Re: [debian-mysql] [Summary] Request for release team decision on MySQL and MariaDB

Hi, jumping in here, cause I think this one is really uncalled for: On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 08:30:09PM +, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > And apart from sponsoring Debian packaging work, Oracle seems > conspicuously missing from: > http://debconf16.debconf.org/sponsors.html So is about

Re: [debian-mysql] [Summary] Request for release team decision on MySQL and MariaDB

Norvald H. Ryeng wrote: > >Norvald H. Ryeng wrote: > >>Tell us exactly what you want, in detail. If you don't then I don't > >>think your position is reasonable. > > I don't recognize those words, and it's not in the style I usually express > myself. Are you paraphrasing? Sorry, that was Robie

Bug#811219: transition: netcdf

On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 05:25:22 +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > Can we fix this once and for all, or do we have to rely on hints to > migrate netcdf packages every time? > Yes, please feel free to get the reverse deps of the remaining cruft fixed or removed. Cheers, Julien

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: texstudio_2.10.6+debian-1_amd64.changes REJECT

Your "texstudio" upload

Hi, I noticed that there's a texstudio 2.10.6+debian-1 upload in the proposed-updates-new queue. I'm assuming that this was unintentional, given that stable currently has version 2.8.4, and the changelog says: texstudio (2.10.6+debian-1) unstable; urgency=medium However, the .changes

Re: Your "texstudio" upload

Hi Adam Uff, well that was really unintended, I'm sorry. I must have picked the wrong chroot to build. I'll rebuild for unstable and upload again. Sorry for the trouble. Regards Tom On 28.01.2016 18:23, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed that there's a texstudio 2.10.6+debian-1

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: pam_1.1.8-3.1+deb8u1+b1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pam_1.1.8-3.1+deb8u1+b1_arm64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pam_1.1.8-3.1+deb8u1+b1_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pam_1.1.8-3.1+deb8u1+b1_armhf.changes ACCEPT Processing

Re: Kernel version for stretch

On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 08:01:13PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > Ben Hutchings wrote: > > For stretch, I would very much like to choose a kernel version for > > stretch that gets longterm maintenance by Greg Kroah-Hartman. That > > lasts 2 years from release, after which

Re: Kernel version for stretch

On Thu, 2016-01-28 at 20:01 +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > Ben Hutchings wrote: > > For stretch, I would very much like to choose a kernel version for > > stretch that gets longterm maintenance by Greg Kroah-Hartman. That > > lasts 2 years from release, after which

Bug#812821: nmu: pam_1.1.8-3.1+deb8u1

Control: tags -1 + pending On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 22:21 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 15:28 -0800, Tianon Gravi wrote: > > Due to some kind of mistake in my amd64 build environment (details being > > tracked down in #812566) the amd64 build

Processed: Re: Bug#812821: nmu: pam_1.1.8-3.1+deb8u1

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #812821 [release.debian.org] nmu: pam_1.1.8-3.1+deb8u1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 812821: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=812821 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#813047: transition: proftpd-dfsg

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition An uncoordinated transition has been started by the last proftpd-dfsg upload (new upstream version fixing a CVE): proftpd-abi-1.3.5 ==> proftpd-abi-1.3.5a Since this is a virtual

Bug#810568: transition: openexr

libvigraimpex has been updated an don't FTBFS anymore (on most archs so far). BTW there is a test failure on test/impex which puts out some EXR related error [1] (I've set this test to be failsafe). It would be interesting if this maybe vanishes with the more recent openEXR ... DS [1]

Bug#812990: jessie-pu: package gummi/0.6.5-3+deb8u1

package with Sbuild against stable [3]. Please see the attached debdiff for the whole set of changes. Thank you very much, DS [1] https://bugs.debian.org/812577 (gummi: relative import paths couldn't be used) [2] https://bugs.debian.org/812881 (wheezy-pu: package gummi/0.6.3-1.2+deb7u2) [3] http://w

Processed: retitle 812990

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 812990 jessie-pu: package gummi/0.6.5-3+deb8u2 Bug #812990 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package gummi/0.6.5-3+deb8u1 Changed Bug title to 'jessie-pu: package gummi/0.6.5-3+deb8u2' from 'jessie-pu: package gummi/0.6.5-3+deb8u1' >

Bug#812881: wheezy-pu: package gummi/0.6.3-1.2+deb7u2

I've now filed also a jessie-pu for this fix: https://bugs.debian.org/812990 DS -- 4096R/DF5182C8 46CB 1CA8 9EA3 B743 7676 1DB9 15E0 9AF4 DF51 82C8 LPI certified Linux admin (LPI000329859 64mz6f7kt4) http://www.danielstender.com/blog/

Bug#812977: nmu: ceph_0.80.11-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hi, somebody reported to ftpmaster@ that two mipsel binaries are corrupt: ceph-test-dbg_0.80.11-1_mipsel.deb and qgis-dbg_2.8.4+dfsg-1_mips64el.deb > $ dpkg-deb --extract

Bug#765639: Bug#802159: Bug#765639: Bug#802159: New OpenSSL upstream version

The dhparam thing is really about a default that if you generate DH parameters that it defaults to 2048 instead of 1024. This shouldn't break anything itself, nor do I know of any other software that would get broken by this. Apparently Java 6 and 7 will fail to handshake if a server tries to

Bug#813019: transition: nfft 3.3

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear Release Team, I would like to request a transition for the latest version of nfft from experimental to unstable. Some API breaking changes were introduced from in version 3.3.0

Re: [debian-mysql] [Summary] Request for release team decision on MySQL and MariaDB

On Wed, 27 Jan 2016 21:30:09 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: And apart from sponsoring Debian packaging work, Oracle seems conspicuously missing from: http://debconf16.debconf.org/sponsors.html http://debconf15.debconf.org/ https://www.debian.org/mirror/sponsors

Bug#813071: jessie-pu: package amavisd-new/1:2.10.1-2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu The version of amavisd-new Debian I just uploaded to unstable has a fix that I believe resolves #812325 which can prevent amavisd-new from failing to detect viruses correctly.

Processed: unblock 650601 with 810204

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unblock 650601 with 810204 Bug #650601 [release.debian.org] transition: libpng 1.6 650601 was blocked by: 809921 810167 810189 809859 662411 662473 650489 810168 809958 662523 809892 810208 809910 810173 809889 809897 648129 810171 810191

Bug#813004: jessie-pu: package ruby-defaults/1:2.1.5+deb8u2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu This fixes a serious bug which stops a transitional package from being installed on jessie: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=798712 The debdiff is very simple,