, 8 Nov 2015 19:38:36 -0600 Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > On 9 November 2015 at 01:12, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > | > edd@max:~$ bts block 802246 by 804495 804496 804497 804498 804499 804500 > 804501 804502 > | > edd@max:~$ > | > > | > Thanks *so much* for your very

Bug#760849: transition: glew

Dear Release Team, FYI, the 1.13.0 stable version has been released meanwhile by upstream on October 15, 2015. On October 25, 2015 a first testing-purpose package has been uploaded to experimental and with the huge help (as usual) from Luca Falavigna (dktrkranz) and his Deb-O-Matic

Bug#789077: ruby2.2 transition: about to switch the default in unstable

On 08/11/15 23:44, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: > FTR, we're now down to just subversion, uwsgi and zeroc-ice. > > James and Antonio are making some progress with subversion in > #803589, but it appears to be more tricky (and upstream has no fix > yet). > > zeroc-ice has an upstream fix, but

Bug#797926: transition: openssl: remove SSLv3 methods

On Sat, 7 Nov 2015 12:30:11 +0100 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > All the rdeps have been binNMUed at this stage. What about experimental? Is there a "apt-cache rdepends libssl1.0.0" equivalent command that only reports packages from experimental? Anyway, here we have a

Bug#804285: transition: ode

On 09/11/15 22:25, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > El Dilluns, 9 de novembre de 2015, a les 19:11:05, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort va > escriure: >> Control: tags -1 confirmed >> >> On 06/11/15 23:53, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: >>> Package: release.debian.org >>> Severity: normal >>> User:

Bug#799369: swift update for jessie

On 11/06/2015 03:17 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Hi, > could you prepare a jessie update for CVE-2015-5223 ? > http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/08/26/5 > > Cheers, > Moritz Hi Moritz, Thanks for taking care of it. This patch has been prepared a long time ago. I've

Bug#804055: transition: graphicsmagick

On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 08/11/15 11:57, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: >> Only python-pgmagick needs a sourceful upload of its new release. >> I've contacted the maintainer but can do the update myself if needed. > > Yes, that needs

Bug#804055: transition: graphicsmagick

On 09/11/15 09:59, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort > wrote: >> On 08/11/15 11:57, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: >>> Only python-pgmagick needs a sourceful upload of its new release. >>> I've contacted the maintainer