Bug#805012: transition: giflib

On 12.12.2015 14:17, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Control: tags -1 confirmed Let's do this. This is the list of packages for binNMUs: Level 1: mplayer 2:1.2-1 Level2: camlimages 1:4.2.0-1 ecere-sdk 0.44.10-1 emacs24 24.5+1-5 fbi 2.10-2 imlib2 1.4.7-1 kde4libs 4:4.14.14-1 khtml 5.16.0-1

Bug#807506: marked as done (nmu: gcc-mingw-w64_16)

Your message dated Sun, 13 Dec 2015 10:10:03 +0100 with message-id <566d35eb.2040...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#807506: nmu: gcc-mingw-w64_16 has caused the Debian Bug report #807506, regarding nmu: gcc-mingw-w64_16 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Processed: severity of 807128 is normal, severity of 807867 is normal, tagging 798749, tagging 801851 ...

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 807128 normal Bug #807128 {Done: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort } [release.debian.org] nmu: gcc-5_5.3.0-3 Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious' > severity 807867 normal Bug #807867 [release.debian.org] nmu: all packages

Bug#746741: release.debian.org: dh-python2 transition

On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 10:59:56PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 05/05/14 15:46, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 07:48:03 +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > >> Debian python teams would find useful to evaluate on continuous basis > >> removal of python-support from

Re: 8.3 planning

On Sun, 2015-12-06 at 16:10 -0500, Donald Norwood wrote: > On 12/04/2015 01:12 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 05:43:54PM +, Adam Barratt wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> We're a tad overdue for the 8.3 point release and with the holiday > >> period coming up, getting one done

Processed: Re: Bug#798727: Bug #798727: Breaks sa-learn

Processing control commands: > block 799086 with 807828 Bug #799086 {Done: gregor herrmann } [libencode-perl] Encode::Unicode decode() dies unnecessarily 799086 was not blocked by any bugs. 799086 was blocking: 798727 Added blocking bug(s) of 799086: 807828 > block 798727 with

Bug#796345: Status report on perl 5.22 transition readiness (30th Sept)

On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 11:10:54PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > Niko has uploaded 5.22.1-RC3 to experimental and we should see > 5.22.1 final in a few days. > > I'm rebuilding all the packages involved in the perlapi transition > against 5.22.1, and spotted a couple of issues which I've

Bug#807828: jessie-pu: package libencode-perl/2.63-1+deb8u1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 I'd like to upload libencode-perl to s-p-u to fix #799086 (cf. also #798727 for the perl core variant). The patch is taken from

Bug#807828: jessie-pu: package libencode-perl/2.63-1+deb8u1

Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Sun, 2015-12-13 at 16:39 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > I'd like to upload libencode-perl to s-p-u to fix #799086 (cf. also > #798727 for the perl core variant). > > The patch is taken from upstream's 2.77 release and changes the > behaviour of decode() in the

Processed: Re: Bug#807828: jessie-pu: package libencode-perl/2.63-1+deb8u1

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #807828 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package libencode-perl/2.63-1+deb8u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 807828: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=807828 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#807828: jessie-pu: package libencode-perl/2.63-1+deb8u1

On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 17:04:10 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > I'd like to upload libencode-perl to s-p-u to fix #799086 (cf. also > > #798727 for the perl core variant). > > Please go ahead; thanks. Thank you; uploaded. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -

Processed: Re: Bug#807855: jessie-pu: package shotwell/0.20.1-1

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + moreinfo Bug #807855 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package shotwell/0.20.1-1 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 807855: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=807855 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#807855: jessie-pu: package shotwell/0.20.1-1

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Sun, 2015-12-13 at 20:59 +0100, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote: > Correct CVE TEMP-0807110-881366 + * CVE TEMP-0807110-881366 (Closes: #807110): Don't do that. For one thing, "CVE TEMP-*" makes no sense - it's *not* a CVE identifier. TEMP-* identifiers are not

Bug#807855: jessie-pu: package shotwell/0.20.1-1

Hello Adam, Am Sonntag, den 13.12.2015, 20:12 + schrieb Adam D. Barratt: > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > On Sun, 2015-12-13 at 20:59 +0100, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote: > > Correct CVE TEMP-0807110-881366 > > +  * CVE TEMP-0807110-881366 (Closes: #807110): > > Don't do that. For one thing,

Bug#796345: Status report on perl 5.22 transition readiness (30th Sept)

On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 12:43:07PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 11:10:54PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > Niko has uploaded 5.22.1-RC3 to experimental and we should see > > 5.22.1 final in a few days. > > > > I'm rebuilding all the packages involved in the

Processed: clone hardening-wrapper issue to get nmu's done

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > clone 801597 -1 Bug #801597 [src:hardening-wrapper] PIE and stack protection appear missing since update to GCC-5 Bug 801597 cloned as bug 807867 > reassign -1 release.debian.org Bug #807867 [src:hardening-wrapper] PIE and stack protection

Bug#807867: nmu: all packages built without GCC 5 and hardening-wrapper

hardening-wrapper 1.28+nmu1 is supposed to fix hardening-wrapper, however binNMUs for all packages build-depending on hardening-wrapper, which got built (either uploaded or binNMUed) after GCC 5 became the default have to be successfully done.

