Excerpts from Steven Chamberlain's message of 2016-01-25 16:48:23 -0800:
> Hi,
>
> As a mere user (systems administrator), I'll share some questions /
> criticisms from my perspective that might help shed some light on the
> underlying issues.
>
> I was wondering why after the 2016-01-19 announce
Excerpts from Holger Levsen's message of 2016-01-25 17:04:57 -0800:
> Hi,
>
> On Dienstag, 26. Januar 2016, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> [...other valid points not quoted here…]
> > Assuming MariaDB is affected by the same issues, I may not be in a
> > technically better situation if I switched to
On Thu, 2015-12-17 at 23:38 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> However 1.0.1q hasn't been in stable at all, which is presumably what
> you'd be proposing introducing to oldstable at this juncture. (and which
> we'd therefore need to introduce to stable first, if we were to agree to
> follow that path.
Julien Cristau:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 22:42:44 +, Niels Thykier wrote:
>
>> [...]
> So I guess one concern I have is for complex transitions we often end up
> doing quite a few britney test runs, and this will make it more likely
> that test runs end up with different results from the "rea
Hi,
On Dienstag, 26. Januar 2016, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
[...other valid points not quoted here…]
> Assuming MariaDB is affected by the same issues, I may not be in a
> technically better situation if I switched to using that. (Although, it
> seems one of the recent CVEs did not affect MariaDB
Hi,
As a mere user (systems administrator), I'll share some questions /
criticisms from my perspective that might help shed some light on the
underlying issues.
I was wondering why after the 2016-01-19 announcement, there is still no
patched mysql-5.5 in jessie or wheezy; and also why mariadb wa
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:14:01PM +, Robie Basak wrote:
> I will send a separate email about what I propose we do next. In this
> email, I'm sticking to the historical record of facts already raised so
> that we can all refer to it.
I hope that the summary is useful and that I've given everyo
In this summary I make no new arguments. I only summarise what has
already been said and provide references to back up what has already
been said. References are in the form [-MM-DD] or [-MM-DD-X]
where disambiguation is needed. URLs are at the bottom.
Where I have not used quotes, I am pa
Dear release-team,
Now that all NMUs are in DELAYED for all fixables.
I think we are ready to throw the switch.
Please let us know and assign us the transition slot :)
Please assign a slot.
Here's the actual summary [1]
Built: 474
Failed: 34
OK: 440
The failed ones split up as follow:
NMUs:
Hi!
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 5:37 PM Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Matteo F. Vescovi
> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > On 2016-01-21 at 09:56 (CET), Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> >> Do rdeps build fine against the new versions of the libraries?
> >
> > FTR, better this ti
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hi,
ruby-integration Build-Depends on ruby-gsl, which is not in testing.
(Also nobody seems to be working on fixing ruby-gsl for it to reenter
testing.)
Thanks,
Christian
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hi,
ruby-distribution Build-Depends on ruby-gsl, which is not in testing.
(Also nobody seems to be working on fixing ruby-gsl for it to reenter
testing.)
Thanks,
Christian
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hi,
Due to a broken pbuild environment, the following backports were built
against sid rather than jessie, and need to be rebuilt:
nmu cdo_1.7.0+dfsg.1-2~bpo8+1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against j
Hello,
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 9:39 PM, Vincent Fourmond
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:49 PM, Vincent Fourmond
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Adam D. Barratt <
>> a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>>>
>>> On Thu, 2016-01-14 at 22:33 +01
On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 09:27:14 +0100 Gilles Filippini wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> Hi,
>
> Despite successful buildlog [0], libaec binary packages are missing
> for arch x32. Please rebuild them.
>
>
Hi!
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 5:37 PM Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Matteo F. Vescovi
> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > On 2016-01-21 at 09:56 (CET), Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> >> Do rdeps build fine against the new versions of the libraries?
> >
> > FTR, better this ti
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
Despite successful buildlog [0], libaec binary packages are missing
for arch x32. Please rebuild them.
[0]
https://buildd.debian.org/st
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 810568 by 811370
Bug #810568 [release.debian.org] transition: openexr
810568 was blocked by: 812519
810568 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 810568: 811370
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 810568 by 812519
Bug #810568 [release.debian.org] transition: openexr
810568 was not blocked by any bugs.
810568 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 810568: 812519
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
19 matches
Mail list logo
