Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
getfem++ was failing to build on ppc64el due to a bug on scilab (#798651).
Since scilab was fixed (see #798652), getfem++ now builds without errors.
I tested it using sbuild with sid.
nmu
On 01/12/15 23:44, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 30/11/15 20:35, Jo Shields wrote:
On 30/11/15 18:56, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 27/11/15 17:54, Jo Shields wrote:
I think this is close to startable, if a transition slot will be available soon.
Of the 17 "bad" packages on the
Your message dated Wed, 2 Dec 2015 15:43:29 +0100
with message-id <565f0391.3050...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#804285: transition: ode
has caused the Debian Bug report #804285,
regarding transition: ode
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 11:09:09AM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 01:24:29AM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > > On 30/10/15 14:34, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > > > That'd only leave us with the apache bug.
> > >
> > >
On 02/12/15 17:48, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 11:09:09AM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 01:24:29AM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 30/10/15 14:34, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> That'd only
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 804246 + pending
Bug #804246 [release.debian.org] transition: gsl
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
804246: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=804246
Debian
Your message dated Wed, 2 Dec 2015 19:07:56 +0100
with message-id <565f337c.6020...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#806892: nmu: getfem++_4.2.1~beta1~svn4635~dfsg-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #806892,
regarding nmu: getfem++_4.2.1~beta1~svn4635~dfsg-5
to be marked as done.
This means
-=| Dominic Hargreaves, 02.12.2015 16:48:39 + |=-
> I will try some real world testing with the new libapache2-mod-perl2
> package in sid/perl 5.20 later this week, and then I think we can plan
> to go ahead with the transition after that - as soon as this weekend
> if other ongoing
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 01:24:29AM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > On 30/10/15 14:34, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > > That'd only leave us with the apache bug.
> >
> > There's a patch available for that now, right?
>
> Yes. It has been included in the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 800556 + pending
Bug #800556 [release.debian.org] transition: suitesparse4.4
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
800556:
Your message dated Wed, 2 Dec 2015 13:53:05 +0100
with message-id <565ee9b1.4090...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#805093: transition: qpdf
has caused the Debian Bug report #805093,
regarding transition: qpdf
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Wed, 2 Dec 2015 13:53:23 +0100
with message-id <565ee9c3.8080...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#805523: transition: bobcat
has caused the Debian Bug report #805523,
regarding transition: bobcat
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
On 2015-12-02 00:53, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 28/11/15 04:25, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> nmu nordugrid-arc-ldap-infosys_5.0.4-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with
>> debhelper 9.20151126"
>
> You probably meant nordugrid-arc there.
The affected package was arch:all as well. Bug
13 matches
Mail list logo