Bug#807855: jessie-pu: package shotwell/0.20.1-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Correct CVE TEMP-0807110-881366 The debdiff between shotwell 0.20.1-1 and shotwell 0.20.1-1+deb8u1 is attached. - -- System

Re: Tentative last d-i release for 2015?

On 13/12/15 21:12, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi, > > I'm not entirely sure I'll manage to get that to work but I'd like to > consider performing a last d-i release for 2015. I haven't been paying > attention closely enough over the past few days but if things are in shape > somewhat, and if image

Tentative last d-i release for 2015?

Hi, I'm not entirely sure I'll manage to get that to work but I'd like to consider performing a last d-i release for 2015. I haven't been paying attention closely enough over the past few days but if things are in shape somewhat, and if image builds can be performed, then maybe… Would debian-cd

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: libreoffice_4.3.3-2+deb8u2_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libreoffice_4.3.3-2+deb8u2_arm64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libreoffice_4.3.3-2+deb8u2_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libreoffice_4.3.3-2+deb8u2_armhf.changes

Bug#793556: jessie-pu: package mkvmlinuz/37+deb8u1

Hi Adam, We've got third party confirmations and requests[0][1] for this fix. Should I upload mkvmlinuz/37+deb8u1 to s-p-u? Milan [0] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=793556#28 [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=741642#56 signature.asc Description:

Bug#806251: marked as done (transition: apt)

Your message dated Sun, 13 Dec 2015 23:18:56 +0100 with message-id <566deed0.3040...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#806251: transition: apt has caused the Debian Bug report #806251, regarding transition: apt to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#746741: release.debian.org: dh-python2 transition

On 13/12/15 14:45, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 10:59:56PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> On 05/05/14 15:46, Julien Cristau wrote: >>> On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 07:48:03 +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: Debian python teams would find useful to evaluate on continuous

Bug#793556: jessie-pu: package mkvmlinuz/37+deb8u1

Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed On Sun, 2015-12-13 at 13:01 -0500, Milan Kupcevic wrote: > Hi Adam, > > We've got third party confirmations and requests[0][1] for this fix. > Should I upload mkvmlinuz/37+deb8u1 to s-p-u? I was rather hoping that your poking of debian-kernel might elicit

Processed: Re: Bug#793556: jessie-pu: package mkvmlinuz/37+deb8u1

Processing control commands: > tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed Bug #793556 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package mkvmlinuz/37+deb8u1 Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #793556 to the same tags previously set Bug #793556 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package mkvmlinuz/37+deb8u1 Added tag(s)

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: arb_6.0.2-1+deb8u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libencode-perl_2.63-1+deb8u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libphp-phpmailer_5.2.9+dfsg-2+deb8u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: redmine_3.0~20140825-8~deb8u1_amd64.changes

Processed: Re: Bug#807576: jessie-pu: package arb/6.0.2-1+deb8u1

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #807576 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package arb/6.0.2-1+deb8u1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 807576: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=807576 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#805721: jessie-pu: package exim4/4.84-8+deb8u2

Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 16:36 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: > On 2015-11-28 Andreas Metzler wrote: > > On 2015-11-21 Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] > >> I would like to fix 805576 for jessie: > > > Please wait on that, I

Bug#807576: jessie-pu: package arb/6.0.2-1+deb8u1

Control: tags -1 + pending On Thu, 2015-12-10 at 16:45 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On 2015-12-10 13:28, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > > The maintainer Andreas Tille has acked the patch > > and will perform a maintainer upload, so you won't see the "NMU" bits > > in > > the uploaded package. > >

Processed: bug 805825 is forwarded to https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-hdf5.html

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 805825 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-hdf5.html Bug #805825 [release.debian.org] transition: hdf5 Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-hdf5.html'. > thanks Stopping

Bug#796345: redhat-cluster/libdlm + lvm + perl transition

[adding redhat-cluster and lvm maintainers to thread. This discussion is about trying to start the perl 5.22 transition, which has been 'about to happen' since August - so obviously those of us who care about that are quite keen to see it happen sooner rather than later] On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at

Bug#796345: redhat-cluster/libdlm + lvm + perl transition

[adding redhat-cluster and lvm maintainers to thread. This discussion is about trying to start the perl 5.22 transition, which has been 'about to happen' since August - so obviously those of us who care about that are quite keen to see it happen sooner rather than later] [take two with fixed

Bug#796345: [Debian-ha-maintainers] redhat-cluster/libdlm + lvm + perl transition

Dominic Hargreaves writes: > From [2] it appears that work is underway to fix all this, by including > libdlm as a separate package. Presumably at this point lvm2 would not > depend on redhat-cluster and it could be removed from testing? Yes, that's the plan. > As a more

Re: Tentative last d-i release for 2015?

On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 09:12:06PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >Hi, > >I'm not entirely sure I'll manage to get that to work but I'd like to >consider performing a last d-i release for 2015. I haven't been paying >attention closely enough over the past few days but if things are in shape

Bug#796345: Status report on perl 5.22 transition readiness (30th Sept)

On 13/12/15 13:43, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > As I already mentioned, redhat-cluster currently FTBFS, and has done > since August, so I don't think we should block on that. We can't remove it from testing as lvm2 depends on it, so this really is a blocker. Cheers, Emilio

Processed: Re: Bug#807828: jessie-pu: package libencode-perl/2.63-1+deb8u1

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #807828 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package libencode-perl/2.63-1+deb8u1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 807828: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=807828 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#784944: jessie-pu: package redmine/3.0~20140825-8~deb8u1 (was 3.0~20140825-7~deb8u1)

Control: tags -1 + pending On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 10:59 -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 03:39:07PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > > > On Fri, 2015-12-04 at 12:10 -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > [...] > > > > > > This release fixes

Bug#807828: jessie-pu: package libencode-perl/2.63-1+deb8u1

Control: tags -1 + pending On Sun, 2015-12-13 at 18:16 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 17:04:10 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > > I'd like to upload libencode-perl to s-p-u to fix #799086 (cf. also > > > #798727 for the perl core variant). > > > > Please go ahead;

Processed: Re: Bug#784944: jessie-pu: package redmine/3.0~20140825-8~deb8u1 (was 3.0~20140825-7~deb8u1)

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #784944 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package redmine/3.0~20140825-7~deb8u1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 784944: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784944 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#796345: redhat-cluster/libdlm + lvm + perl transition

On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 11:56:41PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > [adding redhat-cluster and lvm maintainers to thread. This discussion > is about trying to start the perl 5.22 transition, which has been > 'about to happen' since August - so obviously those of us who care > about that are

Bug#793556: jessie-pu: package mkvmlinuz/37+deb8u1

On 12/13/2015 05:21 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed > > On Sun, 2015-12-13 at 13:01 -0500, Milan Kupcevic wrote: >> Hi Adam, >> >> We've got third party confirmations and requests[0][1] for this fix. >> Should I upload mkvmlinuz/37+deb8u1 to s-p-u? > > I was

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: arb_6.0.2-1+deb8u1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libencode-perl_2.63-1+deb8u1_arm64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libencode-perl_2.63-1+deb8u1_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libencode-perl_2.63-1+deb8u1_mipsel.changes ACCEPT

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: libencode-perl_2.63-1+deb8u1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libencode-perl_2.63-1+deb8u1_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libencode-perl_2.63-1+deb8u1_ppc64el.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file:

Processed (with 2 errors): Re: Bug#807651: udev: unowned files after purge (policy 6.8, 10.8): /etc/init/udev.override

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 release.debian.org Bug #807651 [udev] udev: unowned files after purge (policy 6.8, 10.8): /etc/init/udev.override Bug reassigned from package 'udev' to 'release.debian.org'. No longer marked as found in versions systemd/228-2. Ignoring request to alter

Bug#807890: nmu: caret_5.6.4~dfsg.1-3

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu caret_5.6.4~dfsg.1-3 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against libminc 2.3.00" caret has an RC bug regarding the vtk6 transition, but it still builds fine with vtk5 (verified on amd64).

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: linux-tools_3.16.7-ckt20-1_armhf.changes ACCEPT

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: libencode-perl_2.63-1+deb8u1_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libencode-perl_2.63-1+deb8u1_armhf.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: linux-tools_3.16.7-ckt20-1_armel.changes ACCEPT

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: libencode-perl_2.63-1+deb8u1_s390x.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: linux-tools_3.16.7-ckt20-1_mipsel.changes ACCEPT

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: linux-tools_3.16.7-ckt20-1_s390x.changes ACCEPT