Re: Bug#791195: fixed in lttoolbox 3.3.2~r61000-3.1

On 2016-02-06 13:59, Kartik Mistry wrote: > On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote: >>> What is the best way to fix this? >> >> Probably reverting the reverted transition, therefore reopening this bug. >> >> You can drop the v5 suffix once upstream bumps the

Bug#814367: transition: x265

Control: tags -1 confirmed On 10/02/16 22:45, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > Control: forwarded -1 > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-x265.html > > It's this time

Processed: Re: Bug#814367: transition: x265

Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #814367 [release.debian.org] transition: x265 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 814367: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=814367 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#814442: jessie-pu: package postgresql-9.1/9.1.20-0+deb8u1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi, with today's postgresql-9.1 9.1.20-0+deb7u1 security update in wheezy, the package version in wheezy is now greater than the one in jessie. This no-change (in pl/perl) upload

Re: Bug#791195: fixed in lttoolbox 3.3.2~r61000-3.1

On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > You have a now useless > > Breaks: liblttoolbox3-3.3-0v5 (<= 3.3.2~r61000-3.1) > > in there. > > For the changelog I would say something like "Reinstate the g++-5 ABI > transition and renamed packages." Breaks field was

Bug#814470: nmu: shibboleth-resolver_1.0.0-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu shibboleth-resolver_1.0.0-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against the libstdc++ v5 transitioned shibboleth stack." This doesn't seem to export any symbols affected by the libstdc++ v5

Bug#814468: marked as done (nmu: gnss-sdr_0.0.6-1)

Your message dated Fri, 12 Feb 2016 00:19:05 +0100 with message-id <56bd16e9.5020...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#814468: nmu: gnss-sdr_0.0.6-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #814468, regarding nmu: gnss-sdr_0.0.6-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#814475: nmu: vtk-dicom_0.7.1-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu vtk-dicom_0.7.1-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against gdcm 2.6.3" The maintainer uploaded binaries were sitting in NEW for a long time. Requesting ANY instesd of amd64 due to M-A:

Bug#814468: nmu: gnss-sdr_0.0.6-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu gnss-sdr_0.0.6-1 . i386 . unstable . -m "Rebuild against gnuradio 3.7.9.1" this was sitting in NEW for several months ... Andreas

Bug#814367: transition: x265

On 2016-02-11 09:28:26, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > On 10/02/16 22:45, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition > > Control: forwarded -1 > >