NEW changes in oldstable-new

Processing changes file: gummi_0.6.3-1.2+deb7u2_ia64.changes ACCEPT

Bug#812961: jessie-pu: package php-net-ldap2/2.0.12-1+deb8u1

Hi, On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 06:37:19PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > Control: tag -1 = jessie confirmed > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:13:23 +0700, Prach Pongpanich wrote: > > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > Tags: jessie > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org >

Bug#813567: nmu: apertium-lex-tools_0.1.1~r60994-1+b1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu apertium-lex-tools_0.1.1~r60994-1+b1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild for lttoolbox" -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500,

Re: Bug#791195: fixed in lttoolbox 3.3.2~r61000-3.1

On 3 February 2016 at 02:57, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 16:00:44 + Julien Cristau > wrote: > > lttoolbox (3.3.2~r61000-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium > > . > >* Non-maintainer upload. > >* Rename library packages for g++5 ABI

Bug#813567: nmu: apertium-lex-tools_0.1.1~r60994-1+b1

On 03/02/16 08:57, Kartik Mistry wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: binnmu > > nmu apertium-lex-tools_0.1.1~r60994-1+b1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild for > lttoolbox" Will you first explain, as asked earlier on

Bug#808735: marked as done (transition: xorg-server)

Your message dated Wed, 3 Feb 2016 11:28:33 +0100 with message-id <56b1d651.2000...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#808735: transition: xorg-server has caused the Debian Bug report #808735, regarding transition: xorg-server to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Re: Bug#791195: fixed in lttoolbox 3.3.2~r61000-3.1

On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: >> The v5 transition was entirely unnecessary for this package, and I very >> strongly want it gone. >> > You haven't given a single good reason to revert the change. Maybe you > would have preferred it didn't, but you're

Re: Debian Jessie - Incorrect permissions on /bin directory

[Context: packages shipping /bin with “funny” permissions, seen in stable.] Yves-Alexis Perez (2016-02-03): > On mar., 2016-02-02 at 17:16 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > I didn't check the whole archive, but doing so might be interesting. > > I did a quick check on a local

NEW changes in oldstable-new

Processing changes file: freetype_2.4.9-1.1+deb7u3_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: freetype_2.4.9-1.1+deb7u3_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: freetype_2.4.9-1.1+deb7u3_armhf.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: freetype_2.4.9-1.1+deb7u3_i386.changes ACCEPT

Bug#802331: jessie-pu: package cyrus-imapd-2.4/2.4.17+nocaldav-1

Hi, On Mon, 2016-02-01 at 17:19 +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote: > Control: retitle -1 jessie-pu: package > cyrus-imapd-2.4/2.4.17+nocaldav-0~deb8u1 > > So, it looks like the security queue is quite stalled, so I will use > your offer to p-u. > > Just changed s/jessie-security/jessie/ and preparing

Bug#807969: jessie-pu: package clamav/0.99+dfsg-0+deb8u1

On 2016-02-02 20:31:23 [+], Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Okay, thanks. Let's get this rolling; apologies for the delay in getting > back to you. No problem. It is better that way than just rubber-stamp it. > > havp seems to work (installed old, dpkg -i new package, loaded a page > > and the

Bug#813645: jessie-pu: package libclamunrar/0.99-0+deb8u1

Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Tags: jessie Severity: normal The upgrade of clamav in Jessie (#807969) requires a source upload of libclamunrar building libclamunrar7 instead of libclamunrar6. Please find attached a complete diff against

Re: Kernel version for stretch

* Karsten Merker [2016-02-03 08:28]: > > Having people around to test d-i daily builds until the kernel reaches > > testing > > would be nice, so that we don't wait until the d-i upload (and maybe d-i > > image > > builds) using testing's kernel to get some feedback. > > I

Bug#813653: jessie-pu: package symfony/2.3.21+dfsg-4+deb8u3

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi, As agreed with the security team, we’d like to fix CVE-2016-1902 via p-u. The patch is “a bit” bigger than usual (homemade implementation replaced by a proper embedded one),

Re: Bug#791195: fixed in lttoolbox 3.3.2~r61000-3.1

Control: found -1 3.3.2~r63423-1 On 2016-02-03 11:45, Kartik Mistry wrote: > On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: >>> The v5 transition was entirely unnecessary for this package, and I very >>> strongly want it gone. >>> >> You haven't given a single good

Bug#807969: jessie-pu: package clamav/0.99+dfsg-0+deb8u1

On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 23:55 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2016-02-02 20:31:23 [+], Adam D. Barratt wrote: [...] > > > havp seems to work (installed old, dpkg -i new package, loaded a page > > > and the eicar test signature which got blocked as expected). dansguardian > > > (just

Bug#782143: pu: package stunnel4/3:5.06-2+deb8u1

On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 01:45:11AM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: > Control: retitle -1 pu: package stunnel4/3:5.06-2+deb8u1 > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 10:35:28PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > Control: retitle -1 pu: package stunnel4/3:5.06-3 > > Control: tag -1 jessie > > > > On Wed, Apr

Bug#813047: marked as done (transition: proftpd-dfsg)

Your message dated Wed, 3 Feb 2016 18:38:59 +0100 with message-id <56b23b33.1070...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#813047: transition: proftpd-dfsg has caused the Debian Bug report #813047, regarding transition: proftpd-dfsg to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#813623: wheezy-pu: package libdatetime-timezone-perl/1:1.58-1+2016a

Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 19:40 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > I've prepared an update for libdatetime-timezone-perl for wheezy, > incorporating the changes of the 2016a tzdata release [0]. > > As usual, the changes only touch the perl modules with the timezone > data

Bug#813622: jessie-pu: package libdatetime-timezone-perl/1:1.75-2+2016a

Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 19:40 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > I've prepared an update for libdatetime-timezone-perl for jessie, > incorporating the changes of the 2016a tzdata release [0]. > > As usual, the changes only touch the perl modules with the timezone > data

Processed: Re: Bug#813623: wheezy-pu: package libdatetime-timezone-perl/1:1.58-1+2016a

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #813623 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package libdatetime-timezone-perl/1:1.58-1+2016a Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 813623: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=813623 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Processed: Re: Bug#813622: jessie-pu: package libdatetime-timezone-perl/1:1.75-2+2016a

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #813622 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package libdatetime-timezone-perl/1:1.75-2+2016a Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 813622: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=813622 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#813622: jessie-pu: package libdatetime-timezone-perl/1:1.75-2+2016a

On Wed, 03 Feb 2016 19:35:53 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 19:40 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > > I've prepared an update for libdatetime-timezone-perl for jessie, > > incorporating the changes of the 2016a tzdata release [0]. > Please go ahead. Thanks! Uploaded.

Bug#813623: wheezy-pu: package libdatetime-timezone-perl/1:1.58-1+2016a

On Wed, 03 Feb 2016 19:35:25 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 19:40 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > > I've prepared an update for libdatetime-timezone-perl for wheezy, > > incorporating the changes of the 2016a tzdata release [0]. > Please go ahead. Thanks! Uploaded.

Re: Kernel version for stretch

On Feb 2, 2016, at 11:28 PM, Karsten Merker wrote: > On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 02:23:06PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> Niels Thykier (2016-02-02): >>> @Kernel+d-i - What is your take on the following: >>> >>> * How long will it take to have the new

Bug#813622: jessie-pu: package libdatetime-timezone-perl/1:1.75-2+2016a

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 I've prepared an update for libdatetime-timezone-perl for jessie, incorporating the changes of the 2016a tzdata release [0]. As

Bug#813623: wheezy-pu: package libdatetime-timezone-perl/1:1.58-1+2016a

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: wheezy User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 I've prepared an update for libdatetime-timezone-perl for wheezy, incorporating the changes of the 2016a tzdata release [0]. As