Package: release.debian.org
X-Debbugs-Cc: guile-...@packages.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
According to the maintainer (and several other people) guile-1.8 should
not be release in Stretch, and it's already too much it ended up in
Jessie. See #760986
Pleas
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dear release managers,
After an extremely brief discussion some days ago on IRC, I took the liberty to
upload a new upstream version of fpc,
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
liblivemedia bumped the SONAMEs of its libraries. Please rebuild vlc (the only
reverse dependency) against the new version.
nmu vlc_2.2.1-5 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against new liblive
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
We want to ship ruby2.3 in stretch, so we must start the transition now.
The Ruby transitions are done in phases, as described in
https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/InterpreterTrans
On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 03:30:37PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:42:13PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> >
> > Well, those efforts have not a good track record, afais Ben is maintaining
> > their lts Linus.
>
> I don't really understand the second half of your se
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 08:15:30PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-01-28 at 20:01 +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > For stretch, I would very much like to choose a kernel version for
> > > stretch that gets longterm maintenance by Greg Kroah-Hartman. That
>
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:42:13PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 08:01:13PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > For stretch, I would very much like to choose a kernel version for
> > > stretch that gets longterm maintenance by Greg Kroah-Hartm
Hi everyone, esp release managers
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=787759
There are two bugs, one is the broken fonts, one is the
broken dvipdfmx for t1 fonts.
> This mail made me think about the status of this ...
I asked release managers quite some time ago:
https://lists.d
8 matches
Mail list logo